When a prosecutor is presenting a case, it is called the case-in-chief. He may only ask direct questions of any witness: “Jennifer, how long have you known the defendant?” or “Jennifer, how did you meet the defendant?” Once the prosecutor is done questioning the witness, it is the defense attorney’s turn. This is called “cross-examination”.
Full Answer
The defendant’s lawyer will then question the witness in an effort to discredit or at least shed doubt on the testimony. Generally, questions should address matters covered during the direct examination, but the attorney may also ask questions related to the witness’s credibility.
But, while in court, the prosecution has to let its witnesses give their own accounts. That's why some defense lawyers joke that the most important question for a prosecutor is, "Then what happened?" On cross examination, however, there are only limited restrictions on questioning.
If a leading question is too confusing or there are parts of the question that the witness does not agree with they may answer in the negative and explain their answer. Objections: The Crown Prosecutor or the Defence Counsel may object to a question or the admission of an exhibit or evidence.
The prohibition against leading questions on direct examination forces lawyers to ask non-suggestive questions instead. So, a prosecutor can’t guide the testimony of a prosecution witness too much. The prosecutor has likely spoken to the witness before testimony begins and prepared him or her at least somewhat.
Your witness must answer each question truthfully. It is okay for the witness to say, “I don't know” or “I don't remember” if those are truthful responses. When your adversary is done, and the judge has no further questions, your witness is done.
A deposition is a question-and-answer session conducted outside of a courtroom but still under oath. The reason for a deposition is so that an attorney or attorneys can gather information and facts from witnesses they believe will help their client's position in a case, or, hurt their adversary's position.
When the lawyer for the plaintiff or the government has finished questioning a witness, the lawyer for the defendant may then cross-examine the witness. Cross-examination is generally limited to questioning only on matters that were raised during direct examination.
When you question your own witnesses, this is called direct examination. On direct examination, you will usually only be allowed to ask open-ended questions that do not lead your witnesses in a certain way or influence their answers. “Leading questions,” where you suggest the answer to the question, are not allowed.
So, again, the way to discredit a witness is to bring up prior inconsistent statements that they made. The way to discredit a witness is to call other witness or cross-examine other witnesses and bring up key points about your main witness's testimony and impeach them through over witness statements.
What is reassuring for defendants is that whilst a signed statement from a complainant is enough for a charge, it is not necessarily enough to secure a conviction. The complainant must be able to convince the jury or magistrates that the defendant is guilty beyond reasonable doubt.
Common Courtroom PhrasesAs jurors you are not to be swayed by sympathy.Bail should be continued.Call your next witness.Can you tell the jury…?Could you briefly describe …?Could you describe the appearance of (a package, etc.)?Counsel, lay a foundation.Defendant will be remanded.More items...
Examination, Direct Examination, Examination-in-chief: The questions which the lawyer asks his own client or witnesses called by him.
Steps in a Trial Lawyers for the plaintiff or the government begin the presentation of evidence by calling witnesses . The questions they ask of the witnesses are direct examination. Direct examination may elicit both direct and circumstantial evidence.
Although these uncooperative witnesses may believe they are not required to participate in the criminal justice system, it is entirely possible to subpoena an apparent witness to attend court to be questioned regarding the criminal event they witnessed.
THE TYPES OF WITNESS EXAMINATION DISCUSSED INCLUDES DIRECT EXAMINATION, CROSS-EXAMINATION, REDIRECT AND RECROSS-EXAMINATION, AND VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION.
Ask Leading Questions. Unlike questioning of friendly witnesses, you are allowed to ask leading questions of hostile witnesses. A leading question is a question that elicits a "yes" or "no" answer.
While it is recognised as a punishable offence, no specific criteria on remedial action exists and will be decided by a judge in a court of law should charges be brought against an individual. If found guilty, a prison sentence of up to five years could be initiated or a fine payable by a guilty party.
formal promise to tell the truthDefinition of under oath law. : having made a formal promise to tell the truth in a court of law.
