how to find lawsuits filed by an attorney

Is pacer a legitimate site?

How do you find out if a lawsuit has been filed in California?

How do I find old court records online?

Can I lookup a court case online UK?

Does California have free public records?

How do I find my case number California?

Where can I find legal cases online?

How do I find public records for free?

How can I get court transcripts for free?

Are UK court cases public record?

How do the press find out about court cases?

Are court sentences public Record UK?

Is a civil lawsuit a public record?

Lawsuits Are Generally Public Record. Civil lawsuits are generally public record. Civil proceedings are any proceedings that are not for the prosecution of a crime, such as lawsuits for personal injury and wrongful death, bankruptcy proceedings, lawsuits for breach of contract and anything else that is not criminal including divorce ...

Is a civil lawsuit a criminal case?

Civil lawsuits are generally public record. Civil proceedings are any proceedings that are not for the prosecution of a crime, such as lawsuits for personal injury and wrongful death, bankruptcy proceedings, lawsuits for breach of contract and anything else that is not criminal including divorce and family law proceedings.

How to view court records?

Anyone can view public court records online by heading to the court's website if online records are available for that court, or by going to the court clerk's office to view records. The clerk's office will have records in either paper format or electronically through kiosks.

What is civil case?

Civil proceedings are any proceedings that are not for the prosecution of a crime, such as lawsuits for personal injury and wrongful death, bankruptcy proceedings, lawsuits for breach of contract and anything else that is not criminal including divorce and family law proceedings. Criminal proceedings are also generally public record.

Michael James Duffy

Many times the best result is an out-of court settlement, where the case does not proceed to trial or a verdict. In some cases, success is determined by limiting damages rather than a decision in favor of the client. There might be various claims, some of which are successes at being avoided while others are all but inevitable.

Patrick X Amoresano

Some attorneys give examples of cases they've handled on their website, and some submit them to www.jvra.com, where you can search the name of your attorney, but you need to bear in mind that only case summaries the lawyer has chosen to submit will be found there...

Christopher Edward Ezold

Before I respond to your inquiry, I must state that we have not spoken, I have not reviewed the relevant documents and facts, and I do not represent you. Therefore, my discussion below is not a legal opinion, but is informational only.

Jeffrey Anthony Skiendziul

If you want to investigate the reputation and acumen of who is representing you then either ask the attorney directly about their past experience, type their name into a google search engine or use this site to review the resume of your attorney.

Joseph Clark Melino

The type of information you seek can be found in the LA Daily Journal, every Friday. It reports the settlements and verdicts of cases tried in the courts of the State of California and other courts. You can subscribe to the paper and get the information from its website...

Shannon Claire Lamb

You should also use Google to see if you can obtain information about an attorney's track record. Your local law library may also have books with information about prior verdicts and settlements, listed by both attorney and practice area - in California, O'Brien's evaluator contains this information...

Tyler Joseph Moore

There will be a lot of information about any lawyer that will not be contained in the court record. The most important thing is to find a lawyer that you can work with, and has a similar idea of how your case should be handled.

Douglas James Pettibone

There is no public record search like this available that I am aware of. ThompsonWest has a research program something in line with what you are talking about. They claim to be able to check out an attorney, the cases filed and the rulings of the court on each case.

Where are court records transferred?

When court records and case files are eligible for permanent preservation, they are transferred to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) for storage and preservation.

Is there a fee for court opinions on PACER?

Court opinions are available for free on PACER to anyone with an account. Additionally, access to court opinions from many appellate, district, and bankruptcy courts are available for no fee in a text searchable format through a partnership with the U.S. Government Publishing Office (GPO), consistent with the E-Government Act.

What is a PACER account?

Federal case files are maintained electronically and are available through the internet-based Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) service. PACER allows anyone with an account to search and locate appellate, district, and bankruptcy court case and docket information. Register for a PACER account .

What is the IDB?

Define the data needs for research using the Federal Court Cases Integrated Database (IDB) provided free of charge by the Federal Judicial Center. The IDB has case data (not documents) for criminal, civil, appellate, and bankruptcy cases that can help researchers refine their requests.

Step 1

Go to your local criminal courthouse and ask for a listing of recent cases in which the attorney has represented a defendant. While many jurisdictions have case records online, that is not the case in every state or municipality.

Step 2

File an open records request with the public defender's office or local court. If the attorney is a public defender, then his office has a duty to release information regarding every case he has defended while working there and even has to release performance reviews.

Step 3

Call the local bar association and ask for the any records on file related to your attorney. The bar association will have information on disciplinary actions and complaints filed by prior clients.

What is the Facebook lawsuit?

citizens, U.S. nationals, refugees, asylees, and recent lawful permanent residents) in its recruitment and hiring practices, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (1). The lawsuit alleges that Facebook routinely refused to recruit, consider, or hire U.S. workers for positions that it reserved for temporary visa holders in connection with the permanent labor certification process (“PERM”). The complaint alleges that beginning no later than January 1, 2018 and lasting until at least September 18, 2019, Facebook used recruiting methods designed to deter U.S. workers from applying to positions reserved for temporary visa holders, refused to consider U.S. workers who applied to the positions, and hired only temporary visa holders for the positions.

