Don’t try to outsmart the lawyer who is questioning you. It can lead to disaster. Instead, be truthful, answer the questions that are being asked of you by that lawyer.
Full Answer
8 key factors drive what your best defense strategy is: Defendant’s explanation of what happened, why and credibility. Witness testimony and credibility. Provable facts and physical evidence. Police reports, errors and credibility. Expert, 3rd party reports and testimony. Penal code charge and the required crime elements to prove.
Jun 25, 2013 · 1. Develop your theory of the case. The state has a theory already. For example, if your client has been charged with murder, the state's theory might be that your client got into an argument with the victim and stabbed him five times. You need a …
Jan 14, 2020 · Here are five common tactics employed by defense attorneys to try and get their clients off. More importantly, here are some strategies on how to beat them. 1. Putting Everyone on Trial Except the Defendant. Defense attorneys will attack an officer’s credibility more often and harder than other prosecution witnesses just because you’re an officer.
Nov 15, 2017 · 5 How To Outsmart A Master Manipulator. 5.1 Avoid contact with one; 5.2 Say no; 5.3 Ignore them; 5.4 Set personal boundaries; 5.5 Set goals; 5.6 Assume responsibility for what you do; 5.7 Keep track of everything you are involved in; 5.8 Don’t get emotionally involved, your emotions can be targeted; 5.9 Recognize mental illness when you see it & find help
Don’t assume you know what the other person’s arguments are. Assuming you know what your opponent is going to argue is a surefire way to be caught without an effective counter-argument. Prepare as much as you can based on what you think your opponent might argue, but leave room for surprises.
Double-check and triple-check the sources with other sources to make sure that the argument is supported by multiple claims.
Remain calm. The person who loses their temper or their hold on their emotions first is the person who loses the argument. It doesn't matter how good your facts are, because you're out of control and more likely to make a mistake.
You can't always count on being fully prepared for an argument ahead of time , but there are some things you can do to make it more likely that you come out on top in an on-the-spot argument. If there are certain subjects that are important to you make sure you know as much about them as possible.
Pick the right time. There is no way, unfortunately, to outsmart an authority figure like a parent or a teacher every single time. There are, however, times when they'll be more susceptible to persuasion.
Ask a criminal defense lawyer why they chose that legal subspecialty and the most common answer is that nothing gets their blood going more than a case with high stakes. “Cases move faster and they’re just more interesting than civil cases,” Gates says. “There’s nothing worse than an extended conversation about Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code. It’s just more interesting to talk about a bank robbery.”
Criminal defense attorneys, who stand beside clients accused of everything from minor offenses to mass murder, must mount the most effective defense of their client possible no matter how heinous the crime. While their work enforces a person’s constitutional right to a fair trial, some observers chastise them for representing society's villains.
Once in court, Lichtman focuses on finding the one person in the box of 12 to connect with. “I look up the backgrounds of jurors,” he says. “I’m looking for anything in the background I can exploit in order to tailor my summation to something that’s happened in their lives.”
"For me, I don’t mind this new mindset because I play into juries’ natural skepticism in my theory of defense. I exploit the facts that seem impossible to believe, even when true, and beseech the jury to use their common sense gained from a lifetime of experience. And TV watching."
While their work enforces a person’s constitutional right to a fair trial, some observers chastise them for representing society's villains. In their view, that’s missing the point. In addition to making sure the scales of justice are balanced, criminal defense attorneys find satisfaction in tackling cases with high stakes.
To get a better understanding of this often emotionally draining work, Mental Floss spoke with three high-profile defense lawyers. In addition to Lichtman, we talked to Chris Tritico—the subject of the first episode of Oxygen’s In Defense Of docuseries premiering June 25, and who represented Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh in 1997—as well as Bryan Gates, practicing in North Carolina. Here’s what they shared about life as a devil’s advocate.
It might seem like an innocent client would be easier to defend. But according to Gates, having a strong belief that a client is falsely accused creates additional strain on the defense. “It’s very stressful because you’re really identifying with the person,” he says.
They’re hoping to obtain inconsistent or conflicting answers from the testifying officer.
Defense attorneys want to put you on trial so the jury will be distracted from who is actually on trial. They don’t want to spend time on the evidence. The evidence proves their clients are guilty. On days you are scheduled for court, put a Q-tip in your pocket.
