Jul 16, 2021 · (17) Whether the client will be able to pay the fees and expenses of the litigation (in non-contingency cases). (18) The possibility of informal settlement on reasonable terms. (19) The court the claim could be heard in, how long it would take to …
There are a number of reasons why an attorney might decide against taking your case, and there may be steps you can take to make your case more attractive to a lawyer. Why a Personal Injury Lawyer Might Refuse to Take Your Case It's Too Late to Sue. All personal injury cases are subject to lawsuit-filing deadlines set by the statute of limitations. Subject to a few exceptions, if you …
Jun 20, 2016 · Your file will then go to a pool of Supreme Court clerks, who will review all of the documents, summarize them for the justices, and include a recommendation on whether to take the case. The justices then make a final decision. If they decide to hear a case, they will issue a "writ of certiorari." Factors the Court Considers When Choosing Cases
5. How will a lawyer decide whether to take my case? In general, there are three major criteria attorneys use to decide whether to take a case to litigation: …
Every law firm is different, and may handle speaking with potential new clients differently than another. Some firms do a great deal of screening o...
Most attorneys charge a fee (called a "consultation" fee) for an initial meeting, but some do not. When you make an appointment to see an attorney,...
The attorney will ask you questions designed to get the relevant information quickly and to determine if your situation is something the attorney i...
In most situations, no. The law governing employment relations does not contain many hard and fast rules about what conduct is or is not legal. The...
In general, there are three major criteria attorneys use to decide whether to take a case to litigation: 1. the client; 2. the merits of the claims...
Even if you have significant injuries and liability seems clear, a number of factors could derail your case, including: your shared fault for the underlying accident. your delay in getting medical treatment for your injuries, and. your (perceived) credibility.
Most personal injury lawsuits will require expenditure of at least a few thousand dollars for things like court filings, copying documents, hiring expert witnesses, paying stenographers for depositions, and postage. In a more complex personal injury lawsuit, costs of litigation can easily exceed five figures. Other times, the attorney has the money, but doesn't have the time. Maybe their caseload is too much or they just had an associate leave the firm.
One of the biggest red flags for an attorney is a client who expects too much. This can make settling a case more difficult or lead to disappointment even after a successful win at trial.
Subject to a few exceptions, if you try to sue after the statutory deadline has passed, your case will get thrown out, and the attorney might face sanctions from the court.
In a car accident case, getting a copy of the police report can be a big help. It also helps to organize and gather any potential evidence, like your medical records, contact information of potential witnesses, and a timeline of notable events.
It's Too Late to Sue. All personal injury cases are subject to lawsuit-filing deadlines set by the statute of limitations. Subject to a few exceptions, if you try to sue after the statutory deadline has passed, your case will get thrown out, and the attorney might face sanctions from the court.
Lawyers must abide by certain ethical guidelines, including the avoidance of any conflict of interest. Let's say you slipped and fell inside a restaurant, but the attorney you want to hire previously represented that restaurant in a contract dispute. In this instance, the attorney will probably have to reject your case due to a conflict of interest.
If the judge decides all or part of the case against you, you can then appeal the case to a higher court. When you have appealed as far as possible, you can consider appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court. Thank you for subscribing!
The Court will Hear Cases that are Important: Sometimes the Court will consider a highly unusual case such as U.S. v Nixon (concerning the Watergate tapes) or Bush v. Gore (concerning the extremely close election in 2000), or a case with an important social issue, such as abortion in Roe v. Wade.
The Court hears Cases when Lower Courts Disregard past Supreme Court decisions: If a lower court blatantly disregards a past Supreme Court decision, the court may hear the case to correct the lower court, or alternatively, simply overrule the case without comment.
Every year, the Supreme Court receives about 10,000 petitions for certiorari, but only hears about 80 of them. While no one really knows why some cases get heard but others do not, the Supreme Court has several factors that it considers when deciding what cases to hear:
The Court will Hear Cases to Resolve a Conflict of Law: The U.S. judicial system consists of 13 federal circuits and 50 state supreme courts. When a number of these courts reach different conclusions about an issue of federal or constitutional law, the Supreme Court may step in and decide the law so that all areas of the country can then operate ...
