The Uranium One controversy involves various theories promoted by conservative media, politicians, and commentators that characterized the sale of Uranium One to Rosatom as a $145 million bribery scandal involving Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation.No evidence of wrongdoing was ever found. Since the 2015 publication of the book Clinton Cash by Breitbart …
Feb 10, 2022 · On October 18, 2017 calls for Special Counsel Robert Mueller's resignation in the Trump-Russia collusion hoax mounted over evidence tampering in the Uranium One bribery scandal and the Clinton Foundation. The New York Post reported on Obama FBI and DOJ cover up of Russian crimes. Attn. Gen.
Jun 25, 2019 · What new documents reveal about the Uranium One deal . Unveiled memos conflict with the Justice Department's statement. And the investigation was led by then-Assistant FBI Director . Andrew McCabe, then-U.S. Attorney Rod Rosenstein, The Hill reported. Rosenstein is now the deputy attorney
Peter Schweizer, author of Clinton Cash, The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich,was one of the first to document the story behind what has become known as the Uranium One scandal. Mr.
The Uranium One bribery scandal occurred when Obama Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gave approval to a deal that allowed a Russian government enterprise to control one-fifth of all uranium producing capacity in the United States.
Bill Clinton helped his Canadian billionaire friend, Frank Giustra, obtain uranium-mining rights from Kazakhstan's dictator, Nursultan Nazarbayev. On September 6, 2005 the two flew aboard Giustra's private jet to Almaty, Kazakhstan, where they dined Nazarbayev. Clinton expressed support for Nazarbayev's bid to head the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) - an international elections monitoring group and supports democracy that would confer legitimacy on Nazarbayev corrupt regime. Joseph Mifsud served as an election watcher. Clinton's public endorsement undercut Bush administration policy critical of Kazakhstan's poor human rights record. Even then Sen. Hillary Clinton was publicly critical of Nazarbayev's poor human rights record. As of 2015, Kazakhstan has never held an election meeting international standards. Mifsud however certified that the elections met all the norms and standards of the European Union.
In February 2007, a company called Uranium One agreed to pay $3.1 billion to acquire UrAsia. Giustra would be paid $7.05 per share for a company that just two years earlier was trading at 10 cents per share. The new company, which kept the Uranium One name, was controlled by UrAsia investors with Giustra becoming a major shareholder. Besides acquiring the Kazakh reserves, Uranium One also controlled about one fifth of the uranium reserves in the United States. In April 2007, Uranium One announced the purchase of a uranium mill in Utah and more than 38,000 acres of uranium-exploration properties in four Western states, followed quickly by the acquisition of Energy Metals and its uranium holdings in Wyoming, Texas and Utah.
After Russia took control of the Uranium, the Podesta Group received $180,000 to lobby for Uranium One during the same period that the Clinton Foundation was receiving millions from U1 interests, and after Russia took majority ownership in the “20 percent” deal (source – you have to add up the years).
Between 2008 and 2010, Uranium One and Former Ur-Asia investors donated $8.65 million to the Clinton Foundation. During this period of time, Uranium One's legal hold on the Kazakhstan -based uranium deposits was in doubt. Allegedly, Uranium One executives contacted U.S. Embassy officials in Kazakhstan to help ensure the validity of their mining licenses. According to the New York Times, the State Department cable explaining the circumstances was copied to Secretary Clinton, among other individuals. In 2009, when the validity of the mining licenses was at issue, the Chairman of Uranium One, Mr. Ian Telfer, donated $1 million to the Clinton Foundation via his family charity called the Fernwood Foundation. In the same year, ARMZ acquired a 17% state in Uranium One and the parties sought an initial CFIUS review. In June 2010, Rosatom, via ARMZ, sought majority ownership in Uranium One. According to news reports, Mr. Telfer donated $250,000 to the Clinton Foundation during this crucial time. In total, Mr. Telfer donated over $2 million through 2013.
On October 22, 2010 CFIUS certified to Congress the sale of Uranium One to Rosatom of the Russian Federation. No disclosure of Russian racketeering and strong-arm tactics was made to Congress — not by Secretary Clinton, Attorney General Holder, or President Obama.
Uranium is the one viable clean energy source that does not create carbon emissions. By 2014 Russia controlled 60% of the world's uranium supply and half of all enrichment capacity. Energy was one export commodity Russia had to integrate itself into the global trading system.
The Russian commercial agent responsible for the sale and transportation of this uranium to the U.S. is the Kremlin-controlled company “Tenex” (formally, JSC Techsnabexport). Tenex is a subsidiary of Rosatom. Tenex (and by extension, Rosatom) have an American arm called “Tenam USA.”.
