The thesis is that any trial lawyer can go too far in the heat of a trial, but when prosecutors' offices seek to justify unethical and unconstitutional conduct on appeal, arguing that it constitutes acceptable trial tactics, they make the prosecutorial misconduct official policy ... UNDERSTANDING LAWYERS' ETHICS § 4.13 (4th ed. 2010). 4. Fred ...
Discuss what the new lawyer could do in the following scenarios: if unsure whether a partner or associate?s conduct is inappropriate and suspects that it might be; if a superior in the new lawyer?s firm instructs the new lawyer to do something that the new lawyer believes to be unethical, such as under/over-reporting billable hours and if the ...
Answer (1 of 5): Entire books are written on this subject, and both law and paralegal students must study this subject. Despite the fact that the public hears horrible stories about unethical lawyers, the ethics of the profession are highly specified and …
ous disqualification to attorneys sharing office space'4 and to student law clerks.15 In the view of the ABA Committee on Ethics and Professional Re-sponsibility, DR 5-105 extends disqualification to the firm without im-puting the attorney's knowledge to the firm.16 The courts, however,
As long as he can legally do what he is saying he will do, that is not a threat and perfectly allowed. If he is truly threatening, i.e. harming your children or doing bodily harm to you, then that is not only unethical to say the least, but also illegal. Attorneys are supposed to keep their clients and opposing attorneys informed of any court dates that they arrange or get notice of. To not do so is not really unethical, it's just sloppy lawyering. Without proper notice, the hearing will probably have to be adjourned and if a judgment was entered without proper and timely notice, it can easily get set aside. If the attorney is persistent in this behavior it exposed him to possible sanctions from the court or even from the bar association. It also gives you very good grounds to terminate him.
Your question is somewhat general, however, the opposing attorney does not have an attorney client relationship with you. Therefore, claims that the opposing attorney did threatened trial or to file a motion or to seek to take certain property or the like are not viewed as breaches in the duties to you, since the other attorney does not have such duties to you. Your attorney can address all of these things. In any case, the opposing side needs to provide notice for most Court proceedings. There are exceptions, however, this is the general rule. You should address all of these concerns to your attorney for more detailed explanations.
Opposing counsel should not contact you if you are represented. In terms of notice re court, the court should notify you or your attorney. I have to believe a lawyer must tell his client of a court date.