In short, a false statement is perjury when it is made under oath or made under penalty of perjury. Two separate statutes define the crime of perjury under federal law.
n. 1) a swearing to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, which would subject the oath-taker to a prosecution for the crime of perjury if he/she knowingly lies in a statement either orally in a trial or deposition or in writing.
Attorney Quentin Brogdon of Dallas, TX recently spoke on Surviving Cross-Examination at the SEAK National Expert Witness Conference. He recommended that attorneys interview potential expert witnesses to avoid cross-examination problems.
There are no special questions asked by prosecuting attorneys during cross-examination. In a trial, when either side calls a witness, the other side is entitled to cross examine the witness.
Learn the basic rules and procedure for questioning witnesses at criminal trials, including the order for presenting witnesses, defendants’ rights to compel witness testimony and cross-examine them, and witnesses' rights against self-incrimination.
You can start questioning your witnesses, one at a time, by asking them their name and asking them some background information, like how they know the parties in the case. You will then have to get into asking questions about the event they witnessed or any other issue they are there to testify about. It is best if you can prepare with your witnesses beforehand so you know what they will ...
Ch. 9: Probable Cause and Transfer Hearings (Oct. 2017) North Carolina Juvenile Defender Manual 13. Was the witness under the influence of any drugs or alcohol when speaking with the
As part of their trial strategy, lawyers will call their witnesses in an order that’s most helpful for convincing the jury of the guilt or innocence of the defendant. However, the judge has the ultimate say over when witnesses testify.
Criminal defendants have the right under the Sixth Amendment’s “confrontation clause” to be present when witnesses are testifying against them and to cross-examine those witnesses. There may be exceptions, however, when witnesses aren’t available to testify at trial. Depending on the circumstances, certain types of reliable statements from unavailable witnesses might be admitted as evidence, such as previous testimony at a preliminary hearing or deposition where the defendant’s attorney was able to question the witness.
Criminal defendants have a number of rights related to witnesses, most of which stem from the Fifth and Sixth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution .
Before the trial, as part of the evidence-sharing process known as “ discovery ,” defendants are normally entitled to receive the names and statements of the witnesses that the prosecution plans to call (although prosecutors may not always have to reveal the names of confidential informants). Defendants also have a right to any information that prosecutors have about the identity or whereabouts of other witnesses who might be able to provide relevant testimony for the defense.
Criminal trials follow the same basic order. Following opening statements, the prosecution presents its evidence, including its witnesses. For each witness, there may be two or more steps to the testimony: 1 Direct examination. First, the prosecutor will ask questions intended to bring out the witness’s story. 2 Cross-examination. The defendant’s lawyer will then question the witness in an effort to discredit or at least shed doubt on the testimony. Generally, questions should address matters covered during the direct examination, but the attorney may also ask questions related to the witness’s credibility. 3 Redirect and recross examination. After the cross-examination, the prosecutor may ask the witness more questions, usually to clarify parts of the testimony or address issues that came up during the cross. Then, the defense attorney also has another chance at further questioning, usually to discuss new subjects discussed during the redirect.
Witnesses are a critical part of criminal trials. Strong testimony from even one good witness can sometimes make or break the prosecution’s case. Other than expert witnesses—who give opinions based on specialized knowledge like forensics and DNA evidence—witnesses testify about what they’ve personally seen, heard, or observed.
That personal knowledge is one reason witness testimony can be so persuasive to juries. Sometimes, witness testimony is the only evidence that places the defendant at (or far from) the crime scene. Other times, witnesses provide the context that supports or undermines other evidence. Either way, there are general rules for how ...
A witness for the prosecution is a witness who is brought into the court in order to provide testimony which supports the prosecution’s overall case.
Because a witness for the prosecution will often be providing testimony which is ultimately critical to the prosecution’s overall case , the prosecution will likely help to establish a witness statement for a witness for the prosecution.
The defense of a trial would focus on discrediting, in some fashion, any important witness for the prosecution, in order to take the weight off the testimony given by such a witness for the prosecution.
Sometimes, a witness statement may actually be all that is necessary for the witness’s evidence to be entered into the trial, as a full out questioning of the witness for the prosecution may be deemed unnecessary in light of the witness statement. In general, however, a witness statement is less often used within the courts of the United States ...
