Monetary relief is not required; non-monetary relief such as reinstatement or a higher performance rating is sufficient. Id. An attorney who represents himself is not entitled to an award of fees. Kay v. Ehrler, 499 U.S. 432 (1991). Neither a non-attorney nor a federal employee (including attorneys) who represents a complainant is entitled to an award of fees. 29 C.F.R. § …
Aug 28, 2014 · If an employer is granted a relief from charges, it should not have any impact of the Claimant’s UC Benefit status. However, it is the Claimant’s best interest to consult with the UC Service Center or an attorney to be positive. Chat with an employment attorney: (412) 626-5626 or [email protected].
Jun 25, 2021 · A second federal district judge has blocked USDA from providing as much as $4 billion in loan debt relief to minority farmers. U.S. District Judge Marcia Morales Howard in the U.S. District Court for Middle Florida issued a preliminary injunction Wednesday against USDA, blocking the department from sending out the debt relief while the legal battle over the …
Case settled for $193,236 in monetary relief and injunctive relief. Tempe Elementary School District No. 3: (D. Ariz.) resolved 5/23/12 by Phoenix District Office - The Commission alleged that the charging party and a group of retired employees were discriminatorily compensated for accrued leave based on their age. More specifically, Defendant ...
City of Memphis: (6th Cir.) filed 3/2009, decision 12/10/10 - The Commission filed a brief in support of plaintiffs' argument that abolishing the rank of Captain violated the ADEA since the rank was only available to officers who had served thirty years with the police department. Sixth Circuit affirmed the district court ruling that the plaintiffs could not challenge the City's abolishment of the Captain rank based on disparate impact because it only applied to one group of employees.
N.M.) filed 12/27/11 by Phoenix District Office - The Commission alleges that two charging parties, long-time management employees, were discharged and disciplined because of their gender and age; a third employee was disciplined because of her gender and age. More specifically, the Commission alleges that Defendant terminated and disciplined the charging parties for reasons not applied to younger male managers and employees.
AT&T: (S.D. N.Y.) resolved 10/26/11 by New York District Office - The Commission alleged that AT&T and a number of its subsidiaries discriminated against a class of retired AT&T workers based on age. Defendant denied the retirees the opportunity for reemployment solely because they retired under certain early retirement or enhanced severance programs. Case settled for injunctive relief including elimination of policy that excludes employees who left AT&T under one of the early retirement plans from being rehired, priority hiring of class members, reporting among other things.
N.M.) resolved 12/21/10 by Los Angeles District Office - The Commission alleged that charging parties, two sales managers ages 67 and 55, were subjected to discrimination based on age when their positions were eliminated. Defendant subsequently hired two younger employees to replace the charging parties. Case settled for $60,000 in monetary relief and injunctive relief.
Mo.) resolved 11/14/09 by St. Louis District Office - The Commission alleged that Defendant, a nationwide insurance company, imposed a hiring moratorium that had a disparate impact on former sales agents age 40 and over. Defendant also implemented a policy prohibiting the rehire of any former employee/agent during the longer of 1 year after termination or the period during which the individual received severance benefits (a maximum of 2 years). Almost 95% of the former sales agents affected by the hiring moratorium were age 40 or older. Case settled for $4.5 million (75% back pay and 25% interest) to 92 individuals and injunctive relief.
P.R.) resolved 9/22/08 by New York District Office - The Commission alleged that Defendant violated the ADEA by not allowing workers over 55 to become members of Retirement System, because of their age. Case settled for $1.3 million in monetary relief and injunctive relief including provision of retirement credit to all affected employees, and a Special Master to oversee that process, among other things.
Nucletron Corp.: (D. Md.) resolved 11/5/07 by Philadelphia District Office - The Commission alleged that charging party, a 61-year-old employee, was terminated by Defendant, a manufacturer of medical equipment, because of his age. Defendant refused to consider the charging party for other positions in the company. The EEOC also alleged that Defendant violated the retaliation provisions of the ADEA, EPA, and Title VII by using a severance agreement that conditioned benefits on a promise not to file an employment discrimination charge. Case settled for $295,000 in monetary relief and injunctive relief including prohibiting defendant from offering or enforcing any severance agreement or other contract requiring individuals to give up right to file discrimination complaints.
Browse US Legal Forms’ largest database of 85k state and industry-specific legal forms.
Monetary relief is a protection available to trademark owners under the Lanham Act. Monetary relief includes provable damages, attorneys fees, corrective advertising costs, defendants’ or plaintiffs’ lost profits, prejudgment interest, punitive damages, reasonable royalty, or treble damages.