PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Petitioner Jeffrey R. MacDonald respectfully requests the issuance of a writ of certiorari to review the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. OPINIONS BELOW The decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is a
Aug 22, 2019 · See Supreme Court Rule 16.2. A formal writ will not issue unless specially directed. Id. Alternatively, the clerk may enter an order denying the petition, but the order of denial will not be suspended pending disposition of a petition for rehearing except by order of the Court or a justice. See Supreme Court Rule 16.3.
24, 2008. This Court’s jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2101(e), Mr. Berg having asserted below and asserting in this petition the deprivation of rights secured by the United States Constitution. Jurisdiction of the United States Supreme …
Apr 27, 2016 · "The Supreme Court, 1995 Term," 110 Harv. L. Rev. 372 (1996). But, at the petition stage, there is no straightforward relationship between the merits and whatever review will be granted. The reason for this — and it is an awkward concept for many lawyers — is that the Supreme Court does not regard its principal job to be the correction of ...
the U.S. Supreme CourtIt is derived from the Latin word certiorare, which means "to be fully informed." It is most commonly associated with the U.S. Supreme Court, which uses certiorari to decide which cases it hears. In order for the Supreme Court to issue a writ of certiorari, at least four justices must agree to hear the case.
In the Supreme Court, if four Justices agree to review the case, then the Court will hear the case. This is referred to as "granting certiorari," often abbreviated as "cert." If four Justices do not agree to review the case, the Court will not hear the case.
A: On the average, about six weeks. Once a petition has been filed, the other party has 30 days within which to file a response brief, or, in some cases waive his/ her right to respond.
Relists and cert grants: Together forever For the court's 2016 to 2020 terms, between 31% and 43% of petitions that were relisted at least once were eventually granted review. And between 66% and 75% of all cases granted certiorari were relisted at least once.Jan 4, 2022
The U.S. Supreme Court Both parties have the right to appeal the decision to the United States Supreme Court, the highest court in the nation. The Supreme Court, unlike the court of appeals, is not required to take all cases.
When the Supreme Court rules on a constitutional issue, that judgment is virtually final; its decisions can be altered only by the rarely used procedure of constitutional amendment or by a new ruling of the Court. However, when the Court interprets a statute, new legislative action can be taken.
BreyerWith Ginsburg's death in September 2020 — and her replacement with the conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett — Breyer leaves a Court with a 6-3 conservative majority, one that shows far less inclination toward compromise than the Court Breyer served on for most of his time as a justice.Jan 27, 2022
The court will grant a stay if at least five justices vote to do so. ... Justices who disagree with the outcome may decide to do so publicly, either with a short statement included toward the end of the court's order or by filing a dissenting opinion to express their dissatisfaction.
What happens when the Supreme Court refuses to hear a case? When the Supreme Court refuses to hear a case the decision of the lower court stands. What is the importance of a Supreme Court majority opinion? o The importance of the majority opinion is to express the views of the majority of the justices on the case.
Court agrees to hear only about 1 percent of the petitions it receives, according to a recent USA Today study.
The Court is likely to deny review if the lower court also ruled against the party on an alternative ground, if there is doubt about the Court's jurisdiction to decide the question, or if the Court would have to resolve some other difficult factual or legal question in order to decide the question presented.
the federal courtsThe majority of cases handled by the Supreme Court come from the federal courts (specifically the federal courts of appeal). While state courts decide about 30 times as many cases as the federal courts, most state court decisions do not raise a federal constitutional question or a question of federal law.
Appellate specialization is necessary to successfully navigate the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The Brownlee Law Firm specializes in both civil and criminal appeals at the state and federal level.
It provides, “ [a]n amicus curiae brief that brings to the attention of the Court relevant matter not already brought to its attention by the parties may be of considerable help to the Court. An amicus curiae brief that does not serve this purpose burdens the Court, and its filing is not favored.” See Supreme Court Rule 37.1. Such brief may only be filed by an attorney admitted to the Court in accordance with Rule 5. Id.
