(a) This Court has jurisdiction to consider whether the attorney gen-eral’s motion to intervene should have been granted notwithstanding respondents’ contention that the motion was jurisdictionally barred. See . Arbaugh . v. Y & H Cor p., 546 U. S. 500, 506. Respondents concede that a court of appeals generally has jurisdiction to consider ...
, for example, a motion to intervene was held to be timely where the motion “was filed only seven months after [t he plaintiff] filed his original complaint, three months after the government filed its motion to dismiss, and before any discovery had begun.” 865 F.2d at 1213; see also Diaz v. …
The United States' Motion to Intervene satisfies each of Rule 24 (a)'s four criteria for intervention as of right. 1. The United States' Motion to Intervene is Timely. As the docket reflects, this case is in the earliest stage. Importantly, neither legal nor factual issues have been litigated.
Nov 17, 2011 · Ct., 84 Cal.App.4th 383, 386 (2000).) “A person has a direct interest justifying intervention in litigation where the judgment in the action of itself adds to or detracts from his legal rights without reference to rights and duties not involved in the litigation.” (City and County of San Francisco v. State (2005) 128 Cal.App.4th 1030, 1037.)
A provision of law confers an unconditional right to intervene. The person seeking intervention claims an interest relating to the property or transaction that is the subject of the action and that person is so situated that the disposition of the action may impair or impede that person’s ability to protect that interest, ...
Intervention is the procedure whereby someone not named as a party to an action (or ordered joined as a party) may nevertheless become a party.
“An intervention takes place when a nonparty, deemed an intervenor, becomes a party to an action or proceeding between other persons by doing any of the following: Joining a plaintiff in claiming what is sought by the complaint. Uniting with a defendant in resisting the claims of a plaintiff.”.
No, to discharge any attorney, you just have to inform him verbally or in writing that you no longer wish him to represent you or provide you with services.
It is your attorney that would file a motion to withdraw. However, in the instance yo describe, the appellate case is a new case, and an attorney needs to file a notice of appearance to represent you on the case. You would need to sign a new retainer agreement with the attorney.
No, to discharge any attorney, you just have to inform him verbally or in writing that you no longer wish him to represent you or provide you with services.