ny case where attorney was ineffecrive for failing to argue clients pro se motion

by Paul Schaden 7 min read

What is a pro se motion in a civil case?

Defendant bases his motion on the ground of ineffective assistance of counsel, in that his trial counsel failed to argue the unconstitutionality of the intentional murder statute (Penal Law § 125.27 [1] [a] [i]), the assault statute (Penal Law § 120.05 [1]), and the statute defining "serious physical injury" (Penal Law § 10.00 [10]) in that these statutes fail to distinguish the intent to …

Why did she go back to the Attorney for a second motion?

Rubino v. New York, 145 AD2d 285 (1st Dept. 1989) (when a defendant participates in a lawsuit on the merits, he indicates his intention to submit to the court's jurisdiction over the action and by appearing "informally" in this manner, he confers in personam jurisdiction on the court); Taveras v.

What happens if a defendant fails to file a suppression motion?

Oct 14, 2010 · As defendants here acknowledge, in most cases strict enforcement of the CPL 460.30 time limit is constitutionally permissible because attorneys usually accede to their clients' requests to file notices of appeal and, when they fail to do so, most defendants are in a position to discover the omission within the statutory grace period. 3. As we observed in Corso, CPL …

When to file a motion for mistrial for ineffective counsel?

The defendant argues that his trial counsel failed to provide effective representation, in that counsel failed to procure certain New York State Division of Parole (hereinafter the Division of Parole) documents and related testimony prior to the pretrial Dunaway hearing (see Dunaway v New York, 442 US 200). The defendant contends that such evidence would have shown that he …

image

What Supreme Court case established the defendant's right to an attorney even if the defendant Cannot pay?

The Sixth Amendment gives defendants the right to counsel in federal prosecutions. However, the right to counsel was not applied to state prosecutions for felony offenses until 1963 in Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335.

Which case said all must have the right to an attorney if they Cannot afford one?

Gideon v. WainwrightIn Gideon v. Wainwright, the Court concluded that the Constitution required state-provided legal counsel in criminal cases for defendants who are unable to afford to pay their own attorneys.Mar 18, 2019

Why does the Strickland standard make it so difficult for defendants to claim ineffective assistance of counsel?

The Strickland test is intentionally difficult for a defendant to satisfy, and courts reject nearly all IAC claims. The primary justification for this is that prosecutors and judges should not have to retry defendants because of defense counsel's errors, as such errors are completely outside the government's control.

How would a criminal defendant prove that his attorney was ineffective?

To prove ineffective assistance, a defendant must show (1) that their trial lawyer's performance fell below an "objective standard of reasonableness" and (2) "a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different." Strickland v.

What rights did Abe Fortas Gideon's attorney argue were being violated?

In 1961, Clarence Gideon was arrested and charged with breaking and entering and petty larceny in Panama City, Florida. ... After Gideon was sentenced to 5 years in prison, he argued that Florida violated the Sixth Amendment's guarantee of the right to counsel.

What impact did Gideon vs Wainwright have?

In Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution requires the states to provide defense attorneys to criminal defendants charged with serious offenses who cannot afford lawyers themselves.

What is Strickland standard?

Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), was a landmark Supreme Court case that established the standard for determining when a criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel is violated by that counsel's inadequate performance.

What exactly is ineffective assistance of counsel?

: representation of a criminal defendant that is so flawed as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial claimed ineffective assistance of counsel following his conviction. — called also ineffective assistance.

What is a ineffective claim?

Ineffectiveness claims can be brought by defendants who pled guilty to a plea deal and did so following the bad advice of counsel. Such claims typically arise when the defendant's lawyer fails to inform their client about the “collateral” consequences of their guilty plea.

What is ineffective counsel examples?

Real case examples of ineffective assistance of counsel are: defense counsel not objecting to the use of the defendant's incriminating statement, defense lawyer not objecting to errors in a presentence report, defense attorney failing to object to the excessive length of the defendant's sentence, 11 and.

Which of the following is an example of ineffective counsel?

Examples of ineffective, or deficient assistance by a counsel include the following: Not enlisting experts to challenge the prosecution's physical evidence. Not investigating the prosecution's witnesses. Failure to investigate alibi's or alibi witnesses.May 25, 2017

What are the types of ethical violations that have been associated with prosecutors?

These are:failure to disclose exculpatory evidence,introducing false evidence,using improper arguments, and.discriminating in jury selection.

Criminal Defendant’S Handbook – Order Now!

  • Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are raised initially by motion in district court. In most cases, it’s inappropriate to raise the issue on direct appeal. Ineffective assistance claims must be sufficiently substantiated in the trial court and an appropriate record made. Pre-trial claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are reviewed on a different standard than post-trial claims. If a …
See more on libertyinternational.wordpress.com

A. Pre-Trial Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims

  • If the defendant claims before trial that counsel is rendering ineffective assistance of counsel, the trial court must, before trial, conduct an inquiry sufficient to determine the truth and scope of the defendant’s allegations. On post-conviction review, if no pretrial findings were made, the government must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant was accorded repr…
See more on libertyinternational.wordpress.com

B. Counsel Has Constitutional Duty to Investigate

  • “Counsel has a constitutional duty to make reasonable investigations or to make reasonable decisions that make particular investigation unnecessary .” Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 688, 691, 80 L.Ed.2d 674, 104 S.Ct. 2052 (1984). The Sixth Amendment requires investigation and preparation, not only to exonerate, but also to secure and protect the rights of the accused. suc…
See more on libertyinternational.wordpress.com

C. Developing Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claim

  • Ordinarily, a defendant who claims ineffective assistance of counsel bears a substantial burden of proving that his counsel’s representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceedings would have been different. Bellamy v. Cogdell, 974 F.2d 302 (2nd Cir. 1992). To succeed on a claim of ineffective …
See more on libertyinternational.wordpress.com

D. Post-Conviction Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims

  • The customary procedure for challenging effectiveness of counsel under the Sixth Amendment is a post-conviction 28 U.S.C. §2255 motion. United States v. Houtchens, 926 F.2d 824, 828 (9th Cir. 1991). Prejudice is not strictly construed because strict definition “would impose a heavy burden on defendant’s who are often proceeding pro se in an initial 28 U.S.C. §2255 motion.” Peguero v…
See more on libertyinternational.wordpress.com