Rule 37.4 states that no motion for leave to file an amicus brief is necessary if the brief is presented on behalf of: 1 the United States by the Solicitor General 2 any agency of the US, when submitted by the agency’s authorized legal representative 3 a State, Commonwealth, Territory, or Possession when submitted by its Attorney General 4 a city, county, town, or similar entity when submitted by its authorized law officer
Justice Brennan routinely decided that a case was not certworthy by looking at the "Questions Presented" on the first page of the petition — and reading no farther. Justice Brennan could decide so quickly, he explained in a 1973 law review article, because 60% of paid petitions he saw were "utterly without merit.".
Certiorari in your case may seem unnecessary, for example, because a conflict has only recently developed. If so, you can argue that it may still be corrected without the Court's intervention. Conversely, you might point out that the conflict is old and has proven tolerable.
According to the last Harvard Law Review round-up, over 7000 petitions for certiorari were filed during the 1994 Term of Court: 2151 in paid (i.e. , non-indigent) cases and 4,979 in in forma pauperis (IFP) cases. The Court granted review in 83 paid cases (3.9%) and 10 IFP cases (0.5%). It disposed of another 66 cases by summary affirmance or reversal or (most commonly) by simply vacating the judgment below and remanding for further proceedings in light of some intervening Supreme Court decision (a resolution referred to as a "GVR" — Grant, Vacate, and Remand). The tenure of Chief Justice Rehnquist has seen a sharp decline in the number of cases the Court hears on the merits. Only 90 cases were argued in the 1995 Term, compared to 167 in the 1987 Term and 116 in the 1992 Term.
The brief is limited to 30 printed pages and is due 30 days after receipt of the petition or of the Court's request for a response. Rule 15. Your brief in opposition should be low key, befitting the trivial issue the petitioner has tried to foist on the Court.
Moreover, many cases on the argument docket involve criminal law issues. If you include habeas corpus cases, no fewer than 23 of 1994's argued cases lay on the criminal side of the docket. So if your case involves a business issue, the odds that the Court will show any interest are even longer.
the decision below conflicts with decisions of one or more federal courts of appeals or state courts of last resort on an important issue of federal law; the court below decided an important federal question in a way that conflicts with rulings of the Supreme Court;
Only 90 cases were argued in the 1995 Term, compared to 167 in the 1987 Term and 116 in the 1992 Term. Even these uninspiring numbers exaggerate the chance that the Court will grant a private party's petition.
A petition for a writ of certiorari shall contain, in the order indicated: (a) The questions presented for review, expressed concisely in relation to the circumstances of the case, without unnecessary detail. The questions should be short and should not be argumentative or repetitive.
No separate brief in support of a petition for a writ of certiorari may be filed, and the Clerk will not file any petition for a writ of certiorari to which any supporting brief is annexed or appended. 3.
Key Takeaways: Writ of Certiorari 1 A writ of certiorari is a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to hear an appeal from a lower court. 2 The word certiorari comes from a Latin word meaning "to be more fully informed." 3 The act of "granting certiorari" means the Supreme Court agrees to hear a case. 4 Certiorari must be requested by submitting a petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court. 5 The Supreme Court grants only about 1.1% of the thousands of petitions for certiorari submitted each term. 6 Denying a petition for certiorari has no effect on the lower court’s decision or the laws involved. 7 Granting a petition for certiorari requires the affirmative votes of at least four Supreme Court justices.
The Supreme Court has the right to deny the petition for writ of certiorari, thus refusing to hear the case. Rule 10 of the Rules of the Supreme Court specifically states: "Review on writ of certiorari is not a matter of right, but a judicial discretion.
The act of "granting certiorari" means the Supreme Court agrees to hear a case. Certiorari must be requested by submitting a petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court grants only about 1.1% of the thousands of petitions for certiorari submitted each term.
Granting a petition for certiorari requires the affirmative votes of at least four Supreme Court justices. The word certiorari (sersh-oh-rare-ee) comes from a Latin word meaning "to be more fully informed" or "to be made certain in regard to.".
Among a sea of largely obscure Latin legal terms, certiorari is of particular importance to Americans because the U.S. Supreme Court, due to its limited original jurisdiction, uses it to select most of the cases it hears.
