what are the requirements in georgia for an attorney to defend a death penalty case

by Zelma Terry 6 min read

The defense team's death penalty-related knowledge must be of the highest order. Some of the requirements for a defense team in such cases include the following: The defense team must have no fewer than two criminal lawyers, one of whom should be an investigator and one of whom should be a specialist in getting reduced sentences.

Full Answer

When did the death penalty become legal in Georgia?

If you have been charged with a crime punishable by death in the state of Georgia, hire a Marietta criminal defense lawyer immediately and fight for a reduction or dismissal of your charges. Georgia reserves the death penalty as a punishment for murder or in cases of kidnapping with bodily injury where a death resulted.

Do I need a lawyer for a death penalty case?

Aug 18, 2008 · The defense team's death penalty-related knowledge must be of the highest order. Some of the requirements for a defense team in such cases include the following: The defense team must have no fewer than two criminal lawyers, one of whom should be an investigator and one of whom should be a specialist in getting reduced sentences.

Does Georgia have a capital punishment for rape?

reinstatement of the death penalty in 1976, 23 inmates were legally executed by electrocution in Georgia. Death by Lethal Injection 2001-Present. HB 1284, signed into law in 2000, changes the legal method of execution in Georgia to lethal injection effective May 1, 2000. Anyone who commits a capital crime after May 1, 2000, and

What crimes are punishable by death in Georgia?

Mar 27, 2017 · Gregg v. Georgia Case Brief. Statement of the facts: Gregg was convicted of robbing and murdering two men. Once the verdict was read, a penalty hearing was conducted before the same jury resulting in the imposition of the death penalty. The Georgia state Supreme Court set aside the death penalty for armed robbery but upheld the sentence for murder.

image

Does getting the death penalty depend on the quality of the accused's attorney?

Whether a defendant will be sentenced to death typically depends on the quality of his legal team more than any other factor. Some lawyers provide outstanding representation to capital defendants.

Do death row inmates have the right to counsel?

Ryan (2012), the Supreme Court decided that even though there is no constitutional right to adequate representation during post-conviction proceedings, the federal courts will under very limited circumstances review the effectiveness of a post-conviction lawyer's representation.

What trial is required for death penalty cases?

However, death penalty cases are divided into two separate trials. In the first trial, juries weigh the evidence of the crime to determine guilt or innocence. If the jury decides that the defendant is guilty, there is a second trial to determine the sentence.

Does Georgia support the death penalty?

Capital punishment is a legal penalty in the U.S. state of Georgia. Georgia reintroduced the death penalty in 1973 after Furman v. Georgia ruled all states' death penalty statutes unconstitutional.

Who is advocating for the death penalty?

The Advocates for Human Rights opposes the use of the death penalty anywhere and everywhere. We serve on the Steering Committee of the World Coalition Against the Death Penalty, an alliance of more than 160 NGOs, bar associations, local authorities, and unions from around the globe.

What is a capital case?

A capital case is one where the defendant is charged with first-degree murder and the state has decided to seek the death penalty as punishment if the defendant is convicted.

What is the criteria for death penalty?

The federal cases in which a defendant is eligible for a capital sentence are generally those in which: (1) the defendant is charged with a crime for which the death penalty is a legally authorized sanction, (2) the defendant intended or had a high degree of culpability with respect to the death of the victim, and (3) ...

What is the two stage approach in establishing the death penalty?

A “bifurcated trial” refers to a trial divided into two stages: (1) guilt phase and (2) penalty phase.

What amendments does the death penalty violate?

The Court held in Furman7 that the death penalty, at least as administered, violated the Eighth Amendment.Sep 17, 2021

Who decides the death penalty in Georgia?

3. Death penalty cases in Georgia have become rare. Sentences of death must be decided by juries and must be unanimous. If a single juror opposes a death sentence, resulting in a hung jury during the trial's penalty phase, a life sentence is issued.Jan 30, 2020

How is the death penalty done in Georgia?

In 2000, lethal injection was signed into law as the new legal method of execution in Georgia. The first execution by lethal injection was carried out in 2001 and a total of 30 executions by that method have been carried out.Nov 24, 2021

What does Georgia use for the death penalty?

lethal injectionIn 2014, results remained about the same: LWOP 45% and death penalty 50%.” In Georgia all executions are carried out utilizing lethal injection.Feb 14, 2021

Who was the first person to be convicted of the death penalty in Georgia?

