Attorney General Eric Holder and U.S. Attorney for the Western District of North Carolina Anne M. Tompkins announced today that the United States has filed a civil lawsuit against Bank of America Corporation and certain of its affiliates, including Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith f/k/a/ Banc of America Securities, LLC, Bank of America, N.A., and Banc of America Mortgages Securities, Inc. (collectively “Bank of America”).
Aug 06, 2013 · Attorney General Eric Holder and U.S. Attorney for the Western District of North Carolina Anne M. Tompkins announced today that the United States has filed a civil lawsuit against Bank of America Corporation and certain of its affiliates, including Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith f/k/a/ Banc of America Securities, LLC, Bank of America, N.A., and Banc of …
Dec 09, 2021 · December 9, 2021, 8:37 AM · 5 min read. Attorneys for the family and estate of Gloria Ann Satterfield say they have added finance giant Bank of America to an ongoing civil suit involving former...
Jan 06, 2022 · Plaintiff Joanne Farrell sued the bank after she was overdrawn five days in a row. Farrell was charged $35 for every overdraft she experienced. At the time, her account balance was negative between $2 and $284. If the charge were legal, the …
Nathan Graham is a managing attorney at Graham Legal, PLLC. He represents individuals and small businesses in Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 bankruptcy cases. Nathan is passionate about helping his clients save their homes, protect their vehicles …
Farrell was charged $35 for every overdraft she experienced. At the time, her account balance was negative between $2 and $284. If the charge were legal, the bank would be liable for interest on the amount. The court ruled that the fees were usury and a violation of federal law.
The company claims this will save its customers millions of dollars. This policy is illegal under the U.S. federal Consumer Financial Protection Act, and it was determined that the policy is unfair. A third-party lawsuit was filed against the bank on behalf of Farrell.
When the plaintiff finds out that you have an attorney, they may offer to settle the lawsuit. These settlements are often for significantly less that the amount listed in the lawsuit. Very responsive, educated and respectful response. I have been using Graham legal for a collections dispute.
The plaintiff may dismiss the lawsuit because there are defects in their case. It can be very difficult for creditors to prove that you actually owe the money they are suing you for. In many cases, the debt has been sold and transferred several times, and it can be difficult to establish a chain of title.
The plaintiff may dismiss the lawsuit for financial reasons. Sometimes it is simply too expensive to collect a debt. If it appears to the creditor that they will not get an easy default judgment then they may decide not to pursue the lawsuit.
Don’t panic. Being sued is a scary, nerve-wracking experience. Most people have no experience with the court system, so there are a lot of unknowns. We may be able to help you with this situation, but you need to act quickly.
Don’t ignore the problem. A large percentage of defendants who are sued ignore the lawsuit, and as a result, the plaintiff may win automatically. Hiring an attorney to represent you greatly increases your chances of a successful outcome in this matter.
In February 2012, Wasinger filed a sealed case against Bank of America on behalf of O’Donnell, who accused Countrywide of selling thousands of shoddy mortgage loans to the government-controlled Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
A CALL FROM A STRANGER. After the Bank of America case became public in October 2012, Wasinger said he received dozens of phone calls from people claiming to be whistleblowers. Most of their tales of corporate fraud were not credible, he said, and turned them away.
The percentage that a lawyer for a whistleblower gets varies widely, but a general rule of thumb is 33 percent to 40 percent, according to Stephen Kohn, executive director of the National Whistleblower Center, a non-profit group that advocates for whistleblowers.
One Justice Department lawyer slept on an air mattress in the office after his home was damaged by Hurricane Sandy. Wasinger said he was often daunted by the army of Bank of America lawyers that would pull up to court each morning. “It was like a presidential motorcade,” he said.
Wasinger declined to comment on possible earnings. Representing whistleblowers is a lucrative business for lawyers and is hyper competitive, since few corporate insiders who come forward actually have the information that leads to big government lawsuits.
Wasinger’s client, former Countrywide Executive Vice President Edward O’Donnell, was the star witness for the prosecution. And earlier this month, JPMorgan Chase agreed to pay $614 million to settle claims that it defrauded the U.S. government by submitting sub par home loans for federal insurance.
The government and Bank of America are waiting for a judge to determine the bank’s penalty. A spokesman for Bank of America, headquartered in Charlotte, declined to comment. A spokeswoman for the U.S. Attorney’s office also declined to comment.
After a financial setback, the couple sought a loan modification from Bank of America, which serviced the loan, held by Bank of New York Mellon. Bank of New York Mellon sued for foreclosure. Originally, Bank of America was not a party to the lawsuit.
At the heart of the dispute is the purge of 1.88 billion records. Bank of America, in a court filing, insists the records were copied, returned to the bank and still exist in its system.
A “statement of work” between Bank of America and SourceCorp describes how the bank’s loan documents would be imaged and ultimately purged from SourceCorp’s system, according to a document turned over in discovery.
Bank of America said Jacobs has it all wrong.
It said Jacobs’ “baseless charges of fraud, conspiracy, perjury and other allegedly illegal or improper acts” by Bank of America have never been proven . Jacobs “nevertheless continues, without a trace of shame or irony, to recycle these reckless and rejected accusations ad nauseum.”
Bank of America, in a court filing, insists the records were copied, returned to the bank and still exist in its system. But Bruce Jacobs, a former Miami-Dade County prosecutor, says the bank got rid of loan records he was seeking that he says may be evidence of fraud because the original records may have been altered by the bank.
The foreclosure case was settled last year, and the couple, who had to file for bankruptcy, remained in their home. However, Jacobs, who represents them, filed a countersuit against Bank of New York Mellon in which he made serious allegations against the two banks.
Sorry to hear of your problems in the banking industry. It is not appropriate for us to recommend, in here, specific legal counsel to address your issue (s). However, you should be sure to click on to the "Find a lawyer" button above and search , for instance, for instance for attorneys with a specialty in consumer protection and/or banking.
Sorry to hear of your problems in the banking industry. It is not appropriate for us to recommend, in here, specific legal counsel to address your issue (s). However, you should be sure to click on to the "Find a lawyer" button above and search , for instance, for instance for attorneys with a specialty in consumer protection and/or banking.
SAN FRANCISCO (CBS SF) — A class action suit has been filed against Bank of America for its role in the widespread fraud involving California Employment Development Department (EDD) debit cards provided by the bank to people receiving unemployment benefits.
KPIX 5 first exposed how hackers took advantage of people in need. A San Francisco law firm filed the class-action lawsuit Thursday alleging a laundry list of failings by Bank of America, saying the suit is a wakeup call for the bank and that the problems could have been foreseen.
Bank of America sent KPIX 5 the following statement in response to the lawsuit: