The head of this law firm’s medical malpractice division, attorney Michael R. Jackson, spent fifteen years defending physicians, hospitals, nurses, long-term care facilities and other health care providers before undertaking the rewarding job of becoming an advocate for patients in their medical malpractice litigation.
Full Answer
Jul 06, 2017 · Family of Teen Files Medical Malpractice Lawsuit Against Jackson North Medical Center. Brian Brown, a 19-year old who was set to move to California next week on a football scholarship, was shot during a drug deal gone wrong. Brown was taken to Jackson North Medical Center by his girlfriend where he collapsed to the floor after pleading for help. It appears that …
Aug 24, 2018 · Hospital Negligence Attorney in Jackson Memorial | Dante Law Firm, P.A. Hospital Negligence Attorney in Jackson Memorial | Dante Law Firm, P.A. If negligence happens in Jackson Memorial Hospital, you need a Hospital Negligence Attorney in Jackson Memorial, turn to the Dante Law Firm for help. 305-949-2526.
The head of this law firm’s medical malpractice division, attorney Michael R. Jackson, spent fifteen years defending physicians, hospitals, nurses, long-term care facilities and other health care providers before undertaking the rewarding job of becoming an advocate for patients in their medical malpractice litigation. Jackson Law International has litigated medical malpractice …
Jun 26, 2009 · With Michael Jackson’s sudden death yesterday at 50 have come swirls of rumors about prescription medications he was taking for dancing related injuries. And if toxicology tests show over-medication being a substantial cause of death, that leads to the inevitable questions regarding potential medical malpractice as well as potential criminal liability. So these are the …
Detailed law firm profiles have information like the firm's area of law, office location, office hours, and payment options. Attorney profiles include the biography, education and training, and client recommendations of an attorney to help you decide who to hire.
It is always a good idea to research your lawyer prior to hiring. Every state has a disciplinary organization that monitors attorneys, their licenses, and consumer complaints. By researching lawyer discipline you can:
When you or a loved one have to go to the hospital, you do so with the hope that the doctors and nurses can help you. Whether you are injured or ill, you just want to feel better.
Medical mistakes happen at an alarming rate in this country. In fact, they are the third leading cause of death behind heart disease and cancer. Research found that nearly 700 people die a day in the US due to medical errors. These are scary statistics, especially when they happen at the hands of those we trust to make us better.
Determining whether a health care provider has breached his duty requires establishing and understanding the applicable standard of care with respect to the particular patient’s care and treatment. The definition of the concept of standard of care can differ between states, but, as a general proposition, the phrase generally means that the standard of care that is to be applied in a given situation is that level of care that a reasonable, similarly situated professional would have provided in that particular circumstance.
Licensed medical professionals are bound by the Hippocratic Oath (which dates back to ancient Greece in the late Fifth Century B.C.E.) to uphold certain ethical standards in the care of their patients. The modern physician will say that his first duty is to relieve pain and injury and avoid causing or worsening problems in his patient. Some physicians will shorten that maxim to “ Do No Harm .”
As a matter of practice, the first element, i.e., the existence of a legal duty, is typically the easiest of the four elements to establish. In those instances where a health care provider extends medical services to a patient, the health care provider is said to owe a duty of reasonable professional care to this patient. Therefore, when the law determines that a provider/patient relationship exists, then the duty of reasonable medical care is applied.
Typically, juries within a given jurisdiction will start with a favorable opinion of health care providers, which the patient must overcome in order to win their lawsuit. Therefore, it is critical that a patient hires an attorney familiar with bringing a medical malpractice case.
David Marsh and Mike Beard settled a medical malpractice case on behalf of a young woman who suffered a brain injury when she contracted pneumococcal meningitis. The case centered on allegations that our client would never have gotten meningitis if she had received a post-splenectomy immunization as ordered by her doctor two years earlier. Today, our client requires 24-hour care and supervision. She experiences problems with her short-term memory, judgment and impulse control.
David Marsh, Ben Ford, and Susan Silvernail resolved a case on behalf of a 23-year-old woman who emerged from neck surgery catastrophically injured. The case against a Birmingham doctor and his employer grew out of the misplacement of a surgical screw, which resulted in serious damage to the young woman’s brain stem.
A Montgomery County jury returned a $2 million verdict against Noland Hospital in February 2018. Marsh, Rickard & Bryan attorneys David Marsh, Ty Brown, and J.D. Marsh tried this case on behalf of the plaintiff. The medical malpractice case grows out of the death of 77-year-old Larry Nobles while he was a patient at Noland’s Long Term Care Hospital in Montgomery in 2012. Mr. Nobles was admitted to Noland after a two week hospitalization at another hospital in Montgomery. When he entered Noland, he was noted to be confused and disoriented, and at high risk for falls. His doctor ordered that wrist restraints be applied to Mr. Nobles because he was unable to avoid pulling on his central line, dialysis catheter and Foley catheter. Despite the fact that when she left for the evening, Mr. Nobles’ wife reminded the nurses on duty to put the restraints on Mr. Nobles, the nurses did not do it. They left him in bed, unrestrained and unobserved. This was a violation of the doctor’s orders and a violation of Noland’s own policies and procedures. Because he was unrestrained, Mr. Nobles climbed or fell out of bed and was found an hour later on the floor in his room, moaning and bleeding. He had pulled out his dialysis and Foley catheters. The nurses got him back into bed but never put an occlusive dressing over the hole left behind by this dialysis catheter. This, too, was a violation of the standard of care. Thirty minutes later, Mr. Nobles died as a result of an air embolism that entered his jugular vein through the open hole. The air embolism blocked the blood flow to his heart and resulted in his death.