Georgia, named for Troy Leon Gregg, the first man in Georgia to be convicted under the new statute.

How long did the Georgia death penalty last?

March 2014 - March 2019 – For the first time since bringing back the death penalty in 1973, Georgia goes five years without imposing a death sentence.

Why was Andrew Brannan executed?

Brannan’s attorneys asked the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles to grant clemency because Brannan suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder and bipolar disorder.

What happened in Furman v. Georgia?

Furman v. Georgia (1972): William Furman was caught by homeowner William Micke while attempting to burgle Micke’s home. In his escape attempt Furman claims that he fired his gun blindly behind him and accidentally killed Micke. Furman was convicted of felony murder largely on the basis of his own statement to police, and subsequently sentenced to death. Furman’s lawyers appealed all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court after the highest courts in Georgia upheld the conviction. In 9 separate opinions, and by a vote of 5 to 4, the Court held that Georgia’s death penalty statute, which gave the jury nearly complete sentencing discretion, could result in arbitrary sentencing. The Court held that the scheme of punishment under the statute was therefore “cruel and unusual” and violated the Eighth Amendment. Thus, on June 29, 1972, the Supreme Court effectively voided 40 death penalty statutes, thereby commuting the sentences of 629 death row inmates around the country and suspending the death penalty throughout the United States because existing statutes were no longer valid. Furman remained in prison until he was paroled in 1984. He was again convicted of burglary in 2004 and sentenced to twenty years in prison.

Why was the death penalty unconstitutional in Georgia?

Georgia wrote opinions declaring the death penalty itself unconstitutional, the narrower opinion of Justice Potter Stewart declared only the death penalty statutes of the states unconstitutional because they allowed too much discretion for juries to deliver arbitrary death sentences.

What was the charge against Furman?

Furman was convicted of felony murder largely on the basis of his own statement to police, and subsequently sentenced to death. Furman’s lawyers appealed all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court after the highest courts in Georgia upheld the conviction.

Why did the Supreme Court strike down the capital punishment in North Carolina?

In the same case the Supreme Court struck down the new capital statutes of North Carolina and Louisiana because the statutes called for mandatory death sentences for defendants convicted of capital murder. Although Gregg’s conviction and sentence had been upheld, his execution would never be carried out.

What is a law crosser?

LawCrossing has received tens of thousands of attorneys jobs and has been the leading legal job board in the United States for almost two decades. LawCrossing helps attorneys dramatically improve their careers by locating every legal job opening in the market. Unlike other job sites, LawCrossing consolidates every job in the legal market and posts jobs regardless of whether or not an employer is paying. LawCrossing takes your legal career seriously and understands the legal profession. For more information, please visit www.LawCrossing.com.

Who is Harrison Barnes?

Harrison Barnes is the founder of LawCrossing and an internationally recognized expert in attorney search and placement. Harrison is extremely committed to and passionate about the profession of legal placement. Harrison’s writings about attorney careers and placement attract millions of reads each year. LawCrossing has been ranked on the Inc. 500 twice. For more information, please visit Harrison Barnes’ bio.

When was death by hanging abolished in Georgia?

On August 16, 1924 , the Georgia General Assembly passed a law that abolished death by hanging for all persons convicted of a capital crime after the passage of the act. Thereafter, death was to be imposed by electrocution within the walls of the state penitentiary at Milledgeville or wherever the state penitentiary may be located. Because Arthur Meyers was convicted of a capital offense prior to the passage of the law authorizing death by electrocution he was hung in accordance with the previous law that authorized death by hanging in the county in which the crime was committed.

When did lethal injection become legal in Georgia?

HB 1284, signed into law in 2000, changes the legal method of execution in Georgia to lethal injection effective May 1, 2000. Anyone who commits a capital crime after May 1, 2000, and receives a death sentence, will be executed by lethal injection. In addition, if either the Georgia or Supreme Courts declare death by electrocution unconstitutional, lethal injection will become the legal method of execution for all inmates under death sentence, regardless of the date of their crimes—and in fact, on October 5, 2001 the Georgia Supreme Court did rule executions by electrocution cruel and unusual punishment. HB1284 immediately took effect and the first execution by lethal injection occurred in October, 2001. Since that time, a total of thirty executions by lethal injection have been carried out.

