An affirmative defense is an answer to a charge or complaint in which a defendant takes the offense and responds to the allegations with his/her own charges, which are called "affirmative defenses.".
An Answer is a legal response to the plaintiff’s original petition. In Texas, the defendant has 20 days and until 10 a.m. the following Monday after the day of service to file an answer, or the plaintiff may proceed with a motion for default (Tex. R. Civ. P. 83 & Tex. R. Civ. P. 239).
There are a few ways to provide proper service in Texas. 1) Sherriff/County constable. The plaintiff fills out a form and pays a fee to the county clerk to issue citation. A constable or other officers from the sheriff’s office will then take the proper documents to the defendant (Tex. R. Civ. P. 103).
The plaintiff must show that they tried to serve the defendant in another manner but was unable to locate them. Service by publication is usually only used as a last resort because it gives rise to several challenges that a defendant might later employ (Tex. R. Civ. P. 116).
They can issue a General Denial where, as the name suggests, the defendant generally renounces the plaintiff’s causes of action.
Service by publication is usually only used as a last resort because it gives rise to several challenges that a defendant might later employ (Tex. R. Civ. P. 116). Proper service is a necessary step in beginning any lawsuit in Texas.
Many defendants will take comfort in knowing that around 95% of civil lawsuits in the United States are settled or dismissed before they get to trial. Theodore Eisenberg & Charlotte Lanvers, "What is the Settlement Rate and Why Should We Care?", 6 Journal of Empirical Legal Studies (2009). This article will summarize the initial process and preliminary pleadings associated with a Texas action.
Brown’s lawsuit alleges that Cole violated FLSA federal overtime laws by failing to properly compensate employees for working more than 40 hours per week. The class action lawsuit seeks back pay for unpaid overtime, damages, court costs, and attorney fees. Brown has also asked the court to order an accounting of the books at Cole to determine if additional damages are warranted.
Monica Brown alleged that she did not receive paid overtime while working as a test proctor and IT troubleshooter at Elevate Learning.
As we recently reported, lawsuits over FLSA violations have risen for two years in a row, climbing to nearly 8,000 cases in 2014.
The lawsuits allege that the companies violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), a federal law that guarantees a 40 hour work week and additional compensation for overtime work in excess of 40 hours.
The lawsuit alleges that Sudiek Brown and other workers at Cole International Tubular Service were paid a salary and bonuses but no overtime, despite the fact that they sometimes worked more than their usual 40 hour work week.
Workers who are subject to overtime violations or other improper payment practices may be eligible to file a lawsuit under FLSA and receive back pay or other compensation. FLSA lawsuits that are filed on behalf of individual workers or as a class action may allege that an employer failed to properly pay workers for the time they spent on the job or denied other benefits to which they are entitled under federal labor laws.
Thousands of FLSA lawsuits and class action cases are filed each year by workers who allege that they were not fairly paid for their overtime work. FLSA non-exempt employees who work more than 40 hours per week and were not paid time and a half for their overtime work may also have grounds to file a lawsuit or a class action case against their employer under the FLSA.
If you believe you have suffered damages as a result of your lawyer’s wrongdoing, call the Houston legal malpractice lawyers at Kassab Law Firm at 713-522-7400 or fill out our form to arrange a time to discuss your case.
Violating the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act: These violations typically involve the attorney misrepresenting facts or withholding information in order to motivate you to make a decision you wouldn’t have made if you’d had all the facts.
For example, if you’re concerned that your attorney isn’t working on your case, your first step should be to contact the attorney either by telephone or in writing. Explain your concerns, and you may find that there has been a simple miscommunication in terms of what needs to be done and the timing of getting those tasks completed.
If your attorney isn’t responsive, and your case involves filing a lawsuit, you can visit the courthouse to identify the documents that have been filed with the court.
Breach of contract: This issue usually arises when a client has been charged for the completion of services as defined in a contract but not all the services were actually performed.
In situations where you haven’t lost money or been hurt by your attorney’s delay or lack of attention, the smartest thing to do is simply move on. You can file a grievance with the Texas State Bar, which will initiate a review of the situation, but it won’t help you resolve your problem.
If your attorney revealed the details of your case to a friend, that is certainly a breach of fiduciary duty, but unless you suffered damages as a result, it’s not something you can use as the basis for a lawsuit.
In Pennington v. Fields, the majority of shareholders of a closely held business forced the buy-out of the minority shareholder and litigation ensued. No. 05-17-00321-CV, 2018 Tex. App. LEXIS 6601 (Tex. App.—Dallas August 21, 2018, no pet. history). Later, the minority shareholder sued the majority shareholder’s attorney and alleged that he committed legal malpractice by, among other things, negligently advising the majority to engage in oppression and breaches of fiduciary duties and that he failed to advise the minority shareholder to protect his interests against the misconduct of the majority. The attorney filed a motion for summary judgment, alleging that he owed the minority shareholder no fiduciary duty because he never represented him, which the trial court granted. The plaintiff appealed.
