The simple answer is that because clients are “consumers” of the lawyer’s trade or professional work, the 93A law applies to lawyers. It is an additional “count” in a Complaint for legal malpractice. A successful 93A case can result in double or treble damages plus attorney fees.
Full Answer
The Supreme Judicial Court has held that attorneys can be held accountable under Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 93A, and that the scope can be expanded to include negligent as well as intentional misrepresentations. It has been held that Chapter 93A, Section 2 includes the practice of law as “trade or commerce” which prohibits “unfair methods of …
· Do Violations of the Building Code Violate Chapter 93A? The Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act, General Laws Chapter 93A, § 2, prohibits “unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of trade or commerce.”. Since Chapter 93A was enacted in 1967, the Commonwealth’s courts have continued to define the scope and substance of the conduct that …
· 3. 93A Standard and Misrepresentation Although many cases hold that a statement that has the “capacity to mislead” is a 93A violation, recent authority holds that test cannot be right because it is...
The Regulation of Business Practices for Consumer Protection Act, commonly referred to by its statutory chapter number, “Chapter 93A,” is a frequently utilized statute that provides individual consumers and businesses with a right to bring legal action and recover damages if they are harmed by an unfair business practice. Under the statute, “unfair or deceptive acts or practices” …
Statute of Limitations The statute of limitations for Chapter 93A claims is four (4) years from the date of the alleged injury or deceptive act which gave rise to the lawsuit. If a plaintiff files their claims after the limitations date has run the case against your business can be dismissed.
93A, is a powerful legal tool that allows the Attorney General and consumers to take action against unfair or deceptive conduct in the marketplace. The Consumer Protection Act allows lawsuits against unfair or deceptive acts or practices taken against consumers.
The Consumer Protection Act (M.G.L. Chapter 93A ) protects people from unfair and misleading business actions. It gives buyers the right to sue in court and get back money they lost. The law also allows businesses to sue other businesses.
Some helpful tips on how to handle the receipt of a 93A demand letter:Do Not Assume the Claim is Valid. ... Evaluate the Potential Damages. ... The "Reasonable" Settlement Offer. ... Keep All Evidence When You Receive the Letter.
Filing a Chapter 93A Complaint in MassachusettsBe sent to the business at least thirty (30) days prior to the filing of an actual lawsuit;State that the claimant is a "consumer" - someone who engages in commerce for primarily personal, family, or household purposes;Identify the claimant's full name and address;More items...
Consumer Protection Act is one of the main laws that provide protection to consumers in India. The Act was introduced in the year 1986 and then amended in the year 2002 through the Consumer Protection Amendment Act, 2002. In this article, we look at the protection afforded to the consumers through the Act.
How to Respond to a Demand LetterEvaluate the letter. The first step after receiving a letter is to carefully read it and evaluate its merits. ... Determine its intent. People send demand letters for all sorts of reasons. ... Calculate the claims. ... Is a lawyer needed? ... Respond within allotted time frame.
How to write a demand letterEstablish facts. Don't assume everyone knows the facts. ... Refer to evidence. If there's evidence (like a contract), you don't need to include it, but you should refer to it. ... Make a demand. Be specific as to what you want. ... Set a deadline and establish method of payment. ... Offer a consequence.
At some point after you send your demand letter, the employer, through its attorney, will respond.
The simple answer is that because clients are “consumers” of the lawyer’s trade or professional work, the 93A law applies to lawyers. It is an additional “count” in a Complaint for legal malpractice. A successful 93A case can result in double or treble damages plus attorney fees.
93A requirements are outlined in of the Consumer Protection Statute, Section 9. The basics are simple, the application of the law, however, can be complex. To initiate a 93A case, the client must send a written demand letter to the attorney specifying and “reasonably describing the unfair or deceptive act or practice relied upon and the injury suffered.” You will need an attorney to draft and send the 93A letter as they are complicated and must stand up to Court scrutiny if you later want the right to multiple damages and attorney fees.
The Supreme Judicial Court has held that attorneys can be held accountable under Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 93A, and that the scope can be expanded to include negligent as well as intentional misrepresentations. It has been held that Chapter 93A, Section 2 includes the practice of law as “trade or commerce” which prohibits “unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce.” A lawyer’s liability for multiple damages and attorney fees may generally be found under Chapter 93A, section 9.
To add a layer of confusion, the attorney’s malpractice insurance carrier may or may not be responsible to the client/consumer under 93A and Chapter 176D as well. This is because, once you can show clear liability and collectability, the attorney’s malpractice insurance company is obligated to make a reasonable offer of settlement. While the insurance policy may not cover 93A damages (multiple damages and attorney fees), it would obligate the company to take the claim seriously and focus on resolution to prevent their insured from facing multiple damages. In many cases, a well drafted and properly served 93A letter will result in the insurance company asking to negotiate or mediate prior to even responding, so that they will not be subject to failing to make an unfair offer.