After the prosecutor rests, no more witnesses can be called to the stand or evidence introduced by the government. After the Government rests, the defense has the opportunity to present witnesses and evidence to the jury. The defense also has the option of not having the defendant testify.
During direct examination, the prosecutor can introduce evidence such as a weapon or something from the crime scene. Following the prosecutor’s examination of a witness, the defense attorney has an opportunity to cross examine or ask questions to the same witness.
During trial, the prosecutor uses witnesses and evidence to prove to the jury that the defendant committed the crime (s ). The defendant, represented by an attorney, also tells his side of the story using witnesses and evidence. In a trial, the judge — the impartial person in charge of the trial — decides what evidence can be shown to the jury.
This is called redirect examination. Once the process of direct examination, cross examination, and redirect of all the witnesses is complete, the prosecutor rests his case.
Jurors are selected to listen to the facts of the case and to determine if the defendant committed the crime. Twelve jurors are selected randomly from the jury pool (also called the “venire”), a list of potential jurors compiled from voter registration records of people living in the Federal district.
The prosecutor makes an opening statement first because the Government has the burden of proving that the defendant committed the crime.
For example, a prosecutor or defense attorney may object to the wide range of the direct examination because it is beyond the knowledge of the witness, the attorney may be arguing with the witness rather than asking questions, or the witness may be talking about things irrelevant to the case. Common objections include:
After you have finished asking your witnesses questions, the other side will have a chance to ask them questions, which is called cross-examination. Note: When your witnesses are testifying, your witnesses can only testify as to events that they have personal knowledge of.
When you question your own witnesses, this is called direct examination. On direct examination, you will usually only be allowed to ask open-ended questions that do not lead your witnesses in a certain way or influence their answers. “Leading questions,” where you suggest the answer to the question, are not allowed.
Courtroom Procedures: Questions and Objections. Both the Crown Prosecutor and the Defence Counsel are allowed to ask questions of witnesses during the trial. They are presented in court by either the Crown or Defence in order to help prove their case/argument.
After stating an objection a lawyer must provide grounds (meaning a reason) for the objection.
A lawyer must always stand when addressing the judge. Proper etiquette in a courtroom means that you always “rise” (stand up) when addressing the court. A Lawyer would begin an objection by stating: “I object your honour…” or. “The Crown objects your honour…” or. “Objection your Honour, the Crown/Defence is…”.
The Lawyer harasses, abuses, insults, or intimidates the witness, or is forcefully pursuing a point unnecessarily. (f) repeating (Repetition) or wasting the court’s time: A question or answer is repeated multiple times or it takes too much time to think of questions/answers. (g) coaching the witness.
Leading questions suggest the answer in the question or ask for a yes or no answer.
Unless the witness is qualified as an expert witness (or is identified as a character witness), (s)he should not give opinions or conclusions that they are not qualified to give or is beyond their knowledge. They can speak to their own perspectives of the event. (e) badgering or harassing the witness.
The Judge’s Response to an Objection: The judge may respond in one of two ways. S/he may sustain the objection, which means that the objection is well supported and approved of by the judge. This prevents the line of questioning from continuing or evidence/testimony form being introduced.
Preparation of the witness for examination is as important as the attorney’s preparation for the examination. Review every question and exhibit with the witness. Ask the witness what exhibits she believes would be helpful in explaining her testimony. Inform the witness that after direct examination she will be cross-examined by opposing counsel but that on redirect examination she will have the opportunity to explain the answers she did not have an opportunity to explain during cross-examination. Review the likely points of cross-examination to avoid as much surprise as possible. Tell the witness to show respect for the system and all involved. Instruct the witness to speak clearly, loudly, and to the jury. The witness should speak, dress, and act appropriately. It is important to remember that how a witness testifies is as important as the substance of their testimony. Show the witness the courtroom. If possible, have the witness watch part of a trial to become generally familiar with the process. Review all procedures with the witness. Hopefully, if you follow these suggestions, the witness will be both prepared and comfortable.