United States Supreme Court decisions have shaped history: important decisions have ended racial segregation, enforced child labor laws, kept firearms away from schools, and given the federal government the teeth it needs to regulate interstate commerce.
A case that involves only an issue of state law or parties within a state will likely stay within the state court system where that state's supreme court would be the last step. Assuming the case is capable of being heard by the U.S. Supreme Court, the first step, most of the time, is to file a lawsuit in your local state or federal court.
Sometimes the employer or the number of clients (if a class action case is a possibility) and the scope of the claims are also factors in determining whether the attorney has the experience and resources to litigate a case.
The attorney will ask you questions designed to get the relevant information quickly and to determine if your situation is something the attorney is capable of and interested in handling. The attorney must also first check for conflicts of interest (where the attorney formerly or currently represents interests or individuals potentially involved in your case and therefore might appear biased or unable to fully represent your interests). In addition to the employer's name, you will also be asked for the names of people involved in your case.
The attorney will want to know what acts you believe harmed you and what reasons were given by the employer to justify the employer's decisions. The attorney will ask questions to determine whether you can prove that the reasons given are not true.
While you talk, in addition to getting information, the attorney will evaluate you as a witness and client, in areas such as memory, honesty, appearance, attitude, cooperation, communication skills and many other characteristics. Do not lie or mislead your attorney.
Go to the initial meeting prepared to show your lawyer not only the injustice of your dismissal but how you think the law was violated. Take supporting documents such as evaluations, witness statements, evidence concerning treatment of others, and medical records.
Many clients have unrealistic expectations about their case because of things they read in the papers or were told by others. Each case is different. Proof of events, credibility of witnesses and many other circumstances and variables make each case unique. You and your attorney must focus on your specific case.
Because each attorney has a different view of risk and reward, and may evaluate these criteria with varying experience, if one attorney said "no," you can and should consult with others. If two or more attorneys tell you the same thing, however, especially about the legal merits of your case, then you should probably believe them.
The first and most important determination in whether a personal injury lawyer will take on your case is who is liable for the accident.
If you have been involved in a personal injury accident that was not your fault and require an accident lawyer, contact the best, most professional, and successful personal injury attorneys in Georgia.
After an accident that pushed him into a tree, Mark faced painful injuries and lost income. Learn how The Brown Firm demanded a fair settlement.
You’ll notice the difference when you contact The Brown Firm! Our local dedicated attorneys want to help you recover and rebuild. We serve all of Georgia and South Carolina from four conveniently located offices in Savannah, Atlanta, Athens, and Okatie.
The Prosecutor's Decision: Using the Police Report. Typically, prosecutors base their initial charging decisions on the documents sent to them by the arresting police officers (usually called police or arrest reports ).
Their charging decisions are often, therefore, affected by public opinion or important support groups. For example, a prosecutor may file charges on every shoplifting case, no matter how weak, to curry favor with local store owners who want to get the word out that shoplifters will be prosecuted. For similar reasons, a prosecutor may pursue otherwise weak prostitution charges to avoid alienating powerful civic groups. Deputy or assistant prosecutors may feel that appearing tough will help their careers, either within the prosecutor's office or later if they want to become judges.
Arrest and prosecution functions are separated primarily to protect citizens against the arbitrary exercise of police power. Police officers usually make arrests based only on whether they have good reason ( probable cause) to believe a crime has been committed. By contrast, prosecutors can file formal charges only if they believe that they can prove a suspect guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
Prosecutors can file charges on all crimes for which the police arrested a suspect, can file charges that are more or less severe than the charges leveled by the police, or can decide not to file any charges at all. ( U.S. v. Batchelder, U.S. Sup. Ct. 1979.)
Arrest reports are almost always one-sided. They recite only what the police claim took place and may include only witness statements that support the police theory. While they are generally not admissible as evidence in a trial, arrest reports can have a major impact in criminal cases.
Experienced defense attorneys understand that prosecutors must sometimes be seen as taking a strong stand publicly, even though they may be willing to respond to weaknesses in individual cases at a later stage of the process. This is one of the reasons why practically every criminal defendant will benefit from the help of an experienced, local criminal defense attorney: Only those professionals know where the pressure points are and how to work around them (or with them).
