Generally court-ordered attorney's fees become a judgment that's collectible the way other judgments are collectible - through levying bank accounts, garnishing wages, etc. Here. however, the court's contempt order specifies a payment date, and may result in further contempt orders and penalties if that order is disobeyed.
Full Answer
If they are ordered to pay a judgment and do not, they can be found in contempt of court. What’s more, all the money spent to recover the judgment, including legal fees, is tacked on to what they owe, and sometimes interest as well. There are cases where people have had to pay several times their original judgment was because of their obstinance.
In California the law requires attorneys, before suing a client, to invite the client to submit a fee dispute to the non-binding arbitration, conducted by the county bar association. Many fee disputes are resolved by this method. [ 1]
If your counterparty is ordered by a jodge after a court case to pay your attorney’s fees, that means that you won the case. Congratulations!
A lawyer with a low flow of clients means that he is not very good at what he does. Consider that a successful lawyer would have a lot of clients from where he can gain what he lost with you, meanwhile the one who goes to Court means that you are one of his few incomes.
If the non-payor claims that they do not have the funds to pay the Court would probably order a “judgement debtor exam” (could be called different things in different States) where the person entitled to funds could examine the debtor, under oath , to see if the person can’t pay or just does not want to pay.
Moreover, the lawyer can go one step further and claim damages for the “suffering” which you caused him because of your nonpayment and even go more than that, claiming that because of your nonpayment instead of attracting new clients he now is in Court (which implies loosing business profits).
You can only go to jail if you commit a crime. Crimes are explicitly written in a Criminal Code. Not paying something which you owe is called debt and debt is regulated by Civil Codes, not Criminal ones. One of the difference between civil law and criminal law is the sanction of not respecting the laws of the Code. On the criminal side there are harsh sanctions such as jail and on the civil one you have damages. Therefore, in this case, your nonpayment would imply only damages.
i agree with the other attorneys, you are obligated to pay the bill, try and see if he will accept the reduced amount, if not decide if it worth your while to request fee arbitration with the State Bar or work out a payment plan.
Unfortunately you are the one who entered into the contract to pay your attorney not your ex-husband. Your attorney can collect from you and you would be responsible for collecting from your ex husband.
You still owe the amount until your ex pays him. The attorney was removing it from your bill because your ex owed him but now that you switched attorneys, the amount is owed. Ask your attorney about these issues but if you're not represented then you can garnish the wages or file for contempt.
The order does not expire. Yes there are interests and penalties that could be attributed to the non payment. What is his basis for appeal? If he did not show up but he had adequate notice, then he can't appeal based lack of notice. You could enforce by contempt if he has no excuse and is just being belligerent or you could file a writ and try to attach any bank accounts or other assets. But why aren't you asking your attorney to do all of this?
The standard of proof is criminal -beyond a reasonable doubt, he had the ability to pay you, but he didn't. You can't just go levy on his bank account, if you could find it, because the order isn't a money judgment.
This is not a comprehensive answer and it is impossible to provide a meaningful response without a consultation.
A written contract prevents misunderstandings because the client has a chance to review what the attorney believes to be their agreement.
Attorney fees and costs are one of the biggest concerns when hiring legal representation. Understanding how attorneys charge and determining what a good rate is can be confusing.
Some common legal fees and costs that are virtually inescapable include: 1 Cost of serving a lawsuit on an opposing party; 2 Cost of filing lawsuit with court; 3 Cost of filing required paperwork, like articles forming a business, with the state; 4 State or local licensing fees; 5 Trademark or copyright filing fees; and 6 Court report and space rental costs for depositions.
Factors considered in determining whether the fees are reasonable include: The attorney’s experience and education; The typical attorney fee in the area for the same services; The complexity of the case; The attorney’s reputation; The type of fee arrangement – whether it is fixed or contingent;
The first step to resolving these disputes is communication . If there is a disagreement, clients and attorneys should first seek to discuss it and try to reach a mutually agreeable solution. Often, small disagreements balloon merely because both the attorney and the client avoided talking to the other out of fear.
Hourly rates have traditionally been the most common legal fee arrangement. However, as technology changes and the practice of law evolves, it is more common to see “non-traditional” fee arrangements like flat-fee packages.
Attorneys usually bill in 1/10 th of an hour increments, meaning you will be charged 1/10 th of the hourly rate for every 6 minutes the attorney spends on your case. The most common billing frequency is monthly, however, some attorneys will send bills more frequently, others less frequently.
One type of attorney fee statute that's common in many states allows a judge to require attorneys' fees to be paid to the winning party in a lawsuit that benefited the public or was brought to enforce a right that significantly affected the public interest.
Judges can use an equitable remedy to require the losing side to pay attorneys' fees if they believe it would be unfair not to do so. (In law, equity generally means "fairness," and an equitable remedy is a fair solution that a judge develops because doing otherwise would lead to unfairness.) This type of equitable remedy—granting attorneys' fees to the winning side—is often used when the losing side brought a lawsuit that was frivolous, in bad faith, or to oppress the defendant, and the defendant wins.
If you don't have the funds to pay, your attorney will likely recommend bankruptcy. Attorneys' fees are generally dischargeable, meaning you can wipe them out.
a contract provision call s for the payment of attorneys' fees, or. a statute (law) specifically requires payment of attorneys' fees by the losing side. If you're concerned or hopeful that your opponent will have to pay attorneys' fees, check (or ask your lawyer to check) if any exceptions apply to your particular case.
It's common for attorneys' fees to be awarded when the contract at issue requires the losing side to pay the winning side's legal fees and costs. This usually occurs in a business context where the parties have specifically included an attorney fee requirement in a contract.
For instance, some states have laws requiring the losing side to pay attorneys' fees in lawsuits involving government entities or antidiscrimination laws.
This type of equitable remedy—granting attorneys' fees to the winning side—is often used when the losing side brought a lawsuit that was frivolous, in bad faith, or to oppress the defendant, and the defendant wins. Also, once in a while, a judge will grant attorneys' fees in cases of extreme attorney misconduct, to warn the offending attorney.
Another issue that may arise in connection with a request for an award of attorney's fees is whether the person requesting the fee award is actually the "prevailing party."
For example, if the judgment obtained is for $10,000, and the attorney's fees incurred to obtain that judgment are $8,000, the prevailing party will only net $2,000 unless a statute entitles that party to recover attorney's fees from the opposing party.
Depending on the amount of money involved in a civil case and the complexity of the issues involved, attorney's fees can eat up a substantial percentage of any judgment you obtain in a successful lawsuit.
Examples of these kinds of statutes include: civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in employment and public accommodations. environmental protection laws.
Some statutes permitting an award of attorney's fees to the prevailing party give the court discretion to make such an award based on whether certain defined factors can be established. Other statutes require the court to award these fees without making any independent determination about the propriety of a fee award.
Whether the attorney's fees are "reasonable" typically requires proof that the fees charged are within the range charged by other attorneys in the community with similar experience and expertise. (Check out our Guide to Legal Service Billing Rates for more details.)
Under what lawyers commonly call the "American Rule", the parties in a civil lawsuit are responsible for their own attorney's fees, unless a statute says that the prevailing party is to be awarded -- or is eligible to be awarded -- its attorney's fees from the other side.