obligations of defense attorney when settlement demand is higher than policy limits

by Darron Bruen 7 min read

Is a demand for policy limits a settlement demand?

Dec 19, 2010 · The insurer is not obligated to accept a settlement demand that is within its policy limits unless it is “reasonable.” The insurer’s obligation is to pay a reasonable amount in settlement “based on a fair appraisal of potential exposure and the strength of each case.” Isaacson v. California Ins. Guar. Ass’n (1988) 44 Cal.3d 775, 793. “The reasonableness of a …

Does the duty to settle exceed insurance policy limits?

Jun 01, 2016 · Defense counsel should proactively request documentation of damages from plaintiff’s counsel, especially if the insured’s exposure seems to exceed policy limits. If the insured’s documented exposure exceeds policy limits, defense counsel should advise the insured client thoroughly regarding the possibility that the client will now be personally liable for the …

What happens if a settlement demand fails to meet legal requirements?

Sep 27, 2021 · If you are negotiating a settlement with an insurance company defense attorney and they do not accept your demand letter of policy limits, then repeat it again but in writing. In addition, you may want to involve a personal injury lawyer to make sure that the demand letter is completed correctly and in compliance with all court rules.

What happens if the plaintiff never offers to settle within limits?

Mercury sought to clarify whether the new language precluded an offset of the policy limits payment against the restitution order. While waiting for input from the insured’s mother, acting as her attorney in fact, and from the criminal defense counsel, the plaintiffs’ demand expired.

image

Can you sue above policy limits?

Unfortunately, you cannot make an insurance company pay beyond its policy limit. You do, however, have the right to sue the at-fault driver for more than the value of his or her insurance policy. This would mean directly filing a lawsuit directly against the driver who caused the accident and not the insurer.Sep 9, 2020

What does policy limit demand mean?

A 'policy limit demand' in a personal injury case requests the insurance company to pay the full policy limits or risk their insured's financial stability.Nov 29, 2021

What happens if someone sues you for more than your insurance covers in Texas?

Your insurance provider is only liable for payment up to your policy limits. If a car accident victim sues you and receives a judgment for more than your car insurance policy limits, you are personally liable for the amount above your policy limits.

What happens if insurance doesn't pay enough?

California Law You must show financial responsibility for any vehicle that you own, in case of injury to other people or damage to their property. ... If you do not have auto liability insurance, you can be fined, your license may be suspended, and your vehicle could be impounded.

What happens if an insurance company doesn't respond to a demand letter?

If an insurance company has still not responded to your demand letter, the next step may be to contact a legal representative and file a lawsuit. ... Once those run out, you could lose the right to sue. When you file a lawsuit, the insurance company is served paperwork that legally obligates them to respond.

How do you write a demand letter for negligence?

An effective demand letter should briefly explain your version of the incident and how it occurred, set forth the types and amounts of your injuries and damages, make a claim for lost wages, if applicable, and, most importantly, present all necessary supporting documentation.Apr 24, 2020

How can I protect my settlement money?

Deposit your injury settlement check in a segregated account & don't deposit any other money in the account. You must keep your settlement monies in a segregated, separate bank account. Do not mix up any other money with your settlement monies.

Can you sue an insurance company for negligence?

You can sue your insurance company if they violate or fail the terms of the insurance policy. Common violations include not paying claims in a timely fashion, not paying properly filed claims, or making bad faith claims.4 days ago

Why do lawyers take so long to settle a case?

Once a case gets filed in court, things can really slow down. Common reasons why a case will take longer than one would hope can include: Trouble getting the defendant or respondent served. The case cannot proceed until the defendant on the case has been formally served with the court papers.May 28, 2020

Do insurance companies try to get out of paying?

Insurance companies are notorious for trying, at all costs, to avoid paying out for claims. ... Insurance companies have a lot of sneaky tricks they'll play that can prevent you from getting the compensation you deserve. As you know, the best offense is a good defense, and that means being able to recognize their tricks.

What is it called when an insurance company refuses to pay a claim?

Bad faith insurance refers to an insurer's attempt to renege on its obligations to its clients, either through refusal to pay a policyholder's legitimate claim or investigate and process a policyholder's claim within a reasonable period.

