Because courts have found a duty to inform the client of the requirement of filing within the statutory period, a non-engagement letter should address that issue, without necessarily giving an opinion about when the time within which to file will expire.
In terms of malpractice avoidance, a "disengagement" letter to the client not only will serve to document the discharge of the lawyer's duty in the event of a dispute, but it should also signal to the client, in concrete terms, that the attorney-client relationship has ended.
The first is when a lawyer declines to represent a person in a matter, and it is not clear to the prospective client that the lawyer is declining to represent him. This could happen with a new matter for a current client as well as for a prospective client. For example, in Rice v.
No answer was filed and a default judgment was entered. The attorney admitted that the wife left the citation in his office with his secretary. The court held that the attorney had a duty to inform the client that he was not going to file an answer or defend the case.
The court held that the attorney had a duty to inform the client that he was not going to file an answer or defend the case. Although the lawyer had the right to decline to represent client in this matter, he had an obligated to inform the client of this decision.
If the client delivers or faxes the contract to the lawyer without a clear understanding as to whether the lawyer is accepting the representation, the client may reasonably believe the lawyer is protecting his interests, and the lawyer may be liable for failing to do so.
When declining to accept a legal matter, lawyers should be careful in what they communicate to the client. Even if there is no question that the lawyer is not taking the case, the lawyer may still be liable to the prospective client for any legal advice or opinion rendered to the prospective client.
I am not licensed in FL, so I don't know their rules of ethics. However, in many states, an attorney who has engaged a new client (and you sound like you were a new client to this attorney) is supposed to send an engagement letter to the client.
Hard to say without knowing all the facts, but it doesn't sound like you hired this lawyer and obligated yourself to pay any fees. The formation of an attorney-cllient relationship is like any other contract - there has to be a "meeting of the minds." Here, apparently there wasn't, in your mind...
My question involves legal malpractice in the state of: Florida. I've engaged a lawyer to do a small piece of work. At our first meeting he asked me to sign an engagement letter, which was normal enough.
My question involves legal malpractice in the state of: Florida. I've engaged a lawyer to do a small piece of work. At our first meeting he asked me to sign an engagement letter, which was normal enough.
If the attorney did the work to produce the engagement letter during the time for which he billed you $150 then s/he is likely in violation of professional ethical standards. Whether common or not, an attorney cannot ethically charge twice for the same work or charge an hourly fee for work already charged for as part of a fixed price consultation.
My question involves legal malpractice in the state of: Florida. I've engaged a lawyer to do a small piece of work. At our first meeting he asked me to sign an engagement letter, which was normal enough.
I paid the small $2500 retainer at that time - as I say, it was a small piece of work. On the first billing I received the attorney billed 30 minutes for drafting the engagement letter. The amount of money is not large, since he charges $300 an hour. It amounts to $150. However, it was done during the hour I paid him for.
In today's business climate, however, fee disputes between lawyers and clients have become prevalent. In the event that a fee dispute arises, that cannot be resolved between the parties then it would be wise to designate either court or arbitration as the place to resolve that fee dispute.
To that end, the law firm you engage in must provide no longer than monthly statements on your account.
Attorneys in Massachusetts are, at present, not required to carry malpractice insurance. Search around for the firms that have coverage.
In the area of litigation, in particular, no law firm can predict with 100% certainty what any court outcome will be. It is thus imperative that the firm you choose has a provision that sets forth the understanding that the law firm does not guaranty a favorable result in any matter.
You should call the attorney to discuss her bill. If you were not told there would be a charge for the time she spent prior to your hiring her, and the attorney will not take off her pre-engagement charges based on a phone call with her, you should seriously consider firing that attorney.
As the previous response suggested, this is a fee dispute and not an ethical issue. Depending on what you agreed to in the fee agreement or in the original consultation, the attorney may or may not be entitled to bill you for the time. As to the suggestion of fee arbitration, if the difference is substantial, you could try...
What did you agree to before the first consultation? Was it a free consultation? If nothing was said about consultation charges, what does the contract state about billing beforehand? If the contract is silent and you have concerns, contact the Georgia Bar about your billing dispute.