Crafting Your Response It’s always best to have an attorney respond, on your behalf, to a “lawyer letter,” or a phone call from a lawyer. If that’s not an option for you, though, make sure that you send a typed, written response to the attorney (by e-mail or mail), and keep a copy for yourself.
Witnesses facing questioning by a hostile prosecutor should stay calm and focus only on the questions.
A witness who isn't able to answer a question should communicate that. For example, a witness who doesn't have personal knowledge should say, "I don't know" rather than guess at an answer. And a witness who has to qualify a "yes" or "no" to make it accurate should say something to the effect of, "Your Honor, I can answer that question only if I'm allowed to explain my answer." Even if the witness doesn't get to elaborate on cross-examination, the defense attorney can usually provide that opportunity on re-direct examination.
On cross-examination, lawyers are allowed to ask leading questions. They typically ask narrow questions intended to force the witness to provide certain information. Prosecutors use this tactic, too.
The question is leading but proper. The theory is that since Carson is likely to be hostile to the cross-examiner, he won't agree if the information is false. If Carson had two whiskeys—not three—within the half hour in question, he would simply answer, "No.". Talk to a Lawyer.
If you have received a lawyer letter, you probably need to, at least, contact a lawyer and discuss with them your situation and the contents of the message. It’s a good idea to have a competent, experienced lawyer tell you where you stand. Also, don’t expect this service to be offered pro bono.
There are several Alternative Dispute Resolution (“ADR”) techniques parties can use to resolve disputes. If the parties cannot directly negotiate a compromise, they can engage in good faith mediation to resolve the dispute. If mediation doesn’t work, they can take their case before an arbiter, and agree, in writing, to abide by whatever decision the arbiter makes in arbitration.
If mediation doesn’t work, they can take their case before an arbiter, and agree, in writing, to abide by whatever decision the arbiter makes in arbitration. If you have received a “lawyer letter,” consider ADR as a next step for conflict resolution.
Much of human miscommunication involves one party or the other (or both) refusing to listen to the other side (or each other). Let the person with whom you’re speaking know that you have heard what they have said, and that you understand their position. Then, focus your contribution to the discussion on the specific issues of disagreement at the heart of the conversation. Don’t just stubbornly repeat your own talking points; doing so implicitly communicates that you are not interested in listening to any voice but your own.
Be reasonable. This involves taking positions that you feel others can relate to, understand, or agree with. Being reasonable also involves giving others the benefit of the doubt, when possible.
Be objective. This means putting your personal feelings and emotions aside. It means taking a deep (inaudible) breath, and swallowing your pride and / or indignation. How you feel probably does not matter very much, if at all, to the person with whom you are speaking. And that is okay; how you feel is not the fulcrum on which the universe turns. You need to learn not to react to people, but, rather, to respond to the issues raised in discussions with others.
Leading questions are typically closed-ended lines of inquiry that result in the interviewer upholding the interviewee’s opinion. For instance, “when’s the soonest you can get me the report today?” already assumes the report can be ready today, leaving it more difficult for the interviewee to suggest an alternative timeline.
Probing questions are useful if you need more information to clarify a situation, or if you need to sort out an issue by uncovering layers of details, opinions, or feelings.
The purpose of rhetorical questions is not to elicit answers, but rather, to express key ideas or opinions in an engaging way.
Rhetorical questions are useful for persuading a listener by drawing them in, rather than simply telling or stating an opinion as fact, with no opportunity for engagement.
Leading questions can be useful to persuade one or more interviewees to a specific point of view or course of action. Of course, leading questions are not allowed during direct examination, but are permitted during depositions. Outside of trial and deposition contexts, using this technique to influence business decisions may not be ethical, and can harm relationships in the long run.
Open-ended questions typically elicit more information, while closed-ended questions can be answered with one word or phrase. For instance, “Tell me what happened that night” is an open-ended question that might lead to your gathering plentiful information from the interviewee, whereas “where was the party” is a closed-ended question that can be answered directly with the address of the event, with no other detail.
In the context of clients, these skills are important for learning about the details of the case, confirming information, and avoiding misunderstandings.
Courtroom Procedures: Questions and Objections. Both the Crown Prosecutor and the Defence Counsel are allowed to ask questions of witnesses during the trial. They are presented in court by either the Crown or Defence in order to help prove their case/argument.
After stating an objection a lawyer must provide grounds (meaning a reason) for the objection.