What is the amount an insured person must pay before the insurance will help cover a loss?

Deductible. This is the amount you pay in out-of-pocket expenses before your insurer covers the remaining expense. Therefore, if the deductible is $5,000 and the total insured loss comes to $15,000, your insurance company will only pay $10,000.

What happens if a company is sued?

Your company is sued in a lawsuit for which you believe it has valid defenses, but which nevertheless has the potential to embarrass the company and result in a significant award of damages. You tender the defense of the lawsuit to the company’s liability insurer, which agrees to defend.

Does an insurer have a duty to settle a case?

An Insurer Has a Duty to Settle. The insurer's refusal to settle a case is not unlimited. The insurer cannot arbitrarily withhold its consent to a settlement of a claim that is covered under the policy.

What is the duty of good faith?

To trigger the insurer's duty to settle, the settlement demand must be within policy limits. "The duty of good faith compels acceptance of a settlement offer only if the offer is within the insurer's policy limits.".

What happens if an insurer fails to settle?

The Policyholder Has Remedies When the Insurer Breaches Its Duty to Settle. The consequences of an insurer's failure to settle can be far-reaching. Under California and other states' laws, a breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing is both a breach of contract and a tort.

What is the duty to settle a claim?

An insurer has a duty to settle claims against its insured under the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, which is implied in all insurance policies. The duty to settle generally requires that the insurer accept a reasonable settlement offer that is within the limits of liability of the policy, particularly where there is a substantial likelihood of recovery in excess of those policy limits should the case proceed to judgment. An insurer that unreasonably rejects a policy limits demand by placing its own interests above those of the insured may be liable for bad faith and subject to liability in excess of the policy limits, depending upon the jurisdiction. 1

Does an insurer have a duty to settle?

The insurer’s duty to settle does not impose a “categorical obligation” to accept a plaintiff’s demand when it seeks amounts within the policy limits. 5 Rather, an insurer’s duty to accept a settlement demand depends on whether the demand is reasonable under the circumstances. The reasonableness of a settlement demand is generally a question ...

What is a setup letter?

A setup letter is a policy limits demand that is not truly seeking a settlement for the policy limits but instead is seeking to set up a claim of bad faith against the insurer by reducing the chance that the insurer will accept the offer . This is not a new tactic.

Can an insurer reject a settlement within policy limits?

It is important to note that even if a policy limits demand is “reasonable,” the insurer may have valid grounds for rejecting a settlement within policy limits. For example, the demand letter may require the insurer or insured to fulfill various conditions precedent to valid acceptance of the settlement demand.

What is a red flag in insurance?

One red flag is a policy limits demand made quickly after an accident, thereby depriving the insurer of the ability to conduct a full investigation.

What is the duty of an insurer to defend its insured?

An insurer’s duty to defend its insured arises whenever a lawsuit is filed against the insured alleging facts and circumstances arguably covered by the policy. [i] This duty has been described as “one of the main benefits of the insurance contract.”.

What should defense counsel do?

Defense counsel should periodically analyze whether the insured’s exposure approaches policy limits, and advise both adjuster and insured client. Excess insurers should also be notified. Defense counsel should proactively request documentation of damages from plaintiff’s counsel, especially if the insured’s exposure seems to exceed policy limits.

Does an insurer have to indemnify the insured?

Under these circumstances, the insurer would not have to indemnify the insured, but it would still have to pay the insured’s attorney fees for defense of the lawsuit.

What is an expert comment?

Opinions expressed in Expert Commentary articles are those of the author and are not necessarily held by the author's employer or IRMI. Expert Commentary articles and other IRMI Online content do not purport to provide legal, accounting, or other professional advice or opinion.

What is a first party claim?

Typically, in the property/casualty context, first party claims involve only the company and the policyholder, the policyholder's loss of property in some form, and a demand that the insurer pay the loss. In third-party claims, however, a non-party to the insurance policy alleges a loss (property damage or bodily injury, ...

Can an insurer afford to litigate?

This day-to-day experience teaches that many claimants cannot afford attorneys to litigate on their behalf to force disclosure of the information; consequently, their claims may settle for substantially less than their true value, thereby benefiting the insurer. On the other hand, some claimants who can afford it may decide that litigation is the most viable option when the insurer fails to provide policy limits.

