A disqualified lawyer is prohibited from providing legal services, having contact with legal clients or potential legal clients, appearing as an attorney on behalf of clients in administrative or adjudicative proceedings, or holding out as an attorney in any way. MCR 9.119 (E). May a disqualified lawyer work as a paralegal or a law clerk? Yes.
Full Answer
Disqualification causes delay and added expense. Close cooperation between you and your successor counsel will lessen those burdens. But efficiency is not necessarily an enshrined virtue in lawyer codes of conduct. This article examines the ethical limits on the continuing contacts between a disqualified lawyer and client’s new counsel.
Pursuant to Rule 27 of the American Bar Association’s Model Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Enforcement, a lawyer who is disbarred or suspended from the practice of law must, within ten days of the date when discipline was imposed, send a notice to all clients, opposing counsel, and any co-counsel, notifying them that the lawyer is no longer able to act as a lawyer in the matter. …
Apr 11, 2018 · A disqualified lawyer must notify clients in all active matters of the following: (i) the status as a disqualified lawyer; (ii) the effective date of the disqualification; (iii) the inability to act as a lawyer; (iv) the process for retrieval of the representation file(s); (v) the option to seek legal advice/counsel and representation by successor counsel; and (vi) the address to which all …
Apr 01, 2015 · Few things are worse for an attorney than getting a new big matter, starting work on it, and then facing a motion to disqualify. At that point, the attorney is put in the awkward position of either explaining to the client why he or she should pay more money to keep the attorney, or absorbing the fees associated with defending the motion to disqualify.
In the second hypothetical, Law Firm B is retained by a Liquidator to investigate possible accounting and securities law irregularities in connection with the collapse of related mutual funds. Aware that an existing client, an accounting firm, is a potential defendant, Law Firm B tries to isolate information relating to that accounting firm and avoid any action directly adverse to it. Ultimately, Law Firm B persuades the Liquidator to hire Law Firm C, a firm that represents other interested parties, to file an action against several defendants, including the accounting firm. Law Firm B continues to represent the accounting firm.
That guidance is inextricably intertwined with the four public policies that animate the ethics rules on conflicts and imputation: loyalty, confidentiality, client choice, and lawyer mobility . Though the courts respect the importance of all four values, they tend to emphasize the obligation of loyalty in cases involving simultaneous conflicts and the obligation of confidentiality in cases involving successive conflicts. Compare Cinema 5 Ltd. v. Cinerama, Inc. [528 F.2d 1384 (2d Circ. 1976)], with Solow v. W. R. Grace & Co. [83 N.Y.2d 303 (1994)]. They treat client choice and lawyer mobility as important values, but as subsidiary to the other two.
Both the New York Code of Professional Responsibility and the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct are silent on this issue. While both sets of professional standards address conflicts of interest and imputation, they offer no direct guidance to the disqualified lawyer on how to proceed after new counsel appears. What little formal guidance there is, comes from the courts and the Restatement of the Law Governing Lawyers.
Although the basis for the orders of disqualification is the same in both hypotheticals, the outcome as it affects the nature and extent of any relationship between the disqualified and successor counsel is not. In the first hypothetical, the risk of disclosure of confidential information relating to the prior client is remote. The predecessor firm should therefore be able to share its work product freely with the successor firm. [ See, e.g., IBM v. Levin, 579 F.2d 271 (3d Cir.1978), refusing to overturn a lower court’s order allowing a 60-day period of consultation between counsel.]
An attorney who is disbarred loses that professional license, and is banned from practicing law. Disbarment normally occurs when the state bar association determines, typically after numerous complaints by clients, other lawyers, or judges, that a lawyer is unfit to continue practicing law.
What to do if you discover that your lawyer wasn't much of a lawyer after all. To change attorneys in the middle of a case or other legal matter is disruptive, time-consuming and stressful. It can also negatively affect your case, depending on when, in the course of the litigation or other matter, you need to make the change. ...
Pursuant to Rule 27 of the American Bar Association’s Model Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Enforcement, a lawyer who is disbarred or suspended from the practice of law must, within ten days of the date when discipline was imposed, send a notice to all clients, opposing counsel, and any co-counsel, notifying them that the lawyer is no longer able to act as a lawyer in the matter. Attorneys are usually required to notify clients (as well as co-counsel and opposing counsel) within ten days of being disbarred or suspended. Most jurisdictions require clients to be notified by certified mail.
Disbarment is an extreme punishment, requiring the attorney to literally change careers. (Reinstatement is possible, but extremely difficult for the lawyer to obtain.) That's why disbarment is usually a punishment of last resort. The bar association usually will take one or more other disciplinary actions first.
The attorney may, for example, have grossly mishandled cases (failed to file important court documents by the deadline, for example), lied to a jury or the client, failed to act diligently (for example, failed to file promised articles of incorporation), or stolen client funds held in trust.
For this reason, before hiring an attorney, it is prudent to contact your state’s bar association or the commission that licenses attorneys in your area to ask whether your prospective attorney has previously been subject to disciplinary action, and also to ensure that the attorney is currently licensed in good standing.
Not everyone can call themselves an attorney. In most states, you need to graduate from a three-year law school, take a difficult bar examination, and attend annual classes so as to obtain continuing legal education credits, in order to gain and keep a license to practice law in that state. An attorney who is disbarred loses that professional license, and is banned from practicing law.
Yes. If a disqualified lawyer has been suspended from the practice of law for non-payment of bar dues (administrative suspension) and is subject to a disciplinary suspension, the disqualified lawyer must comply with MCR 9.119.
Yes. MCR 9.119 applies if a disqualified lawyer has active client matters as of the effective date of the order of suspension. If a disqualified lawyer has been suspended for non-payment of bar dues, the disqualified lawyer is not an active member of the SBM and, therefore, may not engage in the practice of law. Rule 3 (A) of the Rules Concerning the State Bar of Michigan ( SBR ).
A disqualified lawyer cannot earn legal fees for work performed while disqualified and cannot share in the profits of a law firm with respect to profits earned during the period of disqualification. MCR 9.119 (F); MRPC 1.5 (e); Ethics Opinions RI-270, RI-030, and RI-019.
No. Whether a disqualified lawyer may perform or may not perform certain work depends on the nature of the work and not whether or not the individual is paid for the work. A disqualified lawyer shall not provide pro bono legal work, because such conduct by a disqualified lawyer constitutes the unauthorized practice of law.
No. Unless ordered otherwise, after the entry of a discipline order but prior to its effective date, a disqualified lawyer may not accept any new retainer or engagement as an attorney for another in any new case or legal matter of any nature, unless specifically authorized by the chairperson of the Attorney Discipline Board for good cause shown. This precludes the provision of new legal services to existing clients as well as retention by new clients even if the representation could be completed prior to the effective date of the order of discipline. See MCR 9.119 (D).
Yes. Unless ordered otherwise, after the entry of a discipline order but prior to its effective date, a disqualified lawyer may attempt to complete on behalf of any existing client all matters that were pending on the entry date. See MCR 9.119 (D).
No . It is the unauthorized practice of law for a disqualified lawyer to be a member of a professional corporation, which constitutes an improper holding out as authorized to practice law. A professional corporation organized to provide legal services must not include members who are not licensed to provide the professional services offered by the corporation. All members of a professional corporation who are licensed in Michigan must be active members in the State Bar of Michigan, which includes having paid and being current on membership dues. MCL 450.1286; MCR 9.119 (E) (4); SBR 3 (A); and SBR 4 (C).
Two important pre-motion strategies are effective. First, identify and resolve potential conflicts, including both multiple and successive representations, before undertaking a representation or hiring a lateral.