What was the Whiz lawsuit?

On May 30, 2012, the Department of Justice settled a lawsuit against Whiz International LLC (Whiz), an information technology staffing company, resolving allegations that the company discriminated against one of its employees when it terminated her in retaliation for expressing opposition to its alleged preference for foreign nationals with temporary work visas. Under the terms of the settlement, Whiz agreed to pay $21,870 in back pay/front pay to the terminated worker, $1,000 in civil penalties to the United States Treasury, and three years of monitoring and reporting requirements. Whiz will also undergo training by the Department of Justice and has agreed not to discriminate against any employee on the basis of national origin or citizenship status.

What is the settlement agreement with Adaequare?

(Adaequare) to resolve an independent investigation into whether the company engaged in citizenship or immigration status discrimination in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (1) (B). IER’s investigation concluded that the company, which recruits workers for other entities, engaged in discrimination in the hiring or recruitment/referral for a fee processes by considering only applicants who were U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents when filling a job for a client. Under the settlement agreement, the company will pay a civil penalty to the United States, train its employees on anti-discrimination obligations, and be subject to departmental reporting requirements.

What is Spike Inc.?

On March 31, 2021, the Division signed a settlement agreement with Spike Inc., a construction company headquartered in Spark s, MD. The Division’s investigation determined that from at least Feb. 1, 2019, to March 11, 2019, Spike discriminated against four U.S. workers by failing to consider them for temporary mover positions. Despite receiving applications from these available U.S. workers, Spike filled the positions with H-2B visa workers, claiming that it could not find qualified and available U.S. workers. Under the settlement agreement, Spike will pay a civil penalty of $ 12,000 to the United States, pay up to $70,000 in back pay to affected U.S. workers, and conduct enhanced U.S. worker recruitment and advertising for future positions. The settlement also requires Spike to train employees on the requirements of the INA’s anti-discrimination provision and be subject to departmental monitoring and reporting requirements.

What is the settlement agreement with National Systems America?

On January 14, 2021, the Division signed a settlement agreement with National Systems America, LP (NSA) to resolve claims based on its independent investigation into whether the company engaged in discrimination based on citizenship status in the hiring and employment eligibility verification processes in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (1) (B) and (a) (6). The company recruits employees using a foreign company as its agent, and directly hires them to perform IT work for NSA clients. IER’s investigation concluded that the company (1) engaged in a pattern or practice of recruiting and hiring only U.S. citizens or U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents for certain positions without legal justification, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (1) (B); and (2) on numerous occasions, requested copies of Permanent Resident Cards to confirm the citizenship status and work authorization of candidates who identified themselves as lawful permanent residents during the applicant screening process, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (6). Under the settlement agreement, the company will pay a civil penalty of $34,200 to the United States and train its employees on the requirements of the INA’s anti-discrimination provision, and be subject to departmental reporting requirements.

What is IER settlement agreement?

On November 24, 2020, IER signed a settlement agreement with Security USA, LLC (Security) resolving claims by a Charging Party (“CP”) that the company made unnecessary and excessive document demands in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b and engaged in retaliation when the Permanent Resident refused to present the requested document in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (5). IER’s investigation concluded that from at least January 1, 2018 through June 27, 2019, Security had routinely: (1) requested specific documents during the onboarding process from the Lawful Permanent Residents, (2) requested more or different documentation from such Lawful Permanent Residents despite their having already provided sufficient documentation to prove their employment eligibility, and (3) requested new Permanent Resident Cards from Lawful Permanent Residents upon the expiration dates of their previous Permanent Resident Cards. The settlement agreement requires Security to agree to train relevant employees about the anti-discrimination requirements of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b and undergo departmental monitoring for 3 years.

What is a SMSC?

On October 6, 2020, IER signed a settlement agreement with Security Management of South Carolina, LLC (SMSC), a private security company that provides security services throughout South Carolina and Georgia. IER’s investigation determined that SMSC discriminated against a worker by withdrawing a conditional offer of employment based on the worker’s citizenship status as a naturalized U.S. citizen. The settlement also resolves claims that SMSC discriminated against non-U.S. citizens by restricting security officer positions in Georgia to U.S. citizens without a legal basis. Under the settlement, SMSC will pay a $60,000 civil penalty to the United States, establish a $75,000 back pay fund for affected workers, train their staff on the requirements of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b, and be subject to departmental monitoring. SMSC will also pay the worker whose discrimination complaint prompted the investigation $7,907.81 in back pay.

When is it relevant to find a case by judge?

It is important to know a few things about your judge before every case. First, you need to know the judge’s familiarity with the context of your case.

Why is it important to have relevant information on judge?

It is important to know the judge’s background on a case so that you can use your time as effectively, both in court and while you are preparing for a case. If a judge has been involved in similar cases, you can provide a brief summary rather than providing extensive background information and spend more time on your argument.

How can I be sure to find the legal case by judge or entity in Westlaw or Westlaw Edge?

To exhaust all legal research options, you may also opt to run a field search on Westlaw or Westlaw Edge. Field searching is a Boolean terms and connectors search that looks for specific terms in a particular part of the document–the title or author fields, for example.