Consumers can make complaints to the Pennsylvania Bar Association Disciplinary Board through the website or by printing or requesting a paper form from them. The complaint should include: Consumer contact information. Attorney’s contact information. Relevant court case information, if applicable.
The Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General receives more than 50,000 complaints and referrals each year, which allows us to fight on your behalf. You can submit a complaint online or by printing out and sending a form into our office. The more information you provide, the better we can help you.
The Pennsylvania Department of State receives complaints concerning the licensees and registrants of the following 29 professional and occupational licensing boards & commissions regulated by the Department's Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs.
In some cases, OPR may determine that the attorney did not commit professional misconduct, but the circumstances warrant another finding. In those cases, OPR may consider whether the attorney exercised poor judgment, made a mistake, or otherwise acted inappropriately.
Return the completed form by mail to the Professional Compliance Office at: Department of State, Professional Compliance Office, PO Box 69522, 2601 North Third Street, Harrisburg, PA 17106-9522. Be sure to include any attachments and supporting documents (legible copies, no originals) that you wish to provide in support of your complaint.
In most states, you can file your complaint by mailing in a state-issued complaint form or a letter with the lawyer's name and contact information, your contact information, a description of the problem, and copies of relevant documents. In some states, you may be able to lodge your complaint over the phone or online.
Perhaps the most common kinds of complaints against lawyers involve delay or neglect. This doesn't mean that occasionally you've had to wait for a phone call to be returned. It means there has been a pattern of the lawyer's failing to respond or to take action over a period of months.
You can download a complaint form from our website at www.attorneygeneral.gov or you can call our toll-free number, 1.800. 441.2555, to have a form mailed to you.
Staff members may be contacted at 800-932-0311 or 717-238-6715.
Professional misconduct is the most common reason for attorney discipline. Lawyers can also be disciplined for conduct in their personal lives.
[1] Lawyers are subject to discipline when they violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so or do so through the acts of another, as when they request or instruct an agent to do so on the lawyer's behalf.
The Attorney General's responsibilities include safeguarding Californians from harm and promoting community safety, preserving California's spectacular natural resources, enforcing civil rights laws, and helping victims of identity theft, mortgage-related fraud, illegal business practices, and other consumer crimes.
To report complaints of noise from individuals or residential sources, call 911 or contact your local police district.
Josh Shapiro (Democratic Party)Pennsylvania / Attorney generalJoshua David Shapiro is an American politician and attorney who has served as the Pennsylvania Attorney General since 2017. A member of the Democratic Party, he is the nominee in the 2022 Pennsylvania gubernatorial election. Wikipedia
Legal malpractice is a type of negligence in which a lawyer does harm to his or her client. Typically, this concerns lawyers acting in their own interests, lawyers breaching their contract with the client, and, one of the most common cases of legal malpractice, is when lawyers fail to act on time for clients.
If you believe that your lawyer has engaged in unethical conduct, you should call the toll-free number 1-800-406-8594. If you enter the five-digit zip code of the attorney's office, you will be connected to the district ethics secretary to request an Attorney Grievance Form.
The three major factors that affect modern customer satisfaction are customer understanding, service, and technology. By tapping into these factors, you can provide positive, consistent customer experiences and create real customer loyalty.
Virginia State Bar Office of Bar Counsel 1111 East Main Street, Suite 700 Richmond, VA 23219-0026 Telephone: (804) 775-0500 Telecommunication Device for the Deaf/TDD: 711 or (804) 828-1120 Office Hours: Mon. -Fri. 8:15 a.m. to 4:45 p.m.
An efficient disposition of your complaint, being mindful of the complexity of the matter, cooperation of all parties, and availability of documents, among other things, which may affect the duration of the investigation; and. To receive official notification of the disposition of your complaint.
Fee disputes are not normally handled within the attorney disciplinary process. Individuals should pursue fee disputes with the Bar association in the county where the attorney practices.
A fair and impartial investigation perform ed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC), wherein staff may communicate with you, the attorney, and in some cases, other parties, to obtain information;
Enforcement Rule 209 (a) provides that any person who communicates with Disciplinary Counsel or the Board relating to misconduct by a respondent-attorney or gives testimony before a hearing committee or special master in a proceeding conducted pursuant to the Enforcement Rules, shall be immune from civil suit based upon such communication or testimony.
A written and signed statement of the facts must be filed with the Disciplinary Board before your complaint can be considered. Therefore, please fully and completely set forth all of the facts and circumstances of your complaint below in the text box. Please be specific, referring to relevant dates, contacts you made with the attorney, the fee arrangement, amounts paid to the attorney and when, services to be performed, the names and addresses of other individuals involved in the legal matter, exactly what conduct you believe is unethical or illegal, etc.
No, but it is strongly encouraged that you do. Although the Board does accept anonymous complaints, they are much more difficult to investigate.