What is the duty of an insurance company?

Assuming coverage exists, the insurance company has a contractual duty to defend and indemnify the insured. A company's failure to act in the best interest of its insured can bring serious problems, including the two dreaded words, "bad faith.".

Can insurers disclose policy limits?

An insurer's failure to reveal policy limits at the pre-litigation stage can serve as a basis for bad faith actions. Moreover, while insurers may generally anticipate such actions from third parties, and since failure to disclose policy limits may be construed as resolving a conflict of interest favoring the insurance company's economic interests over those of its policyholders, an insurer also is vulnerable to bad faith allegations from its own insureds. Silence, then, does not gain the insurer any fair advantage.

What is a demand for policy limits?

A demand for policy limits information often occurs shortly after an accident or "occurrence" in which someone suffers harm, blames another, and seeks compensation. Usually, an attorney or public adjuster contacts the insurance company asking for policy limits.

What is the difference between disclosure and non disclosure?

To disclose or not to disclose, therefore, is the point where an insurance company's interests and the policyholder's may diverge. Whereas, nondisclosure favors the insurer's economic interests, disclosure may serve the policyholder's best interest because it: may prevent litigation.

What is the first step in a full court press case?

The first step of the full court press strategy is to properly evaluate the case in relation to the available insurance coverage. (From our perspective, settlements should be fair to both sides. Swift justice is the goal.) This strategy is only advisable when the insurance coverage is not enough to cover the full amount of the plaintiff’s damages. For instance, if you have a clear liability automobile accident case with significant property damage, and a herniated disc with no prior injuries, and only $25,000 in coverage, you know it’s time to use the full court press strategy. An insurance carrier who balks at settling a case like that for the policy limits deserves to suffer the consequences of a bad faith claim. The reality is that a large percentage of our cases involve damages that exceed the policy limits. The other reality is that insurance companies are often slow to acknowledge the full value of a claim, and sometimes never acknowledge it until a jury awards a verdict or even later.

What is a quick demand?

A quick demand is a letter to the insurance company giving them an opportunity to settle for the policy limits. Most attorneys settle their cases by utilizing what we call a full demand. The full demand is a letter that goes to the insurance company along with all of the relevant records, bills, and other materials that justify payment of the policy limits. A quick demand, on the other hand, is a letter that goes to the insurance carrier along with HIPPA compliant releases, allowing the insurance carrier to gather the relevant records and bills. We send quick demands because it cuts out the time it takes for us to gather the records and bills, and puts pressure on the insurance carrier to gather the records and bills within a certain time period or risk the possibility of acting in bad faith. An insurance carrier has a duty to investigate a claim within a reasonable time frame. Failure to do so can be considered bad faith. A quick demand gives the insurance carrier a date by which the policy limits must be tendered; I usually give them 45 days from the date of the letter. It gives the carrier a list of all relevant medical providers, as well as HIPPA compliant releases, allowing the carrier to retrieve records from all relevant providers. It’s very important to include a list of all prior medical records for the last ten years, because failure to be completely forthcoming with all relevant evidence could kill a bad faith claim.

Who is Jimmy Fasig?

Jimmy Fasig is the managing partner of Fasig Brooks and has won numerous million and multimillion-dollar recoveries on behalf of clients. With nearly two decades of legal experience, he intimately understands Florida personal injury law and is dedicated to providing injured victims with the best possible legal representation.

Do insurance companies acknowledge claims?

The other reality is that insurance companies are often slow to acknowledge the full value of a claim, and sometimes never acknowledge it until a jury awards a verdict or even later.

image

"First in Time, First in Right"

  • Where multiple claimants bring suits against one or more insured defendants seeking damages for bodily injuries or death arising out of a single occurrence and, on any reasonable evaluation, the policy limits are plainly insufficient to cover the insured's total potential exposure, the rule generally applied is "first in time, first in right."5 This principle "applies regardless of "whether th…
See more on duanemorris.com

Good Faith

  • An insurer has a duty to act in good faith with respect to the disbursement of the proceeds of a liability insurance policy and the insurer's "termination of its duty to defend, like all transactions between insurer and insured, requires the insurer to have acted in good faith."23 When an insured has surrendered all control over the handling of a claim to the insurer, the insurer assumes "a du…
See more on duanemorris.com