A Jefferson County state court jury awarded a Birmingham couple $16 million in damages after finding that Brookwood Medical Center violated the standard of care for labor and delivery and participated in reckless fraud. MRB attorneys David Marsh and Rip Andrews tried the case for the couple, Caroline and J.T. Malatesta.
The jury awarded $500,000. The case for the family was tried by Marsh, Rickard & Bryan attorneys David Marsh, Rip Andrews, and Ben Ford. Aleshia Neal was severely mentally handicapped and suffered from a seizure disorder. She lived in a group home in Birmingham. Months before her death, Aleshia had lab work done at St. Vincent’s Hospital East as an outpatient. The results showed high electrolyte sodium levels. Those critical lab values were never communicated to Aleshia’s main doctor so they went untreated. The same lab work was repeated two months later, and the results again showed critically high electrolyte sodium levels. In fact, the sodium level, in particular, had worsened. These second critical lab values didn’t reach Aleshia’s main doctor either, so they, too, went unaddressed. Aleshia died shortly after that from complications of an electrolyte imbalance and her blood showed elevated sodium and chloride levels. Evidence at trial showed that St. Vincent’s East, in order to charge for the labs ir performed, was required by industry groups to have a written policy in place for communicating critical labs. St. Vincent’s East’s policies required that outpatient labs be communicated to the ordering physician. Simply put, the lab missed two opportunities to save Aleshia’s life. Instead, the lab called the critical values to the group home headquarters, violating its policy and adding an unnecessary intermediary to the chain of communication. The case against the group home was resolved prior to trial.
Aleshia died shortly after that from complications of an electrolyte imbalance and her blood showed elevated sodium and chloride levels.
There, the attending physician examined the child, observed him and discharged him within 3.5 hours of admission and four hours of ingestion. David Marsh and Rip Andrews proved that the effects of methadone are delayed and that the child should have been admitted and observed for a period of at least 8 to 12 hours.
A Wayne County jury has awarded $135 million to the plaintiff in a medical malpractice lawsuit filed against the Detroit Medical Center Children's Hospital of Michigan, according to Southfield-based Fieger Law.
The lawsuit, originally filed in 2013, focused on the medical care provided to Faith DeGrand of Wyandotte, who underwent a spinal surgery for scoliosis when she was 10 years old at the DMC Children's Hospital.
Faith was left with permanent quadraparesis of her four extremities and permanent loss of bowel and bladder control.". Faith was unable to walk and forced to use a wheelchair for more than a year, according to her attorneys. Also named in the lawsuit is Dr. Eric Jones, who is listed as an orthopedic surgeon on the hospital website.
on March 19, 2020. Checking a doctor's history of malpractice suits and disciplinary actions can help guide you in choosing a doctor. When you need difficult medical testing or treatment, you must choose your doctor wisely. You'll want to do some research about the doctor to be sure his credentials, experience, and abilities to meet your needs.
If you find a doctor's license has been suspended, that generally means that there has been an actionable offense. Do an online search.
Making a Qualified Judgment. Even when malpractice or disciplinary information can be found, it may require an explanation of terminology or circumstances. Judging a doctor simply on that doctor's malpractice track record may not provide the whole story.
The background search of a doctor's medical history takes time, so don't be discouraged if you don't get your answers immediately. In some cases, you may need to speak with someone on the phone; in others, you may find what you need online. To do a background medical search: 1 Go to the Federation of State Medical Board's Physician Data Center website to check the doctor's basic information including board certifications, education, the listed states where an active license is maintained, and any actions against the doctor. 2 Check the state's medical licensing board for your state and anywhere the doctor has practiced using the AMA Doc Finder. If you find a doctor's license has been suspended, that generally means that there has been an actionable offense. 3 Do an online search. Place quotation marks around the doctor's name to keep the phrase intact (such as "Dr. John Smith") and follow this with such keywords as "malpractice," "lawsuit," "sanction," " complaint ," or "suspension." Start by using only one keyword at a time. You can use more as you widen your search.
It may mean that the doctor has a clean record, or it may be that an infraction has been legally removed. For example, if a lawsuit has been settled out of court, it may be removed since the claim will have been withdrawn.
The sad truth is that a doctor can amass a malpractice track record in one state, get licensed in a new state, and start again with a clean slate. 1 As such, you need to do your homework to ensure you get the fullest body of evidence possible.
While many of the directory listings or doctor rating websites provide some disciplinary information, rarely is it complete or current. In some cases, it is up to the doctors to self-report problems, and malpractice is one thing they'll be least likely to divulge
BIRMINGHAM, Alabama - Attorneys for Brookwood Medical Center are considering their option to appeal a $7.5 million verdict against the hospital in a negligence lawsuit brought by a Birmingham couple.
The Bordens had filed the lawsuit in 2012 based on a Sept. 11, 2011 trip to the Brookwood Medical Center Emergency Department. Borden was recuperating from back surgery and had developed pain. His doctor told him to go to the hospital.
Nurses, however, did not relay to Borden's doctor several changes in his condition, Borden's lawyers said. When his doctor discovered Borden's condition the next morning the doctor performed emergency surgery to relieve pressure ...
Unfortunately, the delay in surgery resulted in Borden, who is 55 now, being permanently impotent and incontinent, the lawyers said. Samples said that the couple used to be active but now because of his condition Borden stays close to home.