There are two versions of our Request for Investigation form available. The first version is for Microsoft Word. If you have Microsoft Word, open the complaint form. You can then fill out most (all but date and signature) of the form in Word, Print It, Sign It, and Mail it to us.
To determine whether an attorney exercised poor judgment, OPR considers whether the attorney had appropriate alternatives available, but the attorney chose an action or course of action that was in marked contrast to that which the Department would reasonably expect of an attorney exercising good judgment. For example, an attorney exercises poor judgment when the attorney takes an action in a situation involving obviously problematic circumstances without first seeking supervisory advice or guidance, because the Department would reasonably expect that an attorney exercising good judgment would consult with a supervisor before proceeding in such circumstances.
Department attorneys are subject to various legal obligations and professional standards in the performance of their duties. For example, attorneys are required to comply with legal obligations imposed by the Constitution, statute, evidentiary or procedural rules, controlling case law, and local rules. In addition, attorneys must comply with standards of conduct imposed by the attorney’s licensing authority, the jurisdiction in which the attorney is practicing, and Department regulations and policies. In its investigations, OPR will determine whether the subject attorney has violated a clear and unambiguous legal obligation or standard. In so doing, OPR will consider the attorney’s affirmative actions, as well as actions that the attorney failed to take.
Intentional Conduct. An attorney’s violation is intentional when the attorney engages in conduct that is either purposeful or knowing. Conduct is purposeful when the attorney takes or fails to take an action in order to obtain a result that is unambiguously prohibited by the applicable obligation or standard.
In cases that cannot be resolved based solely on the written record or that involve more serious allegations, OPR ordinarily initiates an investigation, which includes obtaining relevant documents, conducting witness interviews, and interviewing the subject attorney.
In some cases, OPR may determine that the attorney did not commit professional misconduct, but the circumstances warrant another finding. In those cases, OPR may consider whether the attorney exercised poor judgment, made a mistake, or otherwise acted inappropriately. OPR also may determine that the subject attorney acted appropriately under ...
A mistake finding is based on OPR’s determination that the attorney’s conduct resulted from excusable human error despite the attorney’s exercise of reasonable care under the circumstances. OPR considers various factors when examining whether an attorney’s error was excusable. Those factors include, for example, the attorney’s opportunity to plan and reflect on the possible and foreseeable consequences of the conduct; the significance of the conduct compared with the breadth and magnitude of the attorney’s overall responsibilities and actions; and the extent to which the error was consistent with the attorney’s usual conduct.
Generally, however, the first step after receiving an allegation is to conduct an initial review of the allegations to determine whether further review is warranted . This determination is based on several factors, including the nature of the allegation, its specificity, and its susceptibility to verification. Most complaints received by OPR are determined not to warrant further review because, for example, the complaint appears on its face to be without merit, is outside OPR’s jurisdiction, or is unsupported by any evidence. In such cases, OPR will close the matter without informing the subject attorney of the complaint.
The recipient and any subrecipients (“subgrantees”) must promptly refer to the DOJ Office of Inspector General any credible evidence that a principal, employee, agent, contractor, subgrantee, subcontractor, or other person has either -. 1) Submitted a false claim for grant funds under the False Claims Act; or.
2) Committed a criminal or civil violation of laws pertaining to fraud, conflict of interest, bribery, gratuity, or similar misconduct involving grant funds. Potential fraud, waste, abuse, or misconduct should be reported to the OIG by –. Mail:
You may request a Statement of Complaint Form by mail, by calling the Professional Compliance Office Hotline at 1-800-822-2113 (if you are calling from within Pennsylvania) or at 1-717-783-4854 (if you are calling from outside Pennsylvania). Return the completed form to the Professional Compliance Office at: Department of State, Professional Compliance Office, PO Box 69522, 2601 North Third Street, Harrisburg, PA 17106-9522. Be sure to include any attachments and supporting documents (legible copies, no originals) that you wish to provide in support of your complaint.
The Order to Show Cause sets forth allegations and directs the licensee (Respondent) to file a written Answer to those allegations within 30 days.
After the Respondent files an Answer, the matter is generally scheduled for hearing. If the matter is scheduled for hearing, the case is heard and a decision, known as an Adjudication and Order, is rendered, usually within six (6) months after the evidentiary record has been closed. If the Respondent is unhappy with the outcome, he or she may appeal the decision to Commonwealth Court.
Disciplinary actions are a matter of public record and are subject to release by the Department of State's Office of Communications and Press to various news agencies in the Commonwealth.
The Pennsylvania Department of State receives complaints concerning the licensees and registrants of the following 29 professional and occupational licensing boards & commissions regulated by the Department's Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs.
Decisions about whether or not to prosecute cases are constrained by the applicable licensing laws, rules and regulations, which set forth specifically enumerated offenses for which the licensing boards and commissions may impose discipline on a licensee. If offensive conduct or activity does not fit within any specifically enumerated offense, disciplinary action cannot be filed against the licensee because the activity is not within the applicable board or commission's jurisdiction