how does an attorney impeach a witness?

Full Answer

What does it mean to impeach a witness?

This process is known as witness impeachment. The word impeach means to question someone’s integrity or ability to perform a job or task. If one side to a legal case wants to impeach a witness this basically means they do not want the witness’ testimony to sway the decision maker or have any influence as to the outcome of the case.

How to impeach a witness Tennessee extrinsic evidence?

First, the most basic step, is to have the witness repeat the testimony from today’s hearing that you want to impeach. You cannot effectively impeach unless the witness repeats a fact they said during the current hearing that clearly contradicts a prior statement.

How to impeach a witness inconsistent statement?

• First, the witness may admit making the prior inconsistent statement. If this happens, you are done. ...
• Second, the witness may say they do not remember making the prior inconsistent statement. ...
• Third, the witness may deny making the prior inconsistent statement, which of course permits the use of extrinsic evidence.

What is the impeachment of a witness?

Witness impeachment, in the law of evidence of the United States, is the process of calling into question the credibility of an individual testifying in a trial. The Federal Rules of Evidence contain the rules governing impeachment in US federal courts. .

What does it mean when a lawyer impeaches a witness?

Primary tabs. At trial, impeachment is the process of attacking the accuracy of witnesses' testimony. For example, if a witness's testimony at trial contradicts their earlier sworn statements, one or both parties might bring up the sworn statement to impeach their testimony.

What are 2 ways to impeach a witness?

A witnesses may be impeached with evidence that shows a defect in his or her perception, memory, or truthfulness, such as evidence of bias, mistake, character for untruthfulness, or prior inconsistent statements.

How would an attorney impeach the credibility of a witness?

Defense lawyers may impeach prosecution witnesses by questioning them on the witness stand, or by introducing documents which call their testimony into question. The defense lawyer may also call another witness to undermine the prior statements of the prosecution witness.

How do you impeach a hostile witness?

Revised Rule 32(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows any party to impeach a witness by means of his deposition, and Rule 43(b) has allowed the calling and impeachment of an adverse party or person identified with him.

How do you prove a witness is unreliable?

An attorney can show jurors a witness is not credible by showing: 1) inconsistent statements, 2) reputation for untruthfulness, 3) defects in perception, 4) prior convictions that show dishonesty or untruthfulness, and 5) bias.

What are the grounds for impeachment?

Article II, section 4 of the U.S. Constitution defines the grounds for impeachment and conviction as ''treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.

How do you discredit a witness?

So, again, the way to discredit a witness is to bring up prior inconsistent statements that they made. The way to discredit a witness is to call other witness or cross-examine other witnesses and bring up key points about your main witness's testimony and impeach them through over witness statements.

What happens after a witness is impeached?

Unwary witnesses can be tripped up (impeached) by their own prior words, conduct, and reputation. Impeaching a witness refers to an attack on the witness's credibility. Opposing counsel uses this tactic to show the judge or jury that the witness's testimony should not be believed.

Can you use hearsay to impeach a witness?

If it is offered to prove the truth of the matter, it is hearsay. If offered only to impeach (i.e., discredit) a witness, then it is by definition not hearsay. Cross-examination is the questioning of a witness at a trial or hearing by the opposing party.

What makes a witness hostile?

A hostile witness, also known as an adverse witness or an unfavorable witness, is a witness at trial whose testimony on direct examination is either openly antagonistic or appears to be contrary to the legal position of the party who called the witness.

What constitutes a hostile witness?

A hostile witness is a witness who testifies against the party who has called them to testify. The examiner may ask a hostile witness leading questions, as in cross-examination. Also known as an adverse witness. [Last updated in February of 2022 by the Wex Definitions Team] courts.

What is the punishment for hostile witness?

Section. 344 OF Criminal Procedure Code[7] empower the court it is expedient in the interest of justice to initiate summary legal proceedings against any witness who shall give false evidence or fabricate such evidence, such a person shall be punished by imprisonment of three months and a fine of Rs 500 or both.

What happens when you impeach a witness?

Impeaching a witness refers to an attack on the witness's credibility. Opposing counsel uses this tactic to show the judge or jury that the witness's testimony should not be believed.

How do you impeach a witness in California?

A witness may also be impeached by evidence that he has made, at other times, statements inconsistent with his present testimony; but before this can be done the statements must be related to him, with the circumstances of times, places, and persons present, and he must be allowed to explain them.

