what can an attorney do for better judicial efficiency

Judicial efficiency is often promoted through the use of written arguments and motions over oral arguments. Instead of a judge sitting through live witness testimony and argument, a packet of information is written up that includes each side’s sworn witness statements (called affidavits or declarations) and legal arguments with case citations.

Full Answer

How can we make our courts more efficient?

Aug 12, 2010 · This country's courts could save enormous amounts of time and money using technology. But in order to do so smoothly and efficiently we need two things: 1) education, and 2) standards. Lawyers ...

How can standardization improve efficiency in the judicial system?

Apr 14, 2015 · The Rule One Initiative identifies and recommends court processes and procedures that provide greater access, efficiency, and accountability. The American College of Trial Lawyers is composed of the best of the trial bar from the United States and Canada and is widely considered to be the premier professional trial organization in America.

Why is the judicial system so bad at technology?

the agenda of future national, state, and local judicial and attorney training pro-grams should center on how judges and attorneys can become more efficient and how to use the gains in efficiency to secure both timeliness and case resolution quality. Furthermore, because the results, which demonstrate that greater effi-

What are a lawyer’s obligations to the client and the court?

issued by Attorney Adjudicators. An Attorney Adjudicator can issue an allowance decision that does not require a hearing. See. 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.942, 416.1442. Of the 740,000 dispositions issued by administrative law judges, approximately 629,000 dispositions resulted in an allowance or denial decision, and the

How can a lawyer become more efficient?

Whether you're a busy attorney or a multi-tasking paralegal, these tips can help you have a productive day, every day.Reap the Benefits of Exercise. ... Write a To-Do List Before Getting Started. ... Eat the Frog First Thing in the Morning. ... Harness Your Energy Effectively. ... Carve Out Distraction-Free Time.More items...•Aug 16, 2016

How can we improve the legal system?

Criminal Justice Policy SolutionsPromote Community Safety through Alternatives to Incarceration. ... Create Fair and Effective Policing Practices. ... Promote Justice in Pre-Trial Services & Practices. ... Enhance Prosecutorial Integrity. ... Ensure Fair Trials and Quality Indigent Defense. ... Encourage Equitable Sentencing.More items...

What makes a lawyer a good lawyer?

So what differentiates a “lawyer” from a “good lawyer”? Here are the top 5 qualities of a good lawyer: responsiveness, analytical skills, good research skills, speaking skills, and listening skills. ... All lawyers should respond to their clients, law partners, secretaries, and anyone else involved in a case.

What step must be taken to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the judicial system?

The project carefully introduced three interventions all intended to enhance court efficiency: 1) installation of e-Court system, a computerized case tracking and management tool; 2) massive case decongestion effort that systematically identifies long-standing cases for resolution; and 3) streamlining of trial rules to ...Mar 24, 2017

What does judicial effectiveness mean?

Judicial effectiveness requires efficient and fair judicial systems to ensure that laws are fully respected and appropriate legal actions are taken against violations. ... Judicial independence, • Quality of the judicial process, and • Favoritism in decisions of government officials.

What personality type is best for lawyer?

According to a 1993 study conducted by Larry Richard, the most prevalent personality types for lawyers are:ISTJ (17.8 per cent)INTJ (13.1 per cent)ESTJ (10.3 per cent)ENTP (9.7 per cent)INTP (9.4 per cent)ENTJ (9.0 per cent)Jan 21, 2019

What are the weaknesses of a lawyer?

WeaknessesSkills gaps.Poor work habits.Client development.Negative personal characteristics.Sep 16, 2019

What type of person should be a lawyer?

Fellow attorneys, judges, court clerks, clients, etc., are all crucial to a lawyer's job. You have to be a “people person” to succeed. Sure, lawyers must always have their clients' interests at heart, but those interests are often best served by exercising effective strategy (read: compromise) with opposing counsel.Sep 9, 2019

What does efficiency mean in law?

Efficiency – broadly defined as the time it takes to complete a given task – can mean the difference between a troubled firm with a harried owner and a prospering one led by an attorney who can spend most of his or her time practicing law.