In broad terms, the decisions a lawyer makes in a case are related to strategy or tactics, or technical questions related to procedure. These decisions are the lawyer’s because they usually do not “materially affect” the client’s interests. See Model Rule 1.2.
Sometimes lawyers find their clients’ goals to be unpalatable. This does not mean that the lawyer may not take on the case. When a lawyer represents a client in a matter, this does not imply that the lawyer himself endorses the client’s positions. Of course, sometimes it’s more than just antipathy towards a client’s goals that prevent a lawyer from wanting to perform certain tasks. It may be due to the lawyer’s lack of time or lack of competence in a certain field of the law. In such cases, the lawyer would be ethically obligated to turn down the case.
Importantly, the lawyer is responsible for informing the client of the applicable laws, and operating within the limits of, the laws. The client has a right to discuss with the lawyer how they will pursue their objectives. However, the lawyer does not have to follow through with the client’s requests if the means by which the client wants to achieve his objectives are illegal. In fact, the lawyer is under an ethical obligation not to assist a client in conduct that the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent.
A lawyer is entitled to limit the objectives of representation, provided he consults with the client from the outset. What is most important is that this is all laid out on the table from the start with the client. Both the lawyer and the client must understand the scope of the representation when pursuing their goals together.
A lawyer is obligated according to the rules of professional responsibility to exercise independent professional judgment and to render candid advice. In exercising independent professional judgment, the lawyer should not allow others to unduly influence and sway her opinions in a way that would compromise the quality of the representation.
A lawyer should explain to a client that the client’s conduct would be unlawful. The lawyer must not recommend the illegal conduct, and may never instruct the client on how to break the law.
In providing advice, the lawyer may refer not only to the law, but to moral, economic, social, and political considerations that might impact on a client’s situation.
It really depends on the complexity of the case and the amount of medical records. Send a quick email or make a call to the lawyer and ask for how long s/he thinks it will take to complete the review.
Your lawyer will have to determine what evidence will be required to successfully pursue your case. It is not just the medical records that are important. He will have to engage experts that will have to support necessary elements of a malpractice action.
The time can vary greatly. AS long as there is good communication between you, that is OK
I have been doing medical malpractice cases for over 20 years. In my experience in what might be described as a typical malpractice case it takes about 100 days to get through the review process. In a birth injury case or any other particularly complex situation it can take much longer.
When lawyers and defendants can't agree about an issue as fundamental as whether to go to trial, it's normally the defendant's desire that prevails. Assuming that a defendant's decision is neither unethical nor illegal ("My decision is that you should bump off the prosecution witness"), the lawyer is the defendant's agent and must either carry out the defendant's decision or convince the judge to let him withdraw from the case.
The defendant objected to the lawyer telling the jury that he committed the acts in question and, when testifying, claimed that he was innocent. At the trial's penalty phase, the lawyer again acknowledged his client's guilt but asked for mercy in light of the man's mental and emotional issues.
To enforce this right, defense attorneys are ethically required to: relay the prosecutor's offer to accept a particular plea to their client.
One day, Randy's lawyer phones him to say that he's worked out a good deal with the prosecutor: If Randy pleads guilty (or nolo contendere) to simple assault, the prosecutor will recommend that Randy be given a sentence of time served (the jail time he already served while waiting to make bail), and a small fine.
Before making an important decision, a defendant is entitled to know what alternatives are reasonably available and, as far as can be predicted, the likely consequences of each. For example, assume that the defendant is charged with assault with a deadly weapon. The defense attorney tells the defendant, "The prosecutor is willing to accept a guilty plea to simple assault and recommend a sentence of six months in county jail and a fine of $500. The decision is yours—what do you want to do?"
relay the prosecutor's offer to accept a particular plea to their client. It doesn't matter if the defense attorney believes that the defendant's offer won't be accepted or the prosecutor's offer is unacceptable.
Unless attorney-client communications have broken down to such an extent that Denise cannot get a fair trial, the judge will probably refuse to appoint a new attorney. Talk to a Lawyer. Start here to find criminal defense lawyers near you. Practice Area.