Atty Thomas Renz, with a legal team including Cornerstone Attorney Michael Hamilton & America’s Frontline Doctors Sue DHHS to stop vaccinating children 15 and younger. Breaking: DHHS sued to halt the Covid-19 Vaccines to Children 15 years old and younger.
Attorney Thomas Renz & Americas Frontline Doctors Sue DHHS over EAU's and more Breaking: DHHS sued to halt the Covid-19 Vaccines to Children 15 years old and younger. This game-changing lawsuit was filed by Attorney Thomas Renz and America’s Frontline Doctors against the Emergency Use Authorization of these experimental vaccines that have had no long term …
Jan 31, 2022 · Ohio Attorney Thomas Renz ATTY THOMAS RENZ & AMERICAS FRONTLINE DOCTORS SUE DHHS TO STOP VACCINATING CHILDREN 15 AND YOUNGER. Breaking: DHHS sued to halt the Covid-19 Vaccines to Children 15 years old and younger. This game-changing lawsuit was filed by Attorney Thomas Renz and America’s Frontline Doctors against the …
Atty Thomas Renz, with a legal team including Cornerstone Attorney Michael Hamilton & America’s Frontline Doctors Sue DHHS to stop vaccinating children 15 and younger. Breaking: DHHS sued to halt the Covid-19 Vaccines to Children 15 years old and younger. This game-changing lawsuit was filed by Attorney Thomas Renz and America’s Frontline Doctors against …
47 minutes ago · Attorney Thomas Renz is the lead Attorney in several major cases brought in Ohio, New Mexico, Maine, and Nationally against the Useless CDC and DHHS regarding the COVID-19 lockdowns, mask mandates, business closures, false PCR data, fraudulent death numbers and more.
DHS may file a motion countering the claim, and a judge may set an evidentiary hearing. The legal costs cover 36,187 hours of work during the four years of the lawsuit, which included 18 attorneys and 13 paralegals at the nonprofit. About $1 million was spent in non-recoverable costs by Children's Rights and its attorneys.
The group that sued the Oklahoma Department of Human Services citing failures in the state's child-welfare system is asking $9.5 million for its costs associated with the federal class-action lawsuit, according to a court filing made late Monday night.
Legal fees breakdown. The $9.5 million costs requested by Children's Rights in its federal lawsuit against DHS covered more than 36,000 hours of work over the course of four years.
Outcome: A settlement agreement reached in January requires an improvement plan be created by the agency to address specific performance areas. The plan is pending approval by an oversight panel of three people, who are out-of-state experts in the field and hired in agreement by the parties. The plan will:
Northern District on behalf of nine foster children in February 2008 and it gained class-action status in May 2009. Through the years, the nonprofit's lawyers complained the agency was resistant to settling and dragged its feet with extensive filings.
At one point, two DHS oversight commissioners refused to give depositions, citing medical reasons, the motion states. One commissioner resigned, and the other - Jay Dee Chase, who is a current commissioner - was ordered by Magistrate Frank McCarthy to give a deposition.
Gone is a Commission which turned a blind eye. Come is an inquiring and active Commission. Gone is a system with no accountability. Come is a system with hallmark accountability. "But for the dedication and resources of the lawyers for Children's Rights, none of these changes would have occurred.
You can't sue DHS, or the individual caseworker, that's for certain. There's really nothing you can do to stop someone from talking about you. (In theory, there are defamation suits.
You can't sue DHS, or the individual caseworker, that's for certain. There's really nothing you can do to stop someone from talking about you. (In theory, there are defamation suits.
However unless you can show that DHS was acting outside the scope of their duties by omitting information, you won't be able to sue them...
You have no valid federal lawsuit unless you can show that the state actors violated the United States Constitution or some other federal law. "Wrongfully managing your case" is not a sufficient basis for such a lawsuit. Nor is failure to provide you with information (of any sort)...