what attorney was appointed to represent gideon

Who was Gideon’s lawyer?

Fortas and Krash represented him before the Supreme Court, and Turner was his lawyer when he was acquitted at the second trial. As we enter the 50th anniversary of Gideon, it is important to remember the contributions these lawyers made to this historic case.

What was the Supreme Court decision in Gideon v Gideon?

Gideon next filed a handwritten petition in the Supreme Court of the United States. The Court agreed to hear the case to resolve the question of whether the right to counsel guaranteed under the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution applies to defendants in state court.

What is a famous line from Gideon's petition to the Supreme Court?

A famous line in Gideon's petition to the Supreme Court reads: "It makes no difference how old I am or what color I am or _____________." Where is the U.S. Supreme Court located? What payment does an attorney representing a client in a Supreme Court case receive?

Why was Gideon charged with breaking and entering in Florida?

Gideon was charged with breaking and entering with the intent to commit a misdemeanor, which is a felony under Florida law. At trial, Gideon appeared in court without an attorney. In open court, he asked the judge to appoint counsel for him because he could not afford an attorney.

How did Gideon get relief from his conviction?

What court did Gideon file a petition in?

What was the charge against Gideon?

Why did the Florida Supreme Court deny Gideon's request for a court appointed attorney?

What was Gideon's charge?

Which amendment did Brady v. Brady violate?

Which amendment guarantees a fair trial?

See 4 more

About this website

Who was Gideon's lawyer in the Supreme Court?

Abe FortasWainwright. Abe Fortas, a Washington, D.C., attorney and future Supreme Court justice, represented Gideon for free before the high court. He eschewed the safer argument that Gideon was a special case because he had only had an eighth-grade education.

Who appointed the Gideon case to the Supreme Court?

The Supreme Court's decision was announced on March 18, 1963, and delivered by Justice Hugo Black. The decision was announced as being unanimous in favor of Gideon. Two concurring opinions were written by Justices Clark and Harlan. Justice Douglas wrote a separate opinion.

How did Gideon get a lawyer?

At trial, Gideon appeared in court without an attorney. In open court, he asked the judge to appoint counsel for him because he could not afford an attorney. The trial judge denied Gideon's request because Florida law only permitted appointment of counsel for poor defendants charged with capital offenses.

When Gideon request a lawyer be appointed in his case what was he told?

On arraignment, he told the trial judge of his lack of funds to hire a lawyer and asked the court to appoint one for him. Betts was advised that it was not the practice in that county to appoint counsel for indigent defendants except in murder and rape cases.

Why did Abe Fortas represent Gideon?

Since Gideon was penniless, the Supreme Court appointed a lawyer to argue the appeal on his behalf. Abe Fortas was named by the Court for this purpose. Fortas asked Ralph Temple, an associate, and me to assist him in writing the brief.

Why was the ACLU involved in Gideon's case?

The case was argued by future Supreme Court Justice Abe Fortas, with support from the ACLU, which urged the Court to overturn the conviction of Clarence Gideon, a petty thief from Florida who had been forced to defend himself after being denied a lawyer.

Why is it called Gideon's Trumpet?

The movie was a Hallmark Hall of Fame presentation produced by Worldvision, and aired on CBS. The name is a play on words, using the defendant's last name and invoking the biblical story in which Gideon ordered his small force to attack a much larger enemy camp.

Why did the court believe that Gideon?

Why did the Court believe that Gideon could not defend himself? The court felt that Gideon, as well as most other people, did not have the legal expertise to defend himself adequately in a criminal proceeding, and that legal counsel for a defendant is necessary to insure a fair trial.

Who won the Gideon v Wainwright case?

In 1963, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor of Gideon, guaranteeing the right to legal counsel for criminal defendants in federal and state courts. Following the decision, Gideon was given another trial with an appointed lawyer and was acquitted of the charges.

Who defended Gideon during the first trial and what was the outcome?

The Court took up his case in 1963 and appointed Abe Fortas, a renowned lawyer and future Supreme Court justice, to defend Gideon.

What did Justice Hugo Black Think about Gideon's appeal?

After the Florida Supreme Court denied his petition, Gideon appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which reviewed his case in 1963. The Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision written by Justice Hugo Black, ruled that Gideon's conviction was unconstitutional because Gideon was denied a defense lawyer at trial.

Did Gideon seem capable of defending himself how could a lawyer have helped him?

Gideon was unprepared and did not seem to have the legal training necessary to defend himself. A lawyer would have been more knowledgeable about the nuances of courtroom procedure and could have helped him by calling appropriate witnesses on his behalf and by challenging the prosecution's witnesses.

What did the Supreme Court rule in Gideon's case?

