is it a conflict of interest for attorney to represent client whose former client will be a witness

The problem can arise whether the lawyer is called as a witness on behalf of the client or is called by the opposing party. Determining whether or not such a conflict exists is primarily the responsibility of the lawyer involved. If there is a conflict of interest, the lawyer must secure the client's informed consent, confirmed in writing.

Full Answer

What is a potential conflict of interest for a lawyer?

The conflict may occur between the prospective client and one of the attorney's current or former clients. There can also be concerns if a client's interests are in conflict with the lawyer's professional or personal relationships.

Can a lawyer represent a former client in a lawsuit?

Lawyers often encounter potential conflicts of interest with former clients. The general rule is that a lawyer may not represent a new client who is materially adverse to a former client when the subject of the representation is “substantially related” to the lawyer’s prior representation.

What is the relationship between a lawyer and a client?

[1] Loyalty and independent judgment are essential elements in the lawyer's relationship to a client. Concurrent conflicts of interest can arise from the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client or a third person or from the lawyer's own interests.

Can a lawyer withdraw from a case to avoid a conflict?

Depending on the circumstances, the lawyer may have the option to withdraw from one of the representations in order to avoid the conflict. The lawyer must seek court approval where necessary and take steps to minimize harm to the clients. See Rule 1.16. The lawyer must continue to protect the confidences of the client from whose representation ...

What is the rule about representing a client whose interests may be adverse to a former client?

(a) A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter represent another person in the same or a substantially related matter in which that person's interests are materially adverse to the interests of the former client unless the former client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing.

What is a conflict of interest in an attorney client context?

A conflict of interest is involved if there is a substantial risk that the lawyer's representation of the client would be materially and adversely affected by the lawyer's own interests or by the lawyer's duties to another current client, a former client, or a third person.

What is a conflict of interest with a client?

A “conflict of interest” is defined in the Rules as the existence of a substantial risk that a lawyer's loyalty to or representation of a client would be materially and adversely affected by the lawyer's own interest or the lawyer's duties to another client, a former client or a third person.

Can a lawyer have a relationship with a former client?

States using the ABA Model Rules have a pretty clear guideline: "A lawyer shall not have sexual relations with a client unless a consensual sexual relationship existed between them when the client-lawyer relationship commenced."

What are the 4 types of conflict of interest?

Conflict of InterestContractual or legal obligations (to business partners, vendors, employees, employer, etc.)Loyalty to family and friends.Fiduciary duties.Professional duties.Business interests.

What are examples of conflicts of interest?

Examples of Conflicts of Interest At WorkHiring an unqualified relative to provide services your company needs.Starting a company that provides services similar to your full-time employer.Failing to disclose that you're related to a job candidate the company is considering hiring.More items...

What determines a conflict of interest?

A conflict of interest occurs when a legislator is substantially involved in the preparation of or participated in the making of a contract with a person or business in which the legislator, an associated business or a family member has a substantial interest.

What are the two major causes of conflict of interest in law?

There are two different sets of circumstances which may constitute a concurrent conflict of interest. One is when the representation of one client would be directly adverse to the other client. [4] This occurs when the interests of one client requires the lawyer to act against the interest of his other client.

What is the legal definition of conflict of interest?

Primary tabs. Conflicts of interest refer to ethical problems that may arise between parties with a preexisting relationship. For example, an attorney and a client; an attorney is representing a new client in an employment dispute with their employer, but that attorney also represents that employer.

Can you date a former client?

The APA Code, Standard 10.08(a), states: "Psychologists do not engage in sexual intimacies with former clients/patients for at least two years after cessation or termination of therapy.” This is the first part of the 2-year rule.

Can I act against a former client?

A lawyer must not act for a new client against the interests of a former client if: the lawyer has confidential information about the former client which is relevant to the new proceedings, and • it is reasonable for the former client to think there is a real possibility that the information would be used against them.

What is the most common reason for an attorney to be disciplined?

Professional misconduct is the most common reason for attorney discipline. Lawyers can also be disciplined for conduct in their personal lives.

What does conflict of interest mean in law?

A conflict of interest exists if a legislator has any interest or engages in any business, transaction, or professional activity, or incurs any obligation, which is in substantial conflict with the proper discharge of his or her duties in the public interest.

What are the two major causes of conflict of interest in law?

