just what is the crime attorney john durham is now investigating?

What is the significance of Durham's prior interaction with the CIA?

What did Barr and Durham seek?

How many meetings did Barr and Durham have in 2019?

When did Barr meet with Durham?

What did Durham's mandate include?

Does Durham have intelligence?

Was the Durham investigation a criminal investigation?

See 4 more

What is John Durham's political affiliation?

Republican PartyJohn Durham / PartyThe Republican Party, also referred to as the GOP, is one of the two major contemporary political parties in the United States. The GOP was founded in 1854 by anti-slavery activists who opposed the Kansas–Nebraska Act, which allowed for the potential expansion of chattel slavery into the western territories. Wikipedia

What is John Durham's title?

Special Counsel for the United States Department of Justice since 2020John Durham / Office

Who is Durham da?

Durham District Attorney's Office The Durham County, NC, District Attorney's Office is led by DA Satana Deberry.

What is the Durham project?

In May 2019, Attorney General William Barr tapped Connecticut's U.S. Attorney John Durham to look into issues related to the origins of the FBI's Trump-Russia investigation. Durham is a longtime federal prosecutor in Connecticut known for leading organized crime and public corruption cases.

Why was the Durham report important?

The "Report" led to major reforms and democratic advances. The two Canadas were subsequently merged into a single colony, the Province of Canada, in the 1840 Act of Union. It moved Canada slowly on the path to "responsible government" (that is, self-government), which took a decade.

How many special counsel's have there been?

Roughly twenty special prosecutors (called independent counsels after 1983) were appointed under the Ethics in Government Act and its reauthorizations during the Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, George H. W. Bush, and Bill Clinton administrations.

What does the District Attorney do?

What is a District Attorney? The district attorney analyzes and gathers evidence to determine if there are grounds for criminal prosecution of cases within their districts and presents cases at trial.

Who is the Assistant District Attorney Durham NC?

Adam Williamson - Assistant District Attorney - Durham County District Attorney's Office | LinkedIn.

What is Project Access of Durham County?

Project Access of Durham County (PADC) links people without health insurance into a local network of clinics, laboratories, pharmacies and hospitals that donate their efforts to help those in need. PADC serves eligible low-income, uninsured Durham residents who have specialty medical care needs.

What to Make of Durham’s Latest Indictment | National Review

U.S. Attorney John Durham speaks at an event in Stamford, Conn., May 1, 2018. (U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Connecticut via Facebook)

Jonathan Turley: Now We See Why Democrats Tried To Shut Down The Durham ...

GWU law professor Jonathan Turley told FOX News on Friday morning that the arrest of a key researcher behind the Steele dossier proves what he and others have been saying for years: special ...

Where John Durham’s Investigation Is Heading | National Review

Durham’s indictment of Igot Danchenko and his mid-September indictment of Democratic lawyer Michael Sussmann appear to confirm that he is building toward a final report, not wide-ranging ...

John Durham's latest indictment casts doubt on the origins of the Trump ...

Durham's charges against Danchenko follow another charge of lying to the FBI filed against Michael Sussman, a prominent cybersecurity lawyer with connections to the Democratic National Committee.. Sussman has denied wrongdoing and has argued that the convoluted nature of the indictment makes it too hard to defend against the charges. ...

John Ratcliffe expects 'many indictments' from Durham investigation

“Many of the documents that John Durham is using are documents that I gave him. So I declassified the documents that we’ve talked about, but I gave John Durham over 1,000 other documents that ...

What Happened To The Durham Investigation? - LifeZette

Special counsel John Durham – who is variously described as either painfully methodical or positively glacial as a prosecutor – reportedly was prompted to indict Sussman by an expiring statute ...

Key Takeaways

The Durham investigation indicates a coordinated effort by the Clinton campaign to disseminate false allegations against Donald Trump to win the 2016 election.

Key Takeaways from the Durham Investigation

While the general contours of Hillary for America’s opposition research efforts during the 2016 election period have been reported in the press and have been the subject of congressional and inspector general investigations, many new details have been uncovered by Durham’s investigation and revealed in federal indictments relating to former Perkins Coie attorney Michael Sussmann and former Brookings Institution policy analyst Igor Danchenko..

The Alfa-Bank Disinformation Campaign

The second major component of Hillary for America’s disinformation campaign was its effort to smear then-candidate Trump with a false allegation that the Trump organization had a secret channel of communication with Alfa-Bank, the largest private bank in Russia.

Conclusion

This paper summarizes Special Counsel Durham’s findings to date regarding just some of the actions taken by key players in Hillary for America’s 2016 disinformation campaign against Trump. The information herein is taken largely from indictments and other court filings in the cases filed against Michael Sussmann and Igor Danchenko.

