Yes, the attorney-client privilege survives the death of the client. But the personal representative of the deceased client’s estate steps into the shoes of the decedent, and has control over the privilege just as the client had during life.
Dec 05, 2016 · Accordingly, in situations where there is no personal representative, then there is no holder of the privilege and the attorney cannot assert the attorney-client privilege on behalf of a deceased client. An attorney should also be aware that even when the attorney-client privilege is not terminated because there is a personal representative, the Evidence Code provides …
May 23, 2018 · Accordingly, in situations where there is no personal representative, then there is no holder of the privilege and the attorney cannot assert the attorney-client privilege on behalf of a deceased client. An attorney should also be aware that even when the attorney-client privilege is not terminated because there is a personal representative, the Evidence Code provides …
Generally, the Executor succeeds to and receives A/C privilege of the deceased person; in other words, it is the Executor’s privilege to assert: T.R.C.E., Rule 503 (c) (3): The privilege may be claimed by a deceased client’s personal representative (“PR”).
On appeal, the Colorado Court of Appeals reversed the probate court decision. The appellate judges ordered Mr. Freirich to turn over all of his late client’s files, and cancelled the award of legal fees.
Before the trial court entered its order, the dispute among the Mr. Rabin’s widow, his ex-wife and his daughter had been resolved. That was one reason Mr. Freirich had given for not turning over the files — they were no longer even needed, he argued. The Court of Appeals was not impressed by this argument. The status of a dispute (or potential dispute) was irrelevant to the personal representative’s right to receive estate assets.
After Mr. Rabin’s death, his widow petitioned for appointment as personal representative of his estate. After her appointment, she demanded that Mr. Freirich turn over all of her late husband’s legal files.
After Mrs. Rabin subpoenaed the files, Mr. Freirich moved to quash the subpoena. One issue in the probate proceeding involved real estate transactions, prepared by Mr. Freirich, between Mr. Rabin, his ex-wife, and their daughter. Mrs. Rabin insisted that she needed those files to resolve the disputes. Mr.
During his life, Louis Rabin had hired Steamboat Springs, Colorado, lawyer Mark A. Freirich to handle a number of property and business matters for him. Mr. Freirich had not prepared Mr. Rabin’s will, but he still had some forty separate files he had opened for Mr. Rabin. After Mr. Rabin’s death, his widow petitioned for appointment as personal ...
That might mean the lawyer can explain how your will (or trust) was signed, or what you meant by some provisions. Generally, though, your lawyer can not reveal confidential communications — even after your death. You own the attorney-client privilege, incidentally — it does not belong to your lawyer. That means a lawyer who really, really wants ...
The personal representative of an estate has a right to receive that property, and to evaluate whether there might be additional claims by, or against, the estate. Yes, the attorney-client privilege survives the death of the client.
In many cases today there will not be a court-appointed personal representative because prior to death the decedent transferred all of her assets to a trust. And, a trustee is not a personal representative. (Prob. Code §58.) Accordingly, in situations where there is no personal representative, then there is no holder of the privilege and the attorney cannot assert the attorney-client privilege on behalf of a deceased client.
Ethics in Brief is designed to present ethical issues that practitioners might well face on a daily basis. It is a service of the Legal Ethics Committee of the San Diego County Bar Association.
Evidence Code section 955 provides that an attorney may only claim the attorney-client privilege on behalf of a client if the attorney is authorized to claim the privilege under Evidence Code section 954 (c).
(e), an attorney must maintain inviolate a client’s confidences. The only exception in that statute is that an attorney may, but is not required to, reveal confidential information to the extent that the attorney reasonably believes the disclosure is necessary to prevent a criminal act that the attorney reasonably believes is likely to result in death of, or substantial bodily harm to, an individual. But, the Evidence Code and applicable case law provide that the rules applicable to disclosure of a client’s confidences change after the client dies.
v. Super. Ct. (2005) 35 Cal.4 th 54, 65.) The Court went on to conclude that when there is no personal representative the attorney-client privilege terminates. ( Id. at 66.)
An attorney should also be aware that even when the attorney-client privilege is not terminated because there is a personal representative, the Evidence Code provides exceptions to the attorney-client privilege in several situations, primarily involving a decedent’s estate planning, which require the attorney to reveal the client’s confidential information. (See Evid. Code §§956-962.)
In many cases today there will not be a court-appointed personal representative because prior to death the decedent transferred all of her assets to a trust. And, a trustee is not a personal representative. (Prob. Code §58.) Accordingly, in situations where there is no personal representative, then there is no holder of the privilege and the attorney cannot assert the attorney-client privilege on behalf of a deceased client.
Evidence Code section 960 provides: “There is no privilege under this article as to a communication relevant to an issue concerning the intention of a client, now deceased, with respect to a deed of conveyance, will, or other writing, executed by the client, purporting to affect an interest in property.”. The above authorities show that ...
