Mirena Migration Lawsuit. Spontaneous migration of the Mirena IUD is one of the most serious side effects of this hormonal contraceptive implant. If this occurs, the edges of the device can erode into the uterus and cause a perforation. Mirena can also migrate outside the uterus, with potentially severe complications including intestinal ...
Aug 16, 2018 · Mirena lawsuits claim the birth control device causes serious side effects. The intrauterine device (IUD) has migrated, perforating the uterus in some cases. The IUD has also been linked to increased pressure in the brain. At least 2,700 women have sued Bayer over these adverse events. Some of these cases settled in 2018 for $2.2 million.
Dec 18, 2013 · In the past decade the use of the intrauterine device (IUD) has grown to be a more popular choice. Less than 1% of women used this device in 1995; that percentage has increase to about 6% in 2006-2010. As this contraceptive method becomes more popular, the lawsuits against the makers of the Mirena IUD have piled up. (Jones, Mosher, and Daniels ...
Thousands of women throughout the United States have filed a lawsuit after experiencing complications with Mirena IUD, including issues with migration of the implanted birth control and side effects that may result in a dangerous buildup of fluid pressure in the skull, known as pseudotumor cerebri (PTC). While similar allegations have been brought by women nationwide, …
Migration of Mirena is a complication that occurs when the device moves from its optimal position. The Mirena is a T-shaped, flexible piece of plastic that is designed to sit inside the pear-shaped uterus. Two plastic “strings” hang outside the uterus, which is important for removing the device and checking its placement. One of the first symptoms of migration is “lost” strings. This symptom should always be investigated by a healthcare professional, because spontaneous migration of the Mirena can have life-threatening complications.
Spontaneous migration of the Mirena IUD is one of the most serious side effects of this hormonal contraceptive implant. If this occurs, the edges of the device can erode into the uterus and cause a perforation. Mirena can also migrate outside the uterus, with potentially severe complications including intestinal perforation, pregnancy, infertility, infection, and more. Bayer is now facing lawsuits from dozens of women, including many lawsuits that allege the company failed to adequately warn about the risk of “spontaneous migration,” and only warned about migration immediately after insertion of the IUD.
Individual Mirena IUD Lawsuits. The first Mirena IUD lawsuits generally concerned device migration. Below is a summary of complications experienced by some of the earliest claimants: Desaree Nicole Lee Johnson suffered pain when her Mirena IUD perforated her uterus and moved into her abdomen.
The total settlement amount was $12.2 million. But, individual settlement amounts for Mirena lawsuits vary depending on the details of each individual case.
The sNDA seeks to extend Mirena's labeling to allow use up to six years. As of July 2020, the sNDA is still underway. Mirena is currently approved for only five years of use. The FDA's Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) keeps track of device injuries.
MDL 2767: Mirena Pseudotumor Cerebri. Many women have experienced complications due to a buildup of pressure in the brain. This is known as pseudotumor cerebri (PTC). This condition has symptoms similar to a brain tumor. Research studies have linked the hormone in the Mirena IUD with this dangerous condition.
However, many women have sued Bayer due to a serious condition known as pseudotumor cerebri ("false tumor"). This condition can cause tumor-like symptoms in the brain. Bayer's 2018 settlement did not settle any cases related to pseudotumor cerebri. These cases are still pending.
The intrauterine device (IUD) has migrated, perforating the uterus in some cases. The IUD has also been linked to increased pressure in the brain. At least 2,700 women have sued Bayer over these adverse events. Some of these cases settled in 2018 for $2.2 million.
Sieniuc K. Wipeout Of Mirena MDL To Be Challenged At 2nd Circ. Law360. August 19, 2016.
In April 2013, the Mirena perforation litigation was centralized in the Southern District of New York as part of an MDL, or Multidistrict Litigation. In 2018, a global settlement agreement was reached to resolve these cases.
Thousands of women throughout the United States have filed a lawsuit after experiencing complications with Mirena IUD, including issues with migration of the implanted birth control and side effects that may result in a dangerous buildup of fluid pressure in the skull, known as pseudotumor cerebri (PTC).
While these multidistrict litigations (MDLs) are handled in a coordinated manner to reduce duplicative rulings into similar issues in the separate claims and eliminate conflicting rulings from different judges, the process is different from a class action for Mirena, where all claims would be litigated through one class representative
While similar allegations have been brought by women nationwide, each case is an individual claim and not part of a Mirena class action lawsuit.
All cases are pursued on a contingency fee basis by our Mirena attorney, which means that there are never any out of pocket fees or expenses, and we get paid nothing unless we win your case. To review a potential claim for yourself or a family member, request a free consultation and claim evaluation.
Each case remains an individual lawsuit, and any Mirena settlement agreement reached will be based on the circumstances for that woman, accounting for the pain and suffering caused by the IUD. In addition, when any offers are received, each client retains the right to decide whether to settle their case or proceed to trial.
Since each plaintiff must establish that their use of Mirena birth control caused the alleged injury and that the manufacturer failed to adequately war n about the risk of side effects , it is very important to have a qualified Mirena class action attorney representing your interests.