Can you impeach a witness with another witness?

In California, unless the witness has been pardoned or relieved of the penalties because of a finding of innocence or rehabilitation, a prior felony is admissible to impeach the credibility of a witness.

How do you impeach a witness in Texas?

Impeachment and Cross-Examination A well-recognized test that witnesses may be subjected to is impeachment by proof of statements made contradictory to their trial testimony. Impeachment can discredit witness testimony.

What Does It Mean to Impeach a Witness?

This process is known as witness impeachment. The word impeach means to question someone’s integrity or ability to perform a job or task.

Who decides whether a witness is impeached?

Ultimately, a judge will decide whether or not a witness is impeachable. They will weigh in on the information presented by the party wishing to impeach the witness as well as the other party or parties involved. The judge will decide if the witness testimony is to be included or excluded as part of the case.

What are the Consequences of Impeaching a Witness?

Ultimately, a judge will decide whether or not a witness is impeachable. They will weigh in on the information presented by the party wishing to impeach the witness as well as the other party or parties involved. The judge will decide if the witness testimony is to be included or excluded as part of the case.

How does an impeachment work?

The methods used to impeach a witness and introduced in a courtroom hearing, trial or during a deposition will vary from case-to-case. While the goal of impeaching a witness is to remove and discredit the witness’ testimony, how a witness impeachment proceeds depends on the situation and the circumstances of the individual case.

What is the deciding factor for the judge or jury regarding the matter?

The elimination or inclusion of witness testimony during a court hearing, deposition or trial may be the deciding factor for the judge or jury regarding the matter. While witness impeachment is commonly handled across the country, each state has its own rules of evidence.

What is an impeachable witness?

Prior Inconsistent Statements: When a witness has given prior statements that are inconsistent with current statements, the witness could be considered an impeachable witness. For instance, if the witness made a statement to the police and later the “story” changed in court — that witness’ credibility can come under question and may not be included as testimony.

What is the elimination of witness testimony?

The elimination or inclusion of witness testimony during a court hearing, deposition or trial may be the deciding factor for the judge or jury regarding the matter.

Why Might You Try to Impeach a Witness?

Witness testimony may also play a vital role in the state’s case against you if you are the defendant. The State may call law enforcement officers, expert witnesses, and lay people to testify. Some of the witnesses may be people you know – an ex-girlfriend/boyfriend, a “friend,” a family member. The discovery rules allow your attorney to find out ahead of time what a witness plans to testify to at trial, giving you the opportunity to mount a defense. If it becomes clear that a witness plans to offer testimony that is less than the truth , you will need to try and impeach him/her. For example, if an ex-girlfriend plans to testify that you were abusive or that you had a drug problem, but neither is the truth, you obviously don’t want a jury to hear that testimony and believe it.

What does impeaching a witness mean?

In essence, impeaching a witness questions his/her character and suggests to the jury that no matter what the witness says the jury should not believe it.

What are the rules for a witness to testify?

The discovery rules allow your attorney to find out ahead of time what a witness plans to testify to at trial, giving you the opportunity to mount a defense. If it becomes clear that a witness plans to offer testimony that is less than the truth, you will need to try and impeach him/her. For example, if an ex-girlfriend plans to testify ...

What is bias in court?

Showing bias – bias is often shown when there is, or was, a personal relationship between the defendant and the witness. If it can be shown that the witness is holding a grudge or there is any ill will between the two it may be cause for the jury to question the witness’s veracity.

What is character evidence?

Character or reputation evidence – this allows the introduction of character or reputation evidence showing the witness is not an honest person. What can be used and how it can be used is governed by state law and can be very complex; however, if you are able to introduce character evidence of untruthfulness it can be a very powerful way ...

What happens if you are charged with a crime in Tennessee?

government if you are charged at the federal level) will likely use a variety of evidence to try and convict you of that offense if your case goes to trial. The prosecuting attorney may also call a number of witnesses to the stand to testify against you.

Can a prior conviction be used to impeach a witness?

Prior criminal convictions – the idea is that a witness may have such disdain for the law in general that the oath a witness takes, to tell the truth, has no meaning. State laws differ with regard to what prior convictions can be used to impeach; however, in most states only serious felonies can be used.