A lawyer must always stand when addressing the judge. Proper etiquette in a courtroom means that you always “rise” (stand up) when addressing the court. A Lawyer would begin an objection by stating: “I object your honour…” or. “The Crown objects your honour…” or. “Objection your Honour, the Crown/Defence is…”.
The Lawyer harasses, abuses, insults, or intimidates the witness, or is forcefully pursuing a point unnecessarily. (f) repeating (Repetition) or wasting the court’s time: A question or answer is repeated multiple times or it takes too much time to think of questions/answers. (g) coaching the witness.
Leading questions suggest the answer in the question or ask for a yes or no answer.
Unless the witness is qualified as an expert witness (or is identified as a character witness), (s)he should not give opinions or conclusions that they are not qualified to give or is beyond their knowledge. They can speak to their own perspectives of the event. (e) badgering or harassing the witness.
The Judge’s Response to an Objection: The judge may respond in one of two ways. S/he may sustain the objection, which means that the objection is well supported and approved of by the judge. This prevents the line of questioning from continuing or evidence/testimony form being introduced.
Negotiations with the prosecutor take into account factors you may not be aware of. For instance, court calendars, officer availability, judicial temperament all can influence negotiation. These are the kinds of things you learn through repeated interactions with law enforcement, prosecutors and the Court.
Say all you’ve got is a pink citation in your hand. The prosecutor says just pay a fine and it’s done. You don’t ever need to come back to Wyoming. That doesn’t sound too bad and you pay the fine. Now, that citation is likely a criminal citation.
If you admit to something—even if it seems obvious—you may be giving the prosecutor the ammunition he needs to sink you. For example, say you admit that you were driving the car, but law enforcement never saw you in the vehicle. Now the prosecutor knows you were driving.
More than occasionally, a criminal defense attorney can bring a motion before the judge to get the case thrown out. More often than that, a criminal defense attorney can raise a legal problem with the case and get you a better deal. It all depends on the facts, the law, and what the prosecutor can prove.
All lawyers have legal ethics that govern talking to non-lawyers about their cases. If the prosecutor says the wrong thing, or even if the prosecutor says the right thing, but you hear the wrong thing (hey, it’s not like legal jargon is confusing), they can get in trouble.
However, in most jurisdictions, the prosecutor will not call you and doesn’t want to talk to you. All lawyers have legal ethics that govern talking to non-lawyers about their cases. If the prosecutor says the wrong thing, or even if the prosecutor says the right thing, but you hear the wrong thing (hey, it’s not like legal jargon is confusing), they can get in trouble.
Tell the Truth. If your lawyer doubts you in the consultation, or doesn't think you have a case, while that may change over time, getting over an initial disbelief is very hard. You have to prove your case. Your attorney is not your witness. They are your advocate - but you are responsible for coming up with proof.
If you don't pay your lawyer on the day of trial, or however you have agreed to, then while he or she may be obligated by other ethical duties to do his/her best, they won't be motivated by sympathy for you, and it will show in court.
It's expensive because we have to wait in line too. Going to court is more than dressing up in a fancy suit and knowing what papers to fill out. Attorneys have to wait in line just like the "regular folk" and we are at the mercy of the court staff just like everyone else. If you get a bill that includes time spent waiting in court, it's not usually exaggerated. While some people may stretch the truth - if you want to see whether I had to wait an hour for the case to get called, then just come with me to court. Some courtrooms have more than 50 cases on the call. Your case may not be first or even ninth. I have been number 210 on the list before. It takes time. Most people hired attorneys because they don't want to sit in court. Well, truth be told, neither do I. The difference between lawyer and client is that the lawyer expects it to take a long time and understands. The client typically thinks it's unjustified. So, your hard truth is that each case takes time. Be patient.
Most people hired attorneys because they don't want to sit in court. Well, truth be told, neither do I. The difference between lawyer and client is that the lawyer expects it to take a long time and understands. The client typically thinks it's unjustified. So, your hard truth is that each case takes time. Be patient.
If the judge can see your boobs, he's not listening to your story. If I can see your boobs, then I know you didn't care enough about yourself to talk to an attorney. Dress like you are going to church. Credibility is one of the most important things in this world - and most important in a courtroom.
If no one can confirm that the story is true, you will at least need something external, such as a hard copy document, to prove your case. Be prepared.
While lawyers can certainly take your money and your time and we can file a case that will be very hard to win, if you don't care enough about your life to get a contract, the judge is not very likely to be on your side. At least, not automatically. Oral contracts are extremely hard to prove. What are the terms.