What's the impact of the verdict?

The verdict is a significant blow to the Durham probe. After more than three years, Durham has racked up one guilty plea, one acquittal at trial and has one more trial scheduled for this fall.

How long has the probe lasted?

The Durham inquiry has outlasted the underlying Trump-Russia probes that he is reviewing.

What's Durham's next trial about?

The only remaining case on Durham's public court docket is against one of the sources for the infamous Trump-Russia dossier -- a compilation of memos written in 2016 by ex-British spy Christopher Steele, who levied explosive and unverified allegations against Trump and his campaign.

What else is Durham investigating?

There is limited visibility into the inner workings of the still-ongoing Durham investigation.

How will this all end?

It's unclear. As long as Garland doesn't intervene, Durham can continue his work.

What is the Durham investigation?

Now, Durham is conducting a comprehensive global probe of the U.S. government’s investigation of the Trump Campaign’s connections with Russia. The investigation covers pre- and post-election matters, and reportedly has come to include the unmasking of former national security adviser Michael Flynn, and the basis for the intelligence community’s assessment that Russia tried to help Donald Trump win the election in 2016. These are all matters on which President Trump has publicly commented. Before and after Durham began his investigation, Trump has often claimed, in fiery rhetoric, that the Trump campaign investigation, and the unmasking of Flynn, and the intelligence community’s assessment, were illegitimate. He has also charged that some of the people apparently under investigation by Durham engaged in misconduct on matters under investigation. Attorney General Barr has also publicly commented that some of the people under investigation engaged in serious wrongdoing.

When did Barr announce the Durham investigation?

Barr first alluded to what would become the Durham investigation in his confirmation hearing on Jan. 15, 2019. He promised Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham that he would examine the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation against Trump and on the same issue he told Sen. John Kennedy “the best policy is to allow light to shine in.”

What did Barr say about the Horowitz report?

First, since ( according to Barr) Horowitz’s inquiry left open the possibility that the errors uncovered at the FBI could be attributed to “bad faith,” Durham’s review was necessary to determine whether there was “improper motive.” Barr said that Durham’s inquiry had not reached a conclusion on that matter, but Barr seemed to tip his own hand when he said : “I think there are episodes there that cannot be squared with innocent mistakes.” He also said that Durham could uncover what motivated certain officials because he’s able to not only look at the evidence within the FBI,” but also “ to require people to testify” and “ to talk to other agencies” and “privat e parties.”

What did Barr say about the Durham probe?

He justified the Durham probe on the ground that “the use of foreign intelligence capabilities and counterintelligence capabilities against an American political campaign to me is unprecedented and it’s a serious red line that’s been crossed .” Barr added that he wanted to understand the basis for the “counterintelligence activities undertaken against the Trump campaign” and “make sure it was legitimate.” Barr said Durham was investigating questions that included:

What is Barr's thinking about the Durham review?

In an interview with the Wall Street Journal on May 15, Barr said (as the Journal paraphrased it) that “he is interested in the underlying intelligence that sparked the bureau’s decision to open the counterintelligence investigation, as well as the actions officials took based on that intelligence.” Barr told Fox News on May 16 that he was trying to figure out whether “government officials abused their power and put their thumb on the scale” during the early stages of the Russia probe. “I’ve been trying to get answers to the questions and I’ve found that a lot of the answers have been inadequate and some of the explanations I’ve gotten don’t hang together, in a sense I have more questions today than when I first started,” Barr added.

Did Barr answer Crawford's questions?

Barr declined to answer some of Crawford’s questions, citing Durham’s ongoing review. But when pressed, Barr signaled that he had concerns with senior former FBI officials and other government officials, and implied that he believed these former officials had engaged in wrongdoing. (We will not repeat Barr’s many insinuations here, but interested readers can read Goldsmith’s detailed analysis of them.)

Who was the attorney general that closed the Mueller investigation?

On March 22, about a month after Barr was sworn in as attorney general, Special Counsel Robert Mueller closed his investigation and submitted his final report to Barr. Two days later, on a Sunday, Barr issued his controversial summary of the report. On the following Monday afternoon, Justice Department records indicate that Barr and his close advisors met with Durham, along with three members of the department’s division that handles logistics and staffing. The records do not indicate what Barr and Durham discussed, but it was almost certainly the investigation that Durham would soon lead. (Department records indicate Barr and Durham would have 18 subsequent scheduled meetings and three scheduled phone calls in 2019; the number of their unscheduled communications is not publicly known. Other records show that Durham was in relatively frequent contact with top Justice Department officials in 2019.)