Illustrative Cases

  • (1) In Farinas v. Florida Farm Bureau Gen. Ins. Co.,31Farm Bureau's insured, Copertino, lost control of his car, crossed a median and hit an oncoming car, causing the deaths of five teenagers and severe injuries to seven others, including a 14-year old girl who was rendered a quadriplegic. The policy limits were $100,000 per claim and $300,000 per accident. Within two weeks of the accid…
See more on duanemorris.com

Practical Considerations

  • We have shown above that when a liability insurer with a duty to defend is faced with multiple claims arising out of a single covered occurrence, and its reasonable assessment of the injuries suffered by one or more of the claimants shows them to be in excess of the aggregate policy limits, the insurer must to treat the claim as if its policy was unlimited. In practice, this means th…
See more on duanemorris.com

Notes

  1. See, e.g., All-Star Ins. Corp. v. Steel Bar, Inc., 324 F.Supp. 160, 163 (N.D. Ind. 1971)("The nature of the insurer's duty to defend is purely contractual. There is no common law duty as to which t...
  2. CG 00 01 12 04
  3. GL 00 02 01 73. Pre-1966 liability policies typically contained the following clause:As respect…
  1. See, e.g., All-Star Ins. Corp. v. Steel Bar, Inc., 324 F.Supp. 160, 163 (N.D. Ind. 1971)("The nature of the insurer's duty to defend is purely contractual. There is no common law duty as to which t...
  2. CG 00 01 12 04
  3. GL 00 02 01 73. Pre-1966 liability policies typically contained the following clause:As respects the insurance afforded by the other terms of this policy, the company shall: (a) defend any suit aga...
  4. "The language manifests the parties' intent to limit the duty to defend to the time before policy limits are exhausted" . . . This policy language can be characterized only as precise, plain, and c...

A Defending Insurer Drives Settlement Decisions

  • Has the insurer acted properly? And, if not, what remedies are available to you as the policyholder? The answers depend on a number of factors. An insurer that is defending its policyholder has the right to control the defense and ultimately to settle the case. Liability insurance policies typically contain a provision that the insurer "may in [its] discretion . . . settle a…
See more on orrick.com

An Insurer Has A Duty to Settle

  • The insurer's refusal to settle a case is not unlimited. The insurer cannot arbitrarily withhold its consent to a settlement of a claim that is covered under the policy. Instead, the insurer owes its policyholder a duty to act in good faith,which requires the insurer to agree to a settlement where (i) the policyholder receives a reasonable settlement demand or is able to negotiate a reasonabl…
See more on orrick.com

The Settlement Demand Must Be Reasonable

  • "The only permissible consideration in evaluating the reasonableness of the settlement offer becomes whether, in light of the victim's injuries and the probable liability of the insured, the ultimate judgment is likely to exceed the amount of the settlement offer." Johansen v. California State Auto. Ass'n Inter-Ins. Bureau, 538 P.2d 744, 748 (Cal. 1975). In evaluating the reasonablen…
See more on orrick.com

The Demand Must Be Within Policy Limits

  • To trigger the insurer's duty to settle, the settlement demand must be within policy limits. "The duty of good faith compels acceptance of a settlement offer only if the offer is within the insurer's policy limits." Walbrook Ins. Co. Ltd. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 7 Cal. Rptr. 2d 513, 519 (Ct. App. 1992). As one court phrased it: "An insurer cannot unreasonably refuse to settle within policy lim…
See more on orrick.com

The Policyholder Has Remedies When The Insurer Breaches Its Duty to Settle

  • The consequences of an insurer's failure to settle can be far-reaching. Under California and other states' laws, a breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing is both a breach of contract and a tort. This is important because it subjects the insurer to liability for all damages proximately caused by the insurer's breach of duty—even outside the limits of the insurance policy—includin…
See more on orrick.com

The Duty to Settle

  • An insurer has a duty to settle claims against its insured under the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, which is implied in all insurance policies. The duty to settle generally requires that the insurer accept a reasonable settlement offer that is within the limits of liability of the policy, particularly where there is a substantial likelihood of recovery in excess of those policy limits sh…
See more on americanbar.org