There are two different sets of circumstances which may constitute a concurrent conflict of interest. One is when the representation of one client would be directly adverse to the other client. [4] This occurs when the interests of one client requires the lawyer to act against the interest of his other client.

Why is conflict of interest with a client an issue for the legal team?

A conflict of interest is a compromising influence that is likely to negatively affect the advice which a lawyer would otherwise give to a client. A conflict of interest can adversely affect a lawyer's judgment, loyalty, and ability to safeguard the interest of a client or prospective client.

How can a lawyer avoid conflict of interest?

Conflicts Among Lawyers in a Firm The firm can avoid the conflict of interest by keeping the conflicted lawyer completely separate from the case. It must notify the previous client and keep them informed about their procedures for keeping the lawyer screened from the case.

What is the RPC test?

Colo. RPC 1.9 sets out the “substantial relationship” test: 1 A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter represent another person in the same or a substantially related matter in which that person’s interests are materially adverse to the interests of the former client unless the former client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing. 2 A lawyer shall not knowingly represent a person in the same or a substantially related matter in which a firm with which the lawyer formerly was associated had previously represented a client#N#whose interests are materially adverse to that person; and#N#about whom the lawyer had acquired information protected by Rule 1.6 and 1.9 (c) that is material to the matter; unless the former client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing. 3 A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter and whose present or former firm has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter:#N#use information relating to the representation to the disadvantage of the former client except as these Rules would permit or require with respect to a client, or when the information has become generally known; or#N#reveal information relating to the representation except as these Rules would permit or require with respect to a client.

What is the purpose of the substantive relationship test?

The primary purpose of the “substantial relationship” test is to protect the secrets and confidences of the former client to which the lawyer was privy. In other words, the former client should not be disadvantaged because of his or her lawyer’s new representation. Recent supreme court decisions have also focused on what constitutes ...

What did Mangeris testify against?

As part of his grand jury testimony, Mangeris testified against Frisco about crimes unrelated to the charges against Mangeris, but also involving the distribution of methamphetamine. Moreover, Mangeris testified that he supplied Frisco with product, methamphetamine, and to pay Mangeris, Frisco supplied the funds used to obtain Mangeris’s release bond. (There was no allegation that Mangeris’s lawyer knew anything of the arrangement.)

Why was the lawyer's representation of Frisco substantially related to the lawyer's representation of Mangeris?

The trial court found that the lawyer’s representation of Frisco was substantially related to the lawyer’s representation of Mangeris because both representations involved controlled substances and because of the “facts and circumstances” that would be at issue in Frisco’s case. Frisco filed a C.A.R. 21 petition.

What is considered a substantial related matter?

Unless both matters involve the same transaction or legal dispute, they are considered “substantially related” only if there is a substantial risk that confidential factual information as would normally have been obtained in the prior representation would materially advance the client’s position in the subsequent matter. See Model Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.9 cmt. 3 (2002); see also Analytica, Inc. v. NPD Research, Inc., 708 F.2d 1263, 1266 (7th Cir. 1983); Koch v. Koch Indus., 798 F. Supp. 1525, 1536 (D. Kan. 1992); see generally Restatement (Third) of the Law Governing Lawyers § 132 cmt. d (iii) (2000). Any meaningful assessment of this risk cannot be limited to the consideration of ultimate legal issues, but must account for facts and circumstances, legal theories and strategies, and even the nature and scope of the attorney’s involvement in the former representation.

What is the Supreme Court case People v. Frisco?

In People v. Frisco, 119 P.3d 1093 (Colo. 2005), the Colorado Supreme Court analyzed the issue of what facts a trial court must consider when determining whether there was a “substantial relationship” between a criminal defense lawyer’s representation of a former client and the lawyer’s representation of a current client when the former client was a prosecution witness against the current client.

What is Crystal Homes v. Radetsky?

In Crystal Homes v. Radetsky, 895 P.2d 1179 (Colo. App. 1995), a legal malpractice case, the Colorado Court of Appeals stated that a lawyer is not always precluded from representing a client in a transaction with a former or currently inactive client. Id. at 1182; see also In re King Res. Co., 20 B.R. 191 (D. Colo. 1982). Whether a lawyer properly may do so depends upon the nature and extent of the former legal work performed for the previous client, as well as the possible relationship between the two transactions. Radetsky, 895 P.2d at 1182; see also Code of Professional Responsibility DR 5-105 (3).