How many people were executed in Reidsville, Virginia?

The first execution by electrocution took place in Reidsville on May 6, 1938 when Archie Goodwin, a 37- year-old black male was executed for a Worth County murder. A total of 256 executions took place in Reidsville with the last execution occurring on October 16, 1964 when Bernard Die, a 34-year-old white male was executed for a McDuffie County Murder. Of the 256 executions carried out at Reidsville, 255 were male and one was female (Lena Baker, a black female, was executed on March 5, 1945 for a murder in Randolph County). The oldest inmate executed was 72, the youngest was 16.

Where is the electric chair in Georgia?

In June 1980 the electric chair was moved to the Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Prison (GDCP) in Jackson, Georgia. A new chair was constructed and the original electric chair, which is no longer used, remains on display at Georgia State Prison in Reidsville. Death Row at GDCP houses the inmates under death sentence for the duration of their stay within the Georgia Department of Corrections. The inmate remains on death row unless the Board of Pardons and Paroles grants a commutation to life or a pardon, a court reverses the conviction during an appeal, the execution is lawfully carried out, or the inmate dies while awaiting execution.

Why was the death penalty unconstitutional in Furman v. Georgia?

In Furman v. Georgia, the court ruled that the death penalty was unconstitutional because it violated the eighth and fourteenth amendments as cruel and unusual punishment. It did not rule that the death penalty itself was unconstitutional per se, rather that the procedure and the administration of the death penalty is unconstitutional given the lack of impartial and arbitrary sentencing in respect to the crimes committed. This gave way to a Georgia Statute detailing that a jury must find 1 of 10 mitigating or aggravating circumstances in order to sentence a defendant to death, so that the setnencing is lawful and justifiable. The court also provides a special provision for defendants sentenced to death: “The court is directed to consider ‘the punishment as well as any errors enumerated by way of appeal,’ and to determine:

What was the death penalty based on?

This claim was based on Furman v. Georgia, in which the court ruled that capital punishment was a violation of the eighth and fourteenth amendments in respect to the crimes committed.

What does Troy Gregg argue about the death penalty?

Troy Leon Gregg would argue that despite Georgia’s development of a bifurcated death penalty system, Georgia’s application of the death penalty is still inconsistently and arbitrarily decided. Not only that, Gregg would further argue that his capital punishment is the violation of his Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights that protect against subjugation to cruel and unusual punishment. Gregg would reference the case Furman v. Georgia 408 US 153 (1972) for his argument, citing the same level inconsistent implementation which the Supreme Court constituted a violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment.

What was Troy Gregg's appeal?

His appeal stood on the claim that the death penalty was in actuality a from of cruel and unusual punishment as a sentence for the crimes he had committed. This claim was based on Furman v. Georgia, in which the court ruled that capital punishment was a violation of the eighth and fourteenth amendments in respect to the crimes committed. As a result of this, Georgia established a statutory scheme to overcome Furman v Georgia. This statutory procedure gives the jury discretion to decide whether or not the death penalty is valid punishment for the crime and also gives the Georgia Supreme Court the ability to decide if the administration of the death penalty was administered “in a discriminatory, standardless, or rare fashion”. In Furman v. Georgia, the court’s decision was not simply that the death penalty was unconstitutional per se, yet that the way the death penalty is administered in a “freakish or wanton” nature is unconstitutional. More specifically, the judge informed the jury that it would not be authorized to consider the death penalty unless it is found beyond a reasonable doubt that either that the offense of murder was committed while the offender was engaged in the commission of two other capital felonies, such as the armed robbery of Simmons and Moore, or that the offender committed the offense of murder for the purpose of receiving money and the automobile described in the indictment, or that the offense of murder was outrageously and wantonly vile, horrible and inhuman, in that it involved the depravity of mind of the defendant.

What is the bifurcated process in Georgia?

The bifurcated process gives the accused to a two-part review system. First, the case is heard and decided by the lower courts where a jury will make the decision for a death penalty sentence. The second and most essential part of the bifurcated process is the mandatory appellate review. This portion requires that the decision made by the lower courts be sent up to the Georgia Supreme Court with the evidence and circumstances being considered once again to determine if the death penalty is an appropriate sentence. In Gregg’s case, the evidence and circumstances validated his capital punishment for the murders. However, the capital punishment as applied to his robbery charges were overturned at the Supreme Court level.

