how to approach questionable attorney fees

When can a court award attorney fees to a party?

May 17, 2020 · Reasonable Fees and/or Questionable Attorney. By ConsiderChapter13, on May 17th, 2020. Please Login to view this content. (Not a member? Join Today!) Attorney's Fees, Ethics, Just Added, Member, The Toolbox. You do not have permission to view the comments. Please Login to post a comment.

What are the ethical restrictions on attorney-client fee arrangements?

Inasmuch as a promise by one party to indemnify the other side for attorney fees incurred in litigation runs counter to the well-understood rule that parties are responsible for their own attorney fees, courts cannot infer a party’s intention to waive the benefit of this rule unless it is unmistakably clear from actual language in the promise.3 Provisions in agreements between …

What are the different types of attorneys fee cases?

If the dispute is presented to a court in Massachusetts, a judge will use the “lodestar method” to calculate reasonable attorneys’ fees. According to a Massachusetts Appeals Court decision , this method involves “the multiplication of a fair market hourly rate …

When should attorneys’ fees be awarded in fdutpa litigation?

Apr 25, 2018 · The attorney’s hourly rate should be reasonable, with reasonableness determined by assuming the fee will be paid irrespective of the result, and considering the market rate charged by Miami lawyers of comparable skill, experience and reputation, for similar services. Rowe at 1151. The number of hours reasonably expended, multiplied by the reasonable hourly …

How do you challenge legal fees?

If you think you've been charged too much by your solicitor, you can challenge their bill. You should either challenge it directly with your solicitor, by asking them to commence detailed assessment proceedings, or failing that, by asking the Senior Courts Costs Office to make a detailed assessment of the bill.

How do you write a letter of dispute for a lawyer?

We hope you will like it.How to write a dispute attorney fees letter. If you feel that your attorney is taking extra payment, you need to write a dispute fee letter. ... Use a standard format. ... Clarify that you are disputing the fees. ... Ask for detailed information. ... Propose negotiation. ... Give a deadline. ... Final words.Oct 21, 2020

Can a lawyer charge you without telling you?

A lawyer can charge you for a consultation but they should tell you before you book and explain any conditions. For example, they may offer the first 30 minutes free but charge for time above that. A lawyer should speak to you about costs and provide the best possible information so you can make an informed choice.

Can you ask for your money back from a lawyer?

If you fire a lawyer to whom you have paid a retainer, you are entitled to a refund of whatever money remains of the retainer after the lawyer is paid for his services up through the time you fired him. Once you fire him, he must prepare and give you a written accounting of the funds and a refund check.

How do I write a letter to dispute a charge?

I am writing to dispute a charge of [$______] to my [credit or debit card] account on [date of the charge]. The charge is in error because [explain the problem briefly. For example, the items weren't delivered, I was overcharged, I returned the items, I did not buy the items, etc.].

What is a 609 dispute letter?

A 609 letter is a credit repair method that requests credit bureaus to remove erroneous negative entries from your credit report. It's named after section 609 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), a federal law that protects consumers from unfair credit and collection practices.Dec 17, 2021

What should you not say to a lawyer?

Five things not to say to a lawyer (if you want them to take you..."The Judge is biased against me" Is it possible that the Judge is "biased" against you? ... "Everyone is out to get me" ... "It's the principle that counts" ... "I don't have the money to pay you" ... Waiting until after the fact.Jan 15, 2010

What is unethical for a lawyer?

Attorney misconduct may include: conflict of interest, overbilling, refusing to represent a client for political or professional motives, false or misleading statements, knowingly accepting worthless lawsuits, hiding evidence, abandoning a client, failing to disclose all relevant facts, arguing a position while ...

How often should I hear from my attorney?

Once a month is a good rule of thumb if things are slow, but if you are preparing for trial or in my case an administrative benefits hearing, the contact with you and your attorney should be more frequent and specifically scheduled.

How do I know if my lawyer is cheating me?

The attorney does not return phone calls in a reasonable amount of time, and; In a meeting with the client, if the lawyer is being very short, taking phone calls, trying to re-schedule, not giving enough time to the client, does not listen, ignores what is asked or is not answering questions.Nov 28, 2015

Can I talk to another lawyer if I already have one?

Fire your attorney before you hire someone else. There are ethical rules that prevent lawyers from speaking to someone who already has an attorney. Generally, if you're shopping around for new representation, the new lawyer will ask to see a copy of the letter you sent firing your old attorney.Aug 23, 2018

How do I fire my attorney?

Firing Your Lawyer If you do decide to fire your lawyer, you should do so in writing. Your letter should set forth and document any conduct or reasons supporting your decision. It should also give instruction as to where he or she needs to send your file.Feb 26, 2021

Do attorneys pay their own fees in Texas?

The notion that parties generally pay their own attorneys’ fees is well-ingrained in the minds of Texas lawyers. But the “American Rule” in Texas is increasingly being limited by statute and contract provisions that allow for fee-shifting awards in a variety of lawsuits. Counsel for clients both seeking and defending against an award of attorneys’ fees should make sure that consideration of the law and facts relevant to the fee award is not an afterthought.

Is fee shifting a contract in Texas?

Because fee-shifting in Texas is a product of statute or contract, the individual procedures and standards vary based on the particular statutory or contractual provisions at play. Counsel should never assume that the same rules apply to proving or defending fee awards that are controlled by a different fee-shifting provision.

