sure to allow enough time in each step to get the work done. You must plan to include enough time for the whole process so that you are not rushed, but not so much time that it takes too long to have an agency on board. The whole process generally takes anywhere from a month and a half to three months (and sometimes a lot longer if
Of those who do respond, a significant number don't do so with any meaningful strategy in mind. They don't measure how much time or effort is going into RFP responses and they rarely follow through to learn more about why they were or weren't …
Many legal marketers are delegated the time-consuming task of coordinating RFP responses. While the effort can result in new work for the law firm, developing a winning response can significantly disrupt the day-to-day responsibilities of the …
In most cases the standard processing time is 60 days, though the actual processing time can be anywhere from 15 days to 80 days depending on the adjudicator’s workload. If you haven’t received a response within 60 days of responding to your RFE, you should call USCIS customer service to check on the status of your application.
The main benefit of doing a bidder’s conference is that you can answer questions at one time with all the potential applicants present. You can also follow up by putting a transcript of the conference or a summary of the answers online. Another benefit of doing a bidder’s conference is that it lets you see the people/agencies who may be bidding and gives you a sense of approximately how many agencies might bid on this contract.
One benefit of having the same group for both the written review and the orals is that the reviewers can follow up during the oral presentations with specific questions about the written proposals. One benefit of having different groups for both phases is that a new person added to the panel for the oral presentations comes into the process with a fresh perspective and can assess the presentations without being influenced by the written proposals.
They help to identify differences among the agencies that score well in the written review. They also often give you a better understanding of aspects of the agencies that don’t always come across in a written proposal, including things like work flow/procedures, creativity/style, technical capabilities, etc.
Legal departments may turn to an RFP process for a variety of reasons:
Regardless of the legal department's impetus for the RFP or the quality of the RFP's design, reliance on this technique is growing and firms that regularly receive these requests are having a hard time handling the volume.
A legal department may be driven to initiate an RFP process for a variety of reasons, including seeking greater value (as defined by the legal department) for a particular matter (or a portfolio of matters) by creating a competitive market for the work.
Susan Hackett is the CEO of Legal Executive Leadership, LLC, a law practice management consulting firm she founded in 2011 after serving as the Senior Vice President and General Counsel of the Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) for more than two decades.
The RFE should indicate an expected timeframe for your response, typically within 30 – 90 days (but never more than 12 weeks).
USCIS may issue an RFE ( Form I-797E) any time an application or petition lacks sufficient evidence or documentation to make a final decision. An RFE does not mean that your application is going to be denied—it simply means that the adjudicator who is reviewing your case needs a little more information to approve your petition.
A Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID) is much more serious than an RFE. While an RFE indicates that your application is missing evidence to make a final decision, an NOID means that you have provided enough initial evidence to evaluate your application and you are determined to be ineligible based on that evidence.
There are many different definitions out there, but I like to keep it simple:
I refer to the RFI as “tire kicking”. Companies submitting an RFI are often just price shopping, or doing general vendor research. Nothing wrong with that approach — we all do that — but don’t spend too much responding to general RFI inquiries.
Requests for Proposal or “RFP” can be expensive and time consuming to create, much less respond to. Often, there are many stakeholders involved, many different decision makers, and many barriers to payment.
The answer is different for products and services. Here is one suggested approach for each:
If you have received requests to produce, you have thirty days to prepare your written responses (unless the court has ordered something else). You do not file your written responses with the court. You simply mail the original back to the other side.
If you have received requests for admissions, you have thirty days to prepare your written responses (unless the court has ordered something else). You do not file your written responses with the court. You simply mail the original back to the other side.
If you have received interrogatories, you have thirty days to prepare your written answers (unless the court has ordered something else). You do not file your written answers with the court.
If you are unable to respond to a request because it is too vague, ambiguous, or somehow objectionable, you can state an objection and the reason for your objection. You must then respond to the extent the request is not objectionable. For example: REQUEST NO. 3: Please produce all papers and tickets.