Before 1891, the Supreme Court was required to hear and issue a decision on almost every case that was appealed to it by the local courts. As the United States grew, the federal judicial system was strained and the Supreme Court soon had an insurmountable backlog of cases. To address this, the Judiciary Act of 1869 first increased the number of Supreme Court Justices from seven to nine. Then, the Judiciary Act of 1891 shifted responsibility for most appeals to the newly created circuit courts of appeals. Since then, the Supreme Court only hears appealed cases at its discretion through the granting of a writ of certiorari.
In deciding which petitions for certiorari it will grant, the Supreme Court strives to hear cases in which its ruling will affect the interpretation and application of the laws involved throughout the United States. In addition, the Court prefers to hear cases in which its ruling will provide definitive guidance for the lower courts . While there are no hard-and-fast rules, the Supreme Court tends to grant petitions for certiorari for:
Getting a case heard by the Supreme Court is considerably more difficult than gaining admission to Harvard. In 2010, there were 5,910 petitions for a Writ of Certiorari filed (read more)
The Supreme Court Press specializes in the affordable preparation, printing, and filing of your amicus brief or petition for writ of certiorari in compliance with the Rules of the United States Supreme Court. Our expert team works hand in hand with you within the Rules of the Supreme Court to exquisitely format, print and file your amici curiae brief or Supreme Court petition. If you are going to place an amicus brief in front of a Supreme Court justice, go with the best and be less stressed!
This case asks whether Congress, through the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, meant to interfere with the way in which a State engages in a sovereign function —its debt collection. Ohio requires its Attorney General to collect debts owed to the State. It authorizes the Attorney General to “appoint special counsel,” in addition to employees, “to represent the state in connection with” this debt collection.
If you believe that the cert petition is meritless, you can file a formal waiver, and the Clerk of the Court will distribute the cert petition upon its receipt. (SCR 15.5.) As long as this occurs when the Court is in session (between October and June), the waiver will speed up the ruling on the petition.
First, to be certworthy, at least two federal circuits usually must clearly disagree on a point of law. The alleged split between federal circuits regarding how to answer a question of federal law may be neither "clean" nor "deep." Although cert petitions often claim that the circuits disagree on a particular point of federal law, these "splits" can be exaggerated. Similar - yet not identical - legal standards or tests are generally not a sufficient split. Even if a split does exist, you can argue that it is too "shallow" to warrant a grant of certiorari, i.e., that not enough courts have weighed in on the question to warrant the Court's intervention. If the issue comes up very rarely, you can argue that it is not important enough to warrant review.
Aside from saving time and money, the upside of waiving the right to respond is that it signals your belief that the cert petition is completely frivolous. The downside is that you lose the ability to influence the Court's first impression of your case.
The cert petition itself must be filed within 90 days of the entry of judgment in the court of appeals or the state court of last resort. (Supreme Court Rule ("SCR") 13 (1).) If a petition for rehearing is filed (or if a petition for discretionary review in a state court of last resort is filed), the 90-day period runs from the date that review is denied or, if review is granted, the date of the entry of judgment. (SCR 13 (1), 13 (3).) The Circuit Justice assigned to the federal circuit in which the case originated can extend this period for up to 60 days for good cause, as long as the extension request is filed within 10 days of the petition's due date. (SCR 13 (5).) Your opposition, if you chose to file one, is due within 30 days of the case being put on the Supreme Court's docket. (SCR 15.3.) It must be received by the Clerk of the Court by the 30th day unless you use the U.S. Postal Service and get an official postmark (not a postage meter stamp). (SCR 29.2.) If you do not file an opposition, the Clerk of the Court will circulate the cert petition to the Justices' chambers once the time for filing an opposition has elapsed. (SCR 15.5.)
If the state law ground can independently support the judgment, then, even if the federal law ground was reversed by the Supreme Court, the outcome would not change. With no practical impact, the Court's decision would merely be advisory, and the Court does not like to render such opinions.
Your opposition, if you chose to file one, is due within 30 days of the case being put on the Supreme Court's docket. (SCR 15.3.) It must be received by the Clerk of the Court by the 30th day unless you use the U.S. Postal Service and get an official postmark (not a postage meter stamp). (SCR 29.2.)
Although the odds of a denial of certiorari are heavily in your favor, the possibility that it might be granted cannot be ignored. Most likely, you will first learn that your opponents are considering filing a cert petition if they move to stay the mandate.