Do you need to get your patent attorney to sign an NDA? No, you do not need to get your patent attorney to sign a nondisclosure agreement (NDA). The state, in which the patent attorney is registered, has a rule against their attorneys disclosing private information of clients without their consent.
So if you are an entrepreneur or an advisor for a startup that is fundraising, think twice before asking VCs to sign an NDA. Breaking this unwritten rule can put investors off. And in any case, NDAs are unlikely to make or break an early-stage company.
The state, in which the patent attorney is registered, has a rule against their attorneys disclosing private information of clients without their consent. However, this duty is only as good as the reputation that the patent attorney is trying to protect.
I’d have to keep track of all the NDA’s I signed. It’s “yet another legal document” in the pantheon of documents we have to keep track of. Hmmm-maybe we should consider funding a startup to automate the creation and tracking of NDA’s. Nah.
The VC business has an unwritten rule on NDAs. And people who violate this rule risk losing credibility with investors even before meeting with them. The rule is simple: never ask a VC to sign an NDA unless your company absolutely needs one.
While NDAs are legally binding, there needs to be a balance of power in order for them to be enforceable. Most NDAs are connected with a severance package or final paycheck. If employee's sign, they forfeit their right to speak out. If they don't, they forfeit their right to receive a severance or final pay.
“If you have a patent you don't need an NDA.”
A patent or invention non-disclosure agreement is a unilateral (1-way) agreement that is used to protect an invention. Due to the confidential nature of an unexecuted idea for a product, an NDA can be essential for an inventor when sharing confidential information to 3rd parties.
Employers must be prepared to terminate any employee who refuses to sign the agreement. If an employer allows even one employee to refuse and remain employed, the agreements signed by the other employees will not be legally binding.
While the rules can certainly vary from state to state, most jurisdictions consider non-disclosure agreements to be enforceable as long as they are drafted and executed properly.
While an NDA gives you a limited level of protection (which in many cases can easily be bypassed), a patent offers you rock-solid, legally binding, enforceable-by-stiff-penalties PROOF of idea ownership.
An NDA ensures parties keep sensitive and proprietary information confidential. In the course of creating IP, you'll likely end up sharing information with third parties. By executing an NDA, you can protect your IP from being leaked or shared with potential competitors.
Provisional applications are a useful tool, but only when they are done right. When provisional patent applications are done poorly you not only obtain no benefit, the filing potentially demonstrates you were not in possession of an invention, which could be catastrophically bad.
No Expiration Dates So long as they are kept secret, trade secrets do not expire. Likewise, the confidentiality obligations in an NDA should have no expiration date.
Not exactly. You cannot make the Patent Office apply your disclosure as prior art to the patent application filed by the investor or licensee. Your disclosure may not be prior art to their patent application.
Non-disclosure agreements prevent problems with unintended public disclosures. These public disclosures start your one-year grace period to file a patent application on your invention in the United States.
It's important to ensure you get a copy of the document to be able to look back at what it says. You cannot be forced to sign an NDA if you do not want to accept the terms.
You will "abide by" the terms and conditions or you "agree to" the terms and conditions. An NDA is a binding legal agreement so it it correct to say something like: "I have read, understood and agree to be bound by your Non-disclosure Agreement dated..."
The VC business has an unwritten rule on NDAs. And people who violate this rule risk losing credibility with investors even before meeting with them. The rule is simple: never ask a VC to sign an NDA unless your company absolutely needs one.
Dave Jilk’s comment on Brad’s post is probably accurate as well:
All these things sometimes need an NDA. But in all other cases and before a term sheet is signed, most VCs decline NDAs and move on. Why is this?
Non-disclosure agreements are an important tool for any business. As I’ve written here before, startups need to protect their intellectual property (IP), especially in the early stages when IP represents the vast majority of the company’s value. Make sure you have them. Make sure you use them.
When I said that everyone knows VC’s don’t sign NDA’s, I wasn’t merely using hyperbole. This is such common knowledge amongst entrepreneurs and investors that asking for an NDA before a pitch meeting will make you look extremely inexperienced. Worse, it means that you don’t have any mentors giving you good advice.
Now I’m not suggesting that there isn’t any risk that VC firms might use information from your pitch meeting for the benefit of their portfolio companies. Unfortunately, that kind of thing happens all the time, even if unintentionally. But there are better ways to protect yourself than an NDA. First, know who you’re talking to.
Once the VC firm is serious about investing in your company, then it might be appropriate to require an NDA. VC firms usually perform extensive due diligence before investing, so if this process would reveal your secret sauce you can safely break out the NDA. Just make sure to keep the NDA simple and short (1 page should do the trick).