Evidence Code section 955 provides that an attorney may only claim the attorney-client privilege on behalf of a client if the attorney is authorized to claim the privilege under Evidence Code section 954 (c). Evidence Code section 954 (c) provides in relevant part: …” [the lawyer] may not claim the privilege if there is no holder ...
Code §58.) Accordingly, in situations where there is no personal representative, then there is no holder of the privilege and the attorney cannot assert the attorney-client privilege on behalf of a deceased client. An attorney should also be aware that even when the attorney-client privilege is not terminated because there is a personal ...
Evidence Code section 954 (c) provides in relevant part: …” [the lawyer] may not claim the privilege if there is no holder of the privilege in existence…” (Emphasis added.)
The only exception in that statute is that an attorney may, but is not required to, reveal confidential information to the extent that the attorney reasonably believes the disclosure is necessary to prevent a criminal act that the attorney reasonably believes is likely to result in death of, or substantial bodily harm to, an individual. ...
v. Super. Ct. (2005) 35 Cal.4th 54, 65.) The Court went on to conclude that when there is no personal representative the attorney-client privilege terminates. ( Id. at 66.)
To invoke the exception, the question is: What does “claiming through the same decedent” mean? As Plaintiff, I would argue that the decedent’s lawyer’s entire file is discoverable because the end result of the fight is a claim through the same decedent; the Party and the Estate are fighting over the contract. More accurately though, the communications between the decedent and his/her attorney regarding the contract creation, its meaning, and interpretation, i.e., the ultimate issue, in that case, would be subject to discovery. But, the communications between the attorney and the deceased party in relation to the representation in that lawsuit pending at the time of death would be less certain.
If you get into a lawsuit, Post-Death over the validity of a that Decedent’s Will or Trust a JTWROS Agreement or something of that nature , then the A/C privilege with the Decedent and his attorney in relation to such documents would not apply, based upon the exception. Absolutely discoverable!
However, if you are in a lawsuit over the validity or enforceability of a contract at the time of decedent’s death, then you have more of a gray area; possibly a hybrid situation.
When we file a will contest or a trust contest, the first thing we do is subpoena the scrivener’s file.
When you are not sure how a death can affect your legal rights, contact the experienced probate lawyers at Spencer & Johnson.
Huie v. DeShazo does not apply to answer your question because it establishes that a serving fiduciary possesses an A/C privilege with his/her/its attorney in relation to the representation of that fiduciary during the administration or litigation and prevents disclosure to the fiduciary’s beneficiaries. It is not a case establishing that a privilege of a decedent carries over to the PR
Generally, the Executor succeeds to and receives A/C privilege of the deceased person; in other words, it is the Executor’s privilege to assert:
Death of a Client 247 client's personal representative expressly or impliedly permits dece- dent's counsel to continue to represent the interests of the dece- dent's estate in the prosecution of the deceased's cause. Bergum v.
. . an exception to this rule is where the attorney has entered into a special contract of employment, such as a specific contract to conduct a suit to final judgment, or an agreement on a fee for the entire case.=' .
Durden,I8 an insurance company retained an attorney to represent one of its policyholders in an action against the policyholder by an injured plaintiff. It was held that the policy- holder's death before his liability to plaintiff was adjudicated did not extinguish the relationship of attorney and client between the attorney and the deceased policyholder since the policyholder-client did not retain the "control and direction of the attorney in the performance of his services . . . ." ID The attorney, therefore, had authority to file an appeal from an adverse judgment against de- ceased ins~red.~O The "ratification exception" to the general agency rule that the death of a client automatically terminates an attorney-client rela- tionship is usually invoked when an attorney's client dies during the attorney's trial or appellate prosecution of the client's cause and the
Lewis is to be measured by her interest therein, she gave none."
by whom the power is to be exercised, such person acts in his own name. The estate, being in him, passes from him, by a conveyance in his own name. He is no longer substitute, acting in the place and name of another, but is a principal, acting in his own name, in pursuance of powers which limit his estate.
The act of the substitute, therefore, which, in such a case, is the act of the principal, to be legally effectual, must be in his name, must be such an act as the principal himself would be capable of performing, and which would be valid, if performed by him. Such a power necessarily ceases with the life of the person making it.
engrafted on an estate in the thing . . . . 'A power coupled with an interest,' is a power which accompanies, or is connected with, an inter- est. The power and the interest are united in the same person. But if we are to undeistand by the word 'interest,' an interest in that which is to be produced by the exercise of the power, then they are never united. The power, to produce the interest, must be exercised, and by its exercise, is extinguished. The power ceases, when the interest commences, and therefore, cannot, in accurate law language, be said to be 'coupled' with it . . . . The interest or title in the thing being vested in the person who gives the power, remains in him, unless it be conveyed with the power, and can pass out of him only by a regular act in his own name. The act of the substitute, therefore, which, in such a case, is the act of the principal, to be legally effectual, must be in his name, must be such an act as the principal himself would be capable of performing, and which would be valid, if performed by him. Such a power necessarily ceases with the life of the person making it. But if the interest, or estate, passes with the power, and vests in the person