what does it mean when the attorney is talking with the opposing counsel

What is an opposing counsel?

An opposing counsel is a lawyer or attorney representing an opposing party in a lawsuit. In a legal dispute, you’ll typically have the plaintiff represented by an attorney along with the defendant also legally represented.

Is it legal to talk to the opposing party's attorney?

There is no rule against your talking to the opposing party, or to the opposing party's attorney. There is a rule, however, that applies to attorneys only, that would prevent opposing counsel from responding to your communication, unless he had permission from your attorney...

Can a lawyer speak to a person who is represented by counsel?

A lawyer cannot speak to a person who is represented by counsel. Have your attorney contact the attorney. Report Abuse Report Abuse Please explain why you are flagging this content: * This will flag comments for moderators to take action.

When does an opposing counsel take assertive action against an attorney?

Actions by the opposing counsel which interfere with the attorney-client relationship may warrant assertive action, as such interference could impact the attorney’s ability to provide competent legal services. However, the notice should be carefully drafted to avoid being viewed as a threat in the underlying dispute.

How do you respond to opposing counsel?

8 Tips for Dealing with Difficult Opposing CounselPoint out Common Ground. ... Don't be Afraid to Ask Why. ... Separate the Person from the Problem. ... Focus on your Interests. ... Don't Fall for your Assumptions. ... Take a Calculated Approach. ... Control the Conversation by Reframing. ... Pick up the Phone.

Do opposing attorneys talk to each other?

Ultimately, it isn't uncommon for attorneys in the community to have a friendly relationship. Don't be afraid if you even see the attorneys partake in some light banter back and forth.

What does an opposing counsel do?

An opposing counsel is a legal professional, lawyer or attorney who represents a party acting in opposition to another party in a legal dispute. In a lawsuit, you have litigants opposing one another and their respective attorneys will be opposing attorneys.

Can opposing counsel contact me directly?

No California legal ethics rule expressly prohibits a non-lawyer client from contacting another party directly, although clients cannot be used as conduits for indirect prohibited contact from lawyers.

What do you do when opposing counsel won't respond?

In a nutshell, if opposing counsel isn't responding: Document your repeated efforts at contact, including your statement of the consequence of continued nonresponse. Wait a reasonable amount of time. To be safe, get a court order authorizing direct contact.

What is the no contact rule in law?

Wolfram's “Modern Legal Ethics,” the no contact rule, as a general proposition, prohibits a lawyer who is representing a client from contacting a party known to be represented by another party. The no contact rule first found its way into the American Bar Association's canons of ethics in 1908.

What is the most common complaint against lawyers?

Perhaps the most common kinds of complaints against lawyers involve delay or neglect. This doesn't mean that occasionally you've had to wait for a phone call to be returned. It means there has been a pattern of the lawyer's failing to respond or to take action over a period of months.

Why do lawyers drag out cases?

Their goal is to drag the case on and pay out as little as possible. This earns more money for the attorney, who gets paid by the hour, and also can help frustrate the plaintiff into making a better settlement for them out of desperation.

What are lawyers not allowed to do?

“An Advocate shall not solicit work or advertise, either directly or indirectly, whether by circulars, advertisements, touts, personal communications, interview not warranted by personal relations, furnishing or inspiring newspaper comments or procuring his photograph to be published in connection with cases in which ...

Can opposing lawyers be friends?

By David L. Hudson Jr. Under the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, attorneys can't represent clients if they have a marital or familial relationship with opposing counsel unless they get informed consent in writing from their client.

Can two represented parties talk to each other?

(A) While representing a client, a member shall not communicate directly or indirectly about the subject of the representation with a party the member knows to be represented by another lawyer in the matter, unless the member has the consent of the other lawyer.

What happens when a lawyer doesn't respond to another lawyer?

If your lawyer still does not respond, you can send him or her a letter explaining the communication problems. If at this point you do not hear anything from your lawyer, you should consult with a legal malpractice attorney.

Can represented parties talk to each other?

(A) While representing a client, a member shall not communicate directly or indirectly about the subject of the representation with a party the member knows to be represented by another lawyer in the matter, unless the member has the consent of the other lawyer.

Do lawyers call each other?

As such, it is usually best to meet other lawyers in person or call them on the phone so that attorneys can have a personal connection with people whom they are contacting. However, many lawyers do not pick up the phone and rather rely almost exclusively on email to communicate with others.

What happens when a lawyer doesn't respond to another lawyer?

If your lawyer still does not respond, you can send him or her a letter explaining the communication problems. If at this point you do not hear anything from your lawyer, you should consult with a legal malpractice attorney.

