In Washington, the general default rule is that each party in a lawsuit is responsible for its own attorney fees incurred in the lawsuit. This is known as the “American Rule”. In contrast, the “British Rule” provides that the losing party in a lawsuit must pay the winner’s attorney fees.
Full Answer
The court shall award and determine the amount of reasonable attorneys' fees and costs under this section if: (a) The prevailing party on appeal was the prevailing or substantially prevailing party before the county, city, or town, or in a decision involving a substantial development permit under chapter 90.58 RCW, the prevailing party on ...
Notwithstanding any other provisions of chapter 4.84 RCW and RCW 12.20.060, in any action for damages where the amount pleaded by the prevailing party as hereinafter defined, exclusive of costs, is seven thousand five hundred dollars or less, there shall be taxed and allowed to the prevailing party as a part of the costs of the action a reasonable amount to be fixed by the …
Feb 25, 2015 · Be sure to talk to your lawyer about this issue so you understand it at both the contract drafting stage and at the pre-litigation decision making stage. Statutory Attorneys Fees RCW 4.84.250, allows the judge to award reasonable attorneys fees. Court Rule Attorneys' Fees - There are a few court rules that authorize the court to award attorneys' fees during a lawsuit. …
Our informal complaint resolution process, which can be reached at this link or by calling 1-800-551-4636, is free to both parties. Another form of ADR is arbitration. Many businesses now have contracts that require that a consumer such as you to arbitrate a dispute instead of filing a lawsuit. Arbitration is a legal technique for resolving ...
Statutory Attorneys Fees - There are quite a few statutes in Washington that allow for the recovery of attorneys' fees. For example, the Washington Law Against Discrimination allows the party claiming injury (not the defendant) the right to recover reasonable attorneys' fees. Similarly, the Washington Consumer Protection Act allows the consumer ...
Court Rule Attorneys' Fees - There are a few court rules that authorize the court to award attorneys' fees during a lawsuit. For example, Rule 37 of the Washington Court Rules authorizes the court to award attorneys' fees to a party who is forced to bring a motion to compel their opponent to engage in discovery.
Similarly, the Washington Consumer Protection Act allows the consumer the non-reciprocal right to recover reasonable attorneys' fees. In addition, for lawsuits where the amount in dispute is less than $10,000.00, RCW 4.84.250, allows the judge to award reasonable attorneys fees.
Common Fund - Another equitable basis for recovering attorneys' fees is where a party brings an action and creates or preserves a common fund for the benefit of others as well as the party bringing the action. So there you have it. These are the exceptions to the rule that each side must pay their own attorneys' fees in Washington State.
In Washington State, where I practice law, the general rule is that each side must pay their own attorneys' fees unless one of the exceptions to the rule applies. And, there are only a few exceptions to this rule.
But, judge and arbitrators will commonly award "reasonable attorneys' fees" and the amount awarded will often be less than the actual attorneys' fees incurred. Be sure to talk to your lawyer about this issue so you understand it at both the contract drafting stage and at the pre-litigation decision making stage.
Washington State created the concept of attorneys liens in the 1880’s, and very little has changed since then. The statute was originally enacted in order to create a property right for lawyers in the cases they litigate, and then modified to better prevent the double taxation of clients. Attorney’s liens are still largely misunderstood by many, ...
First and foremost, what is an attorney’s lien? An attorney’s lien is a creature of statute and thus exists exclusively within the confines of the statutory authorization. RCW section 60.40.010 defines an attorney’s lien as a lien securing “his or her compensation” imposed upon certain things, securing payment for legal services performed by certain lawyers in certain limited circumstances. A common misimpression among the bar is that an attorney’s lien may be asserted by any lawyer or firm and imposed for all legal services performed in all instances, even to secure a revenue sharing arrangement among lawyers. This is clearly not the case.
A possessory lien on the papers or money of the client in the attorney’s possession may be brought forth for adjudication on an expedited basis, wherein the court is empowered to summarily adjudicate the facts underlying the lien claim.
