Dec 28, 2012 · Evidence Code section 958 provides that "[t]here is no privilege under this article as to a communication relevant to an issue of breach, by the lawyer or by the client, of a duty …
Apr 17, 2018 · The news that the FBI raided the offices of President Trump's personal attorney Michael Cohen Monday caused many people to wonder how such a raid could be justified …
Sep 13, 2012 · Lawyers can be punished for violating their client’s trust and lawyers cannot be compelled to release privileged information. Given the sanctity of this privilege, it is easy to see …
individual sanctions may include formal reprimand, suspension or di~barment.~~ These various sanctions are imposed by courts to preserve the integrity of attorney/client communications …
An attorney and a client have a fiduciary relationship of the very highest character, requiring the attorney to respect his or her client's confidences. The attorney-client relationship is sacred and confidential. The integrity of the legal profession requires at all times the protection of a client who depends upon and confides in the attorney. The duty of confidentiality arises whenever a lawyer-client relationship exists and...
An attorney may disclose privileged information when it is necessary to defend himself against claims raised by the client. But, an attorney may not disclose confidential information to outside parties in order to gain an advantage in a civil dispute.#N#More
Piercing the attorney-client privilege may be one of opposing counsel’s top priorities irrespective of the strength of their case. The privilege protects confidential communications between the client and the lawyer made for the purpose of obtaining or providing legal assistance, to “encourage full and frank communication . . . and thereby promote broader public interests in the observance of law and administration of justice.” United States v. Zolin, 491 U.S. at 562, 109 S.Ct. 2619 (quoting Upjohn Co. v. United States, 449 U.S. 383, 389, 101 S.Ct. 677, 66 L.Ed.2d 584 (1981) ). But the privilege may not apply, it may be waived, or there may be exceptions to it. Counsel’s position on issues concerning potentially privileged documents impacts his or her credibility with the court, so it is advisable to be fully familiar with the scope of the privilege from the first time the issue arises in a matter, and not when it is too late.
Clearly identify when seeking or providing legal advice. Only outside counsel should retain and communicate with consultants during litigation. Retention by in-house counsel is preferable to retention by corporate management. Explain privilege limits and waiver to the client at the beginning and throughout a matter.
In general, the attorney-client privilege prevents attorneys from revealing information provided to them by their clients. It usually prevents other parties from compelling a lawyer to disclose this information as well.
In most situations, the privilege also extends to communications between a prospective client and an attorney. For the privilege to apply, a client or a prospective client must be seeking legal advice from the attorney.
Per the communications between them, it is clear that Mr. Juravin was seeking legal advice and would never disclosed anything to Mr. Randazza that would be adverse to his interests in the future unless he believed that the attorney client privilege would protect him.
Don Juravin files this Complaint against Marc Randazza based upon egregious misconduct under the ethical rules and personal persecution of Don Juravin under the guise of the law. His improper actions were not authorized or sanctioned by the law and are in direct violation of the Florida Bar Ethical Rules. “The commission by a lawyer of any act that is unlawful or contrary to honesty and justice, whether the act is committed in the course of the attorney's relations as an attorney or otherwise may constitute cause for discipline.” (Florida Bar Rule 3-4.3)