Are lawyers friendly to each other?

Can a lawyer advise friends, family members and their spouse? Lawyers are allowed to advise friends, family members, spouses and other people with whom they are acquainted. A lawyer is not in a conflict of interest simply because the lawyer is representing a family member or a friend.

What is the ethical rule for lawyers?

One of the fundamental ethical rules for lawyers is that they are not supposed to communicate with opposing parties who are represented by counsel. Model Rule 8.4 at least implicitly extends this prohibition to paralegals as it prohibits attorneys from directing others from doing something they are not allowed to do.

What is Rule 8.4 C?

Rule 8.4 (c) prohibits the lawyer from engaging “in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation.” Do you see where I’m going with this? If your boss is prohibited from making that call to opposing counsel under false pretenses, they cannot work around the rule by asking you to do it. Just say no.

Can an attorney exploit a non-attorney?

Sadly, many of the above tips involve deceitful behavior by attorneys seeking to exploit your non-attorney status for their own gain. Most would never do that, but those willing to cross that line will be tempted to cross it often. Always have a good grasp of your firm’s expectations when it comes to communications with opposing counsel, and don’t ever be afraid to tell an opposing attorney, “I can’t talk about this until I speak with my supervising attorney.”

Do opposing law firms have kinship?

Any litigator knows that some cases drag on for years. Over that length of time, opposing law firms can develop a sort of kinship with each other. In fact, some attorneys make a big production out of calling for “professional courtesy” between opposing firms. Watch out.

What is a difficult opposing counsel?

A difficult opposing counsel is every legal practitioner’s nightmare. Even judges dread the thought of presiding over matters involving a difficult lawyer. Their fears are understandable. Difficult lawyers seem to have a penchant for employing unethical tactics to win a case. According to some lawyers, dealing with a difficult opposing counsel is ...

What upsets opposing counsel more than a calm and collected lawyer?

Nothing upsets an opposing counsel more than a calm and collected lawyer. A relaxed lawyer who is not overwhelmed with emotion is less likely to make mistakes in his case.

Why are lawyers so calm?

Calm lawyers are usually the most efficient because they do not allow their emotions to becloud their sense of reasoning. Nothing upsets an opposing counsel more than a calm and collected lawyer.

How do opposing lawyers distract their opponents?

One way opposing lawyers distract their opponents by filing incessant motions to frustrate a matter. Some lawyers are easily distracted by allowing every issue raised by an opposing lawyer to become a dispute. While it is essential to react to some motions, learn to ignore harmless ones.

How to be proactive in a court case?

To be proactive, lawyers must have a plan of action and anticipate the next move of the opposing counsel, just like in a chess game. By preempting the moves of the lawyer on the other side, you will avoid delays caused by your opponent’s delayed actions.

Why are lawyers so aggressive?

The reason many lawyers are uncivil and aggressive comes from the desire to please their clients. There is certainly a popular misconception by the public that lawyers who are difficult and aggressive are the ones who can bring in results.

How to control an errant lawyer?

Follow the Laws, Rules, and Procedure. By following the law and sticking to the rules of procedure, you will be able to control errant opposing lawyers. Knowing the law, rules, and procedure is a good technique in checkmating some of the antics of difficult lawyers. Make use of the laws and rules of procedure to stay ahead ...

When communicating with the accused in a criminal matter, must a government lawyer comply with this rule?

When communicating with the accused in a criminal matter, a government lawyer must comply with this Rule in addition to honoring the constitutional rights of the accused. The fact that a communication does not violate a state or federal constitutional right is insufficient to establish that the communication is permissible under this Rule. ...

When does a lawyer have to terminate communication?

A lawyer must immediately terminate communication with a person if, after commencing communication, the lawyer learns that the person is one with whom communication is not permitted by this Rule . [9] In the case of a represented organization, this Rule prohibits communications with a constituent of the organization who supervises, ...

What is RPC 219. Opinion?

Opinion rules that a lawyer may communicate with a custodian of public records, pursuant to the North Carolina Public Records Act, for the purpose of making a request to examine public records related to the representation although the custodian is an adverse party whose lawyer does not consent to the communication.

What is the 2002 Ethics Opinion 8?

Opinion rules that a lawyer who is appointed the guardian ad litem for a minor plaintiff in a tort action and is represented in this capacity by legal counsel, must be treated by opposing counsel as a represented party and , therefore , direct contact with the guardian ad litem, without consent of counsel, is prohibited.

What is the purpose of the 2006 Ethics Opinion?