Defense attorneys will attack an officer’s credibility more often and harder than other prosecution witnesses just because you’re an officer. They know if they can raise a doubt about your credibility, it may cause a judge or jury to doubt the credibility of the entire case (remember Mark Fuhrman ?).
On days you are scheduled for court, put a Q-tip in your pocket. If you feel yourself becoming defensive on cross-examination, squeeze the Q-tip to remind yourself to Q uit T aking I t P ersonally.
The respect part is the key. It frustrates a defense attorney when they’re unable to rattle you. Furthermore, your show of respect enhances your credibility with the jury.
If the defense attorney insists, he will be clearly communicating he intends to mislead the jury.
The duty of any attorney is to represent the interests of their client, and defendants are interested in getting off – regardless of whether they committed the crime.
After getting to know you a little bit, a person that wants to influence you to their direct or indirect advantage might try to manipulate the way you see them, e.g. they victimize themselves, they always put themselves in a favorable light and they try to condition you to react in certain ways that are favorable to them. They might also try to twist the facts in a way that will lead you to react (draw conclusions or take action) in a way that is favorable to them.
The reason for this is that they want to find out about your strengths and weaknesses, to test your boundaries and even to induce a Freudian slip (a slip of the tongue).
A master manipulator is different from the other puppet masters because he or she are very good at what they do and also very subtle. They have 2 main goals – to achieve what they want and not be caught manipulating other people because, well, news of this sort spread fast.
But what do you do when that is not an option? There is a reason why they are called master manipulators – emotional abuse is one of their top tactics.
A master manipulator is a person that tries to use other people to influence the following:
It is tended to be recommended to not try it because we are very good at studying you, whereas you are less inclined to be as good at studying us.”
You are absolutely correct, I thought the exact same thing while writing these words. Emotional intelligence and how to use it to guard yourself against emotional manipulators has a bit of a learning curve, but being aware of your emotions and how they influence how you express yourself is a very good first step.
Although you may be tempted to confront a hostile attorney by stating "You seem angry," the smartest response is to remain calm and answer the questions, says Eberhart. "The attorney on the opposing side will attempt to use whatever they can, to get you to answer a question the way they want you to," she says.
Don't let tension impact your statements. When being verbally confronted during a deposition, you may be tempted to blurt out a statement you may later regret. "Do not let the opposing attorney get you rattled by intimidation.
There may be state specific rules, but on a general basis, the opposing attorney can't refuse you a break, says Eberhart. "You can always say 'I need to use the restroom,' or 'I'm tired, I need a break,'" she says.
If you say something you regret, such as an outburst made in frustration, you can make a correction on the record, or you can change the transcript at a later date when you review it. "Both of these methods can be commented upon by opposing counsel at time of trial if they so desire. So the best policy is to think out all your answers and not be forced into making corrections," says Lawrence.
It is more damaging to the case to correct a statement after the deposition is over, says Eberhart. "If you realize that what you said may have been misconstrued, just tell the attorney you want to clarify a statement you made that may be confusing or not correct. It is better if you do this while you are still in the deposition," she says.
Lawyers, especially on television, have a reputation for "playing hardball", negotiating without compromise, launching personal insults, engaging in intimidation tactics, or perhaps "steamrolling" the other side. In reality, this usually does not end well for either side. Value is created when people listen to each other, when they create dialogue, and when they share information. That is how lawyers are encouraged to negotiate, and that is how you should negotiate, too.
When the other side is speaking, use that opportunity to listen intently and try to understand his perspective or position. Among other things, this will help you understand where the two of you may overlap in goals, where there may be room to push, or where you differ irreconcilably such that there may be a hold-out.
For legal matters, the term "bargaining under the shadow of the law" means that when two litigators negotiate with each other, both have—in the back of their minds—what the potential, likely trial outcome would be. And this information will inform their negotiations. A lawyer will only agree to a settlement offer if that settlement offer is preferable to going to trial, and a lawyer will only know that information if she or he goes into a negotiation fully informed and educated.
When it is your turn to speak, use it as an opportunity to put forth your thoughts and perspectives in a clear way. Do not use it as an opportunity to tear down the perspectives or views of the other side. Your goal is to convey to the other side what you expect, what your position is, and what your view of the situation is.