Subpart (c) identifies as lienable money “in the hands of the adverse party in an action or proceeding.” This is widely understood to mean, for example, the insurance proceeds of a defendant in a personal injury lawsuit. Entitlement to lien in this circumstance is restricted, however, to the extent to which the attorney actually performed legal services in the “action or proceeding.” In other words, legal services in the nature of an investigation of a claim where no action or proceeding was commenced are not lienable. Or if the attorney liening an adverse party performed no services in a pending action or proceeding, then a lien is not authorized. Returning again to our example, if Attorney A investigated a claim while at Firm B, but then commenced an action for the client after leaving Firm B, there would be no lien entitlement in Firm B (assuming firms have the legal right to lien in the first place). Attorney A would have the exclusive right to impose a lien on the defendant’s money. A further restriction of this subpart is that the lien right does not arise until an action or proceeding is actually “commenced.” Once an action is commenced, the lien right in the attorney performing services in the action or proceeding automatically attaches as a matter of law, effective from and after the date notice of claim of lien is served. The lien notice need not be “filed” or in any particular format to be effective.
Once an action is commenced, the lien right in the attorney performing services in the action or proceeding automatically attaches as a matter of law, effective from and after the date notice of claim of lien is served. The lien notice need not be “filed” or in any particular format to be effective.
Assuming a correct and timely filed notice of attorney’s lien exists, how is that lien enforced? Attorney’s liens are “foreclosed” in the same manner as judgment liens, with a special exception. A possessory lien on the papers or money of the client in the attorney’s possession may be brought forth for adjudication on an expedited basis, wherein the court is empowered to summarily adjudicate the facts underlying the lien claim. For example, we have effectively employed the show cause process to obtain summary relief in this instance.
From a practical standpoint, the lien on client’s papers is meaningless. Bar opinions make it clear that client’s papers belong exclusively to the client, and such papers must be delivered to the client without restriction upon demand. Most would agree that holding the delivery of client papers hostage to payment of legal fees runs afoul ...
In addition to the usual adverse possession requirements, someone attempting to claim possession of forestland in Washington State must show that they've made or erected substantial improvements, which remained entirely or partially on the land for at least ten years. (See RCW § 7.28.085 .)
Importantly, the burden of proof to establish a claim of adverse possession is on the trespasser. The legal holder of title is its presumed owner until the adverse possessor can meet that burden. In other words, the trespasser must do all the work ...
Adverse possession is a legal concept that allows a trespasser—sometimes a stranger but more often a neighbor—to gain legal title over the land of a property owner. The concept developed in early Britain.
As discussed above, Washington State generally requires a ten-year limitation period for occupation of property by the trespasser in order to gain title under Wash. Rev. Code Ann. § 4.16.020.
Trespasser's Intent Irrelevant in Washington. The doctrine of adverse possession protects someone who has honestly entered and held possession in the belief that the land is his or her own, as well as one who knowingly appropriates the land of others for the specific purpose of acquiring title. In other words, in Washington, there is no requirement ...
In other words, title to public lands generally can't be acquired by adverse possession as against the state. So if you live next to Olympic National Park, you won't be able to expand your backyard by planting a garden and waiting ten years or more. Washington will retain legal ownership.
To make sure that your land remains yours and that a neighbor can't lay claim to a portion of it, it's wise to familiarize yourself with Washington's rules on adverse possession. You yourself might also someday need to assert an adverse possession claim over land that you feel you've developed a right to use and want to continue using;
Under Washington State law, an adverse possessor can only claim right to the property after 10 years of use and possession. If the possessor is paying the property taxes on that piece of land, the time period can be reduced to 7 years.
Adverse possession, more commonly known as “squatters rights” is an interesting situation, often fueled by surprise and emotion. Property owners understandably take matters concerning their residential home , including the dirt within its boundary, personally.
If the rightful owner has given the possessor permission to use the property, that possession is no longer considered “hostile” and adverse possession is invalid. The law office of Holmquist + Gardiner is experienced in the area of land use and real estate.
Rather, it means that permission has not been granted by the actual deeded owner of the property to occupy the land. If the landowner has given the occupant permission to use that space, it isn’t considered hostile and adverse possession cannot be claimed. For example, if a landowner isn’t aware that a neighbor’s fence was placed upon his or her property, the occupation would be considered hostile, as the owner hasn’t given permission.