In 1963, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor of Gideon, guaranteeing the right to legal counsel for criminal defendants in federal and state courts. Following the decision, Gideon was given another trial with an appointed lawyer and was acquitted of the charges.

What was the court's ruling in the first Gideon trial?

In Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution requires the states to provide defense attorneys to criminal defendants charged with serious offenses who cannot afford lawyers themselves.

What was unusual about the petition that Gideon filed with the Supreme Court of the United States?

3. What was unusual about the petition Gideon filed with the Supreme Court of the United States? The petition Gideon filed with the Supreme Court of the United States was handwritten and prepared by Gideon himself without any legal assistance.

Why did the Court believe that Gideon?

Why did the Court believe that Gideon could not defend himself? The court felt that Gideon, as well as most other people, did not have the legal expertise to defend himself adequately in a criminal proceeding, and that legal counsel for a defendant is necessary to insure a fair trial.

Gideon v. Wainwright | Case Brief for Law Students

Points of Law - Legal Principles in this Case for Law Students.. Powell explained, in the light of the facts outlined in the forepart of this opinion — the ignorance and illiteracy of the defendants, their youth, the circumstances of public hostility, the imprisonment and the close surveillance of the defendants by the military forces, the fact that their friends and families were all in ...

Gideon v. Wainwright - Case Summary and Case Brief - Legal Dictionary

The Bill of Rights that are “fundament and essential” to a fair trial are incorporated to the states through the 14 th Amendment. This encompasses the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. In Betts v.Brady, 316 U.S. 455 (1963), the court assumed the state’s refusal to appoint counsel was not a violation of the fundamental principals of fairness and no due process violation occurred.

Gideon v. Wainwright Case Summary: What You Need to Know - Findlaw

Criminal defendants were not always provided an attorney if they couldn't afford one. The Supreme Court forced states to do so in a series of cases that included Gideon v. Wainwright.

Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963) - Justia Law

Gideon v. Wainwright: In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court established that the Fourteenth Amendment creates a right for criminal defendants who cannot pay for their own lawyers to have the state appoint attorneys on their behalf.

Who was the attorney for Clarence Gideon?

On June 25, 1962, the Supreme Court appointed Abe Fortas to represent Clarence Gideon in the case then known as Gideon v Cochran. 5 I was the attorney for the state of Florida in the case.

How long has it been since the Supreme Court ruled in Gideon v. Wainwright?

It has been almost 50 years since the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its decision in Gideon v. Wainwright. 1 At the Supreme Court and in the Circuit Court for Bay County, Fla., where Clarence Gideon received a second trial after his case was remanded by the Court, he received excellent representation by three outstanding lawyers - Abe Fortas, Abe Krash, and W. Fred Turner. There were others involved on his side, but these three were his primary advocates. Fortas and Krash represented him before the Supreme Court, and Turner was his lawyer when he was acquitted at the second trial. As we enter the 50th anniversary of Gideon, it is important to remember the contributions these lawyers made to this historic case. I have had the privilege of knowing these men and would like to say a few words about them.

How many jurors were there in Gideon's second trial?

When the six prospective jurors were placed in the jury box in Gideon’s second trial, Turner knew four of them. He struck two of them from the panel because one was a “teetotaler” who had no sympathy for drinkers, and the other “would convict his own grandmother.” 29 These two were replaced by two more jurors, both of whom Turner knew. 30 Turner was very satisfied with the final six jurors. Of the six jurors, three were gamblers. This was particularly helpful because Gideon’s explanation for having so much change in his pockets when arrested for breaking and entering the Bay Harbor Poolroom with intent to take beer, wine, and coins from the cigarette machine and juke box was that he had won it while gambling. 31

Which amendment gave the right to counsel in felony cases?

Fortas and Krash further argued that the right to appointment of counsel in felony cases had risen to the level of a fundamental right in the years since 1942, and it was only appropriate to extend an absolute right to counsel to state, as well as federal, cases through the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment .

How did Turner select jurors?

26 Therefore, selecting the jurors was extremely important. He said that he “often selected jurors by looking at their shoes.” 27 Presumably, shoes that are “spit shined” indicate a person who is meticulous almost to a fault and might not be entirely sympathetic to a “down and out” defendant who has made mistakes in his life. When trying cases, he wanted to know as much as possible about each prospective juror. He told me the story of a time he traveled to Blountstown to try a case. Blountstown is in another county, about 40 miles northeast of Panama City. He took a friend with him who had been raised there. His friend stood in the rear of the courtroom and, by prearranged signal consisting of pulling on his ear, signaled to Turner whether each potential juror was a kind-hearted, generous person who might be sympathetic to a defendant or a “law and order” type who was likely to vote in favor of the prosecution. 28

Who was the judge in the Johnson v. Johnson case?