You are calling this witness because she supports at least some, if not all, aspects of your case. Therefore, you want the jury to see this witness and hear what she has to say.
Use concise, leading questions that for the most part elicit yes or no responses. Organize your questions so that they build to an important point. The last question of a series of questions should make the point very clear. Stop for a moment to gather your thoughts and to let the jury have an opportunity to appreciate the point and its significance. Then move on to your next point. Keep the witness guessing. Move from point to point in an order that keeps your thought process hidden. If the witness does not know where you are going with your questioning, you are more likely to catch the witness off guard and get the answer you desire.
First, leading questions are not allowed on direct examination except in limited circumstances such as in the case of an adverse or hostile witness or a very young witness. Second, the use of leading questions will have the negative effect of shifting the jury’s focus from the witness and her answers to you and your questions. Finally, the use of leading questions reduces the credibility of the witness. If you use leading questions on a regular basis, it will be as if you are testifying, not the witness. Even if opposing counsel and the judge allow you to use leading questions, the jury will not appreciate this approach and will no doubt question the credibility of the witness.
You have called this witness to testify on behalf of your client because this witness can help you establish the elements you need to win your case. Identify the points you want to make and formulate your questions in a manner which allow you to get to those points as quickly as possible. Be sure to stop once you have developed those points sufficiently. Do not bore or confuse the jury with unimportant or irrelevant points.
Cross-examination has essentially two purposes. The first and primary purpose of cross-examination is to elicit testimony that supports your case . The second purpose, which is discussed in more detail below, is to attack the credibility of the witness or the witness’s testimony.
Many attorneys feel uncomfortable with silence between a witness’s answer and their next question. As a result, those attorneys use verbal crutches such as “um” and “and” to fill this void with sound. In reality, when these sounds are used on a regular basis they only serve to distract the jury. Remember, moments of silence between a witness’s answer and your next question are acceptable. In fact, these moments of silence allow the jury to absorb the witness’s testimony and its significance.
When you are asked questions, give your answer as clearly as possible. Expect to be questioned by several people. One of the basic rules in a criminal case is that both sides have a chance to question every witness. Questions asked by both sides have the same goal – to find out what is true . Do not lose your temper.
This is the single most important advice any witness should remember. Dress neatly. A neat appearance and proper dress in court give an important first, and lasting, impression. Conduct yourself in a dignified manner.
If you cannot attend court at the date and time stated on your subpoena, please call the prosecutor's office immediately and ask to speak to the Witness Coordinator or to the attorney who signed the bottom of your subpoena. Unless you are excused, you must attend.
If you have any fears or receive any threats concerning your involvement in a case, you should immediately contact the law enforcement agency that investigated your case. In an emergency situation, call 9-1-1.
Witnesses are not limited to what is referred to as "eye witnesses," that is someone who actually saw the crime occur. You may have seen or heard the crime happen or may know something about it. You may also know something about a piece of evidence, or may know something that contradicts another witness' testimony.
Therefore, you may not receive payment immediately – in fact it may take up to four to five weeks before you get your check.
If you are lawfully subpo enaed to appear in court, an employer cannot prevent court attendance. When appropriate, the prosecutor on your case can contact your employer to discuss the importance of your role as a witness and try to schedule your testimony to minimize the inconvenience to your employer.
Lawyers might want to restrain themselves somewhat when cross-examining witnesses for fear of coming across as a bully, but they sometimes determine that being aggressive is the best course of action. They might hope that their confrontational style will fluster the witness or expose a nasty character trait. For example, a prosecutor cross-examining a defendant might take a harsh tone with the goal of creating an inconsistency in testimony or exposing the defendant's temper.
The prohibition against leading questions on direct examination forces lawyers to ask non-suggestive questions instead. So, a prosecutor can't guide the testimony of a prosecution witness too much. The prosecutor has likely spoken to the witness before testimony begins and prepared him or her at least somewhat.
On direct examination, lawyers generally can't ask leading questions. A question is leading if it suggests the answer. For example, "You couldn't see very well, could you?" or, "Did you get to the scene at 8 p.m.?"