What is the concurring opinion in Gregg v. Georgia?

Justice White’s concurring opinion, which was supported in concurrence by Justices Burger, Rehnquist, and Blackmun, simply reiterated the defense of the Georgia statute by which Gregg v. Georgia was upheld . This concurring opinion also pointed out the lack of merit in the Gregg’s appeal, specifically stating the appellant’s claim that “the prosecutor’s decisions in plea bargaining or in declining to charge capital murder are standard less” cannot be made or validated because the statutory scheme to satisfy the Furman decision gives the Supreme court the ability to review the judicial process and decide if capital punishment decided by jury is objective, and fitting for the crime committed.

Is the death penalty cruel and unusual punishment?

In his own dissenting opinion, Justice Marshall is in agreement with Justice Brennan in that the death penalty is considered cruel and unusual punishment under the eighth amendment because it is excessive, and the popular opinion would reject it as “morally acceptable” if given adequate information on the judgment, reiterating his statement in Furman.

What is the state of Georgia's capital punishment?

Here, Georgia’s state capital punishment law states that when convicted of murder, individuals “shall be punished by death or by imprisonment for life.”. The state narrowly applied the death penalty by statute through 10 additional circumstances.

What are the two purposes of the death penalty?

The two purposes of the death penalty are retribution and deterrence of capital crimes . Retribution is usually essential in an ordered society and reflects society’s outrage at particular conduct. Attempts to statistically evaluate the level of deterrence the death penalty actually has, have proven inconclusive.

What was the Supreme Court case in Gregg v. Georgia?

Georgia: Gregg was convicted of murder and sentenced to the death penalty under a Georgia state statute. Gregg claimed the sentence violated the Eighth and 14th Amendment of the Constitution. The state Supreme Court affirmed the sentence for the murder conviction ...

What was Gregg convicted of?

Gregg was convicted of robbing and murdering two men. Once the verdict was read, a penalty hearing was conducted before the same jury resulting in the imposition of the death penalty. The Georgia state Supreme Court set aside the death penalty for armed robbery but upheld the sentence for murder.

Is the death penalty a necessary sentence?

Despite prior claims that the current “standards of decency” in the U.S. are at the point where the death penalty should not be tolerated, a large percentage of Americans regard it as both an appropriate and necessary sentence. Currently, 35 or more states have laws permitting the death penalty as punishment for murder.

Is a penalty excessive?

A penalty must not be “excessive.”. To determine whether a punishment is “excessive,” the punishment must not involve unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain and cannot be grossly out of proportion to the crime’s severity.

Is the death penalty unconstitutional in Georgia?

This case established that the death penalty is not per se unconstitutional and state legislatures should draft statutes, which impose the death penalty, to guide the jury in reaching their decision.

Why do courts uphold death sentences?

Despite the poor quality of representation in many capital cases, courts have often upheld the convictions and death sentences imposed because of low expectations and the belief that better representation would not have made a difference in the case.

Why is it important to have a lawyer in capital cases?

It is essential that the lawyer be experienced in capital cases, be adequately compensated, and have access to the resources needed to fulfill his or her obligations to the client and the court . As abuses in the system have been exposed, most states have raised the standards for representation.

How much did Weber County get for suing him?

A for­mer Utah defense lawyer has received a $ 250, 000 set­tle­ment after suing Weber County for alleged­ly fir­ing him in retal­i­a­tion for his pub­lic crit­i­cism of the county’s refusal to prop­er­ly fund a death-row prison…

What court overturned Terence Andrus' death sentence?

By a vote of 6 – 3, the U.S. Supreme Court over­turned a Texas Court of Criminal Appeals ( TCCA) rul­ing uphold­ing the death sen­tence imposed on Terence Andrus (pic­tured). The Court held that Andrus’ c…

Who is Dylann Roof?

Lawyers for fed­er­al death row pris­on­er Dylann Roof argued to a fed­er­al appeals court that the avowed white supremacist’s con­vic­tions and death sen­tences in his tri­al for the 2015 mur­ders of nine Black church­go­ers at Emanuel Africa…

Do death penalty states have capital defense?

However, most death-penalty states do not have statewide capital defense organizations, and many counties who are responsible for assigning and compensating lawyers have small budgets and cannot afford the kind of representation a capital case requires.