It can be challenging to apply 93A because it is vague and has a low threshold of proof necessary to establish liability. Additionally, 93A is extremely complex. It has many inclusions, exclusions, permutations and penumbras, and there are tens of thousands of decided cases creating precedent dealing with the law.
The 93A standard for trade dress infringement is the same as the Federal trade dress infringement standard. – Bern Unlimited v. The Burton Corp. (D. Mass. 2015)
Nearly all business disputes in Massachusetts are governed by Chapter 93A. The winning plaintiff under Chapter 93A is entitled to an automatic award of its attorney's fees, and may be awarded up to three times its actual damages. Neither of these enhanced damages is possible under regular Massachusetts law.
An appellate court has the power to determine whether a trial court ruling in favor of 93A liability actually falls within the “boundaries” of 93A, as determined by the appellate court, and to overturn the trial court decision if it is outside those boundaries. – Silva v.
The plaintiff in a business case must prove a distinct injury due to the unfair or deceptive practice apart from a mere contract breach or tort. – Auto Flat Car Crushers v. Hanover Ins. (Mass. 2014)
A negligent misrepresentation cannot give rise to 93A liability unless it is “extreme” or “egregious.” – Baker v. Goldman Sachs (First Cir. 2014)
Although many cases hold that a statement that has the “ capacity to mislead” is a 93A violation, recent authority holds that test cannot be right because it is a mere test of causation without regard to whether the representation was in any way culpable. – Baker v.
It can be challenging to apply 93A because it is vague and has a low threshold of proof necessary to establish liability. Additionally, 93A is extremely complex. It has many inclusions, exclusions, permutations and penumbras, and there are tens of thousands of decided cases creating precedent dealing with the law.
The 93A standard for trade dress infringement is the same as the Federal trade dress infringement standard. – Bern Unlimited v. The Burton Corp. (D. Mass. 2015)
Nearly all business disputes in Massachusetts are governed by Chapter 93A. The winning plaintiff under Chapter 93A is entitled to an automatic award of its attorney's fees, and may be awarded up to three times its actual damages. Neither of these enhanced damages is possible under regular Massachusetts law.
An appellate court has the power to determine whether a trial court ruling in favor of 93A liability actually falls within the "boundaries" of 93A, as determined by the appellate court, and to overturn the trial court decision if it is outside those boundaries. – Silva v. Steadfast (Mass. App. 2015)
The plaintiff in a business case must prove a distinct injury due to the unfair or deceptive practice apart from a mere contract breach or tort. – Auto Flat Car Crushers v. Hanover Ins. (Mass. 2014).
Cases holding that a 93A claim cannot be brought include Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Feldstein (D. Mass. 2013). 93A claims against former employees for misappropriation of trade secrets were dismissed as they were within the "intra-enterprise" exception to 93A.
A negligent misrepresentation cannot give rise to 93A liability unless it is "extreme" or "egregious." – Baker v. Goldman Sachs (First Cir. 2014)
The Regulation of Business Practices for Consumer Protection Act, commonly referred to by its statutory chapter number, “Chapter 93A,” is a frequently utilized statute that provides individual consumers and businesses with a right to bring legal action and recover damages if they are harmed by an unfair business practice. ...
The court agreed that pre-litigation fees are not recoverable under Chapter 93A, stating that it “is aware of no authority that permits the award of fees incurred before the litigation began and that do not bear directly on its preparation.”.
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 93A is known as the “Consumer Protection Act.” It regulates conduct between consumers and businesses under § nine, but also has some of the same powerful remedies for resolving disputes between businesses in § 11. This law prohibits unfair and deceptive trade practices.
In one federal case, Arthur D. Little, Inc. was faced with a failure of a Korean company to pay bills for services that were rendered over a lengthy period of time.
Chapter 93A, Section 9 provides a right of action to any person, other than one involved in trade or commerce under Section 11, who has been injured by any method, act or practice declared unlawful by Chapter 93A, Section 2 or certain other statutes.
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 93A , § 2 (“Chapter 93A”) states: “Unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce are hereby declared unlawful.”. From that simple statement, numerous acts and practices can serve as the basis for a suit alleging a violation of c. 93A.
Chapter 93A, Section 11 provides a right of action to any person engaged in trade or commerce who suffers a loss of money or property from another person’s use, in trade or commerce, of an unfair method of competition or an unfair or deceptive act or practice. Unlike Section 9, Section 11 does not require a demand letter prior to initiating suit, ...
Under the definitions of Chapter 93A, any person involved in trade or commerce, including corporate persons, can sue and be sued for violating the statute . Chapter 93A contains two different regimes for relief, depending on whether a claimant is a consumer, in which case suit is brought under Section 9, or an entity engaged in trade or commerce, ...