The court in which the case is pending and in which a notice of lien may be filed lacks jurisdiction to determine the validity or amount of an attorney’s lien. To enforce the lien, you must wait until the judgment has been awarded and then bring forward a separate suit to collect. See Carroll v.
Full Answer
An attorney must bring a separate action against the client to: (1) establish the existence of the lien, (2) determine the amount of the lien, and (3) enforce it.
Unlike most jurisdictions, where an attorney’s lien is established by operation of law in favor of an attorney to satisfy attorney fees and expenses out of the proceeds of a prospective judgment, in California, an attorney’s lien can only be created by contract.
While an attorney’s lien may be used to secure either an hourly fee agreement or a contingency fee agreement, hourly fee agreements purporting to create an attorney’s lien must comply with Rule 1.8.1 of the California Rules of Professional Conduct. Rule 1.8.1 requires that:
With hourly fee agreements, a valid attorney’s lien is created only if the attorney complies with California Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3-300. Id. at 69.
An Attorney can file a lien against a client's property for legal work that is not paid for.
Mr. Daymude has provided a very good answer to your question. I would add that the State Bar law/rules on fees prevent an attorney from charging you more for working with another attorney, if the work would increase your fees.
Attorneys’ fee liens, commonly referred to as “charging liens,” pose a difficult problem for defendants. Increasingly, plaintiffs are represented by multiple attorneys due to plaintiffs switching attorneys or attorney referrals. This is particularly true in product liability cases where it is typical for the original plaintiff’s attorney to refer the case to an attorney specializing […]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Guadalupe L. Garcia, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Tom Vilsack, Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § Case No. 1:00-cv-02445 (RBW)
7/13/13 California Bar Journal - Official Publication of the State Bar of California
Another common form of lien that attorneys rely upon in order to secure payment of fees is a retaining lien. A retaining lien is “ [a]n attorney’s right to keep a client’s papers until the client has paid for the attorney’s services.” Black’s Law Dictionary (9 th ed. 2009). However, retaining liens of this kind are not permissible in California. Academy Of California Optometrists, Inc. v. Superior Court (1975) 51 Cal.App.3d 999. Rather, clients have an absolute right to receive their file at the conclusion of the representation. See Rule of Professional Conduct 1.16 (e) (1).
One of the more frustrating aspects of the legal practice is the difficulty of collecting attorneys’ fees. After putting in all of the time, effort, and expense involved in bringing a matter to a conclusion, little can dampen the sense of accomplishment more than a client’s inability — or unwillingness — to pay the agreed-upon fees.
While charging liens have long been permitted in California, in the seminal case of Fletcher v. Davis (2004) 33 Cal.4 th 61, the California Supreme Court ruled that charging liens create an “adverse interest” to the client. Id. at 69. As such, charging liens require compliance with Rule 1.8.1 of the Rules of Professional Conduct, “Business Transactions with a Client and Pecuniary Interests Adverse to a Client.”
A number of remedies exist for attorneys who wish to enforce their fee agreements. First, attorneys can, and indeed must, notify clients of their right to pursue fee arbitration under California’s Mandatory Fee Arbitration Program. See Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 6200, et seq. Attorneys may also bring a civil suit against clients to collect fees after pursuing mandatory fee arbitration. Attorneys may also contract with collection counsel or a collection firm in order to help them to collect unpaid fees.
Second, these steps are likely to engender hostility from former clients, which may harm lawyers’ reputations and hinder their ability to attract future clients. And, former clients may retaliate against lawyers who seek to collect fees by filing legal malpractice or other claims against their prior counsel.
Successor counsel in the possession of settlement or other proceeds against which a predecessor attorney has asserted a lien has a fiduciary obligation to the attorney lienholder with respect to the funds. See Johnstone v. State Bar, 64 Cal. 2d 153, 155-56 (1966); In re Respondent P, 2 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 622, 632 (Rev. Dep’t 1993); Cal. Form. Opn. 2008-175. That duty includes the duty to inform predecessor counsel of the fact and amount of settlement. In re Riley, 3 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 91, 111-15 (Rev. Dep’t 1994); Cal. Form. Opn. 2008-175. Moreover, a third party ( e.g., the defendant or the defendant’s insurer) with notice of the plaintiff’s former counsel’s attorney’s lien, may be civilly liable to the lienholder for paying out the funds directly to successor counsel and the plaintiff. See Levin v. Gulf Ins. Group, 69 Cal. App. 4th 1282, 1287-88 (1999).
By reasonably and promptly quantifying liens, consenting to disbursement of undisputed funds and reasonably negotiating with successor counsel the allocation between attorneys of any contingent fee earned, attorneys should be able to resolve most lien disputes without court involvement. Such a result should be compelled not only by ethical considerations, but by practical considerations as well. Drawn out and costly legal battles over entitlement to fees and validity of liens tax not only the lawyers and clients involved, but the judicial system as a whole.