Can a defendant pay for a lawyer?

The quality of representation a defendant receives in a capital case can make the difference between life and death. Almost all defendants cannot afford to pay for a lawyer, and states differ widely on the standards—if any—for death penalty representation. Accounts of lawyers sleeping or drinking alcohol during the trial, lawyers with racial bias toward their client, lawyers who conduct no investigation or fail to obtain necessary experts, or lawyers simply having no experience with capital cases have been rampant throughout the history of the death penalty.

Interested in sealing your record?

It is no secret that criminal convictions and records can greatly limit an individual's personal and professional opportunities.

Contact a Marietta criminal defense lawyer today!

Our legal team is fully prepared to evaluate your eligibility to obtain an expungement and to handle all of the necessary legal work on your behalf. We have practiced extensively in all areas of criminal defense, including the most serious cases such as murder and death penalty cases.

What is the death penalty?

Capital punishment, also referred to as the “death penalty,” is defined as the legally authorized “execution of an offender sentenced to death after conviction by a court of law of a criminal offense.”. The death penalty is considered the ultimate punishment for committing a serious crime, typically involving murder or the purposefully killing ...

Which amendment prohibits the death penalty?

Georgia, declaring that the “unitary” trial process (when a jury was asked to give their verdict of a defendant’s guilt or innocence and, simultaneously, sentence the defendant to life imprisonment or the death penalty) was unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against “cruel and unusual punishment.”.

Why is the death penalty important?

The threat of capital punishment deters future criminals. The death penalty is appropriate justice for a particularly heinous act. The defendant will never be able to escape or commit a crime again, making society safer. The death penalty provides closure for the victim’s family and loved ones.

How many people have been executed in Texas since 1976?

The Lone Star State is notorious for coming down especially harsh on capital crimes such as homicide and murder. In fact, Texas has executed more prisoners since 1976 than any other state in the country, with over 540 offenders receiving capital punishment sentencing - more than a third of the national total.

How many executions did Texas have?

In total, Texas carried out eight capital punishment executions before gaining statehood in 1846. For the next 80 years or so, Texas carried out the death penalty by hanging in most cases. In 1923, the state changed its death penalty law so that capital punishments were done via electric chair. Map courtesy of DeathPenaltyInfo.org.

What is the law of parties in Texas?

The state of Texas also practices the Law of Parties, which means people can be sentenced to death if they were present while a capital crime was committed due to the offender being “criminally responsible for the conduct of another.”.

Where did the death penalty originate?

Murder, rape, treason and arson were punishable by death in Ancient Greece and Rome.

image

History of The Death Penalty

  • Georgia has employed capital punishment since colonial times, with executions recorded at least as early as 1735. Crimes punishable by capital punishment in Georgia have historically included murder, robbery, rape, horse stealing, and aiding a runaway slave. Up until the 1920s executions were generally carried out by hanging, although the condemned...
See more on deathpenaltyinfo.org

Timeline

  • 1735 – First known execution in Georgia, Alice Rileyhung for murder. 1816 – Georgia statute defines the following as capital crimes when committed by a slave or a free person of color: poisoning or attempted poisoning; insurrection or attempted insurrection; rape or attempted rape of a white female; assaulting a white person with a deadly weapon or with intent to murder; mai…
See more on deathpenaltyinfo.org

Famous Cases

  • Furman v. Georgia (1972): William Furman was caught by homeowner William Micke while attempting to burgle Micke’s home. In his escape attempt Furman claims that he fired his gun blindly behind him and accidentally killed Micke. Furman was convicted of felony murder largely on the basis of his own statement to police, and subsequently sentenced to death. Furman’s law…
See more on deathpenaltyinfo.org

Notable Exonerations

  • In 1991, Gary Nelsonwalked out of Chatham County Jail a free man. He had been convicted and sentenced to death in 1980 for the 1978 rape and murder of a six-year-old girl. On his third appeal to the Georgia Supreme Court, the Court overturned his conviction and his death sentence on the grounds that his original trial had not been fair because the prosecution had withheld evidence f…
See more on deathpenaltyinfo.org