What is witness impeachment?

Witness impeachment, in the law of evidence of the United States, is the process of calling into question the credibility of an individual testifying in a trial. The Federal Rules of Evidence contain the rules governing impeachment in US federal courts .

How to discredit a witness?

In the US, a party has the option of discrediting a witness through impeachment by cross-examining the witness about facts that reflect poorly on the witness's credibility or, in some cases, by introducing extrinsic evidence that reflects negatively on the witness's truthfulness or knowledge.

Why do courts cross-examine witnesses?

Courts permit parties to cross-examine a witness in order to impeach that witness based on demonstration of bias. Witness bias may be catalyzed by any number of circumstances, ranging from the witness's blood relationship to a party to his financial stake in the outcome of the litigation. Most US jurisdictions require a cross-examiner to lay a foundation before extrinsic evidence can be used to demonstrate bias for impeachment purposes. Although Rule 610 provides that evidence of a witness's "religious beliefs or opinions is not admissible to attack or support the witness's credibility," an inquiry into the witness's religious beliefs or opinions for the purpose of showing interest or bias because of them is not within the rule's prohibition.

What is an inconsistent statement?

Inconsistent statement. A party may impeach a witness by introducing those of his prior statements that are inconsistent with his current testimony at trial. In a minority of jurisdictions that follow FRE 801, the prior inconsistent statement may be used not only to impeach but also as substantive evidence.

What is the burden of cross-examining a witness?

Furthermore, if the cross-examining party seeks to introduce evidence of a felony not involving dishonesty or false statement, its success in impeaching the witness will depend on whether the witness is the defendant or not. If the witness is defendant, the burden is on the prosecution to show that the probative value of the impeachment (demonstrating the defendant witness's propensity to lie) outweighs the danger of unfair prejudice to the defendant.

How to rehabilitate a witness?

To rehabilitate a witness, the proponent is confined to using the same techniques used by the opponent to impeach the witness. That is, if the opponent impeached via bias, rehabilitation is limited to negating the claim of bias. If the opponent brought in a rebuttal witness who testified to the character of principal witness as that of a liar, rehabilitation is limited to a character witness who testifies principal witness is a truthful person. That is a different consideration from the ever-present right to cross-examine any witness, including character witnesses which in Trump's case include the likes of John Bolton.

What are the special circumstances of a witness?

Here are the special circumstances: If the witness were an adverse party (such as the plaintiff calling the defendant to the stand, or vice versa). If the witness were hostile (such as the witness refusing to co-operate). If the witness were one that the party was required by law to call as a witness.

What can you use to impeach a witness?

You can use video, police reports, and mathematical calculations to name a few. The techniques for these methods vary based on the admissibility of the underlying evidence used to impeach the witness. A full examination of this topic is better suited to a law review article, or even a book.

What is the key element of impeachment?

One of the key elements of impeachment is to spend a lot of time reviewing the circumstances around the deposition to support the inconsistent statement. Most people get into trouble because they don’t spend enough time with this step.

What to do when confronting a witness with a prior inconsistent statement?

When you confront the witness with the prior inconsistent statement you will do so in one of two ways: (a) with the transcript or (b) with a video of the testimony.

Why do you skip the deposition questions?

When the jury understands the gravity of the deposition, including that an oath was taken, then the inconsistency in testimony becomes more significant. If you have a bench trial or a proceeding in front of a sophisticated arbitration panel, you can skip most of these questions because (hopefully) the finder of fact already understands the point of the deposition.

Can you use statements in a deposition to impeach a witness in arbitration?

Sorry but these are legal questions for which we are not in a position to give you advice. I suggest you hire a lawyer who can help. A couple quick notes – depositions happen BEFORE the final arbitration hearing occurs. You can use statements in a deposition to impeach a witness in arbitration. Whether you can or should attempt to use statements made to HR in a deposition or arbitration is a question for your attorney.

What happens if a witness impeaches a witness?

