attorney who can prepare relator contract between two whistleblowers

by Eliane Heaney 3 min read

Is a relator a whistleblower?

A “Relator” is another term for whistleblower. The Relator exposes government fraud by reporting it to the government and filing a False Claims Act lawsuit.

What type of award is a qui tam relator eligible to receive for bringing a case in which the government intervenes?

The False Claims Act authorizes qui tam lawsuits to assist the government in prosecuting cases to recover damages and penalties for fraud against the government. If the case is successful, the relator can earn a whistleblower reward.

What percentage of False Claims Act cases are successful?

About 80 percent of all fraud cases won under the False Claims Act are a direct result of whistleblower lawsuits. Whistleblower awards under the Federal law have averaged 17% of recoveries. Whistleblowers usually compensate their attorneys by sharing the award.

What is a qui relator?

Usually a qui tam relator is an insider—typically a current or former employee—who has access to confidential information showing that his or her employer has been committing fraud against the government. FCA cases are sometimes referred to as qui tam cases.Feb 21, 2019

What type of award is a qui tam relator eligible to receive?

Whistleblowers (known as “relators” in qui tam lawsuits) are awarded a whistleblower reward based on a percentage of the money recovered by the government when those recoveries are due to a qui tam lawsuit or claims made under the SEC, CFTC or IRS whistleblower programs.

How is a qui tam lawsuit different than most other civil cases?

Qui tam lawsuits are civil suits that are brought by whistleblowers under the False Claims Act to stop many different types of fraud against the government. Some types of fraud that may give rise to a qui tam lawsuit include: Knowingly presenting to the federal government a fraudulent claim for payment.Oct 18, 2021

What is the average whistleblower settlement?

The mathematical average of the total recoveries (settlements and judgments) for this time period is approximately $3.3 million, with an average whistleblower award of $562,000.

What are the penalties for violating the False Claims Act?

Violations under the federal False Claims Act can result in significant fines and penalties. Financial penalties to the person or organization includes recovery of three times the amount of the false claim(s), plus an additional penalty of $5,500.00 to $11,000.00 per claim.

What is an example of a violation of the False Claims Act?

Examples of practices that may violate the False Claims Act if done knowingly and intentionally, include the following: Billing for services not rendered. Knowingly submitting inaccurate claims for services. Taking or giving a kickback for a referral.

Who can be whistleblower?

Description: A whistleblower is a person who comes forward and shares his/her knowledge on any wrongdoing which he/she thinks is happening in the whole organisation or in a specific department. A whistleblower could be an employee, contractor, or a supplier who becomes aware of any illegal activities.

What is the federal Anti kickback law?

The AKS is a criminal law that prohibits the knowing and willful payment of "remuneration" to induce or reward patient referrals or the generation of business involving any item or service payable by the Federal health care programs (e.g., drugs, supplies, or health care services for Medicare or Medicaid patients).

Is qui tam civil or criminal?

The case netted the largest criminal fine ever imposed in the United States for any matter, $1.195 billion, and the largest civil fraud settlement against any pharmaceutical company. Qui tam "relators" are not eligible to receive shares of criminal fines.

State Law vs. Federal Common Law

Whistleblower Lawyers and Privileged Information

  • Following Van Asdale, the Wadler court ultimately determined that the “reason and experience” of federal common law regarding attorney-client privilege permitted Wadler to use evidence for his retaliation claim that would likely have been barred by state law. The court pointed to language in Rule 1.6 of Model Rule of Professional Conduct, cited favorably by several federal courts of app…
See more on kmblegal.com

Sox Preempts State Ethical Rules

  • For the reasons above, the court in Wadlerfollowed precedent from the Ninth, Third, Fifth, and First Circuit Courts of Appeal in ruling that federal common law allows in-house attorneys to use privileged and confidential materials under certain circumstances in support of a whistleblower retaliation claim. In determining that federal rules trump state restrictions on such information, t…
See more on kmblegal.com

Takeaways from Wadler

  • Wadlerillustrates the unique difficulties and legal hurdles that in-house attorneys face in bringing whistleblower retaliation claims. As the court observed, Wadler’s legal claim survived because it arose under federal law – had he attempted to use the same evidence in support of a California state law whistleblower claim in state court, he may well have been unable to proceed. What priv…
See more on kmblegal.com