what are some of the tactics used by the defency attorney at a multiple injury trust fund trial

by Darrick Hauck Published 3 years ago Updated 2 years ago 7 min read

One of the most effective tactics is to get the plaintiffs’ attorney to become angry. When an attorney expresses anger to a jury, or shows the jury that their case has been weakened, the result is often a low verdict or defense verdict.

Full Answer

What is the best defense strategy for a personal injury lawsuit?

What kind of tricks do lawyers play on plaintiff lawyers?

Some lawyers play a trick on plaintiff’s lawyers by making arguments that require the plaintiff to amend the case so that he or she spends an exorbitant amount in legal fees at the very early stages of the case. As the plaintiff, a lawyer can help advise you on how to avoid this particular trick.

Why do lawyers stand next to their clients during verdicts?

THERE’S A REASON THEY STAND SO CLOSE TO THEIR CLIENTS. The image of an attorney standing up next to their client as the verdict is being read is usually interpreted as a sign of solidarity, but lawyers may have another reason.

Why do criminal defense attorneys take on cases with high stakes?

In addition to making sure the scales of justice are balanced, criminal defense attorneys find satisfaction in tackling cases with high stakes. "It's an all or nothing game," says Jeffrey Lichtman, a New York-based attorney who has represented John A. Gotti and accused Mexican drug lord Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman.

Why do defense attorneys ask the same question multiple times?

If the plaintiff or a witness is being deposed, some defense attorneys often ask the same question several times in several different ways. The reason is simple—if a person is forced to answer the same question several times, the person is likely to be inconsistent in at least one of the responses. Also, the deponent is likely to provide unnecessary details or insert responses that are inaccurate. If the plaintiff or witness is being abused by repetitive questions, the plaintiff’s counsel should employ the following tactic:

Why is it so difficult for an attorney to take a deposition?

It is difficult for an attorney to take a deposition if the opposing attorney continuously objects. It throws the deposition off course, interrupts the flow of testimony, distracts the witness, and in all respects is an impediment to productive discovery.

What is not grounds for an instruction not to answer?

Needless to say, the fact that an answer may prejudice the case is not grounds for an instruction not to answer. Also, relevancy, materiality, or competency are not grounds to allow a deponent not to answer a question. If the deposing attorney is getting into an area of privileged attorney work product or is harassing the witness, such an instruction may be proper. However, if a plaintiff’s attorney encounters frequent instructions not to answer for abusive purposes only, he or she should employ the following tactic:

Why do criminal defense lawyers choose that legal subspecialty?

Ask a criminal defense lawyer why they chose that legal subspecialty and the most common answer is that nothing gets their blood going more than a case with high stakes. “Cases move faster and they’re just more interesting than civil cases,” Gates says. “There’s nothing worse than an extended conversation about Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code. It’s just more interesting to talk about a bank robbery.”

Why do criminal defense attorneys chastise?

While their work enforces a person’s constitutional right to a fair trial, some observers chastise them for representing society's villains. In their view, that’s missing the point. In addition to making sure the scales of justice are balanced, criminal defense attorneys find satisfaction in tackling cases with high stakes.

What does Lichtman do in court?

Once in court, Lichtman focuses on finding the one person in the box of 12 to connect with. “I look up the backgrounds of jurors,” he says. “I’m looking for anything in the background I can exploit in order to tailor my summation to something that’s happened in their lives.”

What does it mean to keep tabs on a jury?

THEY'RE ALWAYS WATCHING THE JURY'S BODY LANGUAGE. Keeping tabs on a jury means being able to assess which direction they’re leaning. Lichtman says body language can tell him a lot. “You can feel how a trial is going,” he says. Jurors who laugh or smile at his jokes are on his side.

How long was Tritico's sentence?

Despite Tritico’s advice to take a plea bargain, the man took his chance at trial—and lost. His sentence was 40 years. “I was looking at the jury as the verdict was being read and felt something moving,” he says.

When quizzing would-be participants, Lichtman talks fast: "I’m speaking a-mile-a?

When quizzing would-be participants, Lichtman talks fast: "I’m speaking a-mile-a-minute, looking to get the potentially problematic jurors to either knowingly or unwittingly expose their natural biases so that I can get them kicked off the panel for cause. The jurors who I think can keep an open mind or are anti-police I will not question at all, because I’m afraid they’ll reveal those biases and get struck by the prosecutor when he uses a peremptory challenge [an objection to a juror]."

What is the job of a criminal defense attorney?

Criminal defense attorneys, who stand beside clients accused of everything from minor offenses to mass murder, must mount the most effective defense of their client possible no matter how heinous the crime. While their work enforces a person’s constitutional right to a fair trial, some observers chastise them for representing society's villains.

What happens if the attorney is not the underlying defense counsel who settled the matter?

If the attorney was not the underlying defense counsel who settled the matter or did not draft the most lucid contractual subrogation document, all is not lost . A lack of inclusion of the terms “subrogation,” “primary,” or “transfer” in the subrogation contract is not fatal.

What is a prudent defense counsel?

A prudent defense counsel will cast his ever scrutinizing and unforgiving eye upon the basis of your carrier’s subrogation claim, which is what provides your carrier with carrier to assert its subrogation action. If your subrogation action is a contractual subrogation claim, it is very important to make sure that the contract ...

