john adams acted as the attorney for the british soldiers who were involved in the boston massacre

by Brycen Williamson DDS 5 min read

John Adams and the Boston Massacre Trial of 1770 As noted in the 2008 HBO mini-series chronicling the life and career of John Adams (1735-1826), as a young lawyer the future president served as counsel for the defense in the trial of eight British soldiers accused of murder during a riot in Boston on March 5, 1770.

Although a devout patriot, John Adams agreed to risk his family's livelihood and defend the British soldiers and their commander in a Boston courtroom. At stake was not just the fate of nine men, but the relationship between the motherland and her colonies on the eve of American Revolution.Apr 2, 2020

Full Answer

Who did John Adams defend in the Boston Massacre?

Apr 02, 2020 · HISTORY: At the time of the Boston Massacre, John Adams was a patriot grieving the loss of a child with a new baby on the way. Why did he …

Who was John Adams — defense attorney for British soldiers?

John Adams and the Boston Massacre Trial of 1770 As noted in the 2008 HBO mini-series chronicling the life and career of John Adams (1735-1826), as a young lawyer the future president served as counsel for the defense in the trial of eight British soldiers accused of murder during a riot in Boston on March 5, 1770.

Did John Adams agree to defend the soldiers in exchange for?

John Adams was the defense attorney for the British Redcoats and Captain Preston during the Boston Massacre Trials. Read about how he defended the soldiers. Open Winter Hours: Tours 10a-4p Thursdays thru Mondays.

What testimony did the defense have in the Boston Massacre?

Who is the author of John Adams Under Fire?

In the new book John Adams Under Fire: The Founding Father’s Fight for Justice in the Boston Massacre Murder Trial, Dan Abrams and coauthor David Fisher detail what they call the “most important case in colonial American history” and an important landmark in the development of American jurisprudence. Abrams, who is also the chief legal affairs ...

What happened in Boston on March 6th 1770?

The blood remained fresh on the snow outside Boston’s Custom House on the morning of March 6 , 1770. Hours earlier, rising tensions between British troops and colonists had exploded into violence when a band of Redcoats opened fire on a crowd that had pelted them with not just taunts, but ice, oyster shells and broken glass. Although the soldiers claimed to have acted in self-defense, patriot propaganda referred to the incident as the Boston Massacre. Eight British soldiers and their officer in charge, Captain Thomas Preston, faced charges for murdering five colonists.

Is hearsay evidence reliable?

It is also what is called the dying declaration, and in a courtroom today we have an exception to the hearsay rule for a dying declaration because the theory is that, although hearsay evidence can be typically unreliable, it’s more reliable if it’s someone’s final statement before their death.

Did Captain Preston order his men to fire?

Stunningly so. I think the verdicts are almost exactly what we would see today. It’s obvious to me that Captain Preston didn’t order his men to fire, and he was acquitted. They could have convicted all the soldiers for the actions of one or two of them, but they didn’t—because there simply wasn’t evidence that the others were involved in the shooting. And I think that’s an amazing testament to the jurors of the day.

What did John Adams believe in?

Above all, John Adams believed in upholding the law, and defending the innocent. Adams was convinced that the soldiers were wrongly accused, and had fired into the crowd in self-defense.

What happened in Boston in 1770?

By the beginning of March, 1770, tensions seemed to reach a boiling point. On the evening of March 5, Private Hugh White was under assault by a crowd of boys throwing snowballs, oysters in their shells, stones and clubs.

Trouble in The Colonies

Image
Tensions between colonists and their British overlords intensified throughout the mid-18th century. American colonists wanted more independence and control over their economy. The Americans were prospering on their own and desired to break free of colonial control. Britain felt that the colonies had only flourished because …
See more on historyofyesterday.com

The Search For Justice

  • Governor Thomas Hutchinson arranged to have the accused soldiers removed to an island in Boston Harbor. The Attorney General issued murder indictments for Captain Thomas Preston and eight other soldiers for their participation in the riot. Before the trial, Loyalists and Patriots engaged in a propaganda war. Patriot cartoons and articles painted the riot as an all-out attack …
See more on historyofyesterday.com

The Trial Begins

  • Preston’s trial began on October 24, 1770. For the first time, the jury was sequestered away from family and friends for the duration of the trial. The key question was whether or not Preston had given the order to fire. Preston strongly denied giving any such order. Witness testimony was mixed, with some saying he gave the order and others declaring he did not. Adams was able to i…
See more on historyofyesterday.com

The Verdict Is Delivered

  • In his closing statements, Adams reminded the jury of the law of self-defense. He recalled testimony that the crowd was chanting to kill the British soldiers. Adams implored the jury to consider how they would react when a mob was calling for their death. He entreated the jury to judge the case based on facts and evidence, rather than their Patriot leanings. After deliberating …
See more on historyofyesterday.com

The Impact on Today’S Legal System

  • The Boston Massacre trials served as a landmark case for the new justice system in the colonies. This trial was the first time that a jury was sequestered, which is now typical practice in high profile cases. The standard of reasonable doubt was also introduced during this trial. In his instructions, one of the judges reminded the jurors that they needed to be “convinced beyond a r…
See more on historyofyesterday.com

Early Life

  • John Adams was born on October 30, 1735, to his father, John Adams Sr., and his mother, Susanna Boylston, and had two younger brothers, Peter and Elihu. His mother belonged to a leading medical family of Brookline, and his father was a deacon in Congregational Church, a farmer, and a lieutenant in the militia. His great grandfather Henry Adams immigrated to Massa…
See more on historyten.com

Boston Massacre

  • The Boston Massacre was a conflict in Boston on March 5, 1770. British soldiers shot and killed many people, perceiving them as a mob, and leading patriots including Paul Revere and Samuel Adams heavily publicized the event. Boston, the capital of the Massachusetts Bay, was a significant shipping town and a center of resistance to unpopular taxation acts by the British Par…
See more on historyten.com

Boston Massacre Trial

  • Following the Boston Massacre, Captain Thomas Preston, eight British soldiers, and five British civilians were charged for murder. They were exposed to the possibility of execution and could not find a defense team as they would have to defend them in the anti-British city of Boston. John Adams realized that there was a lot at stake for colonial America, and it was important for the a…
See more on historyten.com

John Adams’ Role in The Boston Massacre Trial

  • In the trial, Adams said that Captain Preston had never ordered his soldiers to fire. He also put forward that those who had shot into the crowd did so entirely for self-defense. He called the people involved in the mob who provoked the soldiers “outlandish Jack tars.” H” persuaded and won th” case releasing Preston and six of his soldiers on all charges. How”ver, two soldiers wer” …
See more on historyten.com

Conclusion

  • It is generally unsatisfying to get a mixed verdict in a case involving so much passion and emotion. However, these cases serve as a compelling example, and the Boston Massacre trial was among these trials. The Boston massacre could have led to a revolution, but it did not, as people accepted it was a very controversial verdict. For firing against the orders of Captain Prest…
See more on historyten.com