Aug 22, 2016 · IVC Filter Lawsuits Update. Our law firm handles inferior vena cava ("IVC") filter lawsuits throughout the country. Our lawyers are focused in 2021 on Cook and Cordis IVC claims. Our lawyers are looking at other IVC lawsuits as well. But the focus on is on Cook and Cordis (and less so Bard). Some of the buzz of the IVC filter suits have slowed down in recent months.
Jul 13, 2015 · IVC Filter Attorney. Matthews and Associates Law Firm is handling IVC filter cases against C.R. Bard, Cook and other IVC filter manufacturers. Contact Matthews & Associates for a free legal consultation if you would like to consider an IVC Filter Lawsuit. Our IVC filter lawyers do all we can to streamline the medical device litigation process.
Start Your IVC Filter Lawsuit To contact our IVC filter lawsuit lawyers now, you can: Submit the Free Case Review Box on this page or call (866) 280 …
IVC Filter Lawsuit Attorneys. What we do is fight for your rights to get you the largest possible settlement to compensate you for your injuries or death. We know medical and hospital expenses are out of this world, and when you are injured through no fault of your own, we go after those responsible for your injuries and see that you're treated ...
For a long time, no vena cava filter lawsuits so far have made it through trial with a successful jury verdict. Yet many plaintiffs' attorneys rema...
The settlement value of an IVC filter lawsuit is going to depend on the severity of the victim's injuries. If there is a global settlement, there w...
The FDA has issued a number of recalls and warnings on IVC filters. Two of the recalls were Class I recalls. Class I means there is a reasonable pr...
The easiest path to join one of the MDL class actions involving the IVC filters is to hire a lawyer who is handling these cases. That attorney will...
Very important to the settlement of these cases is that $2 million of this IVC filter lawsuit award was punitive to punish C.R. Bard for their conduct. Why is this so significant? It shows the jury was mad and this was not just a company that made an honest mistake. This increases projected settlement compensation payouts in all the other IVC lawsuits out there.
The settlement value of an IVC filter lawsuit is going to depend on the severity of the victim's injuries. If there is a global settlement, there will be settlement tiers that group the plaintiffs by injury from death down to more minor complications.
A perforation is when a part of a filter migrates through the wall of the IVC and leaves the IVC. The morbidity and mortality associated with surgical removal of Bard, Cook Medical, Rex Medical, and Greenfield filters are high.
Published studies and reports from the FDA show that risks associated with Bard's IVC filters include, but are not limited to, deep vein thrombosis, filter fracture, filter migration, filter embolization, and IVC perforation.
Patients suffering severe complications after the use of Bard and Cook's IVC filters began filing lawsuits against the manufacturers, alleging migration and breakage causing internal organ damage along with other complications. C.R. Bard and Cook Medical have been the target of IVC filter litigation, with claims against them including:
The easiest path to join one of the MDL class actions involving the IVC filters is to hire a lawyer who is handling these cases. That attorney will file a lawsuit on your behalf. The hope is that you will simply have to fill out some paperwork and wait for a global settlement that will resolve your case.
But in February 2019, a jury in Indianapolis awarded $3 million to a woman who suffered a cardiac injury from a defective Cook Medical IVC filter. Cook's defense of hiding behind the FDA's skirt finally fell flat. This verdict is huge because Cook has been undefeated in their IVC lawsuits. Not anymore!
Matthews and Associates Law Firm is handling IVC filter cases against C.R. Bard, Cook and other IVC filter manufacturers. Contact Matthews & Associates for a free legal consultation if you would like to consider an IVC Filter Lawsuit. Our IVC filter lawyers do all we can to streamline the medical device litigation process.
IVC Filters, used to prevent blood clots from reaching the heart, lungs, or other vital organs, can break off parts and migrate in the body, causing serious complications and even death.
The FDA issued a safety warning on August 9, 2010 (“Removing Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filters: Initial Communication”), which cautioned against leaving IVC filters in too long . The filters can cause life-threatening complications. The FDA warning informed implanting physicians and clinicians that IVC filters are intended for short-term use only, and only in patients at risk for pulmonary embolisms. Doctors were told to retrieve the IVC filter devices after a patient’s blood clot risk subsided. The FDA’s main concern was that doctors timely retrieve the IVC filters meant only for short-term placement.
The FDA had initially turned down Bard’s IVC Filter application for the Recovery filter, then revisited and approved it after what the regulatory specialist implied was fraudulent use of her signature. “That’s not my signature,” Kay Fuller told NBC News after being shown her name signed on the document.
IVC filter migration lawsuits are being filed for patients who have suffered from complications stemming from this surgically implanted device. Inferior vena cava filters – IVC filters – are medical devices that are used to prevent blood clots from causing a pulmonary embolism when a patient is unable to take traditional blood thinners. Recently, there [read more]
The most prevalent of these complications include device fracture, device migration, and organ perforation.
Inferior vena cava filters – IVC filters – are medical devices surgically implanted into the body to prevent blood clots from causing pulmonary embolisms. These devices are typically used by doctors on patients who are unable to take traditional blood thinners. Recently, severe health complications have been allegedly traced back to these devices.
Reported complications included punctured organs and blood vessels. There were also reports that the filters would move, or migrate, to different parts of the body.
