Start studying Chapters 5, 6, 7 & 8 6e Healthcare Law & Ethics. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools.
Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like Which of the following is an example of a patient who usually cannot give informed consent?, Which of the following is a result of the promotion of health information technology (HIT) in the medical industry?, A nurse stops by the scene of an auto accident. She helps a conscious patient to remain calm and provides basic first aid ...
Study Chapter 5 and 6 flashcards from Fatima Garcia's Triton College class online, or in Brainscape's iPhone or Android app. Learn faster with spaced repetition.
If the objection is sustained, it means that what your attorney objected to is not allowed and will not happen. If the trial judge agrees with you that the other side’s question or behavior should not be allowed, then there is no reason for concern.
An attorney will object in court for any number of reasons. A trial without objections would be quite chaotic. It would be hard for anyone to understand what was going on or follow the trial.
A lawyer may object to a witness’s testimony, an opposing party’s argument, or a judge’s ruling because it is improper under the law.
The most common example of this would involve the defense attorney filing a motion to object when the prosecution attempts to introduce prior convictions or crimes that did not result in a conviction. The defense attorney’s reason for wanting these records excluded is that it is prejudicial and not probative to the case.
Before you reach trial, you must find a reputable attorney. Here are some of our tips for choosing an attorney in your area:
An objection is a formal protest that an attorney can use when they disagree about evidence or testimony being used in the case. That happens when one side believes the other is using evidence or testimony that violates the rules of evidence or procedural law.
When a judge overrules an objection, the evidence or testimony is fine to submit to the court – the trial goes on. When a judge sustains an objection, the attorney must either rephrase their question or explain why the evidence or testimony is important.
For example, if a witness says, “My friend told me that the defendant was walking behind the bank before it was robbed,” the criminal defense attorney may object – that answer is hearsay. The witness didn’t see the defendant walking behind the bank; they’re relying on what someone else may have said.
Compound questions: When an attorney asks more than one question at a time, such as “Did you witness the assault, and was the person wearing a mask and red sneakers?”
If you’ve been accused of a crime, we may be able to help you – and don’t worry: It’s completely confidential. Call us at 847-920-4540 or fill out the form below to schedule your free, private consultation with an experienced and skilled Chicago criminal defense attorney now.
Speculation: When a question or answer revolves around a witness’s speculation, such as “I didn’t see him that day, but he was probably at the movies with his friends.”
The first major study to determine why patients sue hospitals and health care practitioners and what might prevent and injured patient or his or her family members from filing a lawsuit was conducted in 1992 by Gerald B. Hickson and others.
A patient tells his physician that he is addicted to pain killers. In many states, revocation of a physician's license may occur due to which of the following acts? Breach of confidence. Since health care procedures and facilities present numerous opportunities for a breach of confidentiality, health care practitioners must make every effort ...
The judge in a negligence case states that the rights of the patient were violated, though no actual loss was proven. The judge awards the plaintiff $1.00. This is known as what type of award?
A health care practitioner who practices the "four Cs of medical malpractice prevention" finds two important benefits related to one of the "Cs", that is, improvement in patients' medical conditions and decreased likelihood that they will sue.
There are four elements (4 Ds) that must be present in a given situation to prove that a health care professional is guilty of negligence. Which of the following is not one of the "four Ds of negligence"?
Many health care professionals use affirmative defenses in medical professional liability suits. With these defenses, defendants are allowed to present evidence of which of the following?
Some states require mediation and/or arbitration for certain civil cases, while in other states alternative dispute resolution methods are voluntary. Under the terms of a written contract, who chooses an arbitrator?
Badgering the witness. When a lawyer on cross-examination is being especially hostile, you should object. Always stand for this objection. Say, “Objection, Your Honor. Badgering the witness.”
If the witness has already answered before you object, the judge will instruct the jury to disregard the witness’ answer if your objection is sustained.
Understand “hearsay. ” Hearsay is second-hand testimony offered in court. For example, a witness can testify that they saw a white car run a red light. However, it is hearsay for the witness to say, “My mother told me a white car ran a red light.”
It’s always important to object. On appeal, you can ask a higher court to review any mistakes the judge might have made. If you didn’t make an objection at trial, you lose the right to object on appeal. This explains why you need to object even if the witness has just answered—you need to preserve the issue for appeal.
Because you are addressing your objection to the judge, you probably want to stand when you raise an objection. Sit with your chair slightly back from the table so that you can stand easily. Generally, you want to object before the witness answers a question.
Legal rules limit what kinds of questions a lawyer may ask a witness during trial. If the lawyer asks such a question, you need to object. There are many different objections you need to learn. If you are representing yourself in a trial, you want to commit several hours to learning the most common objections.
The proper format is to say “Objection” and then identify the specific objection . Sometimes people say only “objection,” but the judge wants you to identify why you are objecting. The standard form of an objection is as follows: “Objection, Your Honor. Leading question.”.
Speculation is a legal basis for objecting to witness testimony on grounds similar to the argumentative objection — because the evidence is not considered reliable or factual. A witness' testimony is limited to their personal knowledge of events (estimating is allowed, but most opinions are not).
Mastering common objections in court is as much a skill as it is an art. This means that you CAN learn how to: Identify when you should object to testimony from a witness and when you should object to inappropriate questioning by the opposing attorney;
Courtroom objections are an essential component of trial. Lack of experience with courtroom objections could destroy your chances of winning your case. You don't want to give your opponent in court free rein to introduce improper evidence (or ask inappropriate questions of witnesses).
5 Types of Objections You’ll Likely Encounter in Court 1 You'll be able to identify if your opponent is doing something objectionable — so you can make a timely objection; and 2 You will be able to form a strategy to recover from the objections of the opposing attorney (sustained by the judge) relating to these five common objections; 3 We also provide you with objections in court examples so you can think through the process.
Plus, if you want introduce valid evidence or testimony — and your opponent keeps objecting because you don't know how to handle common objections in court — you'll never have the chance to introduce important evidence supporting your version of the facts to the judge or jury. Mastering common objections in court is as much a skill as it is an art.
The witness never said he got under the car twice a week — only that someone checked the brakes twice a week. If you'd like additional tips on how to identify questions that may be objectionable as argumentative, you can check out Trial Objections 101: Making and Responding to Objections.
But if you don't master (or at least begin to master) all of the common courtroom objections, you will likely have difficulty proving your claims or defenses in court.
The first major study to determine why patients sue hospitals and health care practitioners and what might prevent and injured patient or his or her family members from filing a lawsuit was conducted in 1992 by Gerald B. Hickson and others.
A patient tells his physician that he is addicted to pain killers. In many states, revocation of a physician's license may occur due to which of the following acts? Breach of confidence. Since health care procedures and facilities present numerous opportunities for a breach of confidentiality, health care practitioners must make every effort ...
The judge in a negligence case states that the rights of the patient were violated, though no actual loss was proven. The judge awards the plaintiff $1.00. This is known as what type of award?
A health care practitioner who practices the "four Cs of medical malpractice prevention" finds two important benefits related to one of the "Cs", that is, improvement in patients' medical conditions and decreased likelihood that they will sue.
There are four elements (4 Ds) that must be present in a given situation to prove that a health care professional is guilty of negligence. Which of the following is not one of the "four Ds of negligence"?
Many health care professionals use affirmative defenses in medical professional liability suits. With these defenses, defendants are allowed to present evidence of which of the following?
Some states require mediation and/or arbitration for certain civil cases, while in other states alternative dispute resolution methods are voluntary. Under the terms of a written contract, who chooses an arbitrator?