The Mirena lawsuits allege: 1 Mirena is defective, dangerous and not suited to be used as intended 2 Bayer did not perform adequate testing to determine the safety and efficacy of the IUD 3 Bayer concealed its knowledge that Mirena could put users at risk for serious side effects 4 Bayer took part in a marketing campaign known as “Mirena parties,” which misled women and further diluted warnings for potential side effects 5 There are other contraceptives available that are equal to or greater in effectiveness and that carry far less of a risk 6 Bayer failed to adequately warn women and doctors about serious side effects associated with Mirena
Hundreds of women have filed lawsuits against Bayer, the maker of Mirena, alleging that the intrauterine device (IUD) puts women at risk for serious side effects that greatly outweigh the benefits of using the contraceptive. These lawsuits claim that Bayer knew, or should have known, that women were suffering infections, ...
In 2009, the FDA demanded that Bayer immediately cease its marketing program known as "Mirena parties." The agency said that these events were misleading because they overstated the efficacy of Mirena, while minimizing its risks.
In a warning letter the FDA sent to Bayer in 2009, the agency said that the manufacturer’s promotional campaign , known as “Mirena parties,” violated the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act by overstating the efficacy of the birth control, while minimizing its risks.
Bayer concealed its knowledge that Mirena could put users at risk for serious side effects
Mirena Side Effects Include Infections, Organ Damage and Hemorrhages. Lawsuits claim that Mirena can damage the uterus or cause other injuries if the IUD migrates from its original position. Some plaintiffs allege they experienced infections, organ damage, hemorrhages and scarring after being fitted with Mirena, ...
Lawsuits allege that the maker of Mirena failed to adequately warn women that the device can embed itself in the uterus, perforate the uterus or travel into the pelvic area, causing infections, scarring, organ damage, adhesions, intestinal obstruction and hemorrhages. If a woman becomes pregnant after receiving Mirena, ...
IUDs are T-shaped devices made out of flexible plastic which, after being inserted into the uterus, provide birth control. Most IUDs are hormone-based contraceptives, with the exception of Paragard which relies on the inflammatory reaction between copper and sperm/eggs to provide birth control.
Pseudotumor cerebri: This is a condition in which pressure on the brain increases, causing headaches, blurred vision, and other symptoms associated with brain tumors. This condition is also referred to as idiopathic intracranial hypertension.
Unfortunately, when pseudotumor cerebri is left untreated, over time it can result in permanent vision loss, not to mention debilitating headaches, blurred vision, and periods of blindness in the meantime. Organ perforation and IUD migration can cause internal complications, in addition to scarring of the uterus and potential infertility.
If you have suffered from pseudotumor cerebri, organ perforation, IUD migration, or another condition you believe may be related to a Mirena or alternate IUD, reach out to a product liability attorney to discuss your options for recovery.
Now that you are aware of the facts, it is time to get down to business and find out how you can receive your Mirena lawsuit settlement. You can either look for help at a law firm that specializes in these lawsuits or look for a personal injury attorney that handles Mirena cases.
You also have emotional trauma, pain and suffering, and even loss of wages that could be awarded to you. The financial compensation may be your largest asset when preparing for your case.
The settlement can be greatly improved if you have a qualified personal injury litigation lawyer on your side. They will not only get you the settlement that you deserve, but they will also ensure that you receive fair representation and fair settlements.
In April 2021, the Multicounty Litigation designation for Mirena IUD lawsuits in New Jersey officially ended given that all “active litigation has resolved.” This was the formal ending to litigation that has long been over.
So why are lawyers still advertising like crazy for Mirena cases? In 2018, there is a whole new MDL In Manhattan with over around 175 lawsuits pending. Plaintiffs allege that Bayer’s Mirena Intrauterine System causes a severe, permanent, and debilitating condition called pseudotumor cerebri or intracranial hypertension (“PTC/IH”). These lawsuits allege that Mirena’s warning does not adequately warn about non-stroke neurological conditions such as PTC/IH, despite a known link between LNG and PTC/IH.
The Mirena perforation cases failed because plaintiffs’ attorneys could not find experts that the federal court judge hearing the cases would accept. We had four experts, and the court rejected all of them then granted judgment without a trial in favor of Bayer. This lead to the dismissal of over 1,000 cases.
This intrauterine device is to be placed within seven days of the first day of menstruation and approved to remain in the uterus for as many as five years. The warning label says that this device should be used in women who have had at least one child.
Mirena, a small, flexible T-shaped IUD, releases a hormone called Levonorgestrel, a hormone that effectively prevents pregnancy. Mirena is placed in a woman’s uterus and is inserted by a doctor in an outpatient office visit. The problem with Mirena is that there are a lot of problems. This intrauterine device is to be placed within seven days ...
Implanon: This device is a plastic implant rod containing progestogen etonogestrel which is surgically inserted under the skin of the upper arm
There is a lot of confusion out there about Mirena lawsuits. Women are confused that there are so many lawyers in recent years are looking for Mirena cases yet they cannot find a lawyer for their case.
When you first sustain an injury due to a defective Mirena IUD, your attorney should contact a personal injury lawyer to help you determine whether or not you have a case. You must remember that even if you are not directly hurt in an attack, you can still file a lawsuit against the manufacturer.
One reason why this delay is understandable is the fact that you have to be able to provide substantial proof that the accident occurred. This proof usually comes in the form of doctor’s reports, pictures of the accident location, and other forms of documentation.
However, it is extremely important for patients to remember that most doctors and hospitals will not assist individuals with filing a lawsuit until all other options have been exhausted. Patients should retain all forms of documentation, and contact a lawyer as soon as possible if they feel they will receive a substantial settlement.