Jun 25, 2005 · WASHINGTON —. With barely a word about it, on Friday workers at the Justice Department removed the blue drapes that had famously covered two scantily clad statues for the last 3 1/2 years ...
Feb. 1 (Cox News Service)--If you fight the Taliban, maybe a little of it rubs off. Granted, as attorney general, John Ashcroft is up against the Taliban only second-hand and at some remove.
Oct 06, 2021 · Actions excluded by statute and regulation such as those listed below are not covered by this policy. This list is not exhaustive. Actions taken under 5 U.S.C. 1215 (Special Counsel actions), 7521 (Actions against ALJs), 7532 (Actions in …
May 16, 2006 · When new Attorney General Alberto Gonzales ordered the removal of the blue draperies covering two statues in the back of the Great Hall of the Justice Department in June 2005 (i), he reversed a...
Portraying Justice as a female figure dates back to depictions of Themis and Justicia in ancient mythology. Themis, known for her clear-sightedness, was the Greek Goddess of Justice and Law. In Roman mythology, Justicia (Justice) was one of the four Virtues along with Prudence, Fortitude and Temperance.May 22, 2003
Most depictions of Lady Justice portray her with a blindfold and holding a double-edged sword in the right hand and scales dangling from the left. However, beneath the central arch on the Palace of Justice's facade in this sculpture of lustitia.
The statues were hidden by curtains on Nov. 20, when President Bush came to the Justice Department to name the building after the assassinated former attorney general, Robert Kennedy. Comstock said the Justice Department bought the drapes to avoid having to rent them every time the agency had a formal event.Jan 29, 2002
The blindfold represents impartiality, the ideal that justice should be applied without regard to wealth, power, or other status. The earliest Roman coins depicted Justitia with the sword in one hand and the scale in the other, but with her eyes uncovered.
The drapes are reported to have been hanging since Monday, drawing to a close the sport of photographers who infamously sprawled on the floor to snap the former Attorney General Edwin Meese holding aloft his report on pornography in front of the female statue.
The female, art-deco "Spirit of Justice" statue, with one breast exposed, is located on the podium in the department's ornate Great Hall where news conferences are often held. One fully-exposed breast protrudes from her toga garment.
Hired drapes have previously hung in front of both statues for formal events, such as President George W Bush's visit to name the building after assassinated former attorney-general, Robert Kennedy. Visual harmony.
The Department of Justice has authority to seek to remedy employment discrimination by state and local governments and their agencies and political subdivisions.
Accordingly, the Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division, or his or her designee, usually the Section Chief of the Appellate Section, will determine whether an appeal will be handled by the Civil Rights Division or the United States Attorney’s Office.
Executive Order 11246 forbids discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin by such contractors or subcontractors. The Department of Labor, which retains primary enforcement responsibility, may, if unable to obtain compliance, refer the case to the Department of Justice for appropriate legal proceedings. The text of Executive Order 11246, as amended, is set forth immediately following Section 2000e of Title 42 of the United States Code.
§ 0.50, the Civil Rights Division has the responsibility for the enforcement of all federal civil rights statutes, with the exception of certain criminal matters assigned to the Criminal Division. United States Attorney’s Offices are critical partners in civil rights enforcement, providing additional resources to redress civil rights violations, expertise on local circumstances in both investigations and litigation, and, in many cases, subject matter expertise in particular civil rights areas. The Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division and the United States Attorneys should cooperate in the enforcement of civil rights laws by taking complementary steps to protect fully the interests of the United States and to assure the effective investigation and successful prosecution of civil rights cases. The nature of the cooperation between the Civil Rights Division and the United States Attorney’s Offices varies according to the statute and matter involved. Thus, greater specificity on how the Civil Rights Division and United States Attorney’s Offices should work together is provided in the subsections below.
This authority has been assigned to the Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division. The Department of Justice can obtain monetary damages for aggrieved persons, civil penalties, and equitable relief. The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act also provides a private right of action to aggrieved individuals.
The United States Attorney’s Offices also have responsibility for enforcing administrative subpoenas issued by HUD under Section 811 of the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3611. HUD will either refer these matters directly to the relevant United States Attorney’s Office or to the Housing and Civil Enforcement Section.
§§ 516 and 517 to file statements of interest in federal court cases in which the United States has an interest. The Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division, or his or her designee, may approve the filing of a statement of interest.
A reprimand will be placed in the OPF for a period not to exceed three years (or less, if the Bureau has established a shorter maximum duration either unilaterally or through collective bargaining), at which time it must be removed.
Voluntary actions initiated by the employee. Actions taken under 5 U.S.C. 7543 (Actions involving SES employees). Actions taken under 5 CFR Part 831 (Retirement).
A reprimand may be removed prior to expiration if it is determined by management that it should be removed . A decision whether to remove a reprimand sooner is not a grievable matter, and may be made only by the official issuing the reprimand, his or her successor, or someone organizationally superior to that official.