If an attorney attempts to enforce a lien for his attorney’s fees in violation of the legal or ethical principles governing attorney’s liens, the lawyer is in breach of his fiduciary duties to his former client.
Even after an attorney is discharged by a client, with or without cause, the discharged attorney “continue [s] to owe [the client] a fiduciary duty of utmost good faith and fair dealing with respect to, at least, the subject matter of [the attorney’s] prior representation of [the client], including [the attorney’s] express lien for his attorney’s fees.” In re Feldsott, 3 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 754, 757 (Rev. Dep’t 1997). If an attorney attempts to enforce a lien for his attorney’s fees in violation of the legal or ethical principles governing attorney’s liens, the lawyer is in breach of his fiduciary duties to his former client.
An attorney’s lien is created and takes effect when the fee agreement giving rise to the lien is executed. Cetenko, 30 Cal. 3d at 534. Such a lien has priority over other liens created after the attorney-client fee agreement was entered into. Carroll, 99 Cal. App. 4th at 1175. An attorney’s lien, however, must generally be enforced in a separate legal proceeding. The court in which the case is pending and in which a notice of lien may be filed lacks jurisdiction to determine the validity or amount of any attorney’s lien. Carroll, 99 Cal. App. 4th at 1176-77.
An attorney’s lien (also known as a “charging” lien) is a lien that secures an attorney’s compensation against the funds or judgment recovered by the attorney for the client. Fletcher v. Davis, 33 Cal. 4th 61, 66 (2004).
Where a dispute arises only between successor and predecessor counsel as to the pro-rata allocation of the fee earned, where the client has not disputed the fee earned, the attorney may reveal to prior counsel the fact and amount of settlement, but that attorney must continue to otherwise maintain her duty of confidentiality to her client when attempting to reach an accord with prior counsel. Cal. Form. Opn. 2008-175. In litigation between counsel, “the presiding officer will be in a position to limit disclosure of confidential information to the greatest extent possible” Id. at 6.
Judgment creditor’s liens and charging liens are different in that the former is created when notice of the lien is filed after the judgment comes into existence. The latter is created and takes effect immediately upon execution of the fee agreement. See Cetenko v United Cal. Bank (1982) 30 C3d 528, 534, 179 CR 902.
For this reason charging liens are often referred to as “secret liens”, because they are valid and protected even without a notice of lien – though it is common and encouraged to file a notice of lien as well.
A charging lien is a lien on a client’s future recovery to secure the client’s obligation to pay the attorney when the recovery is received. Often, attorneys insert the lien language in the fee agreement with the client. It is also possible that a lien may be implied if the fee agreement indicates that the attorney’s payment will come from ...
To enforce the lien, you must wait until the judgment has been awarded and then bring forward a separate suit to collect. See Carroll v.
An added benefit of charging liens is that they have priority over other established liens – including judgement creditor’s liens. See Cetenko v United Cal. Bank. However, charging liens must generally be enforced in a separate legal proceeding. The court in which the case is pending and in which a notice of lien may be filed lacks jurisdiction to determine the validity or amount of an attorney’s lien. To enforce the lien, you must wait until the judgment has been awarded and then bring forward a separate suit to collect. See Carroll v. Interstate Brands Corp.
It is also possible that a lien may be implied if the fee agreement indicates that the attorney’s payment will come from the client’s recovery. However, it is not advisable to rely on this implication, and much more prudent to insert an explicit written lien provision in the fee agreement.
The takeaway is simple: Having a well thought out lien provision gives you options that can translate into real money. Because these liens are created by contract, an attorney must have privity of contract with a party against whom the lien is asserted. Without privity, there can be no recovery from the client.
Even after an attorney is terminated by a client, the discharged attorney "continue [s] to owe [the client] a fiduciary duty of utmost good faith and fair dealing with respect to, at least, the subject matter of [the attorney's] prior representation of [the client], including [the attorney's] express lien for his attorney's fees.".
In the non-contingency (hourly) context, the lien can only be created by representation agreements that comply with Rule 3-300 of the California Rules of Professional Conduct (CRPC), which essentially requires that the attorney fully inform the client of the terms and also avoid interests adverse to the client.
The existence of a lien on its own does not create a right of recovery. The right to enforce an attorney's lien does not exist until the contingency underlying the lien is triggered.
That said, and as set forth above, just because they claim it, doesn't mean they get it.
The relationship between attorney and client is a complicated and delicate one. Even with the best of intentions, like any relationship, it can go bad. Sometimes attorneys and clients have fundamental differences in their personalities. Sometimes they just do not see eye to eye.