An IVC filter is implanted by a surgeon in the vein of a patient for purpose to prevent blood clots from moving into the lungs and heart. The filter was supposed to be retrievable by surgeons ...
Filter breaking, causing harm to the heart or lungs. Death. As a result of these harms, lawsuits against the filter device makers soon followed and are pending across the United States right now. The device makers being sued for defective blood clot filters include Bard and Cook, the two biggest manufacturers and sellers of IVC filters.
There were also reports that the filters would move, or migrate, to different parts of the body. In 2010, the FDA issued a warning that IVC filters posed risks of filter fracture, device migration and organ perforation and recommended that they be removed when the patient was no longer a risk for developing a blood clot.
If you have used an IVC Filter and suffered complications or serious side effects, you owe it to yourself and your family to contact us for a free evaluation and to determine if you are due damages for your injuries.
The implanted IVC filter device captures any blood clots moving within the artery before they can get to the lungs and cause problems.
If you have a case and choose to pursue a lawsuit, you have a chance for financial compensation.
Going against medical device giants is not only intimidating but also scary. Contact us now for a free consultation!
A: IVC filters are generally left in for about 2 to 3 weeks. Though these filters can be removed, even in circumstances in which they have been in place for several years, it is often unwise to do so if the risk for blood clots traveling through your system remains.
Over the course of our law firm’s existence we have recovered over $2 billion in compensation for our IVC filter injury clients and other clients who have been hurt as the result of defective and dangerous medical products.
The next step in the litigation process is called “discovery.” It is during this phase that the parties generally “discover” the information, evidence, and witnesses that the other party intends on using to support its claims and allegations. Witnesses may be deposed or interviewed under oath about their intended testimony at trial. Expert witnesses such as medical professionals or engineers who are familiar with IVC filter devices and their designs will prepare reports of their findings and conclusions and share these with the other party. Documents, reports, records, photographs, and other similar evidence may be copied and shared as well.
Careless behavior exists if a similarly-situated and reasonable IVC filter manufacturer would not have engaged in the same behavior or course of conduct that the IVC filter manufacturer in your case actually did. Some examples of careless behavior that has been alleged in other IVC filter injury lawsuits include manufacturers who did not properly design or construct their IVC filter devices and thereby caused them to fail to prevent blood clots or to disintegrate and send dangerous metal shards through the patient’s body. Careless behavior may also include failing to include adequate warnings to doctors and consumers about an increased risk of pulmonary embolism or stroke.
A: Not necessarily. IVC filter injury lawsuits allege that the manufacturers of these devices either (1) did not adequately inform the general public – including your doctor or surgeon – about the risks of these devices; or (2) did not take reasonable and appropriate steps to manufacture IVC devices that were reasonably safe for intended patients. Even if your doctor told you there were certain risks associated with having an IVC filter device implanted, you may still be entitled to compensation if the information provided to you by your doctor was incomplete or did not fully advise you of all the risks associated with the IVC device. Further, a defectively-manufactured IVC filter device that causes injury to you may still result in you being able to obtain compensation regardless of what information regarding risks and dangers was communicated to you.
Being injured as the result of your IVC filter device can be a terrifying and confusing experience. You need and deserve answers to your questions and concerns. Your IVC filter injury lawyer is here to ensure you receive accurate and timely answers to your questions so you can make the important decisions necessary to protect your legal rights. You may have questions right now: some common questions we receive from our IVC filter injury clients include:
A: Yes, even with a Greenfield Filter made of stainless steel. The risk of it moving due to the magnetic field is considered to be very low. However, it is still very important to let your healthcare provider know of your filter before going through with an MRI.
When your doctor first recommended an IVC filter to prevent blood clots, you might have felt relieved. The procedure should have protected you from life-threatening health risk. But it turns out that IVC filters, the devices doctors sometimes implant to prevent blood clots in bedridden and immobilized patients, can be just as dangerous.
Cook Medical, too, has become the target of thousands of IVC filter class-action claims and individual lawsuits. In particular, problems reportedly resulting from Cook’s Celect IVC filter and G nther Tulip filter have led patients across the U.S. to move forward with claims against the medical device manufacturer. If you think that your health suffered due to one of these medical devices, you should pursue your Cook IVC filter lawsuit now, before it’s too late.
Sometimes, through no fault of the patient, the cage-like metal structure of the IVC filter can break apart. This can pose a significant health risk. The broken metal struts may have sharp edges that can harm the organs and blood vessels around them.
The medical device or its broken pieces can also perforate, or puncture, the wall of the inferior vena cava. It’s alarmingly common how widespread this problem is. Perforation occurs in 40 to 95 percent of IVC filter patients studied, according to the medical journal Seminars in Interventional Radiology.
The contingency fee agreement basics, and how "costs" can affect settlement in an IVC filter injury lawsuit.
Under a contingency fee agreement, your attorney takes a percentage of any settlement or court judgment you receive, and usually pays for all costs as the case proceeds.
An important point to consider when it comes to costs: If you win your case, you will usually be on the financial hook for costs. But whether your attorney takes his or her contingency fee percentage before or after these costs are paid can make a significant difference in how much you ultimately receive.
Let's say that sometime after you hire Attorney A, you decide to end the attorney-client relationship (for whatever reason) and take your IVC filter case to Attorney B at a different firm.