What is informed consent?

[18] Informed consent requires that each affected client be aware of the relevant circumstances and of the material and reasonably foreseeable ways that the conflict could have adverse effects on the interests of that client . See Rule 1.0 (e) (informed consent). The information required depends on the nature of the conflict and the nature of the risks involved. When representation of multiple clients in a single matter is undertaken, the information must include the implications of the common representation, including possible effects on loyalty, confidentiality and the attorney-client privilege and the advantages and risks involved. See Comments [30] and [31] (effect of common representation on confidentiality).

What is a conflict of interest in a lawyer?

[8] Even where there is no direct adverseness, a conflict of interest exists if there is a significant risk that a lawyer's ability to consider, recommend or carry out an appropriate course of action for the client will be materially limited as a result of the lawyer's other responsibilities or interests. For example, a lawyer asked to represent several individuals seeking to form a joint venture is likely to be materially limited in the lawyer's ability to recommend or advocate all possible positions that each might take because of the lawyer's duty of loyalty to the others. The conflict in effect forecloses alternatives that would otherwise be available to the client. The mere possibility of subsequent harm does not itself require disclosure and consent. The critical questions are the likelihood that a difference in interests will eventuate and, if it does, whether it will materially interfere with the lawyer's independent professional judgment in considering alternatives or foreclose courses of action that reasonably should be pursued on behalf of the client.

Why is a lawyer asked to represent several individuals seeking to form a joint venture likely to be materially limited in?

For example, a lawyer asked to represent several individuals seeking to form a joint venture is likely to be materially limited in the lawyer's ability to recommend or advocate all possible positions that each might take because of the lawyer's duty of loyalty to the others.

What are the critical questions in a lawyer?

The critical questions are the likelihood that a difference in interests will eventuate and, if it does, whether it will materially interfere with the lawyer's independent professional judgment in considering alternatives or foreclose courses of action that reasonably should be pursued on behalf of the client.

What are the principles of a lawyer?

General Principles. [1] Loyalty and independent judgment are essential elements in the lawyer's relationship to a client. Concurrent conflicts of interest can arise from the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client or a third person or from the lawyer's own interests. For specific Rules regarding certain concurrent conflicts ...

Can a lawyer represent another person?

Thus, a lawyer related to another lawyer, e.g., as parent, child, sibling or spouse, ordinarily may not represent a client in a matter where that lawyer is representing another party, unless each client gives informed consent.

Can a client terminate a lawyer's representation?

[21] A client who has given consent to a conflict may revoke the consent and, like any other client, may terminate the lawyer's representation at any time. Whether revoking consent to the client's own representation precludes the lawyer from continuing to represent other clients depends on the circumstances, including the nature of the conflict, whether the client revoked consent because of a material change in circumstances, the reasonable expectations of the other client and whether material detriment to the other clients or the lawyer would result.

Can a lawyer defend employment matters?

On the other hand, a lawyer who has repeatedly defended employment matters for a business may not be disqualified from later representing persons making employment claims against the former client, because the facts of each separate employment matter stand on their own.

Can a lawyer represent a business owner in divorce?

For example, a lawyer who has generally represented a business owner and obtained information regarding the business owner’s finances likely cannot later represent the business owner’s spouse in a divorce, because the financial information learned from the previous representation may be highly relevant to property settlement issues. ...

Can a lawyer take a representation that is adverse to a former client?

However, that is not always the case. The Indiana Rules of Professional Conduct specifically provide that there are circumstances where a lawyer may not take a representation that is adverse to a former client.

General Principles

Identifying Conflicts of Interest: Directly Adverse

Identifying Conflicts of Interest: Material Limitation

Lawyer's Responsibilities to Former Clients and Other Third Persons

Personal Interest Conflicts

• The lawyer's own interests should not be permitted to have an adverse effect on representation of a client. For example, if the probity of a lawyer's own conduct in a transaction is in serious question, it may be difficult or impossible for the lawyer to give a client detached advice. Similarly, when a lawyer has discussions concerning possible emp...

See more on americanbar.org

Interest of Person Paying For A Lawyer's Service

Prohibited Representations

Informed Consent

Consent Confirmed in Writing

Revoking Consent