Pennington asserts he believed Collins was “advising him and representing his interests” because Collins represented to Pennington that Pennington’s interests were not adverse to Fields’s and Phillips’s. He contends Collins admitted he was representing all three directors.
An attorney—client relationship was not created between Collins and Pennington simply because Collins discussed matters with Pennington that were relevant to both Pennington’s and Advantage’s interests. Id.
The attorney filed a motion for summary judgment, alleging that he owed the minority shareholder no fiduciary duty because he never represented him, which the trial court granted. The plaintiff appealed. Regarding the existence of the attorney-client relationship, the court of appeals stated:
In his deposition, Collins was asked if he thought he was helping Pennington. Collins stated he was trying to “find a solution for all of the parties to work together” and if it worked out, it would have helped Pennington.
The plaintiff cited to two engagement letters between the company and the attorney, which referenced doing legal services “as required by the board of directors,” of which the plaintiff was one at the time. The court of appeals held:
Pennington was not named in nor did he sign the agreement. The agreement was clearly between Collins and Advantage. Evidence of an agreement between Collins and Advantage is no evidence of an attorney—client relationship between Collins and one of Advantage’s directors or shareholders. Id.
These claims may include negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, fraud, violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, conversion, and other related claims. Depending on the type of claim, there may be a different measure of damages or recovery allowed. Many of these claims also have different statutes of limitations, and different rules determining when the statute of limitations begins to run on each claim.
Most legal malpractice cases require expert testimony to prove the lawyer’s conduct was below the standard of care, so it is important to have the case reviewed by an expert as part of the case evaluation.
A frivolous lawsuit is a lawsuit that has no legal merit. To put it simply, a frivolous lawsuit has no basis in law or fact. A frivolous lawsuit has no legitimate legal or factual support. Tweet this. Ridiculous, absurd, ludicrous, and nonsensical—these are all words that can be used to describe a frivolous lawsuit.
Being sued is incredibly frustrating. Even if the case is meritless, the defendant has to expend time, energy, and financial resources to have the case dismissed. What’s more, the defendant’s reputation might be tarnished if people hear about the lawsuit and assume it’s legitimate. For these reasons, frivolous lawsuits are often used by plaintiffs as a way to harass defendants.
The basis of her lawsuit was that Google Maps advised her to walk along a freeway to get to her destination. Despite the directions being clearly wrong (or at least dangerous), she followed the directions precisely and was hit by a car. The district court granted Google’s motion to dismiss the frivolous lawsuit.
Stella sustained incredibly gruesome third-degree burns on her legs, lap, and groin. (Don’t believe it? Run a search for “Stella Liebeck burn photos.”)
Finally, before suing McDonald’s, Stella attempted to settle the matter for a mere $800. McDonald’s refused.
If the matter is urgent and you need immediate help, get directly in touch with an attorney in your area. Most lawyers offer free consultationsand some are available 24/7.
Generating media attention. Sometimes lawsuits are filed for no other reason than to generate buzz. Generally, these lawsuits are filed by advocacy groups who wish to bring attention to an issue.
Assume one person wants to sue another for assault and battery. Assume also that the statute of limitations for assault and battery is two years. The plaintiff would have two years from the date of the underlying incident (the day he or she was hit by the defendant) to file a personal injury lawsuit. Statutes of limitations can vary ...
A statute of limitations is a state law that sets a strict time limit on a plaintiff's right to file a case in civil court. When a plaintiff misses the cutoff date, the defendant can use the statute of limitations as a defense against any civil lawsuit that's filed.
If the defendant establishes that the statute of limitations applies and has indeed “run,” the court will normally dismiss the case, unless some rare exception applies to extend the filing deadline.
Pursuant to the new law, the Texas Supreme Court will draft rules allowing for motions to dismiss for “causes of action that have no basis in law or fact on motion and without evidence” within 45 days of its filing. See H.B. 274 § 1.01. The Court’s rules will also require a trial court to award costs and reasonable attorney fees to a party that prevails on a motion to dismiss. See H.B. 274 § 1.02. As of the date of this post, the Texas Supreme Court has not yet drafted any rules relating to the new law.
The “American rule” refers to the general policy (there are statutory exceptions) that all litigants—even the party that prevails at trial—must bear their own attorney’s fees. The Texas Legislature has recently altered this rule pursuant to a controversial “emergency session” called by Governor Rick Perry.
The statutory settlement procedure has also been amended to expand recoverable litigation costs to include reasonable deposition costs in an award of litigation costs.