Courts differ on how they address motions to disqualify, especially because such motions are at times simply a litigation tactic by an opposing party in search of a strategic advantage.3 Additionally, courts are usually reluctant to interfere with a client’s choice of counsel unless the conflict is real and there are few options other than to grant disqualification.4
In assessing motions to disqualify based on conflicts, Colorado courts also consider (1) a client’s preference for a particular counsel, (2) the client’s right to confidentiality in communications with his or her attorney, (3) the integrity of the judicial process, and (4) the nature of the particular conflict of interest involved.10 Below are some important concepts that have emerged in the context of motions to disqualify.11
Typically, a former client seeking to disqualify a former attorney from representing an opposing party must identify specific, cogent information that the attorney possesses and show that the information is confidential and implicates the duty of loyalty.
The attorney may know the client’s bottom line for settlement or how the client prefers to approach litigation. This is often referred to as “playbook knowledge”—the attorney knows the client’s paths and approaches.
Where a conflict exists, an effective written consent is the best defense to a motion to disqualify. Second, take effective steps to mitigate, if not eliminate, risks that a former client’s confidences and secrets might be accessible to attorneys working on a matter involving the former client. Increasingly, courts nationwide have recognized ...
Few things are worse for an attorney than getting a new big matter, starting work on it, and then facing a motion to disqualify. At that point, the attorney is put in the awkward position of either explaining to the client why he or she should pay more money to keep the attorney, or absorbing the fees associated with defending ...
Assuming that the judge does not disqualify himself or herself sua sponte, counsel may consider filing a motion to disqualify or recuse the trial judge from further presiding in the action . This article will explain the procedure counsel must follow when filing such a disqualification motion, review the requirements imposed upon trial judges when determining disqualification motions, and examine the case law addressing the legal sufficiency of disqualification motions. Additionally, the procedure and law applicable to disqualification of trial judges in federal cases will be briefly discussed.
Initial and Successive Disqualification Motions. If an initial disqualification motion alleges a fear of prejudice or bias under rule 2.160 (d) (1), the trial judge is required to determine only the “legal sufficiency” of the motion and is prohibited from passing on the truth of the facts averred.
A related principle mitigating against disqualification is that a judge is not required to abstain from forming mental impressions and opinions during the course of judicial proceedings. For instance, in Mobil v. Trask, 463 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), a deputy commissioner’s remark to an employer/carrier’s attorney at a workers’ compensation hearing that “I don’t see how you can’t find this accident compensable,” which comment related directly to the merits of the petitioner’s case, was nonetheless held to be insufficient to justify the granting of a recusal motion. And, in Brown v. Pate, 577 So. 2d 645 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), the First District held that in a dependency adjudication of minor children following a father’s acquittal in the prosecution for the mother’s murder, the trial judge’s expression of “grave concern” regarding the father’s visitation did not serve as a basis for judicial disqualification. Citing the rationale of the Mobil case, the court opined that, “A judge may form mental impressions and opinions during the course of presentation of evidence so long as she does not prejudge the case.” Pate, 577 So. 2d at 647. 24 It has been said that a judge is the “sum of his past” who is expected to be influenced by real life experiences. 25
Rule 2.160 (d) sets forth the following bases for a disqualification motion, at least one of which must be shown in the motion: 1. that the party fears that he or she will not receive a fair trial or hearing because of specifically described prejudice or bias of the judge;
An important requirement contained in rule 2.160 (e) is that a disqualification motion must be made within 10 days after the “discovery of the facts constituting the grounds” for the motion.
This is accomplished by the filing of a motion for reconsideration within 20 days of the order of disqualification. Id.
In Bryant, the court held that due process was denied the contemnor since the judge was the only witness available to prove the contempt charge, and the judge testified without being under oath and refused to be cross-examined. Judicial Disqualification in Federal Cases.
When a court orders disqualification, the court obviously has authority to enjoin the attorney or law firm from appearing before …
The disqualification case of the week involves conflicts in the representation of small businesses and divorcing spouses (particularly in community-property …
The DQ case of the week involves a law firm disqualified for hiring away opposing counsel’s paralegal. Plaintiffs were suing …