Full Answer
Mitigating Evidence Law and Legal Definition. Mitigating evidence is evidence furnished to prove the existence of mitigating circumstances. For instance, information about a defendant's background and upbringing can be introduced as mitigating evidence. It is usually produced by a defendant in criminal trial. A capital defendant is entitled to present any relevant mitigating …
Sep 06, 2021 · First, a mitigation specialist will gather a series of records. After pulling together the needed documents, counsel needs to review and outline them, using them to show evidence of mitigating factors. Step Two. The second step involves interviewing family members, friends, community members, and significant others.
The mitigation evidence is in effect a collection of the defendant’s and his or her family’s life history. This evidence should consist of information, documentation, and public records pertaining to relevant aspects of the defendant’s social, educational, medical, and …
Again, the prosecutor makes an opening statement; the defense may follow with one or present it at the beginning of its case. The state then presents evidence to establish beyond a reasonable doubt at least one aggravating circumstance to qualify for the death penalty. The defense can produce evidence in mitigation.
Mitigation is a process used during negotiation or at sentencing that allows the defendant to effectively present facts about themselves which would lead the court to impose a lower sentence than was first considered.
Mitigation specialists are not always attorneys. They act as independent experts responsible for information, analysis, testimony, and evidence when a judge or jury is trying to decide how to sentence someone in a criminal case.
Mitigation seeks to lessen a sentence rather than set a person convicted of a crime free. This means that even if a conviction occurs, hope still exists, especially in cases where the sentence can mean life or death in jail. 4.
In a criminal case, the state has the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the alleged crime. Under the United States Constitution, defendants are presumed innocent and never have the burden of proving their innocence. INVESTIGATION.
Any person arrested must be released within 24 hours unless a warrant is issued by a judge for an arrest. COMPLAINT AND ARREST. If police determine the evidence constitutes an offense and identify a suspect, the matter is taken to the prosecuting attorney.
The defendant may waive a preliminary hearing, and the case usually will be sent directly to circuit court for trial. If the defendant chooses to proceed with a preliminary hearing, the judge, defendant, defendant's attorney, prosecutor, and any victims or witnesses subpoenaed will attend.
A grand jury is composed of a panel of private citizens, chosen similarly to trial juries, whose job is to look into allegations of criminal activity.
If the defendant is convicted following a jury trial, a new trial may be granted upon "good cause shown" by the defendant. The motion for new trial must be filed within 10 days from the date of conviction.
Good cause may include issues of witness availability, the status of laboratory reports, etc. Pretrial Conference. The Pretrial Conference is a hearing during which the Judge works with the prosecution and the defense to determine the status of the case and to attempt to resolve the case.
Noncapital cases. In all criminal cases, a trial may be held before a jury or, if the defendant does not want a jury trial, before a judge. Typically, jury-tried cases include a jury selection procedure (general voir dire), a guilt phase, and a sentencing phase. The jury may recommend a sentence.
Discovery is likely a significant reason why at least 90% of criminal cases settle before trial. Issues regarding settlement aside, discovery is intended to help defendants in the sense that prosecutors must hand over certain information that's helpful to the defense.
Vy Tummin is charged with assault and battery on a police officer. Vy claims that she reacted in self-defense to the police officer's use of illegal force. The prosecutor plans to show a videotape of the incident to the jury. The prosecutor also has prepared a file memorandum as a self-reminder about what portions of the tape to emphasize during the trial and why those portions are especially significant. Vy's lawyer demands to see the videotape and all the prosecutor's trial memoranda. Discovery rules allow Vy's lawyer to see the videotape. But the prosecutor won't have to turn over the memorandum. The memo is the prosecutor's work product because it contains strategic analysis.