What is equitable subrogation?

Fortunately, equitable subrogation is based on the policy that no person should benefit by another’s loss, and it “may be invoked wherever justice demands its application, irrespective of technical legal rules.” West Am. Ins. Co ., 495 So.2d at 207 (citing United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. Bennett, 119 So. 394 (Fla. 1928)). The West decision is extremely helpful to carriers asserting a subrogation claim, especially as judges typically do not like granting summary judgment against parties with an otherwise valid claim on the grounds of a technicality. West allows courts to make the equitable decision and allow a subrogation claim to proceed in such a circumstance.

What is a subrogee's damages?

A subrogee steps into the shoes of its subrogor. Its damages are the damages of it subrogor. As long as the insured or subrogor has damages equal to or in excess of Y, the carrier’s damages have been substantiated. Through subrogation, the subrogee has essentially bought an interest in the amount of Y in Z’s action.

What is subrogation in law?

Subrogation is an increasingly interesting and challenging field. Subrogation plaintiffs’ attorneys face new and diverse challenges in pursuing their claims on behalf of their clients, who are usually insurance carriers. As most subrogation plaintiffs are insurers, many subrogation plaintiff’s attorneys, are also insurance defense lawyers. This places the subrogation practitioner in the unique position of encountering legal cases from the opposite perspective (i.e., the plaintiff’s) from which he or she is used to encountering them (i.e., the defendant’s). It can be quite rewarding to assume the initiative in the litigation lifecycle and land—rather than parry—the blows. When switching perspectives, the subrogation practitioner needs to be particularly vigilant against the traps and tricks that defense attorneys may cast in their path.

How many sets of rules are there for subrogation?

As all legal fictions, subrogation relies upon a set of technical rules—actually two sets. Defense attorneys often attempt to attack the technical sufficiency of the carrier’s subrogation rights, so it is important to understand the technical requirements of subrogation.

Is a subrogation plaintiff an insurance defense attorney?

As most subrogation plaintiffs are insurers, many subrogation plaintiff’s attorneys, are also insurance defense lawyers. This places the subrogation practitioner in the unique position of encountering legal cases from the opposite perspective (i.e., the plaintiff’s) from which he or she is used to encountering them (i.e., the defendant’s).

What is the next step a defendant can take?

The next step a defendant can take is to file a motion to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a claim. The defendant is not required to file an answer to the complaint until the court rules on the motion to dismiss. If a plaintiff is not expecting much resistance the complaint may be defective and the plaintiff may be required to redraft the complaint. The defendant can still file a motion to dismiss the newly amended complaint as well.

How does a defendant obtain a delay of proceedings?

A defendant may sometimes obtain a delay of proceedings by avoiding service. A plaintiff generally has to start a lawsuit by serving the defendant with a summons and complaint. If a defendant avoids places where he can be served he might make personal service impossible.

What does it mean to change the venue of a lawsuit?

This can include removing a case from state to federal court or filing a motion to change venue from one jurisdiction to another .

What is pre trial dragging out?

dragging out pre-trial. Not suing until the statute of limitations is almost up. (negotiating with the parties for as long as possible to reach a settlement. Then taking the defendant to court when no settlement can be reached.)

What is the importance of far reaching discovery?

The more important key is that a party can use outstanding discovery as a basis for postponing any attempts by a party to obtain summary judgment. VII.

What can an attorney do in court?

An attorney has to sign any pleading filed in court verifying that there is a good faith basis in law and fact to support the pleading or action. In some cases an attorney will not be able to pursue every single motion and every single objection if there is simply no good faith ability to raise such a defense.

Can a potential defendant start a lawsuit as a plaintiff?

It occasionally makes sense for a potential defendant to preemptively start the lawsuit as a Plaintiff.

How to defend a personal injury case?

The first strong defensive strategy is to be keenly aware of the philosophy of your side of the case. For example, if you are a plaintiff in a personal injury case or a personal injury lawyer, you may want to get to the end of the case in which you discuss damages and how the accident affected the victim. As you know, the more that the personal injury lawyer spends on the case, the less he or she will actually make if there is recovery. If you are the defendant or the defendant’s lawyer, you likely want to slow the case down so that you can gain leverage by making the case drag out. If you slow the case down, the other side may become desperate to settle for less than the case is actually worth. Personal injury lawyers are aware of this tactic and often offer to represent the client on a contingency fee basis so that the client does not have to come up with sizable funds to support the litigation strategy.

How can a good litigator derail a case?

A good litigator can easily derail a case even before a trial starts by using some procedural checks. Here are some of the most common tricks lawyers play in civil litigation and how you can fight back.

How does service of process aggravate a plaintiff?

This can aggravate the plaintiff because he or she will likely have to pay for service to be perfected multiple times or may have to try another form of service of process. If the defendant makes an argument against valid service, the entire case may have to start again, costing the plaintiff more time and money. While there are other ways besides personal service to execute valid service, a judge may side with a defendant if the proper steps were not followed. Therefore, it is important that service is properly executed to avoid this problem.

Why do litigators retain consultants?

Another trick that litigators play is to retain all of the potential experts as consultants if the field is very limited. This can help prevent the other side from being able to find a qualified expert to represent their client’s interests.