A conflict of interest can also occur at the law firm level. For example, even if an attorney working at a law firm didn't personally work on a particular matter (because someone else at the firm handled it), if the attorney leaves the firm, he or she could still have a conflict of interest related to that matter based on the firm's work.
Finally, ignoring a conflict of interest may violate the duty of care that a lawyer owes a client and constitute a breach of a fiduciary duty, both of which may lead to civil liability. The standards governing most conflicts of interest are found in DR 5-101 through DR …
Dec 07, 2018 · The conflict may occur between the prospective client and one of the attorney's current or former clients. There can also be concerns if a client's interests are in conflict with the lawyer's professional or personal relationships. For example, if the client is looking to sue a particular business that happens to be owned by the lawyer's brother-in-law, there's a clear …
New York State officers and employees and Legislative members and employees shall not... have any interest, financial or otherwise, direct or indirect, or engage in any business or transaction or professional activity or incur any obligation of any nature, which is in substantial conflict with the proper discharge of his (or her) duties in the public interest.”
More generally, although the existence of a contractual relationship permit-ted by DR 1-107 does not by itself create a conflict of interest violating DR 5-101(A) whenever a law firm represents a client in a matter in which the non-legal professional service firm’s client is also involved, the law firm’s interest in maintaining an advantageous relationship with the non-legal professional …
The Commission administers an "Attorney of the Day" program to help provide State officials and employees, lobbyists, and clients of lobbyists with free, confidential advice on navigating the State's ethics and lobbying laws.
have any interest, financial or otherwise, direct or indirect, or engage in any business or transaction or professional activity or incur any obligation of any nature, which is in substantial conflict with the proper discharge of his (or her) duties in the public interest.”
The Code of Ethics is intended to prevent you from using your State job and official position to benefit yourself or someone else. The Code of Ethics not only addresses actual conflicts of interest, but also conduct that can create the appearance of such conflicts when performing your State job. Next Section. Continue.
The Code of Ethics not only addresses actual conflicts of interest, but also conduct that can create the appearance of such conflicts when performing your State job. Next Section. Continue.
The Code of Ethics contains nine standards of conduct. Each standard examines the types of conflicts that State officers and employees are prohibited from engaging in while in State service.
The Joint Commission on Public Ethics periodically releases Ethics Reminders. Each reminder is a brief and easy to understand synopsis of the laws and rules under the Commission’s jurisdiction. Ethics Reminders are issued to assist those subject to the Commission’s jurisdiction in understanding and complying with their obligations under the law.
Ethics Reminders are issued to assist those subject to the Commission’s jurisdiction in understanding and complying with their obligations under the law.
Let’s start with the basics of imputed conflicts. The key New York rule governing the imputation of conflicts is DR 5-105 (D), which provides as follows:
New York case law, while less explicit, has usually reached the same result. The most often cited New York State decision on this point is Nemet v. Nemet, 491 N.Y.S.2d 810, 112 A.D.2d 359 (2d Dept. 1985).
Against this background, the Second Circuit considered the appeal in Hempstead Video v. Incorporated Village of Valley Stream, 2005 WL 1274244 (2d Cir. May 31, 2005). The essential facts are relatively simple. The plaintiff, Hempstead Video, is an “adult” video store operated by a man named James Alessandria.
When a law firm directly provides a client with both legal and non-legal services that are “so closely entwined that they cannot be distinguished from each other” ( EC 1-9), then the non-legal services are always subject to the Disciplinary Rules, including the conflict of interest rules. When either a law firm itself or an affiliated entity provides a person with non-legal services that the law firm considers distinct from any legal services offered by the law firm, the law firm should always explain to the recipient that the services “are not legal services and that the protection of an attorney-client relationship does not exist with respect to the non-legal services…” A law firm that does not issue such a disclaimer regarding non-legal services must either scrupulously abide by the Disciplinary Rules or bear the risk of a reasonable recipient’s confusion.
EC 1-13: DR 1-107 permits lawyers to enter into inter professional contractual relationships for the systematic and continuing provision of legal and non-legal professional services provided the non-legal professional or non-legal professional service firm with which the lawyer or law firm is affiliated does not own, control, supervise or manage, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, the practice of law by the lawyer or law firm . The non-legal professional or non-legal professional service firm may not play a role in, for example, the decision whether to accept or terminate an engagement to provide legal services in a particular matter or to a particular client, determining the manner in which lawyers are hired or trained, the assignment of lawyers to handle particular matters or to provide legal services to particular clients, decisions relating to the undertaking of pro bono publico and other public-interest legal work, financial and budgetary decisions relating to the legal practice, and determining the compensation and advancement of lawyers and of persons assisting lawyers on legal matters.
The attorneys at the Catafago Law Firm, P.C., handle any type of claim involving injuries caused by a conflict of interest, including cases in which:
For a free consultation, contact the firm by email or call at 212-239-9669. Attorneys are available for appointments on weekdays and evenings or weekends by request. The firm’s offices are located in the Empire State Building.
