Pledgor hereby irrevocably appoints Agent as Pledgor's attorney-in-fact, with full authority in the place and stead of Pledgor and in the name of Pledgor or otherwise, from time to time in Collateral Agent's discretion reasonably exercised, to take any action and to execute any instrument that Agent deems reasonably necessary or advisable to accomplish the purposes …
Jul 19, 2016 · Attorney-in-Fact: If Contractor’s unavailability or any other factor prevents Company from pursuing or applying for any application for any United States or foreign registrations or applications covering the Inventions and related intellectual property rights assigned to Company, then Contractor irrevocably designates and appoints Company as Contractor’s agent and …
Feb 22, 2018 · Attorney-in-fact clause within contract; what does it do? Ask Question Asked 3 years, ... and Consultant hereby appoints Company as his/her attorney-in-fact (which appointment is irrevocable and coupled with an interest), with full power of substitution and delegation, to execute any and all such documents and do any and all such other acts ...
agreement or recognizes the clause's dubious enforceability, there may be little incentive to actively oppose inclusion of a successor- ship clause." However, as long as a successorship clause is argua- sorship clause would not contravene the policy underlying Rule 65(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 414 U.S. at 180. 17.
A security agreement normally will contain a clear statement that the debtor is granting the secured party a security interest in specified goods. The agreement also must provide a description of the collateral.
A GSA can secure most types of personal property, both present and future, including: machinery and equipment the Debtor uses in carrying on its business. inventory. accounts receivable.Aug 28, 2013
Certain specific requirements are required for the security agreement to form the foundation for a valid security interest, namely 1) it must be signed, 2) it must clearly state that a security interest is intended, and 3) it must contain a sufficient description of the collateral subject to the security interest.Oct 22, 2020
What is a General Security Agreement? A General Security Agreement (GSA) is a contract signed between two parties – a creditor (lender) and a debtor (borrower) – to secure personal loans, commercial loans, and other obligations owed to a lender. General security agreements list all the assets pledged as collateral.
Often, a business will purchase inventory or equipment on credit and then use that same property as collateral. The debtor must authenticate the security agreement by signing a statement that announces the intention to grant a security interest in the property specifically outlined in the security agreement.
unsecured loanAn unsecured loan is a loan that doesn't require any type of collateral. Instead of relying on a borrower's assets as security, lenders approve unsecured loans based on a borrower's creditworthiness. Examples of unsecured loans include personal loans, student loans, and credit cards.
The effectiveness of the unperfected security interest against the debtor and creditors, however, provides valuable rights to the lender. ... All the rights granted under the security agreement are effective against the borrower, without regard to whether perfection of the security interest has occurred.Oct 26, 2016
A perfected security interest is any secure interest in an asset that cannot be claimed by any other party. The interest is perfected by registering it with the appropriate statutory authority, so that it is made legally enforceable and any subsequent claim on that asset is given a junior status.
MoneyCertain types of collateral may or must be perfected by possession. Money, for example, must be perfected by possession of the secured party. A security interest in instruments, certificated securities, chattel paper, goods and negotiable documents may be perfected by possession.
Most commonly, a creditor with a valid security interest in a farmer's personal property, in a default situation, can enforce the security agreement by seizing any or all of the security through a civil enforcement agent or by appointing (with or without a court order) a receiver or a receiver and manager.
In general, the promissory note is your written promise to repay the loan and a security agreement is used when collateral is given for the loan.
Mortgage is different from a security agreement. A mortgage is used to secure the lender's rights by placing a lien against the title of the property. Once all loan repayments have been made, the lien is removed. However, the buyer doesn't own the property till all loan payments have been made.
First, it is meant to educate transactional attorneys (like the author) regarding principles of contract interpretation so that they can draft contracts with these principles in mind. Second, it is meant to serve as a resource for analyzing contracts that have already been drafted or that are already effective, whether that analysis precedes or is in response to a specific dispute. Finally, and in the same vein, the case law cited in this guide is meant to serve as a helpful starting point to those conducting research on the interpretation of a given contract or provision (from a positive or normative standpoint).
Where the terms of one provision are expressly stated to be “subject to” the terms of a second provision, the terms of the second provision will control, even if the terms of the second provision conflict with or nullify the first
Transactional attorneys focus on the ex ante—the relationship between the parties before there is a dispute. Sometimes their sole concern is making sure that the contract “works” sufficiently so that the deal gets done. More conscientious transactional attorneys weigh the various risks associated with contract drafting by regularly thinking about the “what-ifs.”
There is a strong public policy in favor of arbitration, in light of which courts should seek an interpretation that honors the parties’ decision to resolve disputes by arbitration, permits an arbitration clause to remain in effect, and resolves ambiguities regarding the scope of applicability of such clause in favor of arbitration.
After all, if a debtor does not ratify the filing by executing a security agreement and the intended financing transaction never closes, the pre-filing party could be liable for damages under UCC Section 9-625, especially if the debtor is unable to obtain alternative financing as a result of the unauthorized filing.
Where secured transactions are very likely to close, there may be good reason for prospective secured parties to pre-file their financing statements. For example, pre-filing a financing statement can eliminate the necessity and cost of a post-closing lien search. In the event that a financing statement is inadvertently filed without prior written ...
In so holding, the court clarified that the term "authorize," as used in Section 9-509 of the UCC, encompasses forward-looking authorization as well as retroactive ratification of a filed financing statement.
The committee of unsecured creditors in the bankruptcy case brought an adversary proceeding against Capital, seeking to avoid Capital's security interest in the debtor's assets on the grounds that the financing statement was void as filed. The committee argued that, because the debtor had not signed or otherwise provided written authorization ...
By its terms, the inventory security agreement was "part of" and "supplementary to" the factoring agreement. Taken together, the two agreements (the security agreements) granted Capital a lien against substantially all of the debtor's assets and authorized Capital to file a financing statement to that effect.
According to the court's analysis, the UCC's filing requirements are based on a policy of encouraging parties to put potential creditors on notice, as early as possible, that a debtor's assets may be encumbered.
The court acknowledged that "authorize" does have a forward-looking meaning: "to empower or give permission for an act to occur .". This forward-looking meaning, the court conceded, would be consistent with the committee's argument that a debtor's authorization must temporally precede a secured party's filing.
Parties must consider carefully the inclusion of an entire agreement clause both when entering into new contracts and when amending or restating existing contracts. In summary, parties should ensure they have clarity up front as to what has been included and excluded from the contract prior to its execution.
Rectification – A third limitation of an entire agreement clause is that it cannot be relied on to prevent the rectification of a unilateral or common mistake in circumstances where a contract is not a true representation of what was actually agreed by the parties. 4.
Boilerplate clauses are normally uncontroversial and often inserted into contracts by the parties as a matter of routine, without much negotiation or regard to the context and background to the relevant contract.
Entire agreement clauses commonly seek to exclude representations and statements made by the parties which may have been relied on by the parties when entering into the contract, but which have not been expressly incorporated into the contract. However, there are numerous limitations to the effectiveness of entire agreement clauses.
Parties are advised to think carefully about what they want to be included or excluded from their contract. In some circumstances, there may be pre-contractual exchanges, representations or statements on which a party does wish to rely. In that case, refraining from inserting a provision may be more beneficial.
They are commonly referred to and treated as being “standard” which sometimes means that they do not always attract as much attention and consideration as other contract terms, particularly commercial terms.
Instead, parties can, and often do, exclude liability for misrepresentation 2 by way of a statement, independent of the entire agreement clause, of non-reliance or a clause to the effect that the parties have not relied on any representation or statement aside from those set out in the agreement. An example of a non-reliance clause is: