Most fee arbitrators interpret the foregoing statutory language to require the bills to at least identify which lawyer or paralegal performed the itemized services by date and the hourly rate. See Arbitration Advisory 95-02, Standards for Attorney Fee Billing Statements.
Full Answer
Statutory fee. The cost of certain probate and other legal work is set by statute or law. For these proceedings, a court either dictates or must approve the fee you will pay. By law, fee agreements with your lawyer must be in writing when the lawyer expects fees and costs for your case to total $1,000 or more.
The California Rules of Professional Conduct are intended to regulate professional conduct of attorneys licensed by the State Bar through discipline. They have been adopted by the Board of Trustees and approved by the California Supreme Court pursuant to statute to protect the public and to promote respect and confidence in the legal profession ...
· Rule 4-200 Fees for Legal Services. (A) A member shall not enter into an agreement for, charge, or collect an illegal or unconscionable fee. (B) Unconscionability of a …
Title 3 Programs and Services. Title 3 rules conform to the rules structure adopted in 2007 with the exception of the Division 2 Chapter 2 Articles I – XI rules for particular areas of legal …
If you believe your attorney’s bill contains errors or unauthorized charges, contact the attorney immediately and try to resolve the problem.
With the exception of contingency fee arrangements (see below), you can expect to be billed monthly by your attorney.
What to do if you can’t pay. If you cannot afford to pay your lawyer’s bill, try to work out a payment plan or another arrangement with the lawyer. If you cannot reach an agreement on how to handle the problem, the lawyer may be entitled to stop working on your case or even withdraw as your attorney.
Service of process fees charged by individuals who locate parties and witnesses and deliver legal papers to them.
Before you sign a fee agreement with your lawyer, make sure you understand all of the terms and requirements. The lawyer may have a pre-printed fee agreement. If you don’t approve of any part of the agreement, ask the lawyer to make revisions or to draw up a new agreement better suited to your case.
About retainer fees. A retainer fee can be used to guarantee that the lawyer will be available to take a particular case. With this type of agreement, the client would be billed additionally for the legal work that is done.
Fixed fee or standard fee. Commonly used for routine legal matters, such as preparing a simple will. Before agreeing to a fixed fee, find out what it does and does not include, and if any other charges may be added to the bill. Hourly fee, which will can vary among lawyers.
Law firm overbilling - whether described as the euphemistic "bill padding" or simply "billing fraud" - is a serious problem that is seldom discussed and even less frequently addressed. But rare is the legal bill that does not include at least some "padding." In fact, according to the California State Bar, most bills are inflated at least 10-30 percent. This article describes three common ways legal bills are inflated and provides tips to help clients identify problematic billing practices.
Approximately 90 percent of law firm clients who are billed on an hourly basis are “block billed.” Block billing is an accounting technique whereby lawyers aggregate multiple smaller tasks into a single "block" entry, for which a single time value is assigned. In theory, the total time charged equals the sum of the duration of each discrete task. For example, after spending five minutes on a phone call, 35 minutes revising a junior associate’s draft motion and three minutes dashing off a brief e-mail to the client, the attorney should bill the client for seven-tenths of an hour. Unfortunately, in far too many cases, the final block-billed entry for these tasks will end up looking something like this:
When lawyers bill by the hour, they should never use increments greater than one-tenth of an hour. Glover v. Heart of America Mgmt. Co., 1999 WL 540895 at *7, fn 8 (D. Kan 1999) (quarter hour billing... has been virtually extinct for some time"). Yet it appears that anywhere from five to ten percent of lawyers bill clients in unacceptably large chunks of time - usually in one hour or half-hour increments. This is neither honest nor reasonable, and constitutes outright billing fraud, as courts have held that “professional persons who charge their clients fees in excess of $80.00 per hour, based upon time spent, cannot, in all honesty and reasonableness, charge their clients for increments in excess of one tenth of an hour.” In re Tom Carter Enterprises, Inc., 55 B.R. 548, 549 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 1985). By way of illustration, consider these billing entries from a $750 per hour partner:
Now consider that, at least according to the California State Bar and nearly every state and federal court in the country, most lawyers' daily time submissions contain anywhere from thirty minutes to three hours of time billed to clients that was not actually worked.
In order to minimize billable hour inflation, every client should implement outside counsel guidelines that prohibit block billing, billable "hoarding" and excessive incremental billing. However, these are just a few of the practices that lead to overbilling and should cause clients to carefully scrutinize their monthly statements. Please visit our website (www.litigationlimited.com) to learn more about these and other types of law firm overbilling, and the strategies clients can use to help outside counsel improve billing practices and rein in billable hour inflation.
The problem arises when hourly rates are not discounted to reflect that the senior person is actually doing lower-level work. But senior partners should not bill partner rates for associate-level tasks and lawyers should never bill for paralegal work.
Another court observed that block billing allows lawyers to "claim compensation for rather minor tasks which, if reported individually, would not be compensable" and precludes the client "from determining whether individual tasks were expeditiously performed within a reasonable period of time because it is impossible to separate into components the services which have been lumped together." In re Leonard Jed Company, 103 B.R. 706 (Bankr. D. Md. 1989).
Careful management of billing will assure that attorneys' fees are collectible should your client pursue arbitration.
