The answer is no if the lawyer who previously represented you received confidential information about you from you that the lawyer now is using against you. If the matters are totally unrelated, and there would be no appearance of impropriety for the lawyer to represent your adversary, then maybe.
· 4 attorney answers Posted on Jun 1, 2012 No, probably not. Most likely there is a conflict of interest, but without knowing the nature of the new civil lawsuit, no one can really conclude one way or the other.
· There are times when an attorney may be able to represent a client despite an apparent conflict of interest, although the rules on this can vary by state. For example, a lawyer may be able to accept an individual as their client if: The lawyer believes they can provide "competent and diligent" representation to all affected clients; The representation isn't illegal in …
· Can your former attorney represent a party against you in a suit? Yes, providing that the current suit has nothing whatsoever to do with whatever action they represented you …
· As most issues in the legal practice, this one has two sides. First, an attorney does not have to disclose whether s/he represents a particular party. This information can be deemed privileged, and there might be circumstances under which disclosing the very fact of attorney-client relationship can be a malpractice.
The attorney-client privilege is, strictly speaking, a rule of evidence. It prevents lawyers from testifying about, and from being forced to testify about, their clients' statements. Independent of that privilege, lawyers also owe their clients a duty of confidentiality.
"'Conflict of interest' means an individual has multiple interests and uses his or her official position to exploit, in some way, his or her position for his or her own direct, unique, pecuniary, and personal benefit." Ga. Code Ann. § 45-10-90.
The California Rules generally permit a lawyer to represent multiple clients with conflicting interests so long as all the clients have provided their informed written consent.
Conflict waivers serve as a memorialization or proof that a client has given informed consent for a lawyer to handle a legal matter despite a “disqualifying conflict of interest.”
[8] Even where there is no direct adverseness, a conflict of interest exists if there is a significant risk that a lawyer's ability to consider, recommend or carry out an appropriate course of action for the client will be materially limited as a result of the lawyer's other responsibilities or interests.
Examples of Conflicts of Interest At WorkHiring an unqualified relative to provide services your company needs.Starting a company that provides services similar to your full-time employer.Failing to disclose that you're related to a job candidate the company is considering hiring.More items...
Conflicts that are not consentable, therefore, are (1) conflicts in which the lawyer cannot reasonably believe he can provide competent and diligent representation to each affected client, (2) conflicts in which the representation is prohibited by law, and (3) conflicts in which the representation involves assertion of ...
Model Rule 1.7 states: "(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest.
What are the two kinds of legal conflicts are resolved in our legal system? Criminal and Civil cases.
Effective conflict waivers require a writing confirming the affected clients' informed consent. There is no checklist or formula that an attorney can use in discussing conflict waivers with a client, or in drafting a written waiver for the client's execution.
How To Write a Good (And Ethical) Conflict Of Interest WaiverIdentify the conflict of interest. ... Describe the workaround. ... Describe the upside of the client(s) waiving the conflict of interest. ... Describe the downside to the client(s) waiving the conflict of interest. ... Get it in writing. ... Take it home!
Joint Representation simply means that a lawyer represents more than one client in the same dispute or matter. The rules governing the practice of law allow for joint representation, but also require the lawyer to make disclosures so that the parties.
There are times when an attorney may be able to represent a client despite an apparent conflict of interest, although the rules on this can vary by state. For example, a lawyer may be able to accept an individual as their client if: Each affected client provides informed consent in writing.
There are a variety of conflicts of interest that can prevent a lawyer from taking on a particular case. The conflict may occur between the prospective client and one of the attorney's current or former clients. There can also be concerns if a client's interests are in conflict with the lawyer's professional or personal relationships.
In that case, the attorney doesn't need to disclose the name of the client. However, your situation sounds a little suspicious.
Furthermore, if you or your company is involved with litigation and represented by an attorney already, any other attorneys should never contact you but should go through your attorney directly. This is an ethical rule. If the person tries to contact you again instead of your attorney, let your attorney know right away.
Communications between an attorney and the attorney's client are confidential unless the client waives the privilege. There are, however, many exceptions. Since you did not mention having any exceptional legal relationship to the client or the client's attorney, the answer most likely is no. Report Abuse.
