attorney who i met or attorney whom i met

Whom is technically correct because the relative pronoun is the object of met, but in informal English who is commonly used. I consider both forms correct. CB

Full Answer

What does "met" mean in a sentence?

What is the difference between "whom" and "whom"?

Why is it called a fake rule to mimic Latin?

Is it necessary to use the second "with"?

Is "with" a legitimate sentence?

Can you use "meet" with "with"?

Is "who" a good sentence?

See 4 more

About this website

"With who" vs. "with whom" - English Language & Usage Stack Exchange

Is this correct? The person with whom I'm doing the project should be here soon. If it is, is with always a dative preposition (like mit in German)?

Whom did you meet? - English Language & Usage Stack Exchange

A. -you met someone A.I.-did you meet someone? (here 'someone' is object of verb) when we ask about 'someone' in a question we can use 'who/whom' which functions as object of verb.

with whom I will meet | English examples in context | Ludwig

High quality example sentences with “with whom I will meet” in context from reliable sources - Ludwig is the linguistic search engine that helps you to write better in English

What does "met" mean in a sentence?

You later inquire about the name of the person you met: “With whom did I meet ?” “Met” implies the past, “meet” implies the more recent, present, or near future.

What is the difference between "whom" and "whom"?

The difference between the two is one of Grammatical case. Who is nominative, which makes it the appropriate pronoun for the subject of a verb. Whom can be a variety of cases in English, but cannot be the subject. Since your example has a subject to the verb (i.e. he met), whom is the direct object.

Why is it called a fake rule to mimic Latin?

It's just a made up rule invented to mimic Latin because people a few hundred years ago thought Latin was the ideal language so English should try to mimic its grammar. But there is no such rule in English. It's a fake rule. You know that!”.

Is it necessary to use the second "with"?

01. Use of second ‘with’ is not necessary.

Is "with" a legitimate sentence?

Actually, both are very legitimate sentences, after you eliminate the “with” at the end of the sentences to eliminate repetition.

Can you use "meet" with "with"?

Do remember, that “meet” need not always be used in conjunction with “with”, although the difference between the two is more nuanced and far less clear-cut.

Is "who" a good sentence?

Just leave out the " whom" and both sentences are much better. "Whom" is falling out of favor in common use, and in a casual context, "who " is often perfectly acceptable. If speaking or writing informally, it would be fine in these cases. But the best thing to do here is just get rid of the word.

How to contact Carrollton attorney?

When you need legal help, we are here to provide you with the direction and guidance necessary to persevere. Call our Carrollton attorney today at 770-834-4107 to discuss the details of your case and get the help you need to recover fully.

What is met lane?

Met Lane, Esq. is an experienced legal professional who will fight for you to ensure that you get the best outcome in your case.

What does an insurance agent think about your health?

The insurance agent might even appear concerned about your health and want to help, but they are actually just worried about the dollar amount. What seems like genuine care—such as inquiries about how you're feeling—is likely to be used as evidence to damage your claim.

Do insurance companies know you are concerned about paying medical bills?

They know you are probably concerned about paying for your medical bills and other fees—and what they offer you might seem like enough at the time. Unfortunately, however, that offer is rarely close to the amount that will satisfy all of your losses.

Can you talk to an insurance agent in Carrollton?

It's best not to communicate with the insurance company until you've spoken to a personal injury attorney in Carrollton. Then, you can direct all calls from the insurance agent to your lawyer. Plus, your lawyer can calculate how much your insurance claim is worth so that none of your expenses are missed.

What does "met" mean in a sentence?

You later inquire about the name of the person you met: “With whom did I meet ?” “Met” implies the past, “meet” implies the more recent, present, or near future.

What is the difference between "whom" and "whom"?

The difference between the two is one of Grammatical case. Who is nominative, which makes it the appropriate pronoun for the subject of a verb. Whom can be a variety of cases in English, but cannot be the subject. Since your example has a subject to the verb (i.e. he met), whom is the direct object.

Why is it called a fake rule to mimic Latin?

It's just a made up rule invented to mimic Latin because people a few hundred years ago thought Latin was the ideal language so English should try to mimic its grammar. But there is no such rule in English. It's a fake rule. You know that!”.

Is it necessary to use the second "with"?

01. Use of second ‘with’ is not necessary.

Is "with" a legitimate sentence?

Actually, both are very legitimate sentences, after you eliminate the “with” at the end of the sentences to eliminate repetition.

Can you use "meet" with "with"?

Do remember, that “meet” need not always be used in conjunction with “with”, although the difference between the two is more nuanced and far less clear-cut.

Is "who" a good sentence?

Just leave out the " whom" and both sentences are much better. "Whom" is falling out of favor in common use, and in a casual context, "who " is often perfectly acceptable. If speaking or writing informally, it would be fine in these cases. But the best thing to do here is just get rid of the word.