If you were an attorney making your opening statement, what might your statement include: a. A brief version of the facts and the supporting evidence. 18. An order directing a sheriff to seize and sell the defendant's nonexempt assets is called a: ... Quizlet Live. Quizlet Learn. Diagrams. Flashcards. Mobile. Help. Sign up. Help Center. Honor ...
Opening Statement Examples. The following are examples of opening-statement comments that courts have found improper: A defense attorney said that the defendant had offered to take a polygraph test in or to prove that he was innocent. (Evidence regarding lie detectors was inadmissible.) (Simmons v. State, 208 Md. App. 677 (2012).)
An attorney making an opening statement might typically include _____ . a brief version of the facts and the supporting evidence ________ consist of a series of court rules guaranteeing presentation of reliable evidence during trial.
Effective Opening Statements I. Introduction The opening statement is one of the most important components of any trial. It is your first opportunity to present the case to the jury, and to shape the jury’s perspective of the entire trial. The opening statement also is your first opportunity to present yourself to the jury, and to
Please answer a few questions to help us match you with attorneys in your area.
The following are examples of opening-statement comments that courts have found improper:
If a lawyer goes too far astray in an opening statement, opposing counsel can object—if the objection is proper, the judge will cut off the lawyer and potentially admonish the jury not to consider what he or she just said. The judge will probably let the lawyer resume the opening statement, but intervene if it gets off track again.
The opening statement provides the first impression of the case and shapes the impressions of the jury. The opening statement provides the first impression of the case and shapes the impressions of the jury. An opening statement forecasts to the jury the evidence they will see and hear during the trial—it allows the jury to know what to expect ...
Themes and storytelling are what make opening statements engaging and effective. The story of the case tells the jury what happened chronologically either from the viewpoint of the plaintiff or defendant. When giving an opening statement, the lawyer should place her side in the best possible light and tell a story that will make ...
The opening statement is one of the most important components of any trial. It is your first opportunity to present the case to the jury, and to shape the jury’s perspective of the entire trial. The opening statement also is your first opportunity to present yourself to the jury, and to establish the kind of credibility that will persuade jurors to trust the testimony, documents, and other evidence that you eventually will submit for their consideration. A superb opening can set you on a path toward winning the case, but a disastrous opening may be difficult to overcome. Thus, the content and the presentation of your opening statement must be developed with care.
Use the opening as an opportunity to persuade the jury to like your client. Explain your client’s motivations, and give the jury reasons to feel camaraderie with your client. If you represent an individual plaintiff, convince the jury of your client’s integrity, and persuade them that your client is not just out to make an easy buck; rather, your client suffered real harm. Obviously, a lawyer representing an individual against a corporation may have an easier job personalizing the client, but a management-side lawyer can personalize their client as well, and the need to do so cannot be underestimated. For example, rather than focusing on the corporation itself, a management-side lawyer should tell the jury about the people who comprise the corporation – the relevant supervisors, the human resources representative, and/or the company’s owner. Familiarize the jury with these individuals’ names, and their roles in the drama, so that the jury will be considering the actions of people versus people in the case, rather than a single, sympathetic plaintiff against a huge, faceless corporation.
Lawyers often agree to waive the opening statement in bench trials, but waiving the opening generally is not a wise move. Just like jurors, a judge needs an overview of the case before the evidence is presented, so that the evidence will have some context. Thus, unless the case has been assigned to the same judge for a long time, and you are certain the judge (and the judge’s clerk) knows your case extremely well, do not waive the opening – just make it shorter and less dramatic. Also, feel free to address more law during your opening in a bench trial. Clarify for the judge what legal questions will govern the case, and what standards the judge will need to apply.