Policy Limits Demands, Time Limit Demands, and Setup Letters

  • Plaintiffs lawyers seeking to open up the policy limits should avoid “setup” letters. A setup letter is a policy limits demand that is not truly seeking a settlement for the policy limits but instead is seeking to set up a claim of bad faith against the insurer by reducing the chance that the insurer will accept the offer. This is not a new tactic. In 1985, Justice Kaus of the California Supreme Co…
See more on americanbar.org

Reasonable Policy Limits Demands and Responses

  • It is important to note that even if a policy limits demand is “reasonable,” the insurer may have valid grounds for rejecting a settlement within policy limits. For example, the demand letter may require the insurer or insured to fulfill various conditions precedent to valid acceptance of the settlement demand. Certain conditions may render a settlement demand unreasonable and thu…
See more on americanbar.org

Conclusion

  • Plaintiffs lawyers and insurers must take certain actions to maximize their respective situations when policy limits demands are at issue. To create a strong policy limits demand, plaintiffs lawyers should provide a comprehensive analysis of the facts and law supporting the conclusion that the insured likely will face exposure in excess of the policy limits. In addition, plaintiffs lawy…
See more on americanbar.org

Notes

  • 1. Badillo v. Mid Century Ins. Co., 121 P.3d 1080 (Okla. 2005). 2. Emcasco Ins. Co. v. Am. Int’l Specialty Lines Ins. Co., 438 F.3d 519 (5th Cir. 2006). 3. Merritt v. Reserve Ins. Co., 34 Cal. App. 3d 858 (1973). 4. Id. at 870. 5. Cont’l Cas. Co. v. U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co., 516 F. Supp. 384 (N.D. Cal. 1981). 6. Kropilak v. 21st Century Sec. Ins. Co., 2014 WL 2884022 (M.D. Fla. June 25, 2014); Pet…
See more on americanbar.org

Why Insurers Need to Be Careful Responding to Policy Limits Requests

Image
A demand for policy limits information often occurs shortly after anaccident or "occurrence" in which someone suffers harm, blamesanother, and seeks compensation. Usually, an attorney or public adjustercontacts the insurance company asking for policy limits. Persons experienced atthe process ask for all p…
See more on irmi.com

Policy Limits Demands and Settlement Demands

  • A demand for policy limits is not a settlement demand; rather, it is whatthe plaintiff asserts she must have to settle a case. If the settlement demandis within policy limits, the insurer rejects the demand, litigates the case,experiences a judgment in excess of policy limits but refuses to indemnify itsown insured for the full judgment, the insurer invites a lawsuit for bad faithrefusal t…
See more on irmi.com

Powell v. Prudential

  • First, in Powell, an auto insured by Prudential and driven byPowell's daughter struck two pedestrians, one of whom was seriouslyinjured. Shortly after the accident, the victim's attorney sent a letter toPrudential asking for policy limits. Getting no response, he sent a secondletter, certified this time, and informing Prudential: Prudential did not respond, so the attorney sent a th…
See more on irmi.com

Boicourt v. Amex

  • In Boicourt, decided 9 years later, following an accident, aninjured passenger in a vehicle sought policy limits information from theinsurer, Amex. Despite a California law requiring an insurer to contact theinsured and get permission to disclose policy limits when demanded by aclaimant, Amex never consulted its insured during three attempts over a 5-monthperiod by the injured part…
See more on irmi.com

Lessons Learned

  • Insurers deal with policy demands and other aspects of claim administrationdaily. This day-to-day experience teaches that many claimants cannot affordattorneys to litigate on their behalf to force disclosure of the information;consequently, their claims may settle for substantially less than their truevalue, thereby benefiting the insurer. On the other hand, some claimants whocan afford it m…
See more on irmi.com

Conclusion

  • An insurer's failure to reveal policy limits at the pre-litigation stagecan serve as a basis for bad faith actions. Moreover, while insurers maygenerally anticipate such actions from third parties, and since failure todisclose policy limits may be construed as resolving a conflict of interestfavoring the insurance company's economic interests over those of itspolicyholders, an i…
See more on irmi.com