There is no requirement that an attorney disclose who his client is, under most circumstances. You are right, it is very unusual for an attorney to call and not disclose who his client is. However, it can occur. However, you are under no obligation to answer any questions either.
An attorney does not have to disclose anything to you. what makes you think so who, other than Obama goes around forcing people to do things they don't care to do?
A "real attorney" has an obligation to maintain client confidentiality and not tell any Tom, Dick or Harry who s/he represents unless the client has specifically authorized them to do so.
The identity of a client is usually considered to be confidential information - so the attorney was correct in not answering your question. Usually, it is only after the client grants permission to the lawyer to reveal the relationship - then the attorney is permitted to do so.
The next step consists of serving a summons to the lawyer, which must be delivered in person. A summons provides notice to the defendant of a lawsuit that there is an action pending against him. The summons will compel the defendant, in this case the attorney you are suing, to answer the complaint filed against him.
A summons provides notice to the defendant of a lawsuit that there is an action pending against him. The summons will compel the defendant, in this case the attorney you are suing, to answer the complaint filed against him. Once the summons has been served, the attorney will have an opportunity to answer the complaint.
This limit varies by state. Florida's statute specifies two years, for example, while New York allows up to six years for contract actions. Some may be as short as one year.
Florida's statute specifies two years, for example, while New York allows up to six years for contract actions. Some may be as short as one year. To complicate things further, states differ in how they define the start of that period.
Once the summons has been served, the attorney will have an opportunity to answer the complaint. This will usually include filing a motion to dismiss the case.
Joel Garrison is a professional writer with a Bachelor of Science in political science from Florida State University. He has served as an editor for the Florida House of Representatives and worked in crash reconstruction. Garrison teaches report writing, communications, physical fitness and health and nutrition to police recruits.
To sue lawyer for negligence, you need to be able to prove the attorney didn't use the proper care in your case and missed a deadline, filed the wrong papers, didn't comply with court orders, or made other errors that were not intentional but were sloppy.
When suing an attorney for legal malpractice, you will need to show that the attorney did not use the ordinary amount of skill and care that most attorneys use in similar situations.
To win when you sue an attorney for malpractice, you need to show that: 1 The attorney was supposed to do something 2 He or she didn't do it (or did it wrong) 3 This resulted in a financial loss to you (losing the case or losing money)
Types of Attorney Malpractice 1 Negligence. To sue lawyer for negligence, you need to be able to prove the attorney didn't use the proper care in your case and missed a deadline, filed the wrong papers, didn't comply with court orders, or made other errors that were not intentional but were sloppy. Negligence happens when the attorney makes mistakes that other attorneys normally would not. 2 Breach of duty. This kind of malpractice happens when the lawyer violates his or her responsibilities to you by settling the case without your approval, not preparing the case for trial, lying to you, abandoning your case, misusing funds you provided for court costs, or misusing funds owed to you (such as a settlement amount). The attorney has not done what other attorneys would do in this type of case. 3 Breach of contract. This occurs when an attorney fails to do something he or she agreed to in your contract, such as filing your deed or patent. If the lawyer promised to do something he or she was contractually obligated to do and didn't do it, you have grounds for breach of contract.
When you hire an attorney, you do so with trust and confidence. Most attorneys are upstanding and do a good job for their clients. Unfortunately, there are also some bad eggs out there. If your attorney has done something wrong, you may want to consider suing a lawyer for malpractice.
The attorney could be disbarred or directed to pay you compensation. If you are disputing a fee with your lawyer, the state also likely has a fee dispute committee that can help you obtain an out-of-court resolution. You can hire another attorney to complete or fix your case and obtain the outcome you need.
Breach of contract. This occurs when an attorney fails to do something he or she agreed to in your contract, such as filing your deed or patent. If the lawyer promised to do something he or she was contractually obligated to do and didn't do it, you have grounds for breach of contract.
Thus, a lawyer related to another lawyer, e.g., as parent, child, sibling or spouse, ordinarily may not represent a client in a matter where that lawyer is representing another party, unless each client gives informed consent.