Another issue that regularly surfaces in fee arbitrations is the propriety and effect of "block billing." Block billing is the practice of assigning a one-time charge to multiple separate tasks. Many judges and arbitrators believe that block billing hides accountability and prevents a client and the fact finder from discerning which of the listed tasks may not be compensable. Where a lawyer handles several disparate tasks in the same day and bills one block of time to all of them, some cases indicate that this disguises non-compensable tasks. See, e.g., Bell v. Vista Unified School Dist., 82 Cal.App.4th 672, 687-689 (2000). Other judges and arbitrators consider the use of block billing a patent violation of the requirement that the bills "clearly state the basis thereof," enabling the client to void the fee agreement and put the burden of proving the reasonableness of the fees on the attorney months, if not years, after the tasks were performed.
A lawyer may charge a client only for work actually done by the lawyer. Therefore, if a lawyer utilizes a recycled or standardized document, unless the client has consented to the contrary in writing in the fee agreement, the client may only be charged for the lawyer's revision of such documents.
A lawyer may charge a client only for work actually done by the lawyer. Therefore, if a lawyer utilizes a recycled or standardized document, unless the client has consented to the contrary in writing in the fee agreement, the client may only be charged for the lawyer's revision of such documents. See ABA Formal Opinion 93-379.
Some case law indicates that a penalty is appropriate at the discretion of the trial court assigning a reasonable percentage to block-billed entries. See Heritage Park Financial v. Monroy, 215 Cal.App.4th 972 (2014). Billing multiple tasks with one entry may be appropriate "when those services are rendered in one time frame without interruption, but it is preferable when counsel interrupts research to make or receive a phone call, that the time spent on that phone call should be separately stated for the reasons set forth above." Different functions performed at different times of day should result in separate entries. See In re Tom Carter Enterprises Inc., 55 B.R. 548 (C.D. Cal. 1985).
Block billing is the practice of assigning a one-time charge to multiple separate tasks. Many judges and arbitrators believe that block billing hides accountability and prevents a client and the fact finder from discerning which of the listed tasks may not be compensable.
Inaccuracy and overcharging can arise where time is billed in high minimum increments such as a minimum .25 hour. However, overcharging may result even when discrete tasks such as phone calls, emails or reviewing correspondence taking only a minute or two each are separately billed at .10 hours each.
B&P refers to the California Business and Professions Code.
2. A statement communicated either orally or electronically to the automotive repair dealer and documented on the estimate authorizing a specific job.
H&S refers to the Health and Safety Code.
Yes, if requested by the customer at the time the estimate is authorized. However, parts that are sold on an exchange basis and parts that must go back to the supplier under a warranty or core arrangement (e.g., battery) are not required to be returned to the customer. In these circumstances, the customer must be offered the opportunity to see the replaced parts. Any replaced parts that cannot be returned to the customer must be recorded on the invoice.
No. Charging for items generally noted as shop supplies or miscellaneous parts is prohibited. The customer may only be charged for the supplies used on their vehicle. The cost of these supplies must be included as part of the estimate and all supplies must be itemized in the invoice.
If a job involves both repairs and preventative maintenance services, an estimate is required to perform the repairs. Although not required, it is best practice to list the preventative maintenance services on the estimate.
An estimate is not required for an automotive repair dealer to perform any of the preventative maintenance services defined in B&P § 9880.1(j) if the customer authorizes the service and either of the following occur: 1. The service is performed free of charge.
The rules in Divisions 1 through 7 govern the procedures in all State Bar Court proceedings.
If an attorney resigns while disciplinary charges are pending under California Rules of Court, rule 9.21, a copy of the attorney’s written resignation, the record of any perpetuated evidence, any stipulation as to facts and conclusions of law, and the attorney’s inactive status must be public and available for public inspection.
Except as otherwise provided by law or by these rules, all State Bar Court proceedings must be public except settlement conferences and portions of the record sealed by court order under rule 5.12 or determined by the court to be confidential.
Rule 5.8 Disposition of Pending Matters After a Judge’sTerm Expires
These rules are adopted by the Board of Trustees of the State Bar under Business and Professions Code § 6086 to facilitate and govern proceedings in the State Bar Court, the Office of Chief Trial Counsel and the Office of Probation.
Chapter 1 Proceedings to Demonstrate Rehabilitation, Fitness, and Present Learning and Ability in the Law according to Standard 1.2(c)(1)
Chapter 8 Bus. & Prof. Code § 6007(e): Failure to File a Response in a Disciplinary Proceeding; Termination
The facts and circumstances that the court may consider are discussed in a large body of decisional law under section 3601 and under other statutes that require the court to determine reasonable attorney's fees.
In determining a reasonable attorney's fee, the court may consider the following nonexclusive factors: (1) The fact that a minor or person with a disability is involved and the circumstances of that minor or person with a disability. (2) The amount of the fee in proportion to the value of the services performed.
The rule is declaratory of existing law concerning attorney's fees under a contingency fee agreement when the fees must be approved by the court.
No trial court, or any division or branch of a trial court, may enact or enforce any local rule concerning this field, except a rule pertaining to the assignment or scheduling of a hearing on a petition or application for court approval or allowance of attorney's fees under sections 3600-3601. All local rules concerning this field are null ...
The Judicial Council has preempted all local rules relating to the determination of reasonable attorney's fees to be awarded from the proceeds of a compromise, settlement, or judgment under Probate Code sections 3600-3601. No trial court, or any division or branch of a trial court, may enact or enforce any local rule concerning this field, ...
A petition requesting court approval and allowance of an attorney's fee under (a) must include a declaration from the attorney that addresses the factors listed in (b) that are applicable to the matter before the court.
Rule 7.955. Attorney's fees for services to a minor or a person with a disability. (1) In all cases under Code of Civil Procedure section 372 or Probate Code sections 3600-3601, unless the court has approved the fee agreement in advance, the court must use a reasonable fee standard when approving and allowing the amount ...