Can you defend against attorneys fees in Texas?

This mindset likely comes from the idea that, in Texas, parties typically pay their own attorneys’ fees. Even recently, the Texas Supreme Court has written that “[a]s a general rule, litigants in Texas are responsible for their own attorneys’ fees and expenses in litigation.”Ashford Partners, Ltd. v. ECO Resources, Inc., 401 S.W.3d 35, 41 (Tex.

Is attorney fees a litigation afterthought?

The issue of attorneys’ fees is often a litigation afterthought—appearing at the back of the pleadings, raised through the last witness or even after trial, and discussed at the end of the appellate opinion. It makes sense to present the merits of a case before talking about fees. But fee-shifting is becoming increasingly more available in Texas, the law more developed, and the stakes higher. Counsel cannot afford to wait until the last minute to consider the issue of attorneys’ fees.

What is the rule for a lawyer to accept a referral fee?

Although many While the “joint responsibility” provision may allow a lawyer to accept a “referral fee” even if the lawyer performs no work, such fees come at a cost. As a comment to the rule notes, “joint responsibility ” means financial and ethical responsibility for the representation as if the lawyers were associated in a partnership.” Rule 1.5, Cmt. 7. That means that, if the lawyer accepts the fee, the lawyer may also be jointly responsible

What makes an attorney valuable?

The very factors that make attorneys’ services valuable – their knowledge of the law and the specialized training that leads their clients to place trust in them – lead to special scrutiny of attorneys’ payment relationships. The attorney-client relationship is a fiduciary relationship and, just as in other fiduciary relationship, the attorney’s dealings with the beneficiary – the client – are subject to special legal scrutiny. As one Illinois court has put it: The law places special obligations upon an attorney by virtue of the relationship between attorney and client. Those obligations are summed up and referred to generally as the fiduciary duty of the attorney. They permeate all phases of the relationship, including the contract for payment.

What are the ABA model rules of professional conduct?

At their outset, the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct (referenced herein throughout as the “Model Rules” or, individual, the “Rule”) require lawyers to serve their clients with competence (Rule 1.1), diligence (Rule 1.3) and loyalty – requiring them to avoid, or at least disclose, ways in which the attorney’s interests may conflict with those of the client. See, generally, Model Rules 1.6-1.8. The attorney-client relationship is also commercial, with the attorney typically entitled to demand payment from the client for services rendered. That commercial relationship inherently creates the potential for conflict. No matter how much the client may appreciate the attorney’s work, it would always be in the client’s best interests to avoid paying for it. Similarly, as much as the attorney may be motivated by genuine respect and admiration for the client, the attorney could always be paid more.

What is Rule 1.5?

Under Rule 1.5(a) a lawyer may not “make an agreement for, charge, or collect an unreasonable fee.” By its terms, the rule requires reasonableness to be assessed not only at the time the fee agreement is entered, but also when attorneys bill for services or attempt to collect the fees they are owed by the client. It is therefore possible to violate Rule 1.5 if an attorney seeks to enforce a fee agreement that, while reasonable at the time, was rendered unreasonable by subsequent events. For example, in In re Gerard, 132 Ill.2d 507, 548 N.E.2d 1051 (1989), a lawyer was found to have violated Rule 1.5 after charging a contingency fee based on the value of account assets located for an elderly client. While, at the time the lawyer had been hired, the client had believed accounts were being wrongfully withheld from him, in fact the accounts were not the subject of any adverse claim, but were turned over willingly by the banks holding them once they learned of the client’s whereabouts – requiring little in the way of attorney professional services. More generally, fees are frequently found to be unreasonable when the lawyer does not perform competent work, or neglects a matter, but nevertheless seeks to be paid the full fee for which he or she has contracted. See, e.g., Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Maryland v. Garrett, 427 Md. 209, 224, 46 A.3d 1169, 1178 (2012); Rose v. Kentucky Bar Ass'n, 425 S.W.3d 889, 891 (Ky. 2014).

Why do attorneys use retainers?

Attorneys commonly use retainers to secure payment of their legal fees and costs. The word “retainer,” however, has a variety of different meanings – and those different meanings result in different application of the relevant ethical rules.

What percentage of lawyers are block billed?

Approximately 90 percent of law firm clients who are billed on an hourly basis are “block billed.” Block billing is an accounting technique whereby lawyers aggregate multiple smaller tasks into a single "block" entry, for which a single time value is assigned. In theory, the total time charged equals the sum of the duration of each discrete task. For example, after spending five minutes on a phone call, 35 minutes revising a junior associate’s draft motion and three minutes dashing off a brief e-mail to the client, the attorney should bill the client for seven-tenths of an hour. Unfortunately, in far too many cases, the final block-billed entry for these tasks will end up looking something like this:

What is overbilling law?

Law firm overbilling - whether described as the euphemistic "bill padding" or simply "billing fraud" - is a serious problem that is seldom discussed and even less frequently addressed. But rare is the legal bill that does not include at least some "padding." In fact, according to the California State Bar, most bills are inflated at least 10-30 percent. This article describes three common ways legal bills are inflated and provides tips to help clients identify problematic billing practices.

What happens when the economy slows down?

When the economy slows down and billable hours are at a premium, work tends to be retained and billed by more expensive senior attorneys. This results in partners doing associate work, associates doing paralegal work, and paralegals doing secretarial work.