[34] A lawyer who represents a corporation or other organization does not, by virtue of that representation, necessarily represent any constituent or affiliated organization, such as a parent or subsidiary. See Rule 1.13 (a). Thus, the lawyer for an organization is not barred from accepting representation adverse to an affiliate in an unrelated matter, unless the circumstances are such that the affiliate should also be considered a client of the lawyer, there is an understanding between the lawyer and the organizational client that the lawyer will avoid representation adverse to the client's affiliates, or the lawyer's obligations to either the organizational client or the new client are likely to limit materially the lawyer's representation of the other client.
Concurrent conflicts of interest can arise from the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client or a third person or from the lawyer's own interests. For specific Rules regarding certain concurrent conflicts of interest, see Rule 1.8. For former client conflicts of interest, see Rule 1.9. For conflicts of interest involving prospective clients, see Rule 1.18. For definitions of "informed consent" and "confirmed in writing," see Rule 1.0 (e) and (b).
[8] Even where there is no direct adverseness, a conflict of interest exists if there is a significant risk that a lawyer's ability to consider, recommend or carry out an appropriate course of action for the client will be materially limited as a result of the lawyer's other responsibilities or interests. For example, a lawyer asked to represent several individuals seeking to form a joint venture is likely to be materially limited in the lawyer's ability to recommend or advocate all possible positions that each might take because of the lawyer's duty of loyalty to the others. The conflict in effect forecloses alternatives that would otherwise be available to the client. The mere possibility of subsequent harm does not itself require disclosure and consent. The critical questions are the likelihood that a difference in interests will eventuate and, if it does, whether it will materially interfere with the lawyer's independent professional judgment in considering alternatives or foreclose courses of action that reasonably should be pursued on behalf of the client.
For example, a lawyer asked to represent several individuals seeking to form a joint venture is likely to be materially limited in the lawyer's ability to recommend or advocate all possible positions that each might take because of the lawyer's duty of loyalty to the others.
Interest of Person Paying for a Lawyer's Service. [13] A lawyer may be paid from a source other than the client, including a co-client, if the client is informed of that fact and consents and the arrangement does not compromise the lawyer's duty of loyalty or independent judgment to the client. See Rule 1.8 (f).
[21] A client who has given consent to a conflict may revoke the consent and, like any other client, may terminate the lawyer's representation at any time. Whether revoking consent to the client's own representation precludes the lawyer from continuing to represent other clients depends on the circumstances, including the nature of the conflict, whether the client revoked consent because of a material change in circumstances, the reasonable expectations of the other client and whether material detriment to the other clients or the lawyer would result.
The answer is no if the lawyer who previously represented you received confidential information about you from you that the lawyer now is using against you.#N#If the matters are totally unrelated, and there would be no appearance of impropriety for the lawyer to represent your adversary, then maybe. However, it would probably...
The answer is no if the lawyer who previously represented you received confidential information about you from you that the lawyer now is using against you.#N#If the matters are totally unrelated, and there would be no appearance of impropriety for the lawyer to represent your adversary, then maybe. However, it would probably...
While a lawyer can represent himself, I think it’s usually a very bad idea, especially in criminal cases. While the lawyer may have the necessary skills, as a defendant she does not have the objectivity. One of the things a lawyer does is objectively and unemotionally evaluate the evidence.
Any person can represent in court for court trials or proceedings. One can always represent themselves in case of minor issues, such as minor traffic issues, ticket issues, minor fines. However, one must always hire a professional licensed lawyer or an attorney for major court trials or criminal cases. 124 views.
Most lawyers carry malpractice insurance. Like any other liability insurance, the policy gives control of the defense to the insurance company. They pick the lawyer who will represent the defendant lawyer, normally, they retain a lawyer experienced in defending professional negligence cases.
Simply put, real estate agents help you buy a house. The best ones eat, sleep and breathe real estate for a living—meaning, they’re in it every single day. Buying a piece of property that’s worth hundreds of thousands of dollars is a huge task! That’s why most people work with a professio.