Fortas entered the case. He presented his argument on Johnson’s behalf to Judge J.C. Hutcheson of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, but Hutcheson wanted to wait until later in the fall, when the entire court could hear the case. Fortas then directly presented the case to Justice Hugo Black, because, he said, “ [Justice] Black will handle it expeditiously” in his capacity as presiding Supreme Court Justice for the Fifth Circuit. 12 Fortas argued that a federal court should not enjoin a state-run election. 13 Arguments took place for a four-hour period in Justice Black’s office in the Supreme Court building. Stevenson’s lawyers argued vote fraud, while Fortas argued that the U.S. district court had no jurisdiction in the matter. 14 “Obviously, the very [astute] Fortas knew [that such an argument] would strike a chord with [Justice Black], who was forever defending ‘Our Federalism,’ especially states’ rights in the federal system.” 15 Fortas also argued that delay in obtaining judicial relief would effectively bar Johnson from running in the general election. Justice Black ruled with Fortas on September 28, 1948, in Johnson’s favor and set aside the challenged order on the ground that the district court had lacked jurisdiction to enjoin the state election. “Johnson was rapidly certified as [the] Democratic candidate and won election to the Senate in November 1948.” 16

Who is Abe Fortas?

Abe Fortas was the editor in chief of the Yale Law Journal. After graduation he served as a faculty member at Yale. He then went to work for the government during the New Deal. In 1946 he was a founding partner of Arnold, Fortas & Porter. It became a very prominent Washington, D.C., law firm. The firm today is known as Arnold & Porter. With offices in many cities and over 800 lawyers, it is one of the largest law firms in the world. 2 When Fortas was appointed as Associate Justice of the Supreme Court in 1965, his name was dropped from the name of the law firm.

What did Gideon do in his case?

In his petition, he claimed his Sixth Amendment right had been violated because the judge refused to appoint counsel. The Florida Supreme Court denied Gideon’s petition. Later, from his cell at the Florida State Prison in Raiford, making use of the prison library and writing in pencil on prison stationery, Gideon appealed to the United States Supreme Court in a suit against the Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections, H. G. Cochran. Cochran retired and was replaced by Louie L. Wainwright before the Supreme Court heard the case. Gideon argued in his appeal that he had been denied counsel and therefore that his Sixth Amendment rights, as applied to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment, had been violated.

What is the meaning of the Gideon v Wainwright case?

Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court rule d that the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution requires U.S. states to provide attorneys to criminal defendants who are unable to afford their own. The case extended the right to counsel, which had been found under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments to impose requirements on the federal government, by imposing those requirements upon the states as well.

How long did Gideon serve in prison?

At the conclusion of the trial, the jury returned a guilty verdict. The court sentenced Gideon to serve five years in the state prison.

What were the criteria for civil litigation before Gideon?

Before Gideon, civil litigants were able to access counsel only based on the following three stringent criteria: whether the case had implications had any implications for a private corporation; whether their not receiving counsel would render the trial unfair or in some way compromised in procedure; and whether the case affected the government's interests. After Gideon, many more litigants were eligible for counsel, giving rise to the "Civil Gideon movement".

How did Gideon die?

The jury acquitted Gideon after one hour of deliberation. After his acquittal, Gideon resumed his previous life and married sometime later. He died of cancer in Fort Lauderdale on January 18, 1972, at age 61. Gideon's family in Missouri accepted his body and laid him to rest in an unmarked grave.

What changes have been made to the criminal justice system since the Gideon decision?

Many changes have been made in the prosecution and legal representation of indigent defendants since the Gideon decision. The decision created and then expanded the need for public defenders which had previously been rare. For example, immediately following the decision, Florida required public defenders in all of the state's circuit courts. The need for more public defenders also led to a need to ensure that they were properly trained in criminal defense in order to allow defendants to receive as fair a trial as possible. Several states and counties followed suit. Washington D.C., for instance, has created a training program for their public defenders, who must receive rigorous training before they are allowed to represent defendants, and must continue their training in order to remain current in criminal law, procedure, and practices. In 2010, a public defender's office in the South Bronx, The Bronx Defenders, created the Center for Holistic Defense, which has helped other public defender offices from Montana to Massachusetts, developed a model of public defense called holistic defense or holistic advocacy. In it, criminal defense attorneys work on interdisciplinary teams, alongside civil attorneys, social workers, and legal advocates to help clients with not only direct but also collateral aspects of their criminal cases. More recently the American Bar Association and the National Legal Aid and Defender Association have set minimum training requirements, caseload levels, and experience requirements for defenders. There is often controversy whether caseloads set upon public defenders give them enough time to sufficiently defend their clients. Some criticize the mindset in which public defense lawyers encourage their clients to simply plead guilty. Some defenders say this is intended to lessen their own workload, while others would say it is intended to obtain a lighter sentence by negotiating a plea bargain as compared with going to trial and perhaps having a harsher sentence imposed. Tanya Greene, an ACLU lawyer, has said that that is why 90 to 95 percent of defendants do plead guilty: "You've got so many cases, limited resources, and there's no relief. You go to work, you get more cases. You have to triage."