All the above elements outlined must be met at all times during the statutory period. That means the possessor cannot share possession with anyone else or give up use of the property, return to it later, and then count the time that property was abandoned as part of the continuous time period.
Once it’s discovered that there is in fact a boundary line discrepancy, people aren’t exactly willing to give up a parcel of land they view as part of the property they purchased. So, things can get tricky. Again, people are understandably emotional about their dirt.
Adverse possession is not a possibility in all situations. For example, titles to government-owned land cannot be obtained in this manner. If the rightful owner has died, is disabled, is absent from Washington, is in the armed forces, or is in prison when the adverse possessor takes ownership of the land, the 7- or 10-year period could be “tolled” ...
Equity. If there are no statutes or no contractual provisions that apply, there are various equitable grounds upon which courts can decide to award attorney fees. But these grounds are narrow and usually only applicable in special, limited circumstances. One of the more common equitable grounds for awarding attorney fees is if the other side has engaged in some sort of bad faith in the litigation, but that is a high burden to prove and courts are reluctant to find a party engaged in bad faith.
In Washington, the general default rule is that each party in a lawsuit is responsible for its own attorney fees incurred in the lawsuit. This is known as the “American Rule”. In contrast, the “British Rule” provides that the losing party in a lawsuit must pay the winner’s attorney fees.
Examples include parties who prevail on a Consumer Protection Act claim, on a claim involving unpaid salary or wages, or on a claim of discrimination. However, each statute is different and should be read carefully.
Contract. A party can also recover attorney fees if the dispute involves a contract that includes a provision that the prevailing party is entitled to recover attorney fees. It is actually quite common to see these boilerplate attorney fees provisions in contracts nowadays. Even if the contractual provision is written to only benefit one party—only party A can recover its attorney fees if it wins, but not party B—there is a Washington law that says such provisions are reciprocal, meaning that the benefit of the attorney fees provision applies to both parties equally.
Disclaimer: This article and blog are intended to inform the reader of general legal principles applicable to the subject area. They are not intended to provide legal advice regarding specific problems or circumstances. Readers should consult with competent counsel with regard to specific situations.
A party to a lawsuit can recover its attorney fees against another party in the following circumstances: (1) if a statute provides for the recovery of attorney fees; (2) if a contractual agreement between the parties provides for the recovery of attorney fees; or (3) some recognized ground of equity.
And it is important to know this as early as possible. The answer can drive economic decisions in pursuing or not pursuing litigation. If the prevailing party will have a right to recover attorney fees, that could make it more palatable to pursue a lawsuit through to the end, especially for a party that has a strong case. But the flip-side of the coin is if the other side wins it will recover its attorney fees. So, the stakes are increased in attorney fee cases.
Property disputes can involve just about anyone who has an interest in the real estate in question. For example, most property disputes involve the owner of the property in some way, but they can also involve: Neighbors; Landlords and Tenants; Homeowner Associations (HOAs);
A property dispute is a legal dispute that involves real estate. While it may sound relatively simple, the term “property dispute” covers a wide range of possible disputes over a wide range of property. The property involved could be anything from a vacant lot to a home, deck, condominium, manufactured home, pond, driveway, ...
Most commonly, when we think of a property dispute, we think of a boundary dispute. For example, a homeowner puts up a fence in the backyard and inadvertently puts their fence over the property line into the neighbor’s yard. Or perhaps there is a tree located between two homes, and one neighbor wants to cut branches that are arching over her roof–who owns the tree?
It depends on the nature of the property dispute. Sometimes, a dispute can be resolved by just talking to your neighbor and maintaining a good relationship with them. Politeness and respect can go a long way in resolving minor disputes. If it gets to the point where you feel a demand letter is necessary, you can certainly discuss that option with an attorney.
Zoning Issues: Which involves whether the property is being used for the same purpose it was zoned, what zoning ordinances the town has in place, and whether the owner needs to apply for a variance from the town.
Remedies for property disputes often depend on the nature of the dispute and the state where the property is located. Potential remedies include injunctions, judicial sales, monetary damages, and quiet title actions.
Often, boundary disputes can be resolved at least in part by having a proper survey conducted on the property (especially if you’re planning on putting in a fence). Other property disputes may become more complicated, especially when you start running into issues questioning ownership.