Opinion explores the extent to which a lawyer may communicate with employees or officials of a represented government entity. 2006 Formal Ethics Opinion 19. Opinion rules that the prohibition against communications with represented persons does not apply to a lawyer acting solely as a guardian ad litem.

Who can communicate directly with the pathologist?

RPC 184. Opinion rules that a lawyer for an opposing party may communicate directly with the pathologist who performed an autopsy on the plaintiff's decedent without the consent of the personal representative for the decedent's estate.

Can a lawyer communicate with an adverse corporate party?

Opinion rules that a lawyer may not communicate with an adverse corporate party's house counsel, who appears in the case as a corporate manager, without the consent of the corporation's independent counsel. RPC 132.

Dorothea Elaine Laster

Unless the court ordered opposing counsel to communicate about something specific by a certain date, he doesn’t have to. It can be frustrating when opposing counsel will not communicate when it would seem that professionalism would dictate that they should communicate. But the other attorney works for their client and no one else.

Jennifer Elizabeth Wright Satagaj

Your daughter should talk to her attorney. There is not enough information to be able to determine the appropriate next steps. It may be appropriate to request to modify the temporary orders. It may be appropriate to request the case go to mediation. It may be appropriate to request a child custody evaluation.

Thomas John Baker

Yes, attorneys can refuse to talk to opposing counsel. They should not conduct the profession in that manner, but some do. The attorney for the mother needs to take whatever steps he or she can take through the court or through mediation to attempt to overcome the situation with the other counsel.

Can a DSS lawyer contact opposing counsel?

The DSS lawyer is correct. A party who is represented by counsel cannot be contacted directly by opposing counsel unless that party and opposing counsel expressly authorized direct contact.

Can a lawyer talk to you without your attorney's permission?

That is correct - he should not be talking to you without your attorney's permission.

Can a lawyer talk to you directly?

No, they cannot talk to you directly. All communication has to go through the lawyers in order to protect your rights and attorney-client privilege.

Can you talk to opposing counsel?

There is no rule against your talking to the opposing party, or to the opposing party's attorney. There is a rule, however, that applies to attorneys only, that would prevent opposing counsel from responding to your communication, unless he had permission from your attorney... 2 found this answer helpful.

Is it a good idea to speak to an Opp counsel?

In general, it is not a good idea to directly communicate with Opp counsel. First, opp counsel should not respond; second, it sends a message that you are bypassing your atty, which may undermine his work in the case; third, it may be an insult to your atty. 2 found this answer helpful. found this helpful.

Can you communicate with opposing counsel?

I would not advise you to communicate with opposing counsel while you are still represented. Opposing counsel will probably not reply to you, but will most likely forward your communication to your attorney. I would recommend that you speak to your attorney in person, and insist that he or she draft the letter to opposing counsel that you are contemplating sending.

Can opposing counsel respond to you?

It is very unlikely that opposing counsel will respond to you, but you are not prohibited from sending him/her an email. That being said, it is a very bad idea for you to do so. Nothing good can come from this. Your lawyer, who is paid to do this, has his/her reasons for not engaging in your proposed communication. Your email will likely somehow end up before the Court (attached to a declaration or...

When communicating with the accused in a criminal matter, must a government lawyer comply with this rule?

When communicating with the accused in a criminal matter, a government lawyer must comply with this Rule in addition to honoring the constitutional rights of the accused. The fact that a communication does not violate a state or federal constitutional right is insufficient to establish that the communication is permissible under this Rule. ...

Can a lawyer request a court order?

A lawyer may also seek a court order in exceptional circumstances to authorize a communication that would otherwise be prohibited by this Rule, for example, where communication with a person represented by counsel is necessary to avoid reasonably certain injury.

Can a lawyer make a communication prohibited by this rule?

A lawyer may not make a communication prohibited by this Rule through the acts of another. See Rule 8.4 (a). Parties to a matter may communicate directly with each other, and a lawyer is not prohibited from advising a client concerning a communication that the client is legally entitled to make.

Is consent required for a lawyer to communicate with a former constituent?

Consent of the organization’s lawyer is not required for communication with a former constituent. If a constituent of the organization is represented in the matter by his or her own counsel, the consent by that counsel to a communication will be sufficient for purposes of this Rule. Compare Rule 3.4 (f).

Can a lawyer evade the requirement of obtaining the consent of counsel by closing eyes to the obvious?

See Rule 1.0 (f). Thus, the lawyer cannot evade the requirement of obtaining the consent of counsel by closing eyes to the obvious.