It is also important as a practical matter to notify the successor counsel of the existence of your lien, preferably in writing. It is not prudent to rely on your former client to inform the successor counsel of the existence of your lien-better to do that yourself.
By filing with county recorder [CC §§8412, 8414, 8416] The lien must also be served upon the owner or reputed owner. Where the owner or reputed owner resides in or outside California, by registered mail, certified mail, or first-class mail, evidenced by a certificate of mailing, postage prepaid, addressed to the owner or reputed owner at the owner’s or reputed owner’s residence or place of business address or at the address shown by the building permit on file with the authority is suing a building permit for the work, or as otherwise provided in the construction trust deed described in §8174. If the owner or reputed owner cannot be served by this method, then the notice may be given by registered mail, certified mail, or first-class mail, evidenced by a certificate of mailing, postage prepaid, addressed to the construction lender or to the direct contractor. Service by registered mail, certified mail, or first-class mail, evidenced by a certificate of mailing, postage prepaid, is complete at the time of the deposit of that first-class certified or registered mail. Failure to serve the copy of the mechanics lien, including the Notice of Mechanics Lien, as prescribed by this section, shall cause the mechanics lien to be unenforceable as a matter of law. [CC §8416]
If the direct contractor gives the lender a bonded stop notice, the lender must in all cases withhold the funds. If any other claimant gives a bonded stop notice, the lender is required to withhold payment unless a payment bond has previously been recorded.
supplied 20 days prior to giving notice, and thereafter.) If notice is given by registered or certified mail, service is complete at the time it is deposited as certified or registered mail. [CC §§8116, 8204] The design professional’s preliminary notice must be given to the owner after a building permit has been obtained but at least ten days before filing his or her lien, and the lien must be filed before work commences on the project. [CC §8304]
Note: Where the project involves the construction of two or more separate residential units (including one structure with several condominiums) the time for filing a lien against each unit begins to run upon the completion of each unit. If, however, the claimant is unable to attribute the amounts to different units, the claimant is still entitled to its lien. [CC §8448]
The notice to the construction lender must be given within 20 days after claimant first furnishes labor, materials, etc. (If given later, will only cover materials, etc. supplied 20 days prior to giving notice, and thereafter.) If notice is given by registered or certified mail, service is complete at the time it is deposited as certified or registered mail. [CC §§8116, 8200, 8204] The notice that must be included in all contracts must be included in all contracts in which the contractor is the prime contractor. [B&P §7030]
PAYMENT BOND: The contractor’s payment bond, or, if public entity fails to ensure that a contractor provides a sufficient bond with a valid insurer, or fails to ensure that the contractor provides a payment bond at all, then the public entity will be liable to unpaid subcontractors.
STOP PAYMENT NOTICE: Funds to be paid to direct contractor. If the direct contractor disputes the validity of the claim, the public entity may permit the contractor to file a release bond and the public entity must release the funds withheld.
The common attorney-client relationship in its simplest form is: the potential client signs a fee agreement retaining the attorney, the attorney performs the requested work, the client achieves an end result, and the attorney gets paid. The unfortunate reality, however, is that sometimes a retained client fail to pay its attorney for some (or all) of the legal work that the attorney performed. When this occurs, the attorney is left in a difficult divide between complying with the attorney’s ethical obligations and enforcing the attorney’s right to be paid. So how can the attorney ethically enforce its right to be paid while still complying with the Professional Rules all attorneys are bound by? Is it even possible? The answer is in one small word “liens.”
An attorney’s lien (also termed a “charging lien”) is a lien that secures an attorney’s compensation “upon the fund or judgment” recovered by the attorney for the client.
While an attorney’s lien may be used to secure either an hourly fee agreement or a contingency fee agreement, hourly fee agreements purporting to create an attorney’s lien must comply with Rule 1.8.1 of the California Rules of Professional Conduct. Rule 1.8.1 requires that:
An attorney must bring a separate action against the client to: (1) establish the existence of the lien, (2) determine the amount of the lien, and (3) enforce it.
An attorney’s lien is created and takes effect at the time the fee agreement is executed , and may be created without even using the word “lien” at all. The determinative question is “whether the parties have contracted that the lawyer is to look to the judgment he may obtain as security for his fee.” Although a notice of lien is not necessary to “perfect” an attorney’s lien, filing a notice of attorney’s lien “has become commonplace, and the courts have endorsed the practice.”
Unlike most jurisdictions, where an attorney’s lien is established by operation of law in favor of an attorney to satisfy attorney fees and expenses out of the proceeds of a prospective judgment, in California, an attorney’s lien can only be created by contract.
The unfortunate reality, however, is that sometimes a retained client fail to pay its attorney for some (or all) of the legal work that the attorney performed. When this occurs, the attorney is left in a difficult divide between complying with the attorney’s ethical obligations and enforcing the attorney’s right to be paid.