Why did Gideon appear in court alone?

Gideon appeared in court alone as he was too poor to afford counsel, whereupon the following conversation took place:

What is the Gideon decision?

In the Gideon decision, the court said that a criminal defendant has a fundamental right to an attorney. What is meant by a fundamental right? What other rights might be considered fundamental?

When did Gideon file for certiorari?

In January 1962, Gideon filed a five-page, handwritten petition for certiorari in the United States Supreme Court seeking review of the Florida Supreme Court’s ruling. The Court accepted the writ and appointed notable Washington, D.C. attorney Abe Fortas – who himself would be ap­pointed to the Court in 1965 – to represent Gideon.

Why do states have to provide defense lawyers?

Thus, the states must provide defense lawyers, if necessary, because lawyers are essential to ensuring that accused persons are provided with a fair trial.

What is the right of an accused to a speedy trial?

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense . (Underlining added.)

Why do police have to have an attorney during interrogation?

The court held that a suspect in custody has the right to an attorney during a police interrogation because of the possibility that a suspect may incriminate himself, which violates the 5th Amendment right not to be compelled to testify against oneself.

Which amendment gives the right to legal counsel?

Explain the Sixth Amendment right of a person accused of a crime to have legal counsel.

Do criminal defendants have a right to not be represented by counsel?

Criminal defendants also have a right not to be represented by counsel but they must get permission from the trial judge. Why do you think judges are reluctant to grant this request?

How did Gideon get relief from his conviction?

Gideon sought relief from his conviction by filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Florida Supreme Court. In his petition, Gideon challenged his conviction and sentence on the ground that the trial judge’s refusal to appoint counsel violated Gideon’s constitutional rights. The Florida Supreme Court denied Gideon’s petition.

What court did Gideon file a petition in?

The Florida Supreme Court denied Gideon’s petition. Gideon next filed a handwritten petition in the Supreme Court of the United States. The Court agreed to hear the case to resolve the question of whether the right to counsel guaranteed under the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution applies to defendants in state court.

What was the charge against Gideon?

Gideon was charged with breaking and entering with the intent to commit a misdemeanor, which is a felony under Florida law. At trial, Gideon appeared in court without an attorney. In open court, he asked the judge to appoint counsel for him because he could not afford an attorney. The trial judge denied Gideon’s request because Florida law only permitted appointment of counsel for poor defendants charged with capital offenses.

Why did the Florida Supreme Court deny Gideon's request for a court appointed attorney?

Lower Court Ruling: The trial judge denied Gideon’s request for a court-appointed attorney because, under Florida law, counsel could only be appointed for a poor defendant charged with a capital offense. The Florida Supreme Court agreed with the trial court and denied all relief.

What was Gideon's charge?

Gideon was charged with breaking and entering with the intent to commit a misdemeanor, which is a felony under Florida law.

Which amendment did Brady v. Brady violate?

455 (1942), held that the refusal to appoint counsel for an indigent defendant charged with a felony in state court did not necessarily violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Which amendment guarantees a fair trial?

The Court held that the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee of counsel is a fundamental right essential to a fair trial and, as such, applies the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In overturning Betts, Justice Black stated that “reason and reflection require us to recognize that in our adversary system of criminal justice, any person haled into court, who is too poor to hire a lawyer, cannot be assured a fair trial unless counsel is provided for him.” He further wrote that the “noble ideal” of “fair trials before impartial tribunals in which ever defendant stands equal before the law . . . cannot be realized if the poor man charged with crime has to face his accusers without a lawyer to assist him.”

Abe Fortas

Abe Krash

W. Fred Turner

• Fred Turner is the Bay County, Fla., criminal defense lawyer who represented Clarence Gideon at his second trial after the Supreme Court had ruled with Gideon and had remanded the case. Judge Robert McCrary, the circuit judge who tried Clarence Gideon both times, asked Gideon which lawyer he wanted. Turner was known as the best criminal defense law...

See more on nacdl.org

Conclusion

Notes

A Conversation with Bruce R. Jacob