Notable Commutations/Clemencies

  • In 2008, Samuel David Crowewas granted clemency by Gov. Sonny Perdue. The decision came just two hours before his scheduled execution. The Board of Pardons and Paroles did not provide a reason for commuting Crowe’s sentence to life without parole. However, considerable testimony from friends, pastors and even a former corrections officer was presented to the board emphasi…
See more on deathpenaltyinfo.org

Summary

  • Gregg v. Georgia, 428 US 153 (1976) was the Supreme Court case which established that the death penalty, as long as it is applied appropriately, is constitutional and does not violate the 8th and 14thamendment. Troy Gregg, after being convicted in the lower Georgia Courts and sentenced to death, appealed his case to the Supreme Court. Troy Gregg did so on the grounds t…
See more on sites.gsu.edu

Background

  • One of the most significant aspects ofGregg v. Georgia was the basis of Troy Gregg’s appeal to the Supreme Court. His appeal stood on the claim that the death penalty was in actuality a from of cruel and unusual punishment as a sentence for the crimes he had committed. This claim was based on Furman v. Georgia, in which the court ruled that capital punishment was a violation of t…
See more on sites.gsu.edu

Procedural History

  1. Troy Leon Gregg is arrested 1973, and his case will be the first case to be decided underneath Georgia’s new bifurcated system.
  2. Gregg is convicted by the lower courts of Georgia in 1973 on all charges (Murder/Armed Robbery), and is sentenced to death using the first set of procedural guidelines of the bifurcated system
  1. Troy Leon Gregg is arrested 1973, and his case will be the first case to be decided underneath Georgia’s new bifurcated system.
  2. Gregg is convicted by the lower courts of Georgia in 1973 on all charges (Murder/Armed Robbery), and is sentenced to death using the first set of procedural guidelines of the bifurcated system
  3. The case decision is sent to the Georgia Supreme Court for appellate review as the second step of the bifurcated process.
  4. The Georgia Supreme Court justices review the lower courts decision and affirm Gregg’s death penalty as it relates to the murders not the robberies

Issues

  1. Does Georgia’s new bifurcated system still violate the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment because it is still creates an inconsistency in applying the death penalty?
  2. Is the imposition of the death sentence prohibited under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments as “cruel and unusual” punishment per se?
See more on sites.gsu.edu

Arguments by Petitioner

  • Troy Leon Gregg would argue that despite Georgia’s development of a bifurcated death penalty system, Georgia’s application of the death penalty is still inconsistently and arbitrarily decided. Not only that, Gregg would further argue that his capital punishment is the violation of his Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights that protect against subjugation to cruel and unusual punish…
See more on sites.gsu.edu

Arguments by Respondent

  • Georgia would counter Troy Leon Gregg’s claim and argue that their new bifurcated system creates a “checks and balances” method that allow for the impartial sentencing of the death penalty. The bifurcated process gives the accused to a two-part review system. First, the case is heard and decided by the lower courts where a jury will make the decision for a death penalty se…
See more on sites.gsu.edu

Decision

  • Is the death penalty in Georgia considered unconstitutional due to a violation of the eighth and fourteenth amendments as cruel and unusual punishment? (No) In a 7-2 decision, the court ruled that the death penalty could be upheld and impartially justified in states that decided to enforce it.
See more on sites.gsu.edu

Majority Opinion

  • Joined by Justices Powell and Stevens, Justice Stewart’s majority opinion declares that the “the punishment of death for the crime of murder does not, under all circumstances, violate the eighth and fourteenth amendments”. He states that “in the 4 years since Furman v. Georgia, at least 35 states have enacted new statutes providing for the death penalty”. Additionally, as a result of the…
See more on sites.gsu.edu

Concurring Opinion

  • Justice White’s concurring opinion, which was supported in concurrence by Justices Burger, Rehnquist, and Blackmun, simply reiterated the defense of the Georgia statute by which Gregg v. Georgiawas upheld. This concurring opinion also pointed out the lack of merit in the Gregg’s appeal, specifically stating the appellant’s claim that “the prosecutor’s decisions in plea …
See more on sites.gsu.edu

Dissenting Opinion

  • Justice Brennan presents the question of morality in his dissenting opinion by stating that “the country has debated whether a society for which the dignity of the individual is the supreme value can, without a fundamental inconsistency, follow the practice of deliberately putting some of its members to death”. Brennan also claims that the advancement of society and modern day mora…
See more on sites.gsu.edu