Who cautioned Durham?from nytimes.com

In a Washington Post op-ed this month, Mr. Holder cautioned Mr. Durham, whom he said he has been proud to know for at least a decade, about his statement. “Anyone in Durham’s shoes would do well to remember that, in dealing with this administration, many reputations have been irrevocably lost,” he wrote.

How much did the Durham case cost?from nytimes.com

Two of the four men had died in prison, but the surviving two were released, and the government paid a $100 million civil judgment in the case. Mr. Durham and his team worked amid speculation that the Justice Department would pull the plug on what was becoming a deeply embarrassing prosecution.

Why was Strzok removed from the Mueller investigation?from nbcnews.com

The New York Times on Saturday reported that Durham and his team appeared to be hunting for signs of anti-Trump bias among former FBI officials and were focused on the actions of Strzok, who was removed from the investigation after Mueller learned of texts he wrote criticizing Trump.

Where did Barr and Durham travel?from thegatewaypundit.com

Advertisement - story continues below. Attorney General Bill Barr and Durham traveled to Italy recently to talk to law enforcement officials there about the probe and have also had conversations with officials in the U.K. and Australia about the investigation, according to multiple sources familiar with the meetings.

Did Durham question Rizzo?from nytimes.com

Mr. Durham “didn’t personally question me but he did the agency people who had contemporaneous knowledge of the plan to destroy the tapes, and he was very tough with them,” Mr. Rizzo, who retired from the C.I.A. in 2009, said in an interview.

Who was involved in the 1965 murder of a mobster?from nytimes.com

In late 2000, he uncovered government memos indicating that F.B.I. officials were involved in framing four men for the 1965 murder of a mobster, to protect a hit man who was one of the bureau’s informants, a scheme likely known to the bureau’s director at the time, J. Edgar Hoover. Mr. Durham alerted defense lawyers.

Who was the associate attorney general in 2008?from nytimes.com

Mr. O’Connor, who was associate attorney general in 2008, was among those who recommended Mr. Durham lead an inquiry into the C.I.A.’s destruction in 2005 of videotapes depicting the torture of two operatives of Al Qaeda.

What is the significance of Durham's prior interaction with the CIA?

It also bears note that while some may view Durham’s prior interaction with the CIA as indicative of an inclination to protect intelligence agencies, it is equally suggestive of Durham’s ability to discern the chosen outcomes sought by those political appointees who selected him and to deliver those outcomes. II.

What did Barr and Durham seek?

Barr and Durham proceeded to crisscross the globe, seeking, as Barr was quoted, “the underlying intelligence that sparked the bureau’s decision to open the counterintelligence investigation, as well as the actions officials took based on that intelligence.”.

How many meetings did Barr and Durham have in 2019?

Other DOJ records reflect that, after that March day, Barr and Durham had at least 18 subsequent scheduled meetings and three scheduled phone calls in 2019. Whether additional unscheduled contacts occurred is not publicly known but, by any measure, Durham enjoyed considerable face time with Barr in 2019.

When did Barr meet with Durham?

On March 25, 2019, between the release of Barr’s tendentious summary of the Mueller Report and Mueller’s letter questioning that summary, Justice Department records show that Barr and his close advisers met with Durham, along with three members from DOJ’s logistics and staffing division.

What did Durham's mandate include?

On April 24, the New York Times reported that Durham’s mandate had been broadened to include “leaks” : specifically, to investigating a number of news articles published early in 2017 that the Trump administration “blame [d] for prompting the chaos that dominated the early days of the Trump presidency.”.

Does Durham have intelligence?

Durham, as I previously noted, has no personal experience with intelligence evaluation or analysis. Other than the relatively cursory background investigation afforded those outside the IC as a precondition to gaining access to classified information, it is almost certain that Durham’s clearance, even for access to so-called special access programs, consists of little more than the blessing of the attorney general. It is virtually inconceivable that Durham, or any member of his staff, has been polygraphed as a precondition to gaining access to, for example, sensitive compartmented information (SCI) in connection with this investigation. These concerns are compounded with respect to Durham’s anonymous staff members. Who are they, and what experience in foreign intelligence evaluation and analysis do they bring to the Durham probe? What process has been used to clear them for access to classified information and evaluate the all-important “need to know” that serves as a bedrock principle for the protection of intelligence sources and methods?

Was the Durham investigation a criminal investigation?

Just days later, the New York Times reported that Durham’s probe had officially morphed into a criminal investigation; although, neither the Times, the Washington Post, nor the Wall Street Journal was able to say just what crime Durham was investigating or when the transition to a criminal probe had occurred.