Generally, absent the former client’s consent, the moving lawyer may not undertake representation adverse to the former client if (1) the moving lawyer personally “represented” the client (that is, obtained or had access to a confidence or secret of the client) or otherwise acquired confidences or secrets of the client relevant to the current representation, and (2) the moving lawyer would be undertaking representation in the same matter or in a matter that is substantially related to one in which the moving lawyer of the old firm previously represented the former client. Further, absent client consent, if the moving lawyer is disqualified from engaging in the representation under this rule, then under DR 5-105 (D) the moving lawyer’s new law firm is also disqualified. [Copyright 1999 New York State Bar Association.]
The New York State Bar Association issued Ethics Opinion 723 on Oct. 12, 1999. The Opinion construes the 1999 amendments to the Code dealing with conflicts of interest and disqualification when a lawyer moves from one firm to another. Because of the general importance of the Opinion, NYPRR reproduces it here in full.
Except as provided in DR 9-10 (B) with respect to current or former government lawyers, a lawyer who has represented a client in a matter shall not, without the consent of the former client after full disclosure :
The phrase can apply in a variety of situations which all have one thing in common: an individual with divided loyalties, such as when a person has to act on behalf of the public in connection with a matter that affects his or her personal interests.
In addition to defining the circumstances when municipal officers and employees may not have interests in contracts, Article 18 prohibits certain other conduct on the part of municipal officers and employees: You are prohibited from soliciting a gift.
As a municipal officer or employee, your job by its very nature places you in a position of public trust. You are responsible for ensuring that public resources are used in the best interests of the public. You also have a duty to use the limited public resources available to you as effectively and efficiently as possible. When serving in your public capacity, the interests of your municipality must come before your own. In fact and appearance, your actions and interests must be above reproach. This brochure is intended to help you better understand New York State law as it pertains to conflicts of interest, and your responsibilities when your public and private interests conflict.
The full text of Sections 800-809 of the General Municipal Law, which details conflicts of interest and is required to be posted in each local government, is provided in poster format [pdf - 2019].
Examples of contracts include purchase or sale agreements, construction agreements and service contracts, as well as vouchers for payment submitted to a municipality. A contract also includes the naming of a depository of public funds or the naming of an official newspaper of a municipality.
A code of ethics may regulate or prescribe conduct which is not expressly prohibited by Article 18, but it may not authorize conduct that is prohibited by Article 18. Such codes may also provide for the prohibition of conduct or disclosure of information and the classification of employees or officers.
Article 18 authorizes counties to establish boards of ethics to provide advisory opinions with respect to Article 18 and codes of ethics to the officers and employees of municipalities within the county. Similarly, the municipalities within a county are also authorized to establish their own boards of ethics.
[8] Even where there is no direct adverseness, a conflict of interest exists if there is a significant risk that a lawyer's ability to consider, recommend or carry out an appropriate course of action for the client will be materially limited as a result of the lawyer's other responsibilities or interests. For example, a lawyer asked to represent several individuals seeking to form a joint venture is likely to be materially limited in the lawyer's ability to recommend or advocate all possible positions that each might take because of the lawyer's duty of loyalty to the others. The conflict in effect forecloses alternatives that would otherwise be available to the client. The mere possibility of subsequent harm does not itself require disclosure and consent. The critical questions are the likelihood that a difference in interests will eventuate and, if it does, whether it will materially interfere with the lawyer's independent professional judgment in considering alternatives or foreclose courses of action that reasonably should be pursued on behalf of the client.
Concurrent conflicts of interest can arise from the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client or a third person or from the lawyer's own interests. For specific Rules regarding certain concurrent conflicts of interest, see Rule 1.8. For former client conflicts of interest, see Rule 1.9. For conflicts of interest involving prospective clients, see Rule 1.18. For definitions of "informed consent" and "confirmed in writing," see Rule 1.0 (e) and (b).
For example, a lawyer asked to represent several individuals seeking to form a joint venture is likely to be materially limited in the lawyer's ability to recommend or advocate all possible positions that each might take because of the lawyer's duty of loyalty to the others.
Thus, a lawyer related to another lawyer, e.g., as parent, child, sibling or spouse, ordinarily may not represent a client in a matter where that lawyer is representing another party, unless each client gives informed consent.
Interest of Person Paying for a Lawyer's Service. [13] A lawyer may be paid from a source other than the client, including a co-client, if the client is informed of that fact and consents and the arrangement does not compromise the lawyer's duty of loyalty or independent judgment to the client. See Rule 1.8 (f).
[21] A client who has given consent to a conflict may revoke the consent and, like any other client, may terminate the lawyer's representation at any time. Whether revoking consent to the client's own representation precludes the lawyer from continuing to represent other clients depends on the circumstances, including the nature of the conflict, whether the client revoked consent because of a material change in circumstances, the reasonable expectations of the other client and whether material detriment to the other clients or the lawyer would result.
[34] A lawyer who represents a corporation or other organization does not, by virtue of that representation, necessarily represent any constituent or affiliated organization, such as a parent or subsidiary. See Rule 1.13 (a). Thus, the lawyer for an organization is not barred from accepting representation adverse to an affiliate in an unrelated matter, unless the circumstances are such that the affiliate should also be considered a client of the lawyer, there is an understanding between the lawyer and the organizational client that the lawyer will avoid representation adverse to the client's affiliates, or the lawyer's obligations to either the organizational client or the new client are likely to limit materially the lawyer's representation of the other client.