Jul 21, 1995 · Rule 7.1 (a) (1) of the Rules of Professional Conduct provides that a lawyer does not violate the duty to represent a client zealously "by avoiding offensive tactics or by treating with courtesy and consideration all persons involved in the legal process." Furthermore, Rule 7.1 (b) (1) authorizes a lawyer "where permissible, [to] exercise his ...
UNDERSTANDING LAWYERS' ETHICS (4th ed. 2010) (with Abbe Smith). Thanks to Barry Scheck for giving me copies of documents in Texas v. Michael Morton. I am also grateful for the research help of Lisa Spar, Assistant Director for Reference and Special Professor of Law at the Maurice A. Deane School of Law,
A. RELIEF FROM DEFAULT UNDER CALIFORNIA C.C.P. 473. Summary of Law: The court may grant relief from default or dismissal due to a party’s reasonable mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect if the party seeking relief files the motion within 6 months of the order of entry of default or dismissal; the court must liberally apply ...
Professional Ethics of the Bar of New York City has decided that an attorney would have committed no wrong in allowing a court to grant a default judgment on all the issues in a new trial even though the attorney knew that the new trial had been limited in scope by the judge who ordered it.'" But the attorney in People ex rel. Healy u.
Lawyers are the punch lines to many jokes. Fortunately, most attorneys are nothing like the stereotype of greedy, irresponsible scoundrels often portrayed. But a minority of attorneys do not live up to the high ethical and professional standards set by the Massachusetts State Bar Association (“MSBA”) and fellow members of the legal profession.
Violations of Massachusetts attorney regulations are not, by themselves, reasons for civil liability. In other words, your lawsuit will not be successful just because your attorney had his or her license to practice law suspended or the MSBA issued a public reprimand.
You must have a specific complaint against your attorney in order to pursue a claim of legal malpractice. Legal fees and a lower-than-expected settlement or jury award are common complaints, but these alone are generally not enough to bring a legal malpractice claim.
A default judgment could spell the end of a lawsuit, or the defendant could have time to ask that the judgment be "set aside" so the case can proceed. Get the details here.
In a civil lawsuit, a defendant who does not respond to the suit papers in a timely manner is considered “in default. ”. When the plaintiff makes the required showing of default and offers proof to the court of the amount of money owed, the court will issue a default judgment in the plaintiff's favor. (Learn more about Parties in a Civil Lawsuit .)
In most jurisdictions, the defendant will have a prescribed period within which to ask the court to set the default judgment aside, on good cause shown. In California, the defendant typically has 30 days to make this kind of motion, starting from the date on which the court clerk mailed the Notice of Entry of Judgment. In Florida, there is no specific timeline, but the party requesting relief from the default judgment must do so with “due diligence.”
In California, the defendant typically has 30 days to make this kind of motion, starting from the date on which the court clerk mailed the Notice of Entry of Judgment.
Our court rules require that notice of an ex parte hearing be given no later than 10:00 a.m. the day before the hearing. Sometimes, if I have something going on the next day, I will fax and email the notice before I go home the night before. If I’m working late, that notice might go out at six or seven o’clock.
There is no such limitation as to the defendant. As soon as the defendant receives the complaint, he can serve you with discovery, and even though he has not appeared in the action, he can serve that discovery by mail because the plaintiff has appeared. Look it up and stop objecting.