When you visit the patent attorney, you will uncover a lot of soft cues that will tell you whether he or she is trustworthy. How do they handle themselves? Is the person asking the right question about your situation and the technology?
For California, the State Bar provides an Attorney Search function so that you can check the status of the California based patent attorney.
A patent attorney is someone who is both an attorney and has also passed the USPTO patent agent test. A patent agent is someone who has only passed the USPTO patent agent test. While the USPTO imposes a duty of confidentiality on patent agents, the state courts appear to be silent on that issue. For patent attorneys, the state bar typically ...
If you cannot trust the person, do not have that person sign the confidentiality agreement thinking that the agreement will provide you with sufficient protection. It will not. Do not be lured in by others things such as a low price. Just keep looking for a trustworthy person. You don’t have to have the person sign the confidentiality agreement. They are already under a duty of confidentiality both by the state bar and the USPTO.
Many people pretend to be a patent attorney to improperly gain people’s trust. You need to be aware of this and guard against these types of businesses and people by conducting a few basic checks. Below are a few action items you can take to research the person you are going to retain. Check whether the person is a patent attorney.
The bottom line is that if you find the right person , you wouldn’t have to get the patent attorney to sign the confidentiality agreement. You should find someone that is trustworthy. The relationship between the patent attorney and the inventor is very close. You will eventually trust them to make recommendations that will cost you a lot of time and money in some cases. If you don’t have this type of trust and feel, then you do not have the right person to represent you. Keep on looking.
For patent agents, the USPTO administrative rules impose a duty of confidentiality on patent agents. However, state law is silent on the issue, at least that is the case in California. For invention promotion companies, regardless of whether they have a duty to confidentiality, they have a generally bad reputation.
Because NDAs are vital to business and more than reasonable in any number of business relationship situations. These agreements protect your startup’s intellectual property, safeguard your trade secrets and shield the proprietary information that’s going to help launch your business to capitalist success.
But, if they sign your agreement, it would drastically limit their ability to review or consider ideas that are even remotely similar to yours, which would essentially cut off their deal flow.
If, and when, a VC is intrigued enough to hear more, they’ll offer a term sheet and then, by all means, whip out that NDA so you can reveal your big secret and seal the deal in confidence.
Non-disclosure agreements (usually shortened as NDA), also known as Confidentiality Agreements, are a dime-a-dozen in 21st century business, but valid and necessary none-the-less.
VC capitalists aren’t building products themselves. Remember, these guys and gals have already done the heavy lifting and they aren’t likely to want to do it again. VC’s and their representative firms are looking for an idea and a team that’s ready to hit the ground running.
The agreements won’t necessarily stop folks from leaking your secrets, but they can certainly help and they sure do make a great exhibit if the inconceivable leak happens and lands you in litigation.
Engaging an accountant who needs specifics in order to create accurate financial projections? Well, this kind of agreement to protect such confidential information, probably, isn’t a bad idea.
Additionally, other unintended issues are created by pushing NDAs including VCs losing interest, not having an opportunity to get great feedback from prospective investors and causing credibility issues in some cases. While it is a risk for startups to operate without NDAs, these entrepreneurs can do checks on the counterparty to ensure that they are legitimate professional investors and can find significant value and potential investment by doing so.
NDAs seem like a great way to protect your incredible billion-dollar idea from others, but the reality is that VCs aren’t looking to build a competing company, they are minority investors often with affiliate controls. They are looking to give capital to high performing teams to execute on their business model in order to produce large potential returns for their limited partners. Researching the counterparty and looking for shared connections is always a good idea when you are uncomfortable sharing information with others. It will always be extremely challenging to get value-add VC investors to sign NDAs but working with them can be worth it.
If VC firms went around sharing company trade secrets with others, it would shrink the universe of future potential investment prospects. Plus the challenge isnt having an idea, its executing on it.
Busy venture capitalists can see this NDA request (unfairly) as a sign of founder inexperience before getting into the meat of what makes your concept unique and investible. This isn’t a significant problem by any means, but it can hurt first impressions with certain VCs.
Understandably, founders are very excited about their companies and want to protect company information via a legal document. However, in the venture capital universe, information is treated with high confidentiality without the formality of an NDA and entrepreneurs should be aware of this dynamic before speaking with institutional investors.
VCs would quickly lose their credibility if they engaged in these behaviors. Plus, with some preliminary due diligence on potential investors, you can get backgrounds on the team, investment approach and their existing portfolio of companies usually just by reviewing their website. If you can see that they are invested in a direct competitor, it may not be wise to share information due to potential conflicts of interest.