Alas, Putin, the neighborhood bully, also wanted the Kazakh uranium. He leaned on Kazakhstan’s dictator, who promptly arrested the official responsible for selling the uranium-mining rights to Giustra’s company. This put Uranium One’s stake in jeopardy of being seized by the Kazakh government.
The Kazakh deal enabled Giustra’s company (Ur-Asia Energy) to merge into Uranium One (a South African company), a $3.5 billion windfall. Giustra and his partners thereafter contributed tens of millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation.
Russia’s energy giant, Rosatom, would purchase 17 percent of Uranium One, and the Kazakh threat would disappear — and with it, the threat to the value of the Clinton donors’ holdings. For Putin, though, that was just a start. He didn’t want a minority stake in Uranium One, he wanted control of the uranium.
The Clintons were just doing what the Clintons do: cashing in on their “public service.”. The Obama administration, with Secretary Clinton at the forefront but hardly alone, was knowingly compromising American national-security interests.
Worse, at the time the administration approved the transfer, it knew that Rosatom’s American subsidiary was engaged in a lucrative racketeering enterprise that had already committed felony extortion, fraud, and money-laundering offenses.
From then on, the Bureau and Justice Department permitted him to participate in the Russian racketeering scheme as a “confidential source” — and he is thus known as “CS-1” in affidavits the government, years later, presented to federal court in order to obtain search and arrest warrants.
This infamous story started in 2010 when Hillary Clinton , a secretary of state, played a crucial role in the Uranium One deal. As a secretary of state, Hillary Clinton served on a government board that approved the transfer of Uranium to the Company called Uranium One.
The controversial story involving Hillary Clinton, Uranium One, the Clinton Foundation, and the Russian government continues to make noise years after it came out. This complex series of events involves a deal that Hillary Clinton made. She sold 20% of America’s Uranium supply ...
This deal allowed a Russian to acquire a controlling stake in Uranium One that reportedly gives Russians 20% control of the U.S. uranium supply. Due to Uranium being a component of nuclear weapons, this posed a serious threat to national security.
Nick Merill, the spokesman of Hillary Clinton, also did not answer questions on whether or not Clinton was ever briefed on the Uranium One deal. He stated that at every turn, this controversy was debunked. Merill further added that Trump’s statement saying, “Your real Russia story is Uranium” was his only way to distract everyone ...
In November 2017, the FBI informant, Willam Douglas Campbell, decided to speak out about the matter for the first time. At the time of the sale, Campbell was a confidential source for the FBI in a Maryland bribery and kickback investigation of the head of a U.S. unit of Rosatom, the Russian state-owned nuclear power company.
He added that the documents related to Uranium One and the political influence that it has do exist and that he has the documents to prove it. With his statement, Campbell had the potential of playing a more significant role in this Washington drama.
These donations received by Clinton Foundation have ties to Uranium One. These donations were not publicly disclosed despite the promise that the Foundation would identify all donors and contributors. To make matters more suspicious, former President Bill Clinton also received $500,000 for Russia’s speaking engagement.
But any money going to the Clinton Foundation occurred years before this deal surfaced, and came from a fellow philanthropist, Canadian Frank Guistra, who had divested himself from uranium years before this Uranium One deal.
The State Department and several government agencies on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States first unanimously approved the 2010 partial sale of Canadian mining company Uranium One to the Russian nuclear giant Rosatom, supposedly giving Moscow control of more than 20% of America’s uranium supply.
The real reason Russia wanted this deal was to give Rosatom’s subsidiary the Uranium One’s very profitable uranium mines in Kazakhstan - the single largest producer of commercial uranium in the world.
Senator Chuck Grassley (R- Iowa) wants the information obtained from a raid on the home of a former FBI contractor who provided watchdog documents related to former Secretary of State and the sale of Canadian mining company Uranium One to a Russian firm. FBI agents raided the Maryland home of Dennis Nathan Cain just last month.
Senator Chuck Grassley wants to get to the bottom of an FBI raid on one of their former contractors ...
But Clinton played no role in this decision so it’s unlikely they actually tried. Besides, at the time there were no U.S. sanctions on Russia. Those began in March of 2014 after Russia annexed Crimea and subsequently invaded Eastern Ukraine. So approving this deal wasn’t a big deal at that time.
Hillary Clinton served as the 67th United States Secretary of State under President Barack Obama. The level of Russian interference in America, and globally, has only recently been appreciated and their attempts seem to be everywhere and to target everyone.