Prosecutors take the position that if the defense lawyer impeaches the witness with one prior statement, that “opens the door” to the admission of all the other consistent statements the witness may have made at the same time. An experienced criminal defense lawyer will resist the “door opening” assertion by arguing that only statements that are necessary to explain fairly the inconsistent statement should be admitted, and, moreover, that the prosecution must meet the stringent requirements for the admission of a prior consistent statement. That is, the statement must both (1) rebut the improper influence or motive or other reason that allegedly gave rise to the recent fabrication; and (2) have been uttered before the improper influence or motive existed. Impeachment with a prior inconsistent statement does not give rise to an inference of improper influence or motive. It merely suggests that the witness is not to be trusted because he told different stories on different occasions. Refreshing recollection If the witness’s prior inconsistent statement lies in a report authored by another person, such as a police report of what an eyewitness said, the defense lawyer might have to call the police officer to admit the extrinsic evidence of the statement. To avoid this, the defense lawyer can attempt to have the witness adopt the statement by refreshing his recollection with it. Memory may be refreshed with writings authored by a person other than the witness and even by non-writings. Often, the witness will lead the way by expressing his disagreement with the prior statement in words such as, “I don’t remember saying the guy had a beard.” If the witness does not provide this lead, one effective technique is to repeat the answer, rephrased as a statement about memory. For example: A: “I didn’t say the guy had a beard.” Q: “So you don’t remember telling Officer Jones that the robber had a beard?” A: “No.” Q: “Let me show you Officer Jones’ report from that night. Take a look at what I have marked as Defense Exhibit M and read the third paragraph to yourself. Does that refresh your recollection about what you told Officer Jones?” A: “I guess I told him the guy had a beard.” Even if the witness still refuses to admit that he remembers or made the prior statement, by this point, the jury will know that Officer Jones’ report states that the witness said, “Beard.”

What happens if a witness admits to making a statement?

If the witness admits that he made the prior statement, the impeachment ends. However, if he denies or does not remember making it, the criminal defense lawyer must introduce extrinsic (outside) evidence of the statement itself. If the witness wrote the statement, the defense lawyer can have him authenticate the writing. If it was prior testimony, the defense lawyer can ask the prosecutor to stipulate that the questions and answers read back to the witness accurately reflect the prior testimony given on the prior occasion. Impeachment with an oral statement requires the defense attorney to call as a witness the person to whom the statement was made (unless the witness being impeached can be persuaded to accept the statement some other way, perhaps by refreshing his recollection with a written report memorializing the statement). Different jurisdictions have different rules about whether a witness must be confronted with a prior statement before extrinsic evidence may be introduced or whether the witness be given an opportunity to explain the statement. Whatever the rule in your jurisdiction, the best practice is to confront the witness on the stand so that the defense attorney can emphasize the inconsistency and give the witness the opportunity to equivocate about it, thereby further undermining his own credibility.

How to attack a witness's general character?

Attack the witness’s general character for truthfulness. Show that, prior to trial, the witness has made statements inconsistent with his testimony. Show that the witness is biased. Show that the witness has an impaired capacity to perceive, recall, or relate the event about which he is testifying. Contradict the substance ...

How to undermine the credibility of an adverse witness in a criminal trial?

How to undermine the credibility of an adverse witness in a criminal trial In most criminal cases, the goal of cross-examination is to render a witness less believable, either generally or on a particular point. There are five acceptable methods of attacking a witness’s credibility (also called “impeaching” a witness):

What is the standard form of impeachment?

Showing that the witness told a different story on a prior occasion or that he omitted incriminating facts to which he now attests is a standard form of impeachment. Ideally, a prosecution witness should be impeached with a statement that exculpates the defendant; that was made thoughtfully and close in time to the events described; and that was preserved, either by a stenographer or recording. An experienced criminal defense lawyer will follow these steps in a prior inconsistent statement impeachment:

Why do you confront a witness on the stand?

Whatever the rule in your jurisdiction, the best practice is to confront the witness on the stand so that the defense attorney can emphasize the inconsistency and give the witness the opportunity to equivocate about it , thereby further undermining his own credibility.

Does impeachment with a prior inconsistent statement give rise to an inference of improper influence or motive?

Impeachment with a prior inconsistent statement does not give rise to an inference of improper influence or motive. It merely suggests that the witness is not to be trusted because he told different stories on different occasions.

Overview

• When someone testifies under oath in a hearing, trial, or deposition, the other side will typically challenge the witness through cross-examination. The oppositions tools include not only the ability to probe the witnesss actual ability to observe certain incidents, or the precision of the wit…

See more on lawyers.com

Categories

Parties that may impeach

Methods

Bolstering and rehabilitating

See also

External links