Do attorneys track billable hours?

Track all your time, not just billable hours: No attorney would say that he or she enjoys tracking billable time, but most would agree that it’s a necessary evil. To understand where you are squandering valuable hours (if not days), try tracking how you spend all your time, even if you only do it for a week.

Is efficiency innate?

It’s important to remember that efficiency is not innate. It’s learned. As is the case with anything learned, improvement is possible. Here are six tips – ranging from simple to strategic – attorneys can try to boost their efficiency.

Why is the criminal justice system important?

The state criminal court system is an important institution in the attempt to limitcriminal activity and to restore a measure of justice when laws are broken.1 Therelationships among state judges, prosecutors, and criminal defense attorneys con-stitute the criminal court system, while the outcomes of their individual and jointdecisions are basic to the public’s perception of the system’s effectiveness. Onekey measure of court effectiveness is how long it takes to resolve cases. The U.S.Supreme Court emphasized the importance of the speedy trial in the criminalprocess by stating that this right was “as fundamental as any of the rights securedby the Sixth Amendment.”2 The Texas Supreme Court also reminded observershow insidious court delay can be:

What is the goal of Chapter 4?

primary goal of this project is to add conceptual clarity and systematicevidence to the debate about case processing quality and timeliness. Chapter 4begins by developing an analytical framework called the productivity frontier toshow how the goals of timeliness and quality are affected by the concept of effi-ciency. Efficiency is a pertinent and helpful idea because high levels of both timeli-ness and quality can be shown to be achievable in more efficient court systems.Our operational definition of case processing quality focuses on a courtsystem’s ability to provide due process through individual attention to cases (ex-amined in Chapter 3) and effective advocacy. This phase of the project draws onthe work of the TCPS and other court management experts to construct an ob-servable and measurable set of work-related factors that we believe are associ-ated with effective advocacy. Over the past decades, court practitioners and re-searchers have isolated certain fundamental aspects of court operations and caseprocessing that, when present, create the opportunity for effective advocacy. Weargue that meaningful and effective advocacy is more likely to occur in criminaljustice systems that are well managed, adequately resourced, sufficientlyadversarial, and home to competent counsel. We do not claim that we have as-sembled an exhaustive set of factors that definitively define effective advocacy.Rather, our goal is to suggest measurable elements, determine what findingsflow from an analysis of those elements, and provide a concrete basis for im-proved future research.

Is timeliness and quality of justice mutually exclusive?

Timeliness and the quality of justice are not mutually exclusive either in theoryor in fact. Expeditious criminal case resolution is found to be associated withcourt systems in which the conditions also promote effective advocacy. Becauseeffective advocacy underlies due process and equal protection of the law, it is anintegral aspect of the broader concept of quality case processing. The evidencefrom this study suggests that well-performing courts should be expected to excelin terms of both timeliness and quality.

Which study found that both firm-specific and country-specific factors explain variation in corporate leverage ratios in seven developed countries

Academic interest in studying corporate capital structure decisions using cross-country data increased with Rajan and Zingales (1995), who found that both firm-specific and country-specific factors explain variation in corporate leverage ratios in seven developed countries. Booth et al. (2001) found that firm-specific factors in developing countries affect capital structure decisions in a similar way as Rajan and Zingales (1995) had found in developed countries. However, macro-factors in these

What is the importance of Armen Alchian?

One of the most important insights was related to organizations of higher education and the existence of tenure. However, the primary empirical predictions of his explanation for tenure have remained unexplored. This paper provides some empirical evidence on these predictions. Alchian’s predictions receive strong support. The results indicate that tenure is significantly more likely to occur in nonprofit institutions than in for-profit institutions, tenure is more common in public institutions than in private nonprofit institutions, and among private nonprofit institutions the incidence of tenure is positively related to the level of endowment support and negatively related to the institution’s reliance on tuition and fees.

What happens if the Court does not wish to hire another judicial officer to assist Commissioner Cimo?

If the Court does not wish to hire another judicial officer to assist Commissioner Cimo, the Courtshould consider giving the Hearing Officers the power to hold pretrial conferences and makerecommendations in non-support matters.

Why were court commissioners created?

The Court Commissioners were created to help alleviate crowded dockets in criminal cases and tohelp expedite cases. More specifically, the criminal commissioner system was designed in part toeliminate the delay and service of process problems in the criminal justice system in JeffersonParish. Before the system was implemented, an average of sixty-five (65) days passed between adefendant’s arrest and his arraignment. The system prior to the Criminal Commissioners wasperceived as moving too slowly. Under the prior system, two (2) problems existed: (1) too muchtime passed from the point that the Sheriff’s Office prepared the arrest report and sent it to theDistrict Attorney’s Office for the screening decision by the District Attorney for a determination ofwhether the evidence was good enough for the filing of the Bill of Information. Only after theInformation was filed with the Clerk of Court’s Office and allotted to a particular division of courtcould the arraignment be scheduled under the prior system, and (2) when the arrestees left jail, theywere not given a court date for their arraignment. When the arraignment was finally set, thedefendants had to be located and served with a subpoena notifying them of the arraignment. Manydefendants could not be located or simply ignored the subpoena.

What is the LA Rev Stat 9:332?

We explored whether the Court can benefit from utilizing La. Rev. Stat. § 9:332, which allows anytrial judge in a custody or visitation proceeding in Louisiana to order the disputing parties to mediatetheir disputes. This statute was examined in an effort to determine whether the Court can benefitfrom utilizing family mediation in the large number of custody and visitation cases that come beforethe Court.

How long does it take to get a hearing before the Domestic Commissioner?

Other than domestic abuse petitions, matters that are truly of an emergency nature14 and supportissues that are heard by the Hearing Officers, it takes over three (3) months to get a hearing in amatter on the docket of the Domestic Commissioner. Attorneys and litigants are now complainingabout the delay associated with setting a matter before Commissioner Cimo. They recognize thatCommissioner Cimo is literally swamped with work and needs some assistance. The following isa list of recommendations to the Court that should reduce the delay associated with scheduling ahearing before the Domestic Commissioner. The first group of recommendations affect thepersonnel in the Domestic Commissioner’s Court and would require the Court to expend additionalsums of money. The second group consists of administrative changes that the court could implementwith little effort that could significantly improve the efficiency in the 24th JDC.

Where is the 24th Judicial District Court in Gretna, Louisiana?

This study was commissioned by the sixteen (16) Judges of the Twenty-Fourth Judicial DistrictCourt (hereinafter referred to as the Court or 24th JDC) located at 200 Derbigny Street in the GretnaCourthouse Annex Building in Gretna, Louisiana 70053. The Court consists of Divisions A throughP. Additionally, the judges are assisted by three (3) Commissioners, two (2) criminal and one (1)domestic, as governed by LRS § 13:717. The Commissioners Courts are located at 802 SecondStreet in Gretna, Louisiana a few blocks from the Courthouse Annex Building.

Who were the judges Bobby Harges met with?

Bobby Harges initially met with Judges Robert M. Murphy, Martha E. Sassone and Henry G.Sullivan on September 10, 2001. He then met with Criminal Commissioner Carol Kiff and DomesticCommissioner Craig Cimo to get a better understanding of their roles and responsibilities. TheCommissioners provided us with all reports that they submitted to the Court evaluating theirperformance for calendar years 1999 and 2000.1 The reports from Commissioner Cimo were datasheets with totals of the number of tasks he performed during those years. Commissioner Kiffprovided us with detailed narrative reports entitled, “Criminal Commissioners’ Report to the Judges

What is the process of mediation?

Mediation is a process whereby a neutral third person assists parties to resolve their disputes in away that is acceptable to all parties. As a neutral party, the mediator, unlike a judge or arbitrator,